Feminists Continue Expanding the Definition of Rape to Absurdity

Now even thinking of a scantily clad woman you know while rubbing one out is “rape” in the minds of feminists

Feminists are putting the word out that there are two new forms of rape we deplorable men need to be aware of. These stunning new (and totally illogical) definitions of rape have arisen as a result of overvalued pussies and massive female egos in the Western sexual market. Anglobitches think mere possession of their fish taco is the anatomical equivalent of a no limits American Express Centurion card. But, the “golden” pussy enterprise is an economic bubble that’s getting ready to pop as men stop investing in sagging vagina futures.

As men continue to abandon women in droves feminists continue pushing the boundaries of what does and does not constitute rape in a mad attempt at totally controlling male sexuality, which is slipping from their frigid grasp as men don’t want anything to do with crazy.

In any case, here are the two new definitions of rape feminists have spun up, hot off the hamster wheel press and now making their way around social media:

Reverse rape is the refusal to sexually engage with women of the wrong body type and is just as horrific as rape. Say no to the sexual advances of Big Bertha? You’ve just committed reverse rape. To illustrate how insane this is, it’s the equivalent of telling men they have no right to refuse sex with women – which is the very definition of rape. But, it’s the men who are being raped, while manipulative women (their most innate talent is manipulation) twist the definition around 180 degrees to their favor.

Portly feminist Anne Gus even went so far as to say this when she created this new definition of rape: No means no unless you are a man; then you are disempowering me when I want sex.

How’s that for objectification? And a total negation of men’s rights as human beings who don’t want to fuck every warthog that comes along? What happens if you get pregnant, Anne? Ever thought of that in between eating Ho-Hos?

Telepathic rape happens when a man masturbates to a woman he knows in real life without her consent. Attend a pool party full of hot chicks, let the views of their scantily clad asses and tits get you hot while (of course) Anglobitches at the shindig friendzone you, then get caught rubbing one out and you’ve just committed telepathic rape.

Believe it or not, a Utah Omega male did the bidding of a human sloth who commanded him to shoot a neighbor who was telepathically raping her. From the NY Daily News:

A Utah woman ordered her husband to shoot their trailer park neighbor because she said he was “telepathically raping her” and “using crack cocaine to control her mind.”

Meloney Selleneit, 55, allegedly bought a gun for spouse Michael, 53, who then gunned down Tony Pierce, 41, as he worked outside his home.

Pierce survived the October 2011 shooting, being hit in the back and leg, and was taken to a hospital for treatment, according to the Salt Lake Tribune.

Michael Selleneit was found competent to stand trial, and pleaded guilty to attempted manslaughter and use of a firearm by a restricted person.

What can the awakened man make of these new definitions of so-called rape?

Feminists continue marginalizing men in what can only be seen as a colossal societal shit test which weak, effeminate men are failing colossally. The definition of rape is becoming so broad it threatens to debase its original definition. Worse, women lie about rape and sexual harassment so often (20% – 50% or more of rape cases are fake according to numerous crime statistics) it’s becoming dangerous to even be caught in a room alone with a female.

There’s one caveat to this crazy. This is only happening in the Anglosphere. The rest of the world still reserves a modicum of decency and sanity when it comes to its dealings with men.

How long before any male sexual desire is classified as rape?