Sex Robots the Rage as Feminist Writer Suggests They Can Replace Men

Bloomberg columnist Cathy O’Neil just made a sexual proposal of gargantuan proportions

This is becoming a big topic in Anglo America now: Fucking robots. Literally, fucking them. And who’s going to get diddled better by them. Meantime, it’s becoming a legal land mine for men to even look sideways at a real woman. How can a rational person not say this culture has lost its mind? (TNMM has detailed the existential dangers of Western machine culture in the past.)

Cathy O’Neil, the porcine, blue-haired tech columnist at MSM rag Bloomberg just unleashed a screed proclaiming sexbots are the future. This latest entry on having sex with machines rather than people appeared on Drudge, meaning it was widely circulated. The feminist writer says men should be worried about sex robots, and not women.

Advances in robotics and artificial intelligence have raised a dystopian concern for women: What if female robots become so realistic â and so adept at sex â that they render men incapable of engaging in real human relationships? Actually, I think itâs the men who should be worried. Itâs entirely possible that robots can outperform them.

Notice the inherent sexism in the article. The cultural bias “sexism is only okay when women practice it” becomes apparent with her next segment:

Perhaps itâs time for a Big Think. Are women not as capable as men of crude objectification? Thereâs room here for everyoneâs impure thoughts and desires. Robots donât discriminate, and they can probably give good massages.

Donât get me wrong, I have a good husband. I doubt I would trade in. But if I had a daughter, I might consider giving her a robot as a college graduation present. Preferably one who can do the dishes and guard the door.

Hmmm…men are only utility objects. How’s that for crude objectification, Cathy? The blue-haired abomination then goes on to suggest men and women permanently separate from one another – an obvious long-term goal of the elite power structure as women become too dangerous and toxic for men to deal with.

Just to be clear: Iâm not saying we should want to live in a militant feminist world without men. Far from it, I am suggesting that women and men can coexist, but possibly not cohabitate. Men will likely have trouble with things like household chores and remembering to go to the doctor regularly, but theyâll manage. Maybe Siri can make their appointments.

And finally she pulls her last feminist punch, the true point of her screed. Women can have their sexual urges satisfied by robots.

Who knows? If our sexual needs can be met by intimate automated helpers, maybe weâll end up stronger as a community. Weâll come together, online or in person, and be more respectful, more relaxed, less edgy. Itâs worth a try. So bring on the sex robots.

There were a few noteworthy replies to this feminist screed the MSM unleashed. Including this insight from Dicaeopolis:

Men have invented pretty much everything on the planet and women have been allowed to use it all. Women are an extremely privileged group in this country, and enjoy a standard of living like nowhere else due to the fact their men were the smartest and conquered the most territory. Pretty funny this one doesn’t want to cohabitate. Good riddance.

Another commenter brings up the obvious contradictions:

This author seems to forget the only evolutionary value and control women have over men is the sexual. Women are NOT stronger than men, women are NOT more ambitious and innovative than men, and compared to men do NOT have the same amount of high IQ geniuses, women are more average IQ. So if Fembots take away the sexual and the homemaking from women, they will [have nothing to offer].

And Homebound1968 says:

Cathy is having a feminist wet dream. Sorry lady, but you’re not getting the slave race, anti-man, metrosexual, automaton, ball-less, wet noodles, posing as “men” like you feminazis crave. Maybe guys wouldn’t be going for these sick stand-in robots, if women, such as yourself, weren’t so insane.

When looking into the dimly lit corridor leading to an overly mechanized future, one honestly begins to wonder if the computer chip will be the cause of extinction for H. Sapiens.

It was like opening Pandora’s Box. Not only will chips soon be micromanaging every detail of our lives, from our financial transactions to our driving behaviors (coming soon – a backseat computer chip driver monitoring your behavior behind the wheel) to our life histories, it seems the tech world won’t be content until we’re fucking robots with chips in them rather than flesh and blood human beings.

Somebody stop the Anglo world, I want off of this ride. Let me get back to more “primitive” life somewhere outside this insane asylum.