~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
copekoro
[–]blackwingsreef2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is fucking awesome, please post to /r/braincels for deployment. Also mods please sticky this.
[–]CuckFestus8372 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Holy mother of god.
[–]UrbanHuntsman0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The photos/album has been removed. :(
[–]copekoro[S] 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
https://imgur.com/a/5XNQZ9V
[–]hirayama_ronin0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Very nice graphics. The colors, images, and text go well together.
The first image might be a bit cluttered. It's a lot of text and images compared to the others.
The second graph on the last image is a bit hard to understand. I assume if the pink and blue were symmetrical, that would indicate that men and women "like" according to attractiveness in the same way. But the graph shows that men will "like" women even if they do not find them particularly attractive. This is the "female advantage." Nevertheless, I find it hard to understand the graph.
Do the percentages indicate both how highly the person is rated, and the percentage of that gender who will "like" the opposite gender at that percentage? For example, should I understand that
100% of women "liked" men ranked at 100% attractiveness,
Only 5% of women "liked" men ranked at 50% attractiveness, and
80% of men "liked" women ranked at 25% attractiveness?
I feel maybe a paragraph interpreting the graphs might be useful.
Edit. Additionally, what does it mean to say that women rate 80% of men below average? I see this a lot in the black pill forums. Inform me if I am wrong, but by definition, women cannot rate 80% of men as below average. Instead average would skew lower, maybe around a three instead of a 5. We cannot say 5 on scale we use to rank attractiveness is an average. It's just the middle of the continuum.
We would also want information that correlates these attractiveness scores to actual action. If women found 80% of men "below average" but messaged (or "liked") them anyway, the black pill wouldn't be very interesting. If the purpose of the second graph was to provide that information, I must say I did not grasp the connection with the shift from integers to percentages.
I wonder if there is a better way of representing these relations, a third graph, perhaps.
Maybe /u/SubsaharanAmerican can chime in here.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You are actually smart and are interested in science not a narrative. Want to talk?
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]blackwingsreef2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CuckFestus8372 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]UrbanHuntsman0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]copekoro[S] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hirayama_ronin0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link