The kidnapping of 186 teenage boys in Syria on 30 May has gone largely unreported in the wider world, a curious omission given the outcry over the teenage girls in Nigeria.

Reddit View
Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy link
PDF EPUB TXT PNG
TVTestPattern
July 11, 2014
769 upvotes
TheRedPill

Post Information
Title The kidnapping of 186 teenage boys in Syria on 30 May has gone largely unreported in the wider world, a curious omission given the outcry over the teenage girls in Nigeria.
Author TVTestPattern
Upvotes 769
Comments 25
Date 11 July 2014 11:54 AM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/229151
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2af321/the_kidnapping_of_186_teenage_boys_in_syria_on_30/
Similar Posts
Loading Loading

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pill
Comments

[–][deleted] 115 points116 points  (22 children) | Copy

When it's girls, the news reports "missing girls!"

When it's boys, the news reports "missing students!"

LOL

[–][deleted] 49 points50 points  (17 children) | Copy

Same thing with minorities. Whenever you hear about "youths rioting" you know it's minorities.

[–]1Mikesapien40 points41 points  (1 child) | Copy

And "urban" is a poorly-disguised synonym for black and latino.

[–]Luke666808g5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

you mean euphemism.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

london riots?

[–]through_a_ways1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy

And when you hear "minorities", you know it's black and Hispanic people.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy

In the US, yes. But I'm european so that actually doesn't quite apply here.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Depends on the country.

France: Black people

Britain: Black people and pakis/indians

Germany: Arabs

Sweden: Arabs and blacks

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Not only turkish, but predomintantly, that's right.

Swedens full of Arabs, check this out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malmö#Demographics

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%B6dert%C3%A4lje#Demographics

Södertälje and Malmö are by far the worst cities when it comes to Sweden.

Little video about Malmö: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzLECtFT4aU

[–]HydrogenxPi2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

http://youtu.be/6ZAuqkqxk9A

[–][deleted] 158 points159 points  (20 children) | Copy

Men are disposable. You have to get to terms with this.

[–]Cold_and_Composed73 points74 points  (12 children) | Copy

Men are intrinsically disposable. You have to ultimately create value in yourself and create value around yourself to remove that disposability. Females by default have this value in our society and white females even more so. Read more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_white_woman_syndrome

[–]Endorsed ContributorWe_Are_Legion76 points77 points  (7 children) | Copy

Call me crazy, but on the whole, I say western white women are the most privileged group of people on earth.

Sure, many upper class men have slightly better opportunity to avenues of power, but those are a minute subset. The rest even face stigma on their behalf. The benefits of being a white woman though... they're pervasive and most are automatically conferred just for being a member.

Now I'm not American or European so I've never personally encountered women peddling the concept of privilege. But I wonder if their own ever got brought up or called out. When I traveled to Canada and the UK, I heard vaguely about that debate and group divides... I understood the idea... but if you really think about it, they are the top of the racial ladder. The epitome of automatic birth privilege.

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself55 points56 points  (4 children) | Copy

Maybe that's why upper middle class white women project so much shit about white male privilege.

[–]M_rafay12 points13 points  (2 children) | Copy

Hmm... very interesting to think about... could it be a form of unintentional power talk?

It wouldn't be very comfortable to admit their own privilege. So they just don't mention it and imply they're victims. Perhaps they see it as better to point at another party. It'd fulfills the three main distinguishing features of power talk at least.

It is used to get something for oneself, rather than to convey information.

It can be truth or lies, according to the needs of the speaker.

It is plausibly deniable.

The Clueless(white knights and other women) absolutely follow the rhetoric and don't lead the movement feminism into attacking its own engine(white women free enough to complain) or call out their self-serving bullshit.

EDIT: Either that or I'm misinterpreting power-talk and you should ignore this attempt.

[–]1PaulRivers102 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Personally, I think this is a great post and spot on. Wonder if you should make a front page post about it.

Ideas like privilege emotionally resonate with women, and there's a reason - it's because they're surrounded by other women. And in a nebulous social system where privilege isn't really based on something concrete, what's the only way to get those women to stop? Convincing the women with privilege to "check their privilege".

[–]M_rafay0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I invite you to write on it actually. I'm very uninformed myself. Besides, power-talk posts almost always welcomed by mods and ECs.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's projection. Five more gay words.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter