In a Norwegian study, female students were choosier about attractiveness for short-term dating than men (Bendixen et al. 2019)

SlashSero · 2019-05-18T14:27:29+00:00

Not surprising, a person that has more choices available is going to be more picky. Since female freshmen have almost four times higher odds to have sex it means they are all choosing the highest quality male they can get, hence the overlap. The ( under ) average men are fucked in the current social dynamics where monogamy is not enforced.

Pidjesus · 2019-05-18T14:21:34+00:00

Feminism has made women realise they can have full control of their desires

UltimateCurryCel · 2019-05-18T20:26:18+00:00

Imaging being paid to document the obvious.

eduardkoopman · 2019-05-19T09:23:33+00:00

What does this mean? ( i have a law background, and don't understand science-language much so far what i read around this forum)

r = .47** for women
r = -.12 for men

p < .0 (for women)
p non-significant (for men)
p = 0.001.

d = 0.9 ( women felt around d=0.9 less sexually attracted)

I have noticed, that women are more picky in Looks when going for short term stuff. For me it always showed the LMS statement to be true. Since when a woman is looking for Long term stuff with a man, she adds the factors: Money/Wealth and Status (and imo to some extend also personality compatibility). Since a man can score well (in the eyes of a woman) on Money/Wealth, Status (and matched personality), she will give him slack in the looks department often WHEN looking for something Long Term.
Imo, Long term relationship are often basically a man being a type of provider to a woman, especially if she compromised on her Looks standard for men. Probably she will be more if not totally forgiving a man being a bad provider in a Long Term relationhip, if he has good Looks.

Imo, its like this.
Short term things, a good looking man has good amount of options.
Short term things, a normie looking man has limited options (unless he''s willing to pay for it, like escorts etc.).
Short term things, a ugly looking man no options (unless he''s willing to pay for it, like escorts etc.).

Long Term things

Long term things, a good looking man has options, even when low in money or status. If he also has money and/or status his options will be hugh.
Long term things, a normie looking man has no options, when he's low in money and status. If he does has normal money and/or status; then he will have limited options. If he has great money and/or status, he will have good amount of options.

Long term things, a ugly looking man has no options, when he's low in money and status. If he does have normal money and/or status; then he will very limited options (but maybe still some, like "saving a woman from a 3rd world shitlhole country). If he has great money and/or status, he will have limited options.

Title	In a Norwegian study, female students were choosier about attractiveness for short-term dating than men (Bendixen et al. 2019)
Author	SophisticatedBean
Upvotes	95
Comments	16
Date	May 18, 2019 1:54 PM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/BlackPillScience
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/bq48l0/in_a_norwegian_study_female_students_were/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/BlackPillScience/in-a-norwegian-study-female-students-were-choosier.238798 https://theredarchive.com/post/238798