I curate. Generally, without notice: See rule 4. Linking a wiki article about female copulatory vocalization, then pretending the explicitly labeled “nonprimate” portion of that article applies to humans is not exactly high quality.
The title makes no mention of humans at all. It says "in the animal kingdom" which is perfectly accurate. There have been other submissions to this sub about the sexual behavior of other species that are also only vaguely related to humans via Bateman's principle & Co., e.g. fish and mice.
this is really funny, gwern was my favorite researcher on dark net marketplaces back when I was big on drugs, now we're both discussing the blackpill, i love you u/gwern !
[–]SophisticatedBean[S] 16 points17 points18 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Speaking of censorship, it seems someone is starting to remove submissions, and what's worse, without notice.
E.g. I cannot seem to find this thread anymore in the search: https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/bpaply/one_of_the_main_purposes_of_much_louder_female/
[–]SubsaharanAmericanshitty h-index[M] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
I curate. Generally, without notice: See rule 4. Linking a wiki article about female copulatory vocalization, then pretending the explicitly labeled “nonprimate” portion of that article applies to humans is not exactly high quality.
[–]SophisticatedBean[S] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
The title makes no mention of humans at all. It says "in the animal kingdom" which is perfectly accurate. There have been other submissions to this sub about the sexual behavior of other species that are also only vaguely related to humans via Bateman's principle & Co., e.g. fish and mice.
[–]Next_Flow12 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
this is really funny, gwern was my favorite researcher on dark net marketplaces back when I was big on drugs, now we're both discussing the blackpill, i love you u/gwern !