http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/01/sullivan-metoo-must-choose-between-reality-and-ideology.html?gtm=top&gtm=top

A long time ago now, I came rather abruptly face-to-face with what being a man means.

I don’t mean the gay thing. Figuring that out in the 1970s hadn’t been easy, but I’d never questioned my sex or my gender, whatever occasional taunts came my way. I mean the fact that, in the years of being HIV-positive, my testosterone levels had sunk, and I decided, given my lassitude, depression, and lack of sexual desire, to go on hormone replacement therapy to get me back in a healthy range for a 30-something male. It was a fascinating experience to witness maleness literally being injected into me, giving me in a sudden jump what had been there all along, and what I now saw and felt more vividly. You get a real sense of what being a man is from an experience like that, as the rush of energy, strength, clarity, ambition, drive, impatience and, above all, horniness overcame me every two weeks in the wake of my shot. It was intoxicating. I wrote about this a couple of decades ago, in an essay I called “The He Hormone.” The visceral experience opened my eyes to the sheer and immense natural difference between being a man and being a woman, and helped me understand better how nature is far more in control of us than we ever want to believe.

My suspicion is that it’s more about nature than about society, and one reason I believe this (apart from all the data) is I because I’m gay. I live in a sexual and romantic world without women, where no patriarchy could definitionally exist, a subculture with hookups and relationships and marriages and every conceivable form of sexual desire that straight men and women experience as well. And you know what you find? That men behave no differently in sexual matters when there are no women involved at all. In fact, remove women, and you see male sexuality unleashed more fully, as men would naturally express it, if they could get away with it. It’s full of handsiness and groping and objectification and lust and aggression and passion and the ruthless pursuit of yet another conquest. And yes, I mean conquest. That’s what testosterone does. It’s also full of love, tenderness, compassion, jealousy, respect, dignity, and a need for security and a home. It’s men’s revenge on men. The old joke applies: What does a lesbian bring on a second date? A U-Haul. What does a gay man bring on a second date? What second date?

I know this must be a pain in the neck for most women. But it’s who we are. It’s a blessing and a curse. It’s called being male, this strange creature, covered in hair, pinioned between morality and hormones, governed by two brains, one above and one below. We can and should be restrained, tamed, kept under control. But nature will not be eradicated. And when left-feminism denies nature’s power, ignores testosterone, and sees all this behavior as a function entirely of structural patriarchal oppression, it is going to overreach. It is going to misunderstand. And it is going to alienate a lot of people. If most men are told that what they are deep down is, in fact, “problematic” if not “toxic,” they are going to get defensive, and with good reason. And they are going to react. So, by the way, are the countless women who do not see this kind of masculinity as toxic, who want men to be different, who are, in fact, deeply attracted to the core aggression of the human male, and contemptuous of the latest orthodoxy from Brooklyn.

And men, especially young men in this environment, will begin to ask questions about why they are now routinely seen as a “problem,” and why their sex lives are now fair game for any journalist. And because our dialogue is now so constrained, and the fact of natural sexual differences so actively suppressed by the academy and the mainstream media, they will find the truths about nature in other contexts. They will stumble across alt-right websites that deploy these truths to foment an equal and opposite form of ideology, soaked in actual misogyny, and become convinced that every sexual interaction is a zero-sum battlefield. They will see this as a war between the genders, not as a way to advance the freedom of both. They will fight back, and in this tribalized culture, the conflict will intensify. Suppress debate, ban ideas from civil conversation, and you won’t abolish these ideas. You will hand them to the worst bigots and give them credibility.

I think this is a pretty accurate depiction of why the manosphere is alluring to so many young men. Poppyblu's recent thread about female deception in what turns them on is case in point in describing the face saving behavior of women and feminists that ultimately lead men to TRP.

I think the assumption in the sort of discussions you’re referring to is that there’s face saving behavior, self-deception, or both taking place. While this attitude about one’s interlocutors doesn’t lead to civil, productive discussion, it’s understandable. People are rarely honest with themselves or others about things that don’t mesh with how they’d like to be seen by themselves or others. Sexuality is often a source of much of this internal conflict... Both fear of personal judgment and the understandable desire not to contradict a narrative they ultimately see as good play a role in this dissonance between public and private speech.

This is quite controversial. In my actual estimation, Red Pillers are demonstrably correct that feminists on Reddit and women at large hide this fact. Women as independent creative and professional agents contributing to society as adults are NOT the same women who respond to something sexually: treating colleagues exactly the same as you might a man, without adopting any red pill attitude toward them, can be correct and awesome. It is not necessarily going to turn them on, however. Sullivan writing for the NY Mag makes the argument that because the mainstream dialog is so constrained, men are lead to find truth in areas of the internet that entertain the idea that there are real biological differences in mate selection. TRP is unique in this regard as the only comprehensive sexual strategy forum that entertains the idea of biological differences and leverages it to a man's advantage.

Is claiming biologically inclined psychological differences between men and women controversial?

Do you agree with the author that men are seeking truth in the manosphere due to the deceptiveness of women and constraints of mainstream dialog?

General discussion on the article.