As I showed in my previous post, nearly 25% of men are now genetically obsolete in egalitarian Norway, which has the highest rate of male obsolescence in the developed world. And this growing male hopelessness may continue to climb for the foreseeable future. The upper limit of male uselessness could be 30-40% or higher.

Civilization was built on two basic foundations, monogamy and patriarchy. For this to function women must remain largely dependent on men for survival. Separate women from the productive and protective element of manhood that wants to provide and derives pride from doing so, and you destabilizing the social compact and foundation of civilization itself. Civilization is built on raising primitive men to be civilized by offering them a better deal than most of them can find in a chaotic and fair competition for females, who typically want a man better than themselves that will enhance her long term genetic trajectory.

The symptoms of this destabilization are everywhere. Low birth rates, massive legal/illegal immigration of the uneducated, low economic growth, low productivity growth, increasing debt levels (for Government and in individuals), near zero interest rates to manage the pace of the collapse and prevent chaos, low savings for retirement, out of wedlock births, sexual degeneracy (trans, gay, swinger, pedophile glorification even among the elites), steadily rising tribalism and group identification (Black Lives Matter, kneeing at NFL games, etc), steadily rising political partisanship and hatred of others, periodic financial crises requiring massive monetary intervention in the free market, rising corruption of banking, business, and political elites fighting for economic table scraps, etc, etc.

What is the end game? We don't precisely know, but it won't be good for women or men in the long run. Not even Trump can reverse this trend, he doesn't possess the power to stop this train from crashing into a wall at full speed.

It's curious to note that Israel is the only modern society with a democratic system of Government and a modern capitalistic model with a relatively high standard of living that is not in full scale population/economic collapse like the entirety of the West and East Asian strategic allies/countries like Japan and South Korea. Somehow they've broken the self-sustaining cycle of perversion, deterioration, hedonism, postmodernism, and malaise that grips the rest of the modern world.

As you might expect, he did find something good to say about men, but the speech wasn’t an apologia for the gender, or a whine about the abuse heaped on men. Rather, it was a shrewd and provocative look at the motivational differences between men and women – and at some of the topics (like the gender imbalance on science faculties) that got Larry Summers in so much trouble at Harvard. Dr. Baumeister, a prominent social psychologist who teaches at Florida State University, began by asking gender warriors to go home.

“I’m certainly not denying that culture has exploited women,” he said. “But rather than seeing culture as patriarchy, which is to say a conspiracy by men to exploit women, I think it’s more accurate to understand culture (e.g., a country, a religion) as an abstract system that competes against rival systems — and that uses both men and women, often in different ways, to advance its cause.”

The “single most underappreciated fact about gender,” he said, is the ratio of our male to female ancestors. While it’s true that about half of all the people who ever lived were men, the typical male was much more likely than the typical woman to die without reproducing. Citing recent DNA research, Dr. Baumeister explained that today’s human population is descended from twice as many women as men. Maybe 80 percent of women reproduced, whereas only 40 percent of men did.

https://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/20/is-there-anything-good-about-men-and-other-tricky-questions/