The debate is about the SMP outside of the black community.

  1. I understand the reasons why the SMP within the black community are multivariate and up for debate, so such a thing is outside the scope of this debate.
  2. This shows that boycotts are not effective.
  3. Understandably, small subsets don't care. These are men who do not value romance highly, (non-black)UMC women etc.
  4. It shows us that a full decline is a male optimal outcome outside of small subsets of women such a child free types or spinsters (less than 20% of women). Above average providers have leverage to choose their female mate, protectors have robust availability of short term mates. Duty of performance is actually more weighted on women in this arrangement (must either be promiscuous to compete for AF mates, or within the top 20% roughly of women, in terms of male interest traits, such as hip ratio, feminine dispositione to obtain a provider).
  5. Also seems to indicate men will orient themselves for female arousal rather than male status (AF\BB)

Will continue to add points if debate seems to fall out of the primary spirit of the CMV.