Feminine Imperative: The tendency of media and culture to put women first, excuse their misdeeds (see also: rationalization hamster), and criticize any holding of accountability or pointing out of double standards as being “anti-women”.

I can agree with this one to some extent. There is a recognisable trend towards this. I wrote an OP about this previously. I don't agree that women aren't held accountable for their actions, though, that is a pretty big exaggeration.

I must say that RP is skating on thin ice to criticise anyone for double standards!

Rationalization Hamster: Analogy for the thought processes used by women to turn bad behavior and bad decisions into acceptable ones to herself and her friends.

There is some truth in this. We all like to be perceived as having social value by our friends and peers. That's why men boast about their sexual conquests, etc, etc. This is not unique to women.

Last Minute Resistance: Contrary to feminist sloganeering, no doesn't always mean no.

I honestly don't think it's far away from RP openly advocating violence against women and men physically forcing themselves on women sexually. That time will come. This is already getting close to this.

Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is eight and twenty; woman when she is eighteen; but hers is a reason of very narrow limitations. This is why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling things to the most important.” - Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women (1851)

There is no evidence for Schopenhauer's quote at all. It's just his opinion, I would love to see him attempt to back up any of those views with remotely valid evidence. Where he gets the idea that men's mental faculties mature at 28 and women at 18, I have no idea. But it's bollocks.

Also, he was living in a society in which men frequently argued for women to be second-class citizens and have virtually no rights, and indeed this was the case. You can't really cite quotations from that period as being of value, unless it's someone arguing that women should be treated as human beings and afforded the same basic rights as men.

Therefore there is no common social contract that we can commit to that benefits both genders. Only men are so easily fooled into entering into these social contracts because they work well for society in general, that they forgot to look at the feminine imperative and ask, but how does that benefit me?

This is extremely debatable. What we probably need is more commitment to social contracts from both men and women. To state that there should be no social contracts at all, or that men should only enter into social contracts that exclusively benefit them...that is a fucking disastrous mentality. When I read something like that, I reflect on how fucked we are as a society and species.

The distinguishing feature of sociopaths, or power players, if you will, is that they are fluent in powertalk.

This is arguably true, but a more valid question would be “are sociopaths admirable and to be imitated?”. Most psychologically well-adjusted people would conclude in the negative.

Dark Triad Personality, aka why “chicks dig jerks”: A catchall phrase that describes the personality types MANY women are naturally attracted to:

I suppose there is some evidence for this, but the situation is considerably more complex than is often suggested. I simply believe that chicks dig attractive jerks. But I've also seen chicks dig attractive nice guys. Acting like a jerk is useless in the absence of other qualities, and it's less useful the older women get, and even at a young age many women are completely immune to it.

Most women realise that jerks are indeed jerks and that they don't make them happy, and learn to stay away from them. Some never go near them. A small number do not learn this. RP completely misinterprets this.

Feminists claim they want equality but what they really want is power without responsibility.

There are many feminists who have a very irresponsible and downright stupid perspective. I would say this is more true of RP and equally true of many MRAs.

Women are irrational and inconsistent, they have a capacity for logic but it is not their modus operandi, that is to say that they must exert effort to be logical as it is not their factory setting.

This is just rubbish. Men aren't logical and rational. Human beings aren't logical and rational. We all think that we're rational because we experience our own thought processes. We're capable of being rational, but many very complex subconscious forces are always at play. There is simply no evidence to suggest that men are more rational than women, let alone proof. Men make irrational decisions and do irrational things all of the time. Arguably men tend to be more impulsive than women. If you believe that men are logical and rational then you must be pretty stupid.

Women are machiavellian in nature...

There is no evidence for this. Also, I hate to point out that Machiavelli was a man!

this means they are comparatively proficient at being manipulative versus the typical male.

Complete bullshit. There is just absolutely no basis for this whatsoever.

Women are hypergamous they feel entitled to a superior mate.

Firstly, the term 'superior' is subjective. Secondly, women do not feel entitled to a superior mate, they just want someone that they're attracted to. Arguably, the media has informed women in particular that they will meet the perfect guy. But there is no evidence that women want a superior mate more than men, let alone that they feel entitled to it.

Women are generally more sexually selective than men for really obvious biological reasons, which RP indeed acknowledges elsewhere in order to justify fucking around all over the place. Also, they have far more opportunity than men because they are bombarded with attention. Stuff like RP and PUA is only exacerbating this process; they are self-fulfilling prophecies.

I am fully aware that dating is more challenging for men than women, believe me, but this is not because women have a sense of entitlement. This is just a projection.

If a woman thinks she is better than you she can't respect you, if she can't respect you she can't love you.

'Better', 'respect' and 'love' are very subjective terms, but there is no evidence for this. Women are attracted to high status men, there is absolutely no doubt about that, but the way this is described here is ludicrous. Women frequently get together with men who are ostensibly inferior to them in every respect...but the women in question fancy those guys! Surely you've noticed this!

Women are more selfish than men are in matters of money and love.

This is just utter nonsense. If the evidence that women are more selfish with money is that men are more likely to have to pay for dates, then this is just purely because this is part of our courtship rituals which have been built up over many generations, and which probably relate to our biological nature. Indeed, elsewhere RP argues in favour of sexual dimorphism (remember what I was saying about skating on thin ice!).

Outside of dating, I would love to see any evidence whatsoever that women are more selfish with money than men. All of the tightest people I've ever known (including myself) are male.

In terms of being selfish about love, that's pretty rich coming from a list that claims later that women's literal only value is beauty and fertility!

Women love pragmatically and have no capacity to love unconditionally for romantic partners, only their children.

Men don't love women unconditionally.

Women have a pronounced gender group bias which means they typically de facto side with other women in a conflict regardless of logic or argument...

I thought women always followed strong and 'superior' alpha men? This is just absolutely baseless garbage again.

women are herd like and stick together closely

All human beings are tribal, to suggest that women are more 'herd-like' than men is just absolutely baseless.

they form cartels and use the power of the group to hen peck/destroy enemies.

Men do this far more than women.

Women have a sexual plurality, if you are a nice guy with money you are husband material that can nail her after 12 dates and she's had so many glasses of wine she forgets how on a primal level you're not that attractive, just cute.

I'm not sure 'plurality' is used correctly here, but there is some truth in this. I would also suggest that beyond a certain age, and perhaps a certain time in their lives when they're open to more casual encounters, women are less likely to sleep around, engage in casual sex, or seek hook ups. Some women never want those things at all.

The law prioritises female safety and well-being over logic, honour and justice.

A lot of the RP stuff on this subject is complete junk, which devalues the valid issues that men face in the criminal justice system, which I do feel strongly about.

Western females (typically anglosphere and western/northern Europe) are self-entitled and come from a psychological position of thinking they're better than you are.

This is just nonsense.

Women are depreciating assets, their major asset and unique selling point is their sexual beauty and fertility.

I suppose this is a reasonable argument in a society that has completely warped values. I'm not sure what relevance fertility has because increasingly sexual conduct and procreation are completely devolved from one another, as predicted in Brave New World.

I suppose you could view women as purely sexual objects, and continually trade in older women for younger women in a completely cynical fashion, without developing any attachment or feelings whatsoever for any of them. It would, of course, make you a cunt; arguably you would also be mentally ill.

Also, if everyone did that, the human race would die out, or the whole concept of the family would go down the toilet completely and there would be some very confused and disillusioned children knocking about. Apart from that, it's a healthy worldview.

Have fun and play nice!