Good news everyone, I am NOT the Father.

It's not abominable behaviour. It's female behaviour. You're making the mistake of scrutinizing a female's actions through the lens of male ethics.

Remember this basic rule of survival: organisms choose the path that gains them the greatest reward for the least amount of effort.

Think back to a time before civilizations existed in any meaningful sense, when we operated in small packs. Males are the dominant human players in the game of survival because they're built to improvise, outmanoeuvre, and outlast competitors. We're specialised to interact with the world.

Given that nature favours those who are "successfully lazy", women gradually specialized not for interacting with the world, but for interacting with men. Why go to all the trouble of improvising, fighting, and enduring themselves when they can simply consume our excesses, providing breeding privileges as repayment. Maybe a man was cuckolded now and then, but it worked well enough to move the species along as a whole.

In this sense, men and women developed a symbiotic/commensal relationship with one another. Sexual dimorphism is an emergent property of nature's tendency to reward the successfully lazy.

The problem now is that modern laws are turning women from symbiotes to parasites, because they aren't legally obligated to offer us anything in return for robbing us blind. And in fact, the state oftentimes robs us on their behalf.

Quick ninja edit: This is why at the Red Pill we say things like "don't take women seriously" and "control her for her own good". Because left to their own devices, women often aren't conscious enough to understand that their base motives and actions are harmful to the very civilization that upholds their sexual agenda. Left unchecked, a civilization that favours the female sexual imperative over the male one will eventually eat itself alive.