TheRedArchive needs help
With 700,000+ posts and 16,000,000+ comments archived, and new Red Pill content being added every week, keeping TheRedArchive alive and discoverable to everyone is starting to become very costly. As a 20-year-old student who just moved out and is living independently for the first time, keeping TheRedArchive alive is beginning to cost me much more than I thought.

Therefore, if you appreciate the website, have gained a lot of knowledge and insight from it, and want to show your appreciation, you can do so by donating any amount that you want via the options below. The money will be used on the expensive monthly host bill and any future maintenance of the website.
Thank you, and I wish you all a successful 2021 and a good luck with achieving your goals and dreams!

Best, /u/dream-hunter

My condolences on your forthcoming ban by Reddit

Reddit View
October 1, 2019

I saw the new rules and thought, "I see, it's just in time for the election."

Every time the Left -- including corporate sponsors like ShareBlue and Google -- starts losing ground when an election is coming up, Reddit revises its rules to enable it to ban any resistance to the Borg.

Despite all these glorious new rules, organized Leftist brigades continue to operate with impunity, as do the large echo chambers of politics, pics, and news where suspicious sock accounts that may be tied to Reddit admins recycle content and mass-upvote politically important articles. Remember that Reddit has never claimed that the voting here is fair and representative, and has never answered the question when asked how much of the content is still posted by admins.

Now they will ban you just like they banned other subs for no reason, so: I feel your pain. It is not fair and not right. You are doing the smart thing by running your own site, outside the probing fingers of the FAANG companies or their slightly slow little brother, Reddit. The important thing to keep in mind is that despite appearing to be about morality, these bans are not about morality; they are about one side trying to win over the other.

I say this as someone with no real connection to The Red Pill. I dig the general concept, which is that "people are biology" and the best guide to how to interact with other humans comes from The Discovery Channel. If you follow this concept, it will lead you to extremist cynics like Fred Nietzsche and Tom Wolfe, who see humans as simply "talking monkeys with car keys."

Poor Reddit. It so badly wants to be cool like Facebook, but here it is, stuck with this old-style internet software and attitudes toward Open Discussion and free expression. Every time the admins implement new rules and cut out more unruly nonconformists such as yourselves, more people leave the site. And not just any people, the interesting ones. Reddit is systematically destroying the one advantage it had over other social media.

You might have noticed that Reddit keeps losing rank on Alexa. Not surprisingly, the nu-Reddit -- censorship, safe spaces, hipsters, SJWs -- is not doing as well as the old. This means that over time this problem will correct itself, but only after something that was once good is vandalized into obscurity, which seems to be Reddit's fate. It is following MySpace into doom by driving away the interesting users, keeping the inoffensive ones, and then wondering why fewer people want to visit.

Post Information
Title My condolences on your forthcoming ban by Reddit
Author ultra-royalist
Upvotes 877
Comments 235
Date 01 October 2019 02:00 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Original Link
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pillsocial justice warrior

[–]modTheRedPike[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (2 children) | Copy

There were a number of posts that were well meaning and apprecaite it but didn't meet the requirements for a post around here. Since it looks like we are staying for now, I removed them but did not lock.

I'm going to leave this one up because it has the most information already and can be a catch all for this discussion.

[–]DYELFORCEONE 1 points [recovered]  (53 children) | Copy

Isn’t reddit open source, why not just copy

[–]cupshadow87 points88 points  (1 child) | Copy

This is an issue of brand, not website technology.

[–]EggOfDelusion39 points40 points  (37 children) | Copy

You’ll never get an app approved for it by apple or google, so you lose on day one. Then no payment processors, ads or DDoS protection will be allowed. So easy!

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (28 children) | Copy

This is the solution:

Decentralized internet, and everyone needs to do their part. Like, all the same faggoty propaganda they use for climate change but for reals. As OP seems to suggest, these companies are amoral power grabbers posing as liberal moralists. It won't be good for anyone if we don't fight back, and doing so with regulation almost gives them more power in a sense. We need to defeat them with alternatives and real competition

[–]Standgrounding7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

So, like Old reddit. Or better yet, 4chan, which has basically no rules.

[–]Affini7y0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Except the average viewpoint of 4chan's is just a tad different than trp's.

[–]radixaf6 points7 points  (25 children) | Copy

Red pill engineer here, climate change isn't propoganda. Read the technical IPCC report from 2013, I would recommend reading the technical summary. Im not a scientist but it's sound to my eyes and it's peer reviewed and all that. Please let me know if you find any systematic, human, or random errors in their data which is all available online via the databases tab in the link below

[–]wanderer7794 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy

Caveat: I know next to nothing about this and don't have a strong opinion one way or another. But one objection I've seen is that the climate scientists have picked a convenient start time for their measurement of sea ice, and that prior to the 70s the amount of sea ice was actually lower than it is now. It appears they're doing the same in this report: " Arctic sea ice extent (annual, multi-year and perennial) decreased over the period 1979–2012 "

I don't have time to read this report but that seems like a red flag for me. Another bigger red flag is that when you bring up objections like this, instead of calmly explaining where I'm off track, people will attack you. If I was in physics class and I questioned something, my teacher would be able to explain why I was wrong. And we would both enjoy the process.

[–]radixaf2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Noted. I will process what you said and assimilate it into my next approach. I thank you for your courtesy and honesty. My only ask is in the future if you're interested look into it and maybe you'll find answers to your questions. I'm not the best source to be speaking to about this, I'm not a scientist, I'm an engineer who designs pipe networks and roadways, I'm familiar with the principles but not the application of climate science.

[–]wanderer7792 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

The trouble is I only have so much time to spend. I do a little googling from time to time.

It is hard to find someone who will calmly reply to the objections. Someone posted a report by some other scientists countering the accepted view that this is a big, manmade problem. If I could find it I'd post it.

I'm a dude with kids who is somewhat worried but also skeptical cause I know there's a lot of money and power at stake and I know how people act when you have that dynamic. And the way the dialogue is being conducted, on this and many other issues, is pretty suspicious to me.

[–]radixaf2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I understand. I have kids myself and if it wasn't for college and my background I'd be in the same boat. The news and media is terrible at informing people

[–]lala_xyyz10 points11 points  (15 children) | Copy

but the propaganda is real, like the "global warming" stuff that we've been fed with until they realized it's stupid because winters are getting harsher, and now the meaningless "climate change" is the new catch phrase. We get it, anthropogenic climate change is real, but its effects are far overblown and it's being used to push a carbon credit system that the globalists will use to control population. they can all fuck off

[–]radixaf4 points5 points  (10 children) | Copy

I only ask, please read the report. It's not propoganda when it's true! Guys! I'm an engineer who works in construction in Dallas Texas, I make no money saying this. Don't politicize science and please just read the technical summary. Draw your own conclusions instead of regurgitating talking points. The only thing that's true is we don't know how exactly bad it's going to be bc how do you build a model for something that hasn't happened before you can only make predictions

[–]lala_xyyz7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

From your study:

In some aspects of the climate system, including changes in drought, changes in tropical cyclone activity, Antarctic warming, Antarctic sea ice extent, and Antarctic mass balance, confdence in attribution to human influence remains low due to modelling uncertainties and low agreement between scientifc studies.

There you go.

[–]lala_xyyz8 points9 points  (7 children) | Copy

OK I've skimmed the entire technical report. To make things clear: I don't think those are that important issues. We will adapt. Clean water can be easily obtained from the sea and atmosphere. If need be, CO2 can be reduced using carbon capture. Year ago I crunched some numbers and it took like 0,1% of world GDP to cut global CO2 emissions by something like 30%. Personally I think that 10 times more pressing issues are the extinction of various species (particularly macrofauna) and the pollution (primarily plastics). Climate will become a pressing issue when it starts visibly hurting everyone. Until that, most won't care. That is the sad truth. And the proposed "fixes" for climate change that we read in the media like not eating meat, not having children (but only if you're in the West), extra taxes on already heavily taxed gasoline, carbon credits, that autistic Swedish kid appealing to emotions etc - none of these are viable solutions and are just being pushed to manipulate and control.

[–]radixaf0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy

I agree, but I just get triggered when someone says climate change is "faggy propoganda". And to your other points I agree, it'll have to get worse before people care, like more extreme weather. Also, the media likes to take the most extreme possibilities and state them like fact. Bc ratings are so important nowadays, "free news" is basically the worse news. ...Thank you for skimming the report

[–]macktheknive2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy

You get 'triggered'?

Think about how easy it is to manipulate people like that.

[–]radixaf-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy

We all have moments of weakness.

[–]throwaway_ind_div1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I would suggest visiting India from April to June next year and going to interior rural areas to see for yourself.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yes, what you said.

Here of all places I'd think I wouldn't get pounced on for that. Climate change propaganda = propaganda. None of the predictions are meaningful and all of the solutions require harsh austerity measures and trillions of dollars. It's fucking retarded

[–]radixaf1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

You're not wrong but you're not right. We don't know how bad it's going to get, but we don't know how much we can stop the change either. What you're suggesting is running an experiment, is very very dangerous. Please read the report a, it's all open data if you can find an error you will be doing the world a service

[–]BrownGummyBear2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

saying the Earth is a sphere is obviously propaganda as well! ##FlatEarth

[–]afterthe_fapocalypse5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy

the issue isn't whether the weather is changing, but whether civilization is responsible for it. course-correction at this stage will mitigate by fraction of degrees centigrade. it's unrealistic, and for the money poured into it to enrich otherwise lazy bureaucrats ... it's stupid. 40 years ago we were going to experience an ice age imminently. now it's all fire.

climate change is real. but so is the propaganda. and I'm not a fan of paying more taxes or hurting the business class here just so some fat suited fucks somewhere can get funding for nothing.

[–]radixaf2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

False. Up until 2010 we didn't know for certain if the increase in the average global surface temperature was caused by humans. After that we did bc the IPCC was able to complete a 30 year study to determine the source of CO2 in the atmosphere through tracer molecules. For instance if CO2 was put in the air through a volcanic eruption it would have trace molecules containing sulfur isotope every so parts per billion (ppb). If the co2 was produced through internal combustion engines it would have a different isotope of sulfur every so ppb. Take enough samples around the globe and you're able to deduce with a guassian distribution the probability to 99.73% the sources of CO2, which is either in the 2010 or 2009 IPCC study.

Edit: to your other point about the predictions the world was going to get colder, that's true! But the reason the IPCC was created back then was bc no one was sure what was going to happen. There was a theory that bc of the wide spread use of aerosols in production and consumer use it would cause a cooling effect, then there was the global warming theory which goes back all the way to the late 1800s with the industrial revolution.

[–]afterthe_fapocalypse1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

you're saying the p-value was what? you can talk probability all day but that only works if A: your assumptions were correct, and B: you didn't overfit your data. That probability you just furnished is like an R-squared of 1. It fits your training data well, but won't count for shit in the future because of high variance/flexibility. You've mapped the data well, but you cannot forecast with that low a bias. The climate is incredibly complex. People who think they can map it and simulate it are ... ignorant of how data actually works. There is a classic trade-off between variance and squared bias, not dissimilar from Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle in quantum physics. You have to go somewhere more middle of the road.

And maybe I should throw in a part C there about how your IPCC study conveniently (to borrow a word from Gore) ignores 1940-1970 when we were in a period of global cooling, and periods before industrialization where we were warming, and then periods before that when it was an ice age, and etc. etc. because temperatures FLUCTUATE naturally. Anything anthropogenic is a drop in the bucket and only alarmists who want tax dollars will feed you with convenient 'data' like the sham study you exhumed from the trash heap. which I've already mentioned, and which your study doesn't take into consideration.

ergo, propaganda. your sword tip is dulled.

[–]radixaf0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

You're reacting with malice bc you're spitting the same talking points I've heard Ben shapiro spout, who by the way is funded by oil money out of West Texas. The certainty I stated isn't in future predictions bc like I said you can't know how accurate your predictions are for something that has never occured on this planet before. The certainty comes from chemistry and the knowledge that the co2 added into the atmosphere is with a 99% accuracy man made. To your second point the cooling period was not ignored and was taken into account. Maybe not in that years IPCC, report but it was studied and recorded in the 80s. The temperature got cooler bc of aerosols containing sulfates which have the effect of scattering light from the sun lowering the energy entering the system (earth). In an earlier comment I went into detail about this cooling theory, which is an actual thing. But unfortunately those same aerosols co rained a molecule with the nickname CFC which also destroy O3 (Ozone). The widespread use of these aerosols had a short term cooling but long term increase in UV rays. There's still a hole in the ozone above Australia, don't ever visit Australia without sunscreen...the Earth's climate is complicated and there's a lot to digest. The 2013 report, if you read the technical summary, goes into great detail on the changes we will probably see and explains the methods used to determine this. Please read it.

[–]afterthe_fapocalypse2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

malice? now why did you go there? is that how your family talks? Is that how think you're going to set frame? the only malice here is in your imagination. if you want a discussion I suggest you stop playing Dr. Phil or I'll walk away. I don't have time to deal with armchair psychologists who theorize others' moods on reddit. that's part of the propaganda, little ad hominem skirmishes like that intended to derail discussions when your fact ammo is running out.

a central piece of the propaganda surrounding this gradual shift in temperatures revolves around prediction. it's humble bragging to downshift by telling me that predictions don't matter, when they totally do and are central to the meaningness of the data. if you can't predict, what's the point of analysis? And finally, if you can't predict, then why the fuck are you overfitting your data? When a system is complex and there are a lot of unknown unknowns, THIS IS PRECISELY WHY YOU AVOID AN R-SQUARED OF 1. It ruins your predictive value and yields uninterpretable results. any data scientist knows that when you get results like this, they're not real. they're not useful. you're using too many parameters, or something else is off.

The problem with overfitting also is that you confuse correlation with causation. You can't tell the difference, because you've lost your anchor. And finally, it leads to unfalsifiability. If the climate cools, then the business-class haters will just say we took steps in time and need to keep raising taxes. If it warms, they say oh well we told you so, and then they'll try to raise taxes again. they'll run another study when they're precious test data destroys the validity of their assumptions in the training data, and then come forward proudly with a re-vamped R-squared back to one. you can't win against these people. they're liars. they don't do science. they don't listen. and they all think that just because research is funded by business interests that it's biased. that's like saying that academic researchers because they're funded by government are biased toward the administration's agenda. Calumny is a revolving door.

you still haven't answered my question about the p-value.

Finally, I don't know if you made this point, but aerosol pollution from volcanic activity is far more contributory to cooling (James Hansen) than the spray bottles that The Donald uses in his bathroom every morning.

[–]party_dragon4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy

I've never used the app. Not even the mobile website. Both are overrated...

[–]EggOfDelusion40 points41 points  (2 children) | Copy

Aren't you a special snowflake. I guess you should let these companies know building an app is pointless then, since you don't use it.

The target audience does use the app and it's immensely popular. Not having an app for a social media website is death. It improves engagement significantly when you can push notifications.

[–]ThrowayButNvrForgten0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Im throwing this idea out there. I know someone will figure out how to make an app VPN to let apps not allowed by google publish. I hope that person monetized it.

[–]DantesInferno910 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

You don’t HAVE to be approved by google though. You can install android apps freely

[–]666Evo1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

You don’t HAVE to be approved by google though

You do if you want the vast, vast majority of people with Android phones to use your app.

[–]I_Dont_Type10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

To function, reddit or a reddit-like absolutely needs a large audience of posters and content creators. It’s very tough to get the ball rolling. It’s the reason why the move to voat failed several years ago- voat didn’t have enough content so people never truly swapped.

[–]rorrr2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

You can't copy all the traffic.

[–]bakamoney7 points8 points  (4 children) | Copy

Same weakness here would be exploited on the "mirror"

[–]LateralThinker1338 points39 points  (3 children) | Copy

The weakness isn't hardware/software, it's wetware (the humans). The humans running the place allow biased and opaque rulings from mods/devs, blatant discrimination, etc. in their treatment of different subs. That's the cancer.

[–]patrixxxx13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

The cancer is that Reddit is owned by the Nutwork as practically all media and media is almost exclusively propaganda and they've been lying about everything.

[–]bakamoney7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yup. But still the up/down vote system .

The way "new" "rising" and "hot" works are easily gamed though.

[–]TFWnoLTR6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

They do it because the advertisers tell them to. They're tailoring an audience to increase its value to those looking to exploit the userbase for advertisements and market research.

It's not some hidden agenda or secret conspiracy. They're straight up and open about it.

The sort of demographics that make up communities like TRP are too difficult to appeal to with advertisements directed at a more general audience, and the true but unpopular narrative common here can harm the reddit brand if it ever got amplified again by social media warriors looking for something to vilify.

Now is a perfect time to quietly delete this sub because it hasn't been in any spotlight for a while. We all knew this was coming when reddit explicitly announced their intentions of sanitizing this site for advertisers.

[–]frankzanzibar2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's not open source anymore, but that's not really the issue. There lots of ways to duplicate the functions of Reddit, it's not rocket science. There are issues around scale: when Voat launched after Reddit began cracking down on dissident views, it got an enormous boost in visitor volumes it couldn't handle.

Basically you'd need something that could start small and grow steadily, without being taken over by leftists. We'll see what happens with Thinkspot, it might work.

[–]Sendmeloveletters1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

That’s a solid idea actually how do I get the code for a Reddit on my server?

[–]Such_Individual 1 points [recovered]  (17 children) | Copy

Reddit is going the way of It is selling out. Absolute free speech is not profitable so they are turning reddit into a propaganda machine for Corporatocracy.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (11 children) | Copy

They want people to buy into collectivism & socialism. They only way they can do it is make it seem like only the government can solve society's problems and that the free market is to blame. And unfortunately, despite literal historical evidence of the failings of socialism, people eat that bullshit up because they cant emotionally deattach themselves from the empty promises of free shit. It appeals to the Sloth in everybody, overriding the logical skeptic that is not valued in todays society.

[–]Such_Individual 1 points [recovered]  (7 children) | Copy

Corporations are the opposite of socialism. Corporations are tools of capitalism. What you should be mad about is any authority that says "this is bad for you, you can't consume or produce that product/media" What we are witnessing here is authoritarian capitalism which says "You can compete with each other and have free speech, but only within these boundaries."

[–]PURE_ARYAN_GENETICS7 points8 points  (3 children) | Copy

yet it is the corporations that push SJW ideals the hardest. sure, they don't want full blown communism(I think), but they want a dependent consumer base

[–]57ashdot 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy

And the only way they can defend themselves without having to actually compete is to utilize the power of government overreach. All those regulations that get passed? Big companies love that shit. It guarantees that startups will never get off the ground, because the insane amount of money required to comply with testing, licensing, fees, etc. That is pocket change to mega corps.

[–]Such_Individual 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy

the insane amount of money required to comply with testing, licensing, fees, etc. That is pocket change to mega corps. It eliminates the need to innovate and compete, a fundamental cornerstone of the free market.

Under capitalism winners get decided and the winners keep growing more powerful in a feedback loop. It's inevitable. You can't just have constant competition because the world is limited and scarce, it's inefficient use of time and resources to have so many businesses competing with each other. For large companies with large operations and scale, sometimes there can be only one winner because no one else can do it. Often the illusion of competition is in capitalism when in reality their are very few corporations that control the market like the media and the food industry.

[–]57ashdot 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy

Authoritairan capitalism is an oxymoron. Only the government retains the right to use physical force against people without reprocussion.

[–]xjx5450 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Corporations are the opposite of socialism. Corporations are tools of capitalism.

They are the same thing with different names. A corporation which has no competition, an infinite amount of VC and no accountability is not going to respond to the free market the same as a company which has to deliver a product to customers.

[–]Chaddeus_Rex0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

espite literal historical evidence of the failings of socialism

to be fair socialism was tried for the first time in human history a few times in the last hundered years.

Capitalism has been the default since the dawn of civilization and failed every time - just look at all the failed empires in the trashbin of history.

[–]57ashdot 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy

You are confusing economy planning with governing method. Capitalism allowed mass empires ro rise. Its only when the government became an issue that they collapsed under the strain they imposed on the people.

[–]Chaddeus_Rex0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

If that's the case, how did communist empires rise? Or Empires like Sparta that did not have a capitalist system and where more of a military dictatorship/communist hybrid?

[–]Onein1024th6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

Absolute free speech is not profitable

funny thing is... it could be. there's a hunger for it in the consumers

[–]∞ Mod | RP Vanguardbsutansalt2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Sadly there isn't an alternative that's pretty enough to use and people are lazy. TRP.RED should hopefully change that once the growing pains are overcome.

[–]commander_zoidberg3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Unlike the days of Digg or LiveJournal or MySpace i think they will be able to keep it going. Look at all these silicon valley tech companies that loose millions of dollars every year and have never made any profit. Those that do like Alphabet and Facebook mainly do so off the back of advertising and Amazon are predatory monopolists, Apple make shit with Chinese slave labour and sell it for 10X what its worth. Most of the advertising these companies are doing is fraudulent. A lot of it is probably driven by clickfarming operations. Many of these companies sole asset is their users but with platforms like Twitter most of their users will be sock accounts at this rate.

They have something that wasn't around 15 years ago. Zero percent interest rates or negative rates (pretty soon). There is just endless free money to keep all these zombie companies going because at this rate they will take over every aspect of our lives.

Today you get banned from Facebook for having the wrong opinion. Tomorrow your thermostat won't work, your car will refuse to drive you. You're fridge will refuse to cool your milk and Amazon will disable your door lock because you have the wrong opinions.

[–]alsuqyadiq113 points114 points  (3 children) | Copy

Thank u internet stranger for this self important post, bury me at wounded knee

[–]420KUSHBUSH18 points19 points  (0 children) | Copy

I will pour one out for you and the rest, may you all rest easy

[–][deleted] 1 points  (1 child) | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]modTheRedPike0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Do me a favor and send me a "hi, theredpike told me to do this" in modmail. I'll explain later.

[–]GearaltofRivia17 points18 points  (0 children) | Copy

Nietzsche is far from a cynic but otherwise good post

[–]pras[🍰] 43 points44 points  (32 children) | Copy

Let's start an alternative to Reddit, using reddit software.

[–]420KUSHBUSH117 points118 points  (11 children) | Copy

"Let's make our own Reddit with blackjack and hookers"

[–]The_Best_0113 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

In fact, forget the reddit!

[–]PickUpScientist6 points7 points  (6 children) | Copy

and coke. don't forget the mounds of coke.

[–]420KUSHBUSH10 points11 points  (5 children) | Copy

I do not condone the use of illicit substances, I'll just take the blackjack thank you

[–]sipsofsake 1 points [recovered]  (4 children) | Copy

You don't have to condone using illicit substances to use them, people spend a lot of time doing things they say not to. Haha.

[–]_Icarus_Reborn_7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy

I think he's messing.

Check the username.

[–]420KUSHBUSH-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy

I made this username since I wanted something edgy and ironic. Have never smoked and don't want to

[–]420KUSHBUSH0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

True that

[–]Chaddeus_Rex2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

blackjack and hookers

If that actually became reality the userbase would explode.

[–]Onein1024th1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

"Let's make our own Reddit with blackjack and


anyone who's been here awhile shouldn't be paying for something they can get for free

[–]ReformSociety13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

Just enjoy the joke, Chad McChad.

[–]Radioactivebuny 1 points [recovered]  (10 children) | Copy

The problem is finding a domain service that’ll host you once they realize you’re a “Nazi”. The free market ISNT providing, is the problem.

[–]CryptoViceroy8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah just look what happened to Gab.

[–]PickUpScientist13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

amazon web services. jeff bezos don't give a fuck.

[–]MoDuReddit2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Look into blockchain and torrent-based tech. It's the best we got against the tech oligopoly.

[–]CryptoViceroy1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah ZeroNet is a fantastic P2P network.

[–]PURE_ARYAN_GENETICS2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

try services in countries with far-right governments like poland, russia or hungary

[–]Radioactivebuny 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy

“Far-right.” You mean normal?

[–]PURE_ARYAN_GENETICS0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

what is far right now was far left a hundred years ago

[–]DEVOmay971 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy


[–]SouloftheVoid1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

TOR hidden services will likely be the last refuge.

[–]porn-chicken2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

You, like every other person that said the same, will realise that it's not the tech, it's the users.

Like in physics, a large mass pulls smaller objects towards it. It's the same here. Reddit just has too large a userbase to cause a significant shift. Unless a 2 or 3 major front-page subs perform a mass exodus, it'll never change.

There's 100's of Reddit clones and these platforms never truly take off because it's small niches that migrate. Raddle and Voat were the two significant ones and they failed horrendously because it was where scorned leftist and right-wing Redditors made their new homes. It turns out, you need more than just one subreddit's worth of users to make a platform attractive.

Reddit won't die, but it'll fade into irrelevance when the next generation come up with their own thing. Personally, I'd rather see single topic forums come back around.

[–]commander_zoidberg2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I miss the old days of the forums. It is unfortunately why i still have a Facebook account because several of my hobbies the groups for them are pretty much on Facebook only. The forums died years ago or are basically dead.

[–]5Imperator_Red79 points80 points  (28 children) | Copy

I say this as someone with no real connection to The Red Pill.

Thanks for your support, but maybe you should join us. We offer nothing but truth and opposition to monstrous tyranny.

[–]MedicalNothing 1 points [recovered]  (16 children) | Copy

This, redpill is the ultimate selfimprovement no matter what and how much you take from it. Even proper eating alone ditching soy, processed food and over/undereating will put you above mediocrity.

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 32 points33 points  (3 children) | Copy

Understanding how sexual signaling -- I got this from Tom Wolfe -- underlies most human behavior is also highly useful, especially in the workplace and politics.

[–]Sendmeloveletters9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy

I’m gonna follow this thread. Where do you recommend I start reading with him?

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy

He is primarily an essayist, but also writes fiction that takes some patience to understand but is worth discovering. For that reason I would recommend two things:

  1. "The Painted Word," perhaps his most famous essay (excerpt)
  2. I Am Charlotte Simmons, in my view his best book

[–]flipdoggers0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy

Nothing wrong with soy (actually pretty healthy) except in exorbitant amounts, which no one would consume in practice. Based on the research I've seen at least. It contains phytoestrogens which aren't the same as estrogen.

Edit: lol at the ppl downvoting even though I posted evidence below. Open to counter-evidence. But don't downvote just because you wanna keep calling people "soyboys" without knowing you're likely wrong.

[–]MoDuReddit9 points10 points  (8 children) | Copy

It contains phytoestrogens which aren't the same as estrogen.

Yeah, but our cells react as if they were estrogens.

It is also true that you can ealthily eat soy, but as a man, you can't your protein from soy, otherwise you really do become a soy boy. I suggest tuna and chick pea.

The same reason women are very sensitive to small doses of testosterone, men are very sensitive to small estrogen-like receptors.

[–]CryptoViceroy2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Also worth remembering that soy isn't the only source of phytoestrogens.

Tin cans, anything wrapped/packaged in plastic, shampoos, soaps etc.

You have to be very diligent to avoid phytoestrogens.

[–]flipdoggers1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy

Meta-analysis on beneficial health effects of soy on cholesterol / risk of cardiovascular disease: "We found that the consumption of soy protein rather than animal protein significantly decreased serum concentrations of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides."

  • Also, from the introduction: "Ingestion of vegetable protein in place of animal protein appears to be associated with a lower risk of coronary heart disease: this effect may reflect decreases in serum cholesterol concentrations. The cholesterol-lowering effects of soy protein as compared with animal protein have been recognized in animals for more than 80 years."

Another study: "Soy consumption did not suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in males. Thus, it seems that the vascular, lipid, and hormonal effects of soy and estrogen differ."

Another study: "There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of changes in serum estrone concentrations, which tended to decrease in the soy-supplemented group and increase in the control group over time."

This was from a few minutes of research right now, where at most I found studies saying results are inconclusive, and at best I found studies citing positive effects of soy on men (and humans in general) WRT cancer and cardiovascular disease risk, and, as seen in the last study above, even estrogen in men.

[–]EvelynnSpoiler2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy

Nice propaganda. Those studies don't prove shit. Comparing a Veganism to the typical Western diet is a no-brainer. The average vegan is far more likely going to make health-based decisions than the person who throws any shit down their throat. Correlation =/= causation.

That being said, the Vegan diet isn't much better of an alternative. Dietary cholesterol has been proven many times to have little connection to the cholesterol in your arteries. Furthermore, one of the primary building blocks of the Sex hormones, is dietary cholesterol. Add estrogen-like molecules to the equation and you've got yourself a Soy boy. Veganism doesn't tell you what you can eat, but what you can't. Any wonder why there are so many fat Feminist Vegans; do you really think they're going to live much longer?

Just like dating and politics, the food industry has it's own "redpill" alternative. For many, it's the Carnivore diet. Those autoimmune diets claim it's been a miracle for all inflammation-related problems from arthritis to brain fog. Haven't tried it as of yet, removing a significant amount of plant-based foods (grains, legumes, sugar) has helped manage my own autoimmune problems.

Sugar/high glycemic foods are the enemy. Not only are they the most addictive foods, but they'll rot your insides and screw up your microbiota.

Compare the average Vegan to the average person on a Paleo diet, and not only will you see a difference in physical capabilities and wellbeing but also in intelligence.

[–]flipdoggers0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Did you look at the studies? None of them mentioned veganism, you just got triggered. If the studies I found don't prove anything, provide your own studies. We were talking about the effects of soy and none of the studies were done exclusively on vegans; the last one, showing a decrease in estrogens in men, was done on Japanese men.

[–]flipdoggers0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Also, there's a lot of strawmen and ad-hominems in your post. Just cause some feminists are vegan and fat doesn't mean veganism is unhealthy, just like how Zyzz dying young from steroid use doesn't mean having muscles is unhealthy. There are countless healthy and jacked vegan dudes out there, with and without steroids.

You've taken, IMO, the wrong red pill in the food industry. The real blue pill is being raised to think that eating burgers made from mass-tortured animals is normal, while being like "ya of course slavery is bad, fuck racists... but animal abuse is totally fine!" And also the constant mob-mentality of people shitting on veganism and saying vegan food tastes bad, when there's actually a lot of awesome vegan food and dishes out there that people just haven't exposed themselves to because they eat bacon everyday.

Research more about veganism (and more importantly, watch a documentary like Earthlings so at the very least you know what you're eating, even if you stick to a carnivore-diet) cause it really doesn't sound like you know much about it or have been exposed to positive vegan sources (which are abound, you just gotta avoid Facebook).

I did some research right now and it looks like you're right that dietary cholesterol isn't strongly linked to CHD. And correlation =/= causation, for sure. But one of the most convincing studies to me was the series of Adventist studies where they took this population, known for good health and good lifestyle habits (not drinking, not smoking, etc) and within this already-healthy group, compared disease-risk-factors across different diet groups. The vegans were by far the healthiest and had lowest morbidity risks across every single factor, and it was a linear progression: vegan > vegetarian > pescatarian > omnivore. The studies didn't involve comparing healthy vegans to unhealthy nonvegans because the whole Adventist population had healthy lifestyle patterns (which is why scientists wanted to study them—they're some of the healthiest people around—and also because there was a fairly high vegan %, like 33% or something).

[–]EvelynnSpoiler0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Why would I need to research Veganism when I'm already aware of the dangers of grains, legumes, lectins, and sugar/high GI? Take all of those things out of a Vegan's and out and what have you get left? Fucking yams?

Boo-fucking-hoo about the animals. Sure I don't agree with the torture but do you really think consuming soy as opposed to eating meat is going to sort the problem?

Better I look up to my cousin who hunts his own meat and grows his own vegetation while breeding his hot wife, half his age.

Once labgrown meat is affordable and in the mainstream, then we can look at doing a complete switchover. The irony is that animals will still get relentlessly slaughtered to save your little cuckbeans plantations.

[–]flipdoggers1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Dude you're acting like you know everything and you clearly don't. The dangers of legumes... lmao... ya, hummus will totally just destroy your body... lentils and peas, so unhealthy...

Boo-fucking-hoo about the animals. Sure I don't agree with the torture but do you really think consuming soy as opposed to eating meat is going to sort the problem?

Lol seriously watch Earthlings and then say "boo hoo" with a straight face. You'll puke first. People (including me before I stopped eating meat) can only eat meat by not thinking much about where it comes from—factory farms i.e. torture houses.

And no, I'm not saying eating vegan will solve the problem, cause you're just one person. Personally I don't wanna participate in those atrocities, and I assume factory farms will be one of those things humans look back on like slavery, like "god damn how did our ancestors do that shit... fuckin' psychopaths". And eating vegan could easily improve your health (especially long-term, but even short-term it'll probably encourage you to eat more fruits and vegetables, which are huge for both physical recovery and mental health).

Better I look up to my cousin who hunts his own meat and grows his own vegetation while breeding his hot wife, half his age.

Yes dude hunting is so much better than the average meat diet. Your cousin sounds fine. Better than bluepill citizens going day after day to pick up their tortured cow flesh pumped with hormones and pretending nothing's horribly wrong about that picture.

And seriously man you're so wrong thinking veganism is unhealthy. The world is filled with anti-veganism, pro-meat propaganda fucking everywhere and you've accepted it point-blank. You've then carried it on yourself, starting this veganism conversation when the original conversation was literally just about the effects of soy on men (and providing relevant scientific evidence) and you completely got triggered, didn't read / misread my comments, and made this a veganism-bashing conversation out of nowhere.

Red pill yourself, homie. Realize the conditioning you've gone through and at the very least think critically for yourself without blindly saying things like "your studies don't prove shit" without doing any proper research of your own or even looking at the studies you're randomly disregarding. That's not how you have a rational conversation.

[–]Chaddeus_Rex0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Dietary cholesterol has been proven many times to have little connection to the cholesterol in your arteries.


Source: Med student who just finished his metabolism module.

Cholesterol can be synthesized in the liver. If you eliminate cholesterol in diet, the liver will simply upregulate cholesterol production. The solution for hypocholesteremia is usually statins (block HMG COA reductase) or bile resins (if you can handle the unpleasant side effects).

The best intervention though is lifestyle factors - increasing exercise, decreasing saturated fats, increasing monounsaturated fats, decreasing low glycemic index sugars.

[–]Dreamcatcher40442 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

This was my understanding as well. I think it gets a bad rap ie "soyboys"

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 20 points21 points  (8 children) | Copy

Thank you for the offer. You might consider me a kindred spirit, since Nietzscheans are -- if they read him correctly -- inherently a bit Red Pilled.

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points  (5 children) | Copy

Nietzscheans are -- if they read him correctly -- inherently a bit Red Pilled.

Are you joking? TRP is simply Nietzsche lite.

[–]ThaBard18 points19 points  (4 children) | Copy

TRP- How to apply Nietzschian Principals on your quest to become a Chad!

[–][deleted] 32 points33 points  (3 children) | Copy

If you're trying to be funny.....that was pretty funny.

If your intention was to mock (sorry, too tired to sort it out), then......yeah, it's all about having a look at the sexual marketplace as it is.

If the sub is, in fact, banned, two sentences will stick with me the rest of my life:

  • Women don't care about the struggle, they hang out at the finish line and fuck the winners.
  • Spinning plates is a rational response to open hypergamy.

[–]ThaBard10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy

Funny lol, I love this sub dude.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

lol thought so, fun user name, too.

Sucks that it's being shut down....odd that there's this much lead time, though.

If I was Reddit, I would have simply deleted the sub on the day it was quarantined.

[–]Onein1024th1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

jokes on them. the struggle is the fun part, finish line is boring

[–]guyau10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy

Everything important here was already said by Nietzsche in his aphorisms on women anyway

[–]jackandjill220 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I wouldn't blame him if he didn't there's alot of stigma around us & judging how insane SJW's are these days I could see how a normie wouldn't want to take the risk.

[–]noobish_senpai14 points15 points  (15 children) | Copy

Where do I find the content if the sub gets deleted?

[–]johncillo27 points28 points  (0 children) | Copy

TRP.Red is the website created for this

[–]Dionysus-VIOLENCE18 points19 points  (1 child) | Copy

somebody already archived the whole subreddit. try to search for it

[–]Ballyop10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

This should be put as a meta post so that we can all prepare for the inevitable.

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy

I don't know. The right way to do this would be to write a script that sucks it out via the Reddit API and then deposits it in a neutral form, whether database or PDF.

[–]Neutral_User_Name11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy

whether database or PDF

PDF is the absolute worst way to deal with data!!

just sayin'

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

PDF sucks for raw data, but if you want people to read it as an ebook, it's the preferred form (works across most devices).

[–][deleted] 1 points  (1 child) | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]modTheRedPike0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Dont' hotlink any sub including our own. There is no way to white list our subs in automoderator.

[–]MillionaireSexbomb0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

[–][deleted] 1 points  (1 child) | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]modTheRedPike0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Dont' hotlink any sub including our own. There is no way to white list our subs in automoderator.

[–]mette130 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

[–]CainPrice12 points13 points  (2 children) | Copy

The first time or two something like this happened and everyone said it was because of the election and leftist politics, I snorted, waved my hands and said that it was a silly conspiracy theory. Nobody is trying to eliminate non-liberal speech on some tiny corner of the internet that doesn't even matter politically to keep Trump out of office. Nobody's that stupid. They're just reacting to complainers and their PR advisors.

But this keeps happening around election time. I think the Reddit administration is so self-important that they really do believe Reddit influences elections, and having conservative people gathering on their platform on the internet actually influenced the 2016 results.

I don't think that actually happened. But I think the Reddit administration actually thinks it did, and that liberal politics and the upcoming election are the impetus behind this and other similar moves. I didn't think that previously, but there's too much of a pattern now.

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

I think the Reddit administration is so self-important that they really do believe Reddit influences elections, and having conservative people gathering on their platform on the internet actually influenced the 2016 results.

They may also be receiving orders from above, including through Google, without whom their search engine juice disappears.

[–]TwentyEighteen2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

think the Reddit administration is so self-important that they really do believe Reddit influences elections

But it does... the influence might not be huge, but it’s there and it counts, same with all media. Media has a huge influence on how people think.

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (1 child) | Copy

I'm libertarian and no stranger to leftist (and even alt right) brigades to shut down free speech. Election years are a fucking nightmare. Shill accounts all over the sub trying to confuse and discredit people.

I peruse this sub on occaision and, although I dont agree with everything, a different perspective is never a bad thing, and this sub has fair points when it comes to just understanding basic, biology driven impulses. The fact that it makes people uncomfy that we are smart monkeys doesnt justify any sort of ba,n and frankly, its only a matter of time before other subs with political dissent (me) or anybody calling for a different appproach to any problem that doesnt involve the Oppression Olympics is closed. My condolences to all you shitlords. I may not agree with everything, but I will stand by your right to say it.

[–]SparkyMcBiff26 points27 points  (4 children) | Copy

There's almost nothing good left on Reddit.

EVERY subgroup that I had come here for has now been wiped out as the fascist SJW totalitarians ramp up their censorship.

(Heck I even got banned fro The_Donald when I pointed out the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9/11).

People in real life now are actually being imprisoned for "opinion crimes".

We are entering a new dark age that will not turn out well at all.

[–]ThatMidJuneNostalgia3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

What if an alternative could pop up from somewhere in Asia?

Also for Israel comment, I read about a book which talked about Israel's involvement in 911, would you know about that?

[–]incelchad1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

How ugly are you. I gotta know

[–][deleted] 1 points  (1 child) | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]modTheRedPike1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Do't hotlink any sub including our own. There is no way to white list our subs in automoderator.

[–]its_meKnightSwolaire8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is a test. The real ban they care about is The Donald

[–]Software_Programmer6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

In the coming years I see more and more communities moving away from "social media" to their own platforms/web sites to regain their freedoms of speech and communications.

So long and thanks for all the fish.

[–]Onein1024th5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

u/spez can choke on a dick. u/AaronSW forever

[–]∞ Mod | RP Vanguardbsutansalt4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

You might have noticed that Reddit keeps losing rank on Alexa. Not surprisingly, the nu-Reddit -- censorship, safe spaces, hipsters, SJWs -- is not doing as well as the old.

Of course. Any time a company rolls hard left it suffers serious financial hardship if not dies completely.

[–]RightHandWolf2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

All together now . . .

Get woke, go broke! Get woke, go broke! Get woke . . .

[–]HighOnLife4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Been here for probably 6 years or so. It's been a pleasure.

[–]freemale10110 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy

Cucked males everywhere...and here's our dear OP on his high horse lamenting the disaster thats almost upon us. Feeling our pain...yet when disaster strikes, our OP will trot off, back over the hill, albeit with a tear in his eye. Won't join us in the battle; however he has some timely and sage advice; without any skin in the game. What a noble man! "Garrison!!...bring my daughter forth to be fucked by this MAN!!"

[–]the_green_grundle1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

I think it’s great that people become aware of this. The sub is already quarantined. Chances are OP, like many others, will soon jump ship to an alternative.

[–]freemale1010 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

What are some 'alternatives'?...[PM if you like]

[–]the_green_grundle0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Saidit is the only one I know of right now that’s not full of actual neonazis. There are others but I avoid them.

[–]pras[🍰] 4 points5 points  (25 children) | Copy

>> extremist cynics like Fred Nietzsche and Tom Wolfe, who see humans as simply "talking monkeys with car keys."

Can you please share some articles on this? I am aware of their books but its far too deep in my To Read list.

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 11 points12 points  (24 children) | Copy

To me the key to understanding Nietzsche was "On Truth and Lies in a Non-Moral Sense". For Tom Wolfe, I would read "The Human Beast" first. Both of these are short and significant, after which it makes sense to move on to The Genealogy of Morals from Fred Nietzsche and of course Hooking Up from Tom Wolfe.

[–]nobody_thinks 1 points [recovered]  (22 children) | Copy

Fred Nietzsche

lol only a gay would write something like this.

You claim to be opposed / "beyond" TRP when in fact Nietzsche would have agreed with 60+% of red pill content. Nietzsche was a misogynist by modern standards and close friends with Wagner who was a master PUA (classical equivalent of a pop star).

But go ahead and keep hiding behind your pseudo-intellectual trans-humanist delusions.

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 1 point2 points  (18 children) | Copy

opposed / "beyond" TRP

No, neither.

close friends with Wagner who was a master PUA (classical equivalent of a pop star)

Wagner is the shit, but they later had a falling out (see Nietzsche Contra Wagner).

Wagner was closer to Schopenhauer or Aurelius; Nietzsche was very similar, and therefore they clashed over details.

[–]nobody_thinks 1 points [recovered]  (13 children) | Copy

No, neither.

then why don't you take an actual position instead of playing the middle like spineless eunuch?

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy

I think I have. What am I waffling on?

[–]nobody_thinks 1 points [recovered]  (11 children) | Copy

state your position on TRP then.

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 2 points3 points  (10 children) | Copy

I do not think I have one, other than to say that understanding the biological and sociological motivations behind human behavior, instead of (say) taking ideology at face value, is vital understanding. People present themselves as demigods, when in fact they are "talking monkeys with car keys."

[–]nobody_thinks 1 points [recovered]  (9 children) | Copy

People present themselves as demigods, when in fact they are "talking monkeys with car keys."

this is just projection. Pythogoras said you cannot know what intelligence is unless you have it. You should think about that.

I do not think I have one

lol just spineless cuckery.

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 4 points5 points  (8 children) | Copy

Pythogoras said you cannot know what intelligence is unless you have it

Dunning and Kruger restated that.

lol just spineless cuckery.

Some people come to the internet looking for power by degrading others. Must be an odd way of life.

[–]nobody_thinks 1 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy

oh wow I didn't fucking know that dipshit.

the point is he was around wagner long enough to understand how game works (wagner even stole the love of his life).

fuck off with your supercilious condescension.

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

And you with your willful misreading of a sympathetic source.

[–]frooschnate0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Someone come get your mans

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

I've always seen TRP as Nietzsche lite.

[–]nobody_thinks 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy

exactly. OP is a pseudo intellectual cuck throwing shade b/c he thinks he is superior.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yep....reminds me of PPD, too. I'm guessing that they'll remain.

[–]NYCMusicMarathon2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Reddit. It so badly wants to be cool like Facebook

Is this true? or just an opinion?

I thought FaceNook was less than Reddit.

i.e. Reddit > FaceNook

Learn something new every day. Oh Well.

[–]bobloblawblogyal4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

The CEO after aquisition is quoted as saying it wants to make it the next Facebook. This was "coincidentally" when all the censorship really started. Also look up the warrant canary. It may be deeper than most believe.

[–]HelloTims2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Reddit isn't doing things to be leftist or evil, it's doing what will make it money. It's a bit ironic supporting the anti-corporation party is profitable, but that's the way it goes.

[–]PURE_ARYAN_GENETICS3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Reddit isn't doing things to be leftist

lol. yeah it's just a coincidence that they're banning harmless subs with hundreds of thousands of subscribers(people to advertise to) just like this one and a hundred others right?

[–]lllkill[🍰] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I've moved away from here for a while not but I recognize my roots when it is needed. That being said it is so embarrassing that redditors are constantly mocking China for their lack of "freedom" on the internet. Yet here we are, a sub that has never threatened any physical harm or presented any racist ideology. Yet it is getting deleted. Are we any different than how they censor their internet? it is merely one step behind. It is also a gradual process like how China does it. First quarantine, then removal.

[–]bammrrm2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I've been meaning to ask this, but no thread up till now seemed appropriate.

Is there a plan to maintain continuity if/when this sub shuts down? (i.e. Archiving all old posts, complete with comments, links, etc? As well as the sidebar material (FAQ, Glossary, New Here?, Theory links, etc — everything in the sidebar)

I just found out about, but I haven't had a chance to check if it's a mirror of this subreddit or if it's just a new place to meet if/when this sub gets shut down.

[–]Brickles092 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Reddit is imploding itself, I love it!!! It's our sputnik moment, we will have to reivent ourselves and come back stronger on another platform!

We will be back, and for good.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Man, I'm so done with this fucking site

[–]mindplaybyneo2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

The thing is they will never be able to take down redpill. Even the extreme left are curious to our narratives. This is why we are quarantined. They don’t want people to know how many men actually follows this sub, or give everyone the idea that people follow us. The more people see this sub has followers the more it goes back to the traditional roles.

[–]Brodin695 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy

Is this guy a monarchist? I can get along with that #longlivethequeen.

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy

Monarchist and traditionalist here.

[–]MoDuReddit0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy


\the king of my country is barely a celebrity, let alone has any control of government, it's just preserving a 800 year old tradition.*)

[–]unfeeling21 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

hey i explain human behaviors by biology too and it was from personal experience(third world country) do you have any books for me ? caue any other place will be bias.

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe is one of the best analyzes of human motivations that I have read. I would also recommend Lucifer's Hammer by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle as a great study in civilization.

[–]unfeeling20 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

this is my first conversation on reddit and maybe the last cause im only here to see the redpill getting pussified but im glad its gone and as i see it the strong will survive natural selection im not* worried about "feminist taking over and soy boys" all it takes is dadicated male to control the world assuming its not already controlled by smart males that see your strugle as kids g ame (any way not the best english i dont practice at all. sue me)

on another note i was thinking about reading ride the tiger.

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

reading ride the tiger.

Do it, but I would start with Revolt Against the Modern World first.

[–]BadDad012341 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I definitely feel like Im a better person thanks to you guys. I didnt post her much but lurker and learned

[–]_Benny_Lava1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Where is the backup in case this sub is shut down?

[–]afterthe_fapocalypse1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

it's exactly what's happened with churches. you turn a place into a cult of niceness, and you're left with ... you're left with a bunch of fucking simp women

[–]ultra-royalist[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

you turn a place into a cult of niceness, and you're left with ...


San Francisco?


[–]afterthe_fapocalypse0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

haha don't get me started brotha

[–]NarrowBath71 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy should join our club. You and your friend.

[–]xytrooo1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

So why is TRP still mainly on reddit when it can branch to any platform that allows correspondence? is lame , nobody would regularly use it the way it is set up.
Why not shift 30% of activity (using various means) to one of the hundreds of different platforms? the bots can repost anything of value anyway.

[–]Dank_Memegod1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Stop blaming the left for shit. It’s just common sense that if you say shit that might piss off people, you’re gonna generally lose supporters/viewers, so it makes sense that these corporations operate like that. Their goal is to make money.

[–]PURE_ARYAN_GENETICS3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy


leftists. no right winger is triggered by trp

[–]simplecountry_lawyer3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy

I think when you say "leftist" you really mean "corporatist."

Progressive leftists don't care at all about the identity politics and feminist imperative schlock that the establishment Democrats are using to control narratives in the MSM or here on Reddit. We just want to see progressive economic policy implemented that would benefit everyone, not just the billionaires. The establishment hates progressive leftists just as much if not more than conservatives/libertarians for the sole fact that we are talking about combating inequality.

Identity politics is a tool of the establishment to keep us fighting amongst ourselves over meaningless bullshit while the elite continue to rape working people for their money and the planet for its resources. They want us fighting about who's a redpiller and who's an incel and who's a TwoX'er. They want us to fight about race, gender and pronouns and left vs right all day because if we're fighting then we're not working together. It's classic divide and conquer writ large and strange for the online era.

I understand the knee jerk reaction to associate conservatism with rebellion against the 'left controlled system' in today's day and age and to some extent I agree with such a reaction. I just wish so called "leftist ideology" didnt all get painted with the same brush. In case you weren't aware, the political left is currently waging a civil war within its own ranks. Corporate establishment vs progressive political revolutionaries. And again, to reiterate, we on the progressive side of things loathe identity politics and censorship just as much as any conservative or libertarian.

So yeah... Let's try to see things through a different lense than just a simple "left vs right" paradigm. We're all on the same side at the end of the day. We hate the establishment.

[–]Ecpiandy2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

You speak with truth but I fear the responses you get will fall under the sphere of "shut up you leftist we work for the individual" or something like that.

[–]simplecountry_lawyer0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Those are the types of responses I'd expect. After all, the right wing has its own establishment, and they're ultra focused on making sure the republican party is seen as the party of independent, dissident thought and rebellion against the system. That's the banner Trump is waving and his base has efficiently united under it.

As satisfying as it was to see Trump sock the donor class in the jaw in 2016, we don't have much progressive policy to show for it. His victory wasn't outright despised by progressive leftists for the simple fact that it revealed a significant chink in the establishment's armor, an actual weakness in their otherwise complete hegemonic domination of the political realm for the first time in decades. Trump was the first to expose it and for that reason alone he commands a modicum of respect even among those of us who are supposed to be opposed to him.

The progressive left doesn't want to wag their finger at Trump for his manners or his dialogue. We care only for policy.

[–]Bridgeboy777-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Progressivism is defined by the belief that equality is the cardinal virtue. You can't be a progressive and be red pilled. They're mutually exclusive.

[–]Zone_Box1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I find this sub to be pretty nonpartisan. Improving yourself, gaining confidence and being viewed as higher value by the opposite sex doesn't need a party.

Thanks, OP, but we're good. Run along now.

[–]MoDuReddit0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I dig the general concept, which is that "people are biology" and the best guide to how to interact with other humans comes from The Discovery Channel.

How can you that with no pause for consideration, when we get stuff like this daily.

Thank you The Red Pill - for saving my life and putting me back better than ever.

[–][deleted] 1 points  (2 children) | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]modTheRedPike0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Dont' hotlink any sub including our own. There is no way to white list our subs in automoderator.

[–]lestratege0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

So are we going back to Digg?

[–]chakamaki0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

You are absolutely correct.. I got banned from many communities by just posting more then “allowed” times of the day.. like I may be posted 4-5 in day where they may have rules for 1-2... however I never see this rule even though they told me reason for being banned is because I “flooded” the sub... what childish.. as you guessed correctly.. I already left those subs... and I am planning to leave this SM too...

[–]incelchad0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

What does redpill have to do with google or the left?

Alex jones motherfuckee

[–]cji250 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Wow. Reddit is censoring us.

Poor us that are ruled by this evil, fascist mods.

Where will I express my unique, counter-cultural ideas now?

[–]IRunYourRiver-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

I say this as someone with no real connection to The Red Pill.

You didn't need to say that. We could tell. Your infatuation with mommy Matrix rather than developing your own frame is a dead giveaway.

[–]MoDuReddit2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah, you can tell from the writing that he still denies the realities that TRP presents (with peer review articles to support it).

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter