Guy exposes a cabal of reddit SJWs and their ties to the admins of reddit and creates a watchdog sub. Then the shit hits the fan.

Classical feminine qualities, especially submissiveness, are what I'm referring to when I claim "women are easily manipulatable". Most women still fall within a classical feminine conditioning. Feminism has tried to "help" women act more like men and deal with man's chauvinist tendencies. Feminism has also help men "get in touch with their emotions", meaning feminism feminizes men to act and think more like women, which is more emotional based than logic based.

I'm not sure what part relies on circle reasoning, or what part is over simplifying today's social heiracrhy. Due to feminism, men are becoming more emotionally expressive, and women more logical and "man-like". One of my points is that socialization is only half the nature vs. nurture debate. Regardless of societal programming, men born as men will tend to act like men and women born as women will tend to act like women. Is that circular? No it's baseline gender attributes inherent in our genetics. What makes a man a man makes him a man, what makes a women a women makes her a women. I'm not making intense jumps in logic, this is how biology works. Sure, our socialization impacts our choices and sociological tendencies sway our actions, but these attributes are arbitrary and external and vary from culture to culture. Homo sapiens drive to have sex and reproduce bridges all cultural differences.

The complexity comes once you throw in gender and sexual preferences. Men born as men who think like men. Men born as women who think like men. Men born as women who think like women. Women born as men who think like men. Women born as women who think like men. Women born as women who think like women. You can throw on more things like sexual preference and the conversation gets more complicated.

My point is men born as men who think like men who are heterosexual - the vast majority of society - are being socially conditioned to think like women, meaning, to think collectively and emotionally rather than selfish and logically. Logically speaking, it doesn't make sense to share resources with someone unless they offer a mutual benefit. A bunch of plugged-in men give so much of their energy to others simply because they are taught to be nice guys and be selfless, regardless of the circumstances. Silly on the guy's part, but that's what happens when you're a nice guy, you don't think about your own self-interests, you constantly worry about the collective's nterest and essentially sacrifice your life for the benefit of others. To me, this only makes sense for your immediate family, but now society thinks my family includes them and big daddy govern!sent wants to assume the caretaker role of the fatherly patriarch.

The majority of women think collectively, they naturally gravitate toward feminist doctrine, Marxist teachings. All individuals in society are equal and resources should be split equally among these individuals. This only works if everyone thinks they're equal to their peers, and work as hard as their peers, which is obviously not how human civilization works. It could also work if each person saw the other as a family member - again - not how we think. Because of this, we have a class differential and a steep gradient between the wealthy and poor. "Hard" work does not equate to tons of money. Some of the hardest workers make no money. There's inequality and feminism, in part, wishes to remove that inequality by removing competition and making all work as close to equal as possible. If the super rich wanted to, they would donate their money to impoverished individuals world wide and everyone would have equal chance in life... And the economy collapses. All men and women are created equal, and should be allowed equal opportunity, but this opportunity is different from redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor. Equal opportunity does not mean everyone gets the same shit, it means everyone gets a chance at the same shit if they desire to obtain it.

All this propaganda regarding women being better than men, women working harder than men, women being smarter on average than men, women being the pinnacle of human existence, all this pandering to women makes perfect sense from a feminist perspective. In order for women to succeed in a male workforce, they must first act like men, rise the ranks, then change the structure how they deem fit. It'll take awhile, and it might be for the better, but it can also be for the worse. We'll probably end up with more Marxist equality, but as I already explained this system wouldn't truly work.

Now, men have little to no male role models in our society because almost all male role models have been deemed too toxic by modern standards. Very few young male adults have their shit together and it's clear based on all the statistics that men have "fallen behind" and women are happy to supersede them. In an ideal world, I want men to think like men without feeling bad, anxious or villianized for having an agenda opposite of women, but here we are discussing why men are more feminized today than before 2nd wave feminism, and why, in part "rewiring" how men think and how women think will cause a bunch of issues with personal identity and the well-being of each sex.

Anyway, I think what I think because I think this way :). You're free to think otherwise as long as things make sense from your perspective.