Hypergamy and how it manifests in sexually liberal western societies has meant that more men are less likely to be considered desirable as women and less men are having sex and getting married than compared to their predecessors. This may not be fair but it is not entitlement when women are just operating under the natural inequities of the sexual market place, and reaping the reward and some of the drawbacks. Men shouldn’t feel entitled to women’s bodies, and women shouldn’t feel entitled to a mans security and commitment. We are entering an age where male entitlement to women’s bodies is universally frowned upon, and women are becoming more empowered to practice their discriminatory sexual choices at the behest of low status and unattractive men.

[Unfortunately, many productive members of society, primarily male tax payers are increasingly expected to pay more in taxes and contribute more to the welfare state](www.researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/xmlui/handle/10063/2852) in order to subsidise the inevitable consequences of this unequal sexual and relationship market. Namely, the meteoritic growth of single mothers. They are also receiving less government support when compared to women. So Women who choose to partake in risky relationship models with higher status or attractive unreliable men who then ditch them, are now the leading recipient for welfare aid in many post trad monogamous western welfare states like those in Europe. These countries also have skyrocketing rates of male loneliness and childlessness.

The old model of traditional monogamy may have restrained women’s natural sexual advantage over men, but it also ensured that men had a stake in raising their families over the longterm and women had reliable partners. Now that nearly all these oppressive restrictions are gone, women are able to unleash their full sexual power to fulfil their sexual imperative but it has also meant that men are no longer required to commit. And the state, or primarily male Tax payers now have to foot the bill when things go awry. Those same beta males who need the additional money and the status to attract women, are seeing their income reduced in these post monogamous high tax welfare states. The value of their commitment and security is reduced by the expanding role of the gynocentric welfare state that is slowly usurping men as the primary provider in these unstable family models, borne out of many women’s preferences for unreliable but high status/attractive partners.

. If sexually empowered women really wanted to operate under a true brutal sexual free market, they have every right too. But I think we will need to destroy the gynocentric welfare state and not expand it, which is what we are seeing today with the rise of gynocentric welfare policies, if we want to see what happens in a true sexual free market where the consequences of women’s sexual choices aren’t outsourced to disproportionately male Tax payers.

Edit: Thanks for the gold, kind stranger.