Discussion about (why we generally don't recommend dating) red pilled men?

Many come to accept it eventually, but deep down hold women in contempt for their nature.

This is only true during the transition from the anger phase into the acceptance phase. A man who has reached full acceptance will no longer have any anger or redpill rage. However, this same man will also be much less likely to want a relationship and will be more likely to be MGTOW.

My own husband is familiar with concepts like hypergamy and all that jazz, and happily married me (without a pre-nup!). He sees me. And he loves me. All the red pill stuff just makes him smile. Femininity isn't distasteful to him. He delights in it. He's very much heterosexual :-)

I don't know the dynamics in your marriage, but I'll assume you live up to the ideals of RPW philosophy. If this assumption of mine is correct, your husband will have no need for TRP!!!

You see, no man actually wants TRP to be true. Men really do want to believe that their wives will contribute equally to the enterprise called the family, that their wives will respect them and sexually desire them forever, amen. No one wants to believe that unlike themselves, the sexual desire of their wives will wax and wane, that she will have drastic mood swings, that respect for him will have to continuously be earned and that he will have to make the bulk of the contributions to the relationship. It's a bitter pill to swallow and no one wants to swallow it willingly.

Therefore, a wise RPW will create a scenario where her husband is so comfortable in his position as husband, that he'd laugh at TRP if he ever heard of it because he has no actual need to swallow these bitter pills. He's perfectly fine living in BP lala land.

Ms Sadie Dunham wrote a beautiful piece on this before she deleted her account back in the day. What may be of interest - the default male setting is beta and alpha, beta and the ideal RPW marriage.