I am not going to comment on whether their theories are true or not. That's not the point.

My point is that tone does matter. Many RPillers will act like it doesn't, but I disagree.

TRPillers basically go out of their way to describe women in the worst way possible. TRPillers will deny that they describe female sexual strategy in negative and biased terms, but I disagree. If you look at their tone, it does absolutely look like they shame women for their so-called sexual strategy. Female behavior is described in the worst possible terms, while male behavior is praised, even negative male behavior is often excused.

Compare this to authors like Tucker Max and Geoffrey Miller, who promote similar theories, but unlike TRP, they don't go out of their way to describe female behavior in the worst possible way and they don't shame women for their preferences.

I get it that society often promotes stereotypes that women are all innocent angels who can do no harm. But this is not an excuse to promote misogyny. I am not someone who uses the word misogyny liberally, but in this case, I think it's appropriate. TRPillers will often go out of their way to excuse negative male behavior, while negative female behavior is demonized. Even if TRP has some things right, it all gets lost because of all the negativity and misogyny.