There's no such thing as a "low" n-count, anyway. Either she's a virgin or she's not. Granted, fewer is better, but if she's not, the degree to which she's not is trivial by comparison.
Yes, to a degree - three is better tha 200 - but I wish all these cucks would stop downvoting the truth: the difference between zero and any one is as big or bigger than the difference between any two other numbers. When we're talking about n-count, three is closer to 200 than it is to zero. We have several decades of good data, the results are in and numbers don't lie: the point of no return is one, even that's not a guarantee.
Reading fail, buddy. The difference between zero and one (virgin versus non-virgin) is the most significant one... bigger by far than the difference between one and five, five and ten, ten and fifty,... get it?
And you're speculating about the importance of circumstances: as far as I know there's no research that breaks down the data in that way. If you have such data I'd love to see it, though. The closest things I'm aware of is that when you parse the Teachman and Heritage data there's a slight uptick in diverce risk when a woman has had exactly two partners, which may suggest that a woman with a single - presumably serious - prior sexual relationship is slghtly more prone to blow up her marriage than a woman who was a little more promiscuous. That's a pretty thin reed to hang your thesis on, though.
Thanks... I know. It's funny through: the post where I made the statement currently stands at -7, while the post I made to explain the statement is currently at +10. I think a lot of people just follow the herd, so when a post is trending down they just pile on by hitting the down button. Anyone who purposely down voted the content is just naive.
Absolutely. I remained celibate until my wedding day, and have not cheated on my wife. My n=1.
But don't put words in my mouth, either. I said nothing about fornication making somebody a "worse person" (your words, not mine). A person's n-count does impact a person's MMV, though... although for various reasons the practical effect is usually more pronounced for women.
So if you don't think someone's worth is tied to their sexual partners why is a lower number better? Why would it ever matter how many partners someone has had? I have no idea what MMV could possibly be.
That's why internet etiquette requires that you lurk for a while and read the sidebar before you come in with guns blazing. Figure out MMV - and how it goes down with increasing partner count - and then you can join the discussion.
Nah this place is a cesspool of sexism and misogynist dudes who think women's worth is tied to how many people they've slept with. I only got here because a post was cross posted somewhere else. Also thank you for ignoring all of my questions.
No you didn't? Are you capable of reading? I asked you why it matters how many partners someone has, and you pointed me to a sidebar which is filled with useless garbage that does not answer my question. And how am i brainwashed lmao. This subreddit is YOUR safe space, because you can't bring these ridiculous opinions out in the real world because everyone would ridicule you and point out how insane they are.
Where does misandry come from? I'm a dude who just thinks everyone should be treated equal, and you're saying it's misandry because I don't think men are automatically superior lol. Everyone in this sub needs to wake up, just because you can all pat yourselves on the back and tell yourselves you're right doesn't make it so. You need outside perspective, it's ironic you saying I live in a bubble yet here you are in this subreddit.
Actually nevermind, I see that you're extremely religious and that tells me everything I need to know, glad I left the church years ago.
[+]EvilKlownz2Gettin nasty with wall busters 87 points88 points89 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RealMcGonzoJr. Hamster Analyst 78 points79 points80 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 30 points31 points32 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]irishmastermind 15 points16 points17 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]YourEnviousEnemy 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]datreddittho346 36 points37 points38 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mr_kukRespaldado El Matador de Putas 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]lurkerhasarisen1 points [recovered] (26 children) | Copy Link
There's no such thing as a "low" n-count, anyway. Either she's a virgin or she's not. Granted, fewer is better, but if she's not, the degree to which she's not is trivial by comparison.
[–]grundysolomon 44 points45 points46 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[+]lurkerhasarisen1 points [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link
Yes, to a degree - three is better tha 200 - but I wish all these cucks would stop downvoting the truth: the difference between zero and any one is as big or bigger than the difference between any two other numbers. When we're talking about n-count, three is closer to 200 than it is to zero. We have several decades of good data, the results are in and numbers don't lie: the point of no return is one, even that's not a guarantee.
[–]grundysolomon 20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]er1nqu1n91 11 points12 points13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SeekingLevelFive 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]ex-turpi-causa -10 points-9 points-8 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]EvilCoyote 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]crazeefun 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ex-turpi-causa -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]lurkerhasarisen1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Reading fail, buddy. The difference between zero and one (virgin versus non-virgin) is the most significant one... bigger by far than the difference between one and five, five and ten, ten and fifty,... get it?
And you're speculating about the importance of circumstances: as far as I know there's no research that breaks down the data in that way. If you have such data I'd love to see it, though. The closest things I'm aware of is that when you parse the Teachman and Heritage data there's a slight uptick in diverce risk when a woman has had exactly two partners, which may suggest that a woman with a single - presumably serious - prior sexual relationship is slghtly more prone to blow up her marriage than a woman who was a little more promiscuous. That's a pretty thin reed to hang your thesis on, though.
[–]ex-turpi-causa -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]lurkerhasarisen1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Thanks... I know. It's funny through: the post where I made the statement currently stands at -7, while the post I made to explain the statement is currently at +10. I think a lot of people just follow the herd, so when a post is trending down they just pile on by hitting the down button. Anyone who purposely down voted the content is just naive.
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TomatoPoodle 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SeekingLevelFive 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]0signal0Metal AF 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]flamethrower781 points [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link
So you judge yourself just as harshly by how many women you've slept with right? The more you've slept with the worse person you are?
[+]lurkerhasarisen1 points [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
Absolutely. I remained celibate until my wedding day, and have not cheated on my wife. My n=1.
But don't put words in my mouth, either. I said nothing about fornication making somebody a "worse person" (your words, not mine). A person's n-count does impact a person's MMV, though... although for various reasons the practical effect is usually more pronounced for women.
[+]flamethrower780 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
So if you don't think someone's worth is tied to their sexual partners why is a lower number better? Why would it ever matter how many partners someone has had? I have no idea what MMV could possibly be.
[+]lurkerhasarisen1 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
That's why internet etiquette requires that you lurk for a while and read the sidebar before you come in with guns blazing. Figure out MMV - and how it goes down with increasing partner count - and then you can join the discussion.
Edit: there is ample research.
[+]flamethrower780 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Nah this place is a cesspool of sexism and misogynist dudes who think women's worth is tied to how many people they've slept with. I only got here because a post was cross posted somewhere else. Also thank you for ignoring all of my questions.
[+]lurkerhasarisen1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
LOL. I answered your questions. You just didn't like the answers and you're too brainwashed to look for truth outside your little bubble of misandry.
We're all about the truth here. Feel free to go back to your safe space and pretty lies. You won't be missed.
[+]flamethrower780 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
No you didn't? Are you capable of reading? I asked you why it matters how many partners someone has, and you pointed me to a sidebar which is filled with useless garbage that does not answer my question. And how am i brainwashed lmao. This subreddit is YOUR safe space, because you can't bring these ridiculous opinions out in the real world because everyone would ridicule you and point out how insane they are.
Where does misandry come from? I'm a dude who just thinks everyone should be treated equal, and you're saying it's misandry because I don't think men are automatically superior lol. Everyone in this sub needs to wake up, just because you can all pat yourselves on the back and tell yourselves you're right doesn't make it so. You need outside perspective, it's ironic you saying I live in a bubble yet here you are in this subreddit.
Actually nevermind, I see that you're extremely religious and that tells me everything I need to know, glad I left the church years ago.
[–]ifuc---pipeline 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SuperGoxxerRecidivist Fuk Boi 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Chairman_Ellen_PaoPuts extra mayo on his roast beef tacos 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RomanianAcre 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nero9214 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TomatoPoodle 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Nero9214 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]z31fanatic 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rvail136 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]crosscourtj 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link