#1 on the front page: The elephant in the room has been mentioned.

The top post on Reddit's front page right now is a picture of an 'anti-rape' poster. It explicitly paints a double standard for what counts as rape when it's done by men and women, and also when alcohol is involved.

I don't need to point out how fucked up the poster is, I'm here to draw attention to the tone of the comments. Men are waking up. Most will probably nod off again, back into their slumbers of toil and cuckoldry, but perhaps a few will manage to get the pill down their throats, before the delirium sets in again, and find us.

#1 Upvoted - 4221, gilded - 1

Men can be raped to, Jake couldn't consent, Josie should be charged with rape as well.

Makes sense in the real world, but not according to law;

#2 Upvoted - 224

I think a lot of people are missing that rape laws often explicitly require penetration. (I do not condone this, I am simply reporting the laws.) For example: FBI Definition: Previously, offense data for forcible rape was collected under the legacy UCR definition: the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will. Beginning with the 2013 data year, the term “forcible” was removed from the offense title, and the definition was changed. The revised UCR definition of rape is: Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. UK Definition: A person commits rape if they intentionally penetrate the vagina, anus or mouth of another person with their penis without consent. Canada removed "rape" from the legal code, and changed the laws to have degrees of sexual assault that account for a gender-blind definition for sexual activity without consent. One might argue that this is very progressive, but opponents of the change (anti-rape activists, primarily) argued it was regressive. So, in the legal definitions in the US, the only way the female could possibly be guilty of rape is if she used an object to penetrate the male via the anus or the mouth. In the UK, she cannot rape him no matter what she does.

Someone sheds more light into the nature of our times;

#3 Upvoted - 540

No silly, men can't get raped! Its a hilarious concept. Its literally impossible for a woman to abuse men Also all men are constantly eye raping every woman

All are links going to anti-feminist media. The comments below it are almost unanimous in their contempt and disdain for the regime of the feminine imperative.

#4 Upvoted - 2586

So according to this ad men can still think clearly enough to be charged with a crime when drunk but women are plainly too stupid to know better

It's almost like the modern feminist agenda is disingenuous, isn't it? Another few thousand upvotes for comments continuing in this absurd vein directly below.

#5 Upvoted - 1316

So that's how it's gonna be, eh, ladies? Fine. We'll just start fucking each other. Supreme Court says it's legal. Let's get weird fellas.

1300+ votes for MGTOW, fairly high up on the most popular current post on the front page of the Internet. MGTOW is no longer the strange periphery inhabited by the occasional loner neckbeard.

#6 Upvoted - 218

Don't equate this with feminism. This isn't feminism; just ignorance.

It was only a matter of time before the White Knights arrived. However, it is interesting to observe how widespread the failings of modern feminism are - a collective with their intentions ought best to hide them, but they get more transparent by the day. We're lucky they're so fucking insane that they can't understand other people well enough to fool them this much.

The decline is happening, and men are waking up. The exodus continues. Feminism hamsters onward.