Many men in the manosphere rationalize their dislike for sluts by arguing that high n-count women have too much experience to be able appreciate an average guy. They believe that a woman who's got a taste of Chad will be constantly comparing her boyfriends to him; conversely, a woman who hasn't been with many men will cherish the few ones she's with. This implies that women can't be aware of their attraction or lack thereof unless they've carnally experienced an attractive male. This can't be further from the truth. A man's sexual ability is just a small aspect of his overall attractiveness. A woman doesn't need to be experienced to understand who's attractive enough for sex/relationships and who isn't.

Furthermore, a woman doesn't need to be past her prime to settle for the first guy that proposes. A woman who thinks she's not attractive enough, or one that comes from a traditional background and lives by the "marry while you can" motto, is just as likely as the so-called post-wall slut to marry a guy she's not attracted to out of desperation.

I understand that high n-count women also have higher divorce rates, but this hardly is all the proof that we need to conclude that sluts are more likely to settle. Lack of divorce can easily mean a perceived lack of options. She might as well stay in a relationship with someone she's not crazy about because she's afraid to be alone or to lose her status as a married woman, but thinks she can't do any better. Someone in her situation is also less likely to admit to be unsatisfied with their marriage.

Finally, mismatched sexual experience between partners can also be a source of marital dissatisfaction, so promoting male promiscuity while expecting female selectiveness is counterproductive.