This is under the assumption that sex is indeed a need and not some glorified desire that (certain) men use to excuse childish behavior.

Since the beginning of time, humans would live near places that facilitates their needs getting fulfilled such as living near arable land. So I think it would make sense for men to live near places where they’d get the best access to sex. Americans are lucky, because there’s a state in their country that allows legal prostitution.

Prostitution should be the best solution for guys who hate relationships. You dont have to waste time courting hookers, having to deal with their “unrealistically high standards”, and not get mad that you paid for an expensive date and your balls are still blue.

If a guy can get casual sex, that’s cool, but with concepts like 80/20 and AF/BB, it depicts that only the hottest of men are able to get free No-Strings-Attached sex. Even obese ugly women are only screw 5a and above, apparently.

Hooker gets money, you get the sex you need, what’s the problem?