Introduction
My best history teacher when I was a wee lad once told me a maxim by which you can understand the world: he said “/u/down_with_whomever, follow the money.” If you want to understand why something is happening, follow the money. From where is it flowing, and into whose hands.
I’ve been a social studies teacher now for quite some time. And after a lifetime of studying history, economics, politics, and culture on a daily basis, I have entirely lost my faith in coincidences. Many things appear as coincidences on first glance that reveal themselves not to be coincidences once you add more data points. Especially not when you follow the money.
Remember when we were told that the purpose of the Iraq War was to stop terrorists, and then it was to build democracy (whoops we switched narratives). But anybody who followed how money was changing hands in the war had to wonder whether it was about democracy. If you followed the money, it stopped looking like a coincidence.
Remember when we were told that the 2007 world financial crisis was caused by banks being “too big to fail?” This was the narrative. Banks too big to fail! We didn’t talk about the collusion between the federal reserve, the ratings agencies, and the banking executives that remained un-fixed with no correction to the laws after. When you follow how money changed hands in this crisis, it stops looking like a coincidence.
Remember when the government, with no regulation on prices, started colluding with banks to offer endless amounts of credit to college students, and then the price of tuition started exploding year after year? After this (very predictable) process harnessed an entire generation into hopeless financial indentured servitude, THEN we got to ask. “Oh Gosh! Maybe we should fix this!” But, we didn’t. And now that billions and billions of dollars of debt that you cannot legally discharge with bankruptcy are already contracted, it stops looking like a coincidence.
Narratives and Conspiracies
We live in the information age. The people with the access to the power to control the flow of information are the most powerful people. A way of thinking or talking about something can be called a “narrative.” The people who control the flow of information can be said to construct a narrative. The narrative is how those who control the information want you to think about the world.
Everyone on each side of the political spectrum has figured out that the major news media organizations are not unbiased. But they are not randomly unbiased. They put certain thoughts in your head and by repetition this guides your thoughts. They can kill an idea from mainstream thought by simply denying it airtime. And they can inject a thought into the mainstream simply by repeating it enough times in enough places.
The problem with this line of thinking, however, is that it can easily lend itself to conspiracy theories. People who are too skeptical. However, conspiracy theories are themselves a narrative, constructed by someone for a particular aim. I’ve been working for a few years in a former USSR country and watching the Russian conversation about the world. The Russian propaganda machine is brilliant. It uses people’s suspicions and skepticism of the establishment and the establishment’s narrative, to create a NEW narrative for the sake of a different establishment. Every problem you can name in the world, a huge portion of Russian people can be very easily convinced that this is an American/CIA plot. This narrative herds the people into pro-Putin nationalism. A lot of “conspiracy theories” are like this. They are another narrative intended to push your thoughts towards someone ELSES goals.
But what I’m talking about is not about being conspiratorial, it’s about being critical.
“Who profits from this?”
But that doesn’t mean that we should not question the narrative. The narrative that has been brought to the attention of many, many people in the world recently is the immigration crisis in Europe. It is not a conspiracy theory to ask, “Who profits from this?”
Most false narratives pushed by the establishment should invoke this question. Who profits from this?
The narrative, in this case, is as follows: The people coming to Europe are refugees in need of help. It is morally wrong to deny them because they are in need. People who question this are racists, who must be shamed, censored, or arrested. The dangers of the people coming are irrelevant because they are no more dangerous than the average European citizen. Any dangerous sounding things in Islam should be ignored because there is also some dangerous sounding stuff in the old testament of the Bible. The host countries are enriched by the addition of foreign peoples because this makes them more diverse, and diversity is a good thing as a rule.
Now, if you’re here reading TRP, you probably understand that these narrative is a gigantic lie. But you also must have heard it repeated hundreds and hundreds of times in the last year. On your facebook feed, on TV, in newspapers, from people talking about it. Isn’t it crazy that something so obviously false you’ve heard repeated infinite times? It might sound like a conspiracy theory to suggest that there is a massive amount of collusion taking place between certain governments, media organizations, facebook, police organizations, in the way they handle this. But if you watch, you can see it happening. The question that someone with a critical mind should be asking – who profits from this?
The Immigration Crisis Payout
It appears to me that the establishment benefits from division among the people. In the US, the news media are largely split between left-wing madness and right-wing madness. And the level of divisiveness between people has been increasing for years, with the help of the media. And there’s a lot of benefit to keeping people this divided. They will battle each other instead of uniting for a common goal.
A lot of Americans actually agree about what’s right for the country. We don’t actually hate each other and our ideas as much as we think we do. But they don’t know they agree because they’ve internalized the anger of this left/right conflict. And this conflict is really profitable. The ways in which our country is broken is very profitable to some people. A lot of money changes hands in the drug war and prison-industrial complex while the left and the right argue about legalizing marijuana slowly, state by state. A lot of money changes hands in the endless war machine while we argue about transgender bathrooms. Millions of people die from obesity and heart disease because we provide billions in subsidies to corn syrup and allow a few megacorporations to control almost our entire food supply, while we debate endlessly about regulating 'assault weapons' which are used used in only a negligible percent of crimes. A lot of money changes hands with the most expensive healthcare system in the world, while the left and right argue whether or not healthcare is “socialism”. I don’t know how to fix the healthcare system – but I do know that as long as it remains as it is, a lot of money is flowing into certain hands. And they have a huge vested interest in seeing it not fixed.
Remember when the Tea Party movement looked like grass roots but it turned out to have been planted by the Koch brothers, who wanted to resist healthcare reform?
This is actually my theory as to why the powers that be in Europe want the immigration crisis to happen. The public conversation is always driven towards race, Islam, etc. But I don’t think it’s about this. Countries like Germany and Sweden have very large, very comprehensive welfare states. Public healthcare, public education, strong benefits. It is hard to take ownership of, and profit, from something which is a public good. What Europe is doing is intentionally creating a permanent underclass. They will always be disproportionately reliant on welfare, they will not contribute to society, they will create social tensions. This is going to create a resurgence of the far right. But I think this was the point. I think they are going to attempt to bankrupt the welfare system so that down the road (how many billions of Euros is Germany spending on this shit?), they can start privatizing. And they will use this division between the left and right to do it.
And as we know from what happened to the former Soviet state industries in Russia in the 90’s, privatization of large state apparatuses can bring gigantic profits for the right oligarchs.
In the US, the image of the “welfare queen” (we all know who she is and what she looks like) is rolled out every single time that we discuss increasing the welfare state. This is such a powerful image because we have such an innate disgust at the idea that the state is forcing us to pay for lazy and useless people. Eventually this feeling is going to kick in Europe, and it is the perfect pretense for an ever-shrinking number of Svens to wonder how they can keep paying for an ever-growing number of Akhmeds. And once they wonder this, they will suddenly find out that the system bankrupted itself. Time to roll out the privatization. Cha-ching. Imagine how much money you could make if you privatized a completely public healthcare system? And then started charging tuition for a formerly free higher education system? And then cut welfare, while keeping taxes as high as they were before?
But I don’t think that privatization is the only target.
It seems to me that the powers that be in Europe are in the process of intentionally ghetto-izing their population centers in the way that American cities have been for years. But this one will be even more extreme. Urban blacks in the US are plagued with social problems, but even I would take the crypts and bloods over ISIS. I’ve actually lived in the ghetto before. Even the angriest thugs from the hood don’t want to see our society destroyed.
I cannot think of a better pre-text for expanding the police state than intentionally importing entire communities of ISIS sympathizers and then attempting to force their distribution equally among the entire continent. Which is exactly what’s happening. I expect that the security problem this creates is going to create some of those “reforms” that the US saw post-911. Remember just how much the establishment in the US needed 9/11 to implement all kinds of changes? The boogey-man of "Islamic terror" became absolutely essential to the growth of the police state and the "patriot act"-ification of our laws. They had created this boogeyman and then it was too late, this was the brave new world in which we lived. The refugee crisis is the powers in Europe creating their own 9/11, their own little tool to manufacture a bigger police state and seize greater powers.
In this regard, the disruption of communities of Europe, the creation of this security problem, and the deepened divide between the left and the right are all profitable to someone.
Conversations about race, privilege, refugees, moral responsibility, these are all just a smokescreen to distract people with useless and idle conversation. Do you think that NATO is really incapable of securing a few kilometers of sea and land? Imagine if instead of Arabs, it was young Russian men loyal to Putin flooding into Germany, raping children and bombing airports. Instead of 5% of them being ISIS, we found that 5% were KGB. You would find the border closed with such speed and force that your head would spin. It isn’t a coincidence. It’s not that they can’t or don’t know how to secure the border, that is absurd. They don’t want to secure the border.
As we watch the fruits of this crisis, I predict that you are going to see two changes: changes to the welfare state that bring huge profits to the groups that benefit from privatization, and a massive increase to the police state and gradual chipping away at freedom of speech.
Virtue Signaling
The thing to understand about the people who support the narrative I described is that their intention is not really to help the needy. How could it be? It’s been proven a hundred different ways that most of the people coming in this crisis aren’t the ones in need, and that money spent on them would benefit far more people if it were spent in other ways. If your goal was to be a moral utilitarian and help as many people as possible, building camps in Germany to house unemployed twenty-somethings from Africa is not effective at helping those dying in Syria, how could it be? No one is dumb enough to think it is.
But the “REFUGEES WELCOME” types have a different motivation, known as “virtue signaling.” Social Justice is the new religion, and diversity and multiculturalism are now Jesus and Mother Mary. Refugees welcome posters are the new rosary beads. They are showing what upstanding citizens they are by displaying their loyalty to their new Jesus. It actually has nothing to do with a desire to help the refugees because if this was the desire, they would want to take measures to make sure that resources are used effectively and on people who are in real need. They don’t want that.
But this “narrative” that the establishment has constructed, to which the left has sworn its allegiance, is extremely useful to the establishment. Because it’s got people arguing about islamophobia, white privilege, and other fake bullshit instead of talking about the real question – which is why the fuck do the governments of Europe want to fill the continent with hostile Islamic ghettos?
Social Justice Warriors in the US
The “virtue signaling” process works the same way in the US and this is the reason you will find so many white people in the US who seem eager to believe in things that don’t make sense and are completely inconsistent.
A very good example is Black Lives Matter and the white people who support it. The “narrative” includes the idea that black people are victims oppressed by racist white police and killed with immunity. The facts, however, are that even though blacks are responsible for most violent crime, they are killed by police at a LOWER rate than whites.
So, how can you accept this narrative knowing that it doesn’t fit the facts?
Because accepting this narrative is virtue signaling. They believe they will be rewarded with higher social status by showing their allegiance to the Jesus and Mother Mary of the Social Justice religion. This is the purpose. And this is why it is not possible to argue with them. Because they are not attempting to evaluate facts – they are, functionally, proclaiming how much they love God just so that the rest of the congregation can hear them.
Remember the “you’re a fucking white male” guy, from the Trump protest? The most telling part of this video was this:
AIDS Skrillex: Let’s talk about all the black people killed by police [he is surrounded by black people]
Trump supporter: Okay, let’s talk about all the WHITE people who are killed by police!
AIDS Skrillex: FUCK YOU
Most conversations with SJW’s will follow this format to some extent because they aren’t debating, they are displaying the strength of their faith in their religion. You can’t argue with that. And that's why they are comfortable breaking the rules, violating free speech, silencing people, shaming them, and using violence. Because it's not a conversation for them. You can't question God, and when you think you have God on your side you can make up your own rules.
If you’ve paid attention, you’ve noticed that any attempt to regulate illegal immigration is viewed as racism. Now, any reasonable person can see this is insane – it is racist to enforce your own laws? How can that be? How does that make any sense? How can “didn’t obey the law” be a race? How can any person really think that it is?
Bu the word “racist” is to the Social Justice religion as the word “heretical” was to Christianity in the old days. It doesn’t have anything to do with race. It simply means that you are not allowed to talk about this. Which means that illegal immigration is something the establishment has found profitable. So they have used their information machinery to add to the SJW narrative that "criticizing illegal immigration is racism" and those who accept this narrative do so because they believe it signals virtue to do so. They believe they will be rewarded with social status and viewed as being "good."
They don't actually care about immigrants. If you did, you would WANT to enforce the law so that those most deserving could come. Have a conversation with a person who tried to immigrate to the US legally. It's a horrible, hellish, expensive procedure. People who are against regulating illegal immigration are, by the converse of this, in favor of fucking over all the honest, hard-working immigrants who try to favor the law. Would you want to fuck over the honest and law-abiding immigrants and reward the law-breaking ones, if your main desire was to help immigrants? Of course not. Because, as in all cases with the SJW religion, their goal isn't to help people it's to "signal virtue."
One very useful thing to note about the logic of the SJW religion is that it is now illegal to "generalize." If you've ever attempted to have a conversation about a group of people and their behavior (and this group isn't white men), you will be met with the comment "You can't generalize." Or, "Not all __ are ___ !" This really is a very clever strategy. It gives useful idiots the chance to feel morally superior and intelligent when what they're really saying is that "it's forbidden to observe the behavior of this group." These people are the self-appointed "morality police" of the Social Justice religion, telling you who you are, and are not allowed to observe. Pay attention to this - notice which groups of people you are not allowed to observe.
The Red and Blue Pills
The Blue Pill has created a tremendous amount of social disruption in the US. I have been trying very hard to figure out the answer to this question: who profits from this?
We’ve created a philosophical system in which men are viewed as morally lesser than women, and taught this to men so they don’t argue or resist. Then we’ve created a legal system which reflects this, so now men figure that divorce rape is normal and natural. Then we’ve created a culture in which single parenthood is normal.
I genuinely wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that, statistically, in families, men earn more money than they spend, and women spend more money than they earn. Women are the bulk of domestic spending. Most commercialist bullshit is aimed towards women. In other words, a divorce-rape culture is good for capitalism. Bad for society but good for commercialism.
I wonder if the purpose of the establishment's Blue Pill Propaganda is simply to decrease the distance between a man's paycheck and the corporation to whom his ex-wife will give his money.
Conclusion
A lot of the time we argue about gender, politics, and culture, we are just caught in the trap of comparing narratives. There was a narrative constructed to get people to think and act in a certain way, and another one that sprung up in response to this. Most of these are a distraction, a smokescreen. Don’t get caught up in them. Realize that in the information age, information is a weapon and the battlefield is your mind. Think for yourself.
Because it’s not really about white / male privilege.
I am from Slovakia (middle Europe) and I know something about the
immigration crysis. And I can tell You, this post is probably the best piece of insight to manipulation behind it I have ever seen. I agree 100% on everything there. I almost had a fight with my own father because I was against thewellcome refugeesmovement. This shit is so powerfull because as You said, they don't listen to facts but they obey something higher.I also agree on guys here telling that this kind of thinking which is presented here on TRP is applicable to much wider spectrum of things than just women and dating stuff. I think this is the kind of
criticalthinking and intelligence that modern man needs to be able to understand and succeed in the world around us.It would be of great benefit to discuss more topics like this. We have more than enough of the typical TRP theory on women/game and such. We all know AWALT- let's expand our discussion further.
Based Philosophy man Stefan Molyneux of Freedomain Radio has got you covered.
Go do it somewhere else, The Red Pill meant to improve our sexual lives, not our political ones.
Edit: In any case, great insight, but this polutes TRP as much as a stupid question does.
I'm going to agree with you here. It's not that it doesn't need to be talked about or doesn't align with TRP, because it does, in both cases. But in the name of keeping this sub succinct and not turning it into a male SRS we need to split this sort of content into a different subreddit. i can get plenty of off beat politics elsewhere. It's not what I come here for.
What is this cowardly royal "we" that you're using? Who is "we"? Speak for yourself.
Go ahead. Branch into a different subreddit if you don't like what's going on in this one. Let people vote with their feet.
Speak for yourself you fucking cuck.
Your father is more leftist than you are? Strange.
You're definitely right about the "you can't generalize" thing. This one has become such a big part of our culture that even children and teenagers have started doing it with smug self-righteousness.
Schopenhauer said it right... If you wanna win an argument never generalize.
I ran a mock scenario in my head about speaking with one of my typical liberal friends. I ask "Why do [insert social minority here] do such weird shit." Response: "They're not all like that, people are unique and aren't cookie-cutter shapes." Now, "Why do white people do weird shit." Response: "Idk man, so white lol." I know if I ask those kinds of questions those will be the kind of responses I get.
When someone tells you, "don't do sweeping generalizations", tell them that 'sweeping generalizations' are the basis of science - called external validity.
Once had a Sociology prof tell me to not do 'sweeping generalizations'. Told her the above. Her response, stunned silence.
I usually use one example I read here. 'We don't look at the individual raindrops in a hurricane, we look at the over all trend of its path.' I'm so sick of hearing "yeah but everyone is different." It's like trying to argue that 7 billion different genders exist and we should cater to each one uniquely. It makes no god damn sense.
That is a really good one! Will use that myself now.
That sociology professor's name?
Albert Einstein.
That sociology professor's name name?
Albert Einstein.
That is quite a good comeback. I might try a variant sometime.
I agree. It is very difficult in certain conversations when you toe the line of political correctness to have to clarify that you are genrealising in every fucking sentence in order to not offend the person who is just waiting with their gun cocked to call you out as soon as you make a blanket statement to get a point across.
Yeah I've noticed if you ever wanna crack jokes about a group of people they have to be about white people or Asians to be received well. People won't necessarily call you racist when joking about others but they won't find it funny.
I'm glad he rephrased it as "you're forbidden from generalizing." Then you immediately see this person is playing the game "who's the holiest?" And it makes the line of defense more clear.
Once you swallow the "race realism" red pill, more of this women/sex/dating stuff makes sense. And there will be more red pills to swallow. In my opinion, TRP theories of women, sex, and dating become part of a larger theory - and to focus solely on women/sex/dating is to miss the bigger picture.
[permanently deleted]
There's a reason TRP is an integral part of the 'Dark Enlightenment'. The Red Pill on women opens a whole can of worms that leads to a new understanding of feminism, political ideologies, race realism, cultural subversion and globalism.
Im researching the Dark enlightment. i didnt know that was a thing.
[permanently deleted]
I have no conclusion. I, as many here, am driven by curiosity. I notice these things and I feel compelled to communicate them and learn more about them. I'm not advocating any kind of reaction.
We have so few places in the modern world where we can talk about such things honestly. That in and of itself has some value, even if it's not prescriptive in that I'm telling you what to do with this information. I'm not.
As an adept teacher of sociology do you have any recommended material to draw from?
I've suspected that the ongoing racial tensions, combined with the immigrant influx, mass abortion, monopolization of mainstream media and the food industry in the West has far larger implications but I haven't the sources to refer to. There's much more to all of this than meets the eyes. Most of which is sinister.
a lot of the things i'm telling you come purely out of my own mind. i'm not talking about things that have ideas from sources you don't already know about.
It's fairly eerie. I think fairly along the same lines though alot of my sources come from sites like Alex Jones' Infowars, The Young Turks and the like. Seems like globalists are effectively seeking to consolidate power while soft killing the population via gmo food and abortion clinics. Destabilization seems like their strategy for a one world nation under the Vatican.Separation between Church and State is an illusion.
Hahhahahahahahaaaaahhaa you had me up until this part. Are you my grandmother?
The pope sure has seemed rather "relevant" lately. Why am i not surprised.
It's up to you how you use the information. The world is literally at your disposal, you've got all this information at your fingertips. do with it what you will.
We live in interesting times.
That is how I understand from this post as well. As referenced by OP, he who knows more has more power. Looking at the World at hand, no one is ever going to get out of it alive unless the Mars Colonization Project worked. Other than that, knowing how this society works is a way to let us prepare how to live out the best with what we have.
This is the very reason why freedom is terrifying. Your shackles broken, your routine destroyed.
What do you do now? You have to decide for yourself. After all, you always wanted to be free, didn' you?
Better to do the shitting than be shit upon. When it's kill or be killed, any honor in being dead in short-lived. Not that it matters much to the dead.
It's about becoming who you are.
I hypothesize TRP has to exist because society has been infected by a damnable parasite. Imagine if you were cursed to hold a snake in your hand and every time you called the snake "a snake" it bit you on the ass. Shit like that will interfere with yourself becoming who you are.
The end goal of TRP guidelines is that there is no goal, you decide where to draw the line. To strive to be alpha, yes cool, but better than that is simply being the best you possible, that is all that is asked. To be genetically worthy to humanity, is pretty nice but other contributions and inventions are what matters- simply be determined to leave your mark with your short life. It's a very kill or be killed world, but we all don't have to strive to be elites. Know your role, play it well. Besides, being the king piece in chess isn't all it's cracked up to be. Man becoming a machine is essentially singularity, no? I would think that is kind of perpetuated by a blue pill mentality. A want to live sedated in any fantasy you chose while casting off what makes you human. It's the way I think about its this champion Viktor in league of legends. He's like a machine commie. "Join the glorious evolution." When I discuss with my blue pill friends, they just want people to unite and come together- which is noble, but not realistic. The only way to make that happen is to plug everyone in and give them their own special little reality, and only in singularity can people be truly one unit and have everything they want, but no longer be human.
You do realize you can be a rich billionaire alpha male AND still not fuck over your entire nation right? Who is Trump?
Its all about accepting biology is more important that ideals.
I don't consider what I've written to be race realism. I consider it to be simple critical analysis of who stands to benefit from something that people appear to be planning with forethougt.
I think your post is probably one of the more insightful, logical posts I've read on here. Definitely the best TRP endorsed one. I'm not sure if you've ever read anything by The Last Psychiatrist, but you definitely remind me of him, in that you trace everything back to power. Black Pigeon has been making videos recently, attributing the migrant issue in Europe to women becoming the main decision makers, but I think he isn't thinking of the people who truly hold the power, and is falling for the narrative.
The only thing I have trouble with, in all discussions of this nature, is the idea of a "powerful few" conspiring behind closed doors, manipulating ideologies for their benefit. I'm sure we can find examples from the past of manipulation on such a massive scale, or even from the present in other countries, so I'm probably just being naive.
It's very connected to the red pill, which is why I don't understand when people say "why are you posting this on RP"?
Some people need to fully open their eyes.
Instead of using the phrase Race Realism and branding yourself as an Alt Right Edge Lord just say: I belive that Intelligence has a heritable biological component. Also if different breeds of dogs and cats can have differing temperaments that could probably be extrapolated somehow to other species...
That sounds "pc" - words to use in the event I'm at a living room party full of leftists?
I'd rather just let the risk of "not-connecting with potential females" be what it will be and say what I am. Which is a race realist and part of the alt-right. I'm not saying everybody on TRP needs to be part of those brands, but Jesus Christ, any man interested in an LTR who isn't both of those things should just give up now and get used to ONS's and double-wrapping their johnson. Forever.
Without being on the right, the risks of everything negative you can catch from a woman go UP. Not saying being on the right gives you immunity, but the risks are far lower. As far as race realism, your race and your woman's race really IS a factor in your capacity to pairbond. My advice to any red pill man: you should know which races you'll most likely get along with, and you should know which races you should avoid. You should be as in touch with racial stereotypes as astrologers are about star signs - right down to the specific country. Understanding race is the most effective shortcut a PUA can use.
And if you're a white dude, don't fool yourself into thinking non-whites don't consider race. Non-whites are far more aware of race than whites.
I don't have illusions about my capacity to get along with a leftist woman who is intent in staying on the left. I don't care if she's a Perfect 10 - she will hit the wall just like every woman does. "Attraction is not a negotiation."
Gaylubeoil, you just have a way with words
Nope, that opinion gets hated on because of the whole"black people=monkeys" racism
Look bro different breeds of dogs have different temperaments. Labradors are very passive and peaceful dogs, Pit Bulls are known for having more energy and having the potential to be more aggressive. Not all pitbulls but some.
I never brought up Africans. You did. The fact that you started thinking about Africans in this context proves that you are the racist.
I wouldn't say that "race" or ethnicity has anything to do with psycho-biological components. Rather african descent humanoids culturally exhibit more physical movement in every aspect of their lifestyle: hunting, cultural celebrations/events, and the hunter-gatherer way of life. The same way scandinavians are usually gigantic because they all ate a bunch of deer/elk meat and descend from germanic tribes that valued strong men.
It's easy to forget, but black people (or "people of color"/african descent) are very new to sedentary ways of life. At least most of the blacks in America who don't come from wealthy Nigerian oil baron money. Most of our former slave class are Africans who were prisoners, slaves, or servants in Africa who were captured and bartered by wealthy kingdoms in exchange for European goods that were manufactured in the new world. These captured slaves were mostly bushmen who caused a raucous to these African kingships so naturally like the rest of humans on earth who act up, they were suppressed.
The trans-atlantic slave trade benefited African kings which is something a lot of people don't want to hear about. Henry Louis Gates talks about this a lot and has even received death threats for it from black activists.
On top of this, the elite class of America has been socially engineering blacks to be reliant on the tit of big government and stay sucking. Various control methods: drug trafficking, poor educational institutions, gangster culture/violence=cool, psyops/mindgames from entertainment industry, and instilling a victim complex / "it's impossible" frame of mind into them.
Africans in their native habitat evolved different cultural practices with respect to their environment than caucasians (a bushman in Botswana has to worry about a lion possibly eating him when he's hunting or something.. A norseman has to learn how to build and insulate a shelter to keep from freezing to death). However the modern world shows us that blacks and whites are similar given they're raised in healthy environments. I see black kids from the ghetto who have more drive and intellect than some spoiled brat SJW at columbia university from Greenwich CT. I see Asian kids blowing mommy and daddy's money on cocaine and other drugs while a poor white kid studies his ass off for a med school exam. The differences between ethnicities is like 99.9% cultural.
You are wrong.
You seem to think evolving on different continents for tens of thousands of years didn't create significant biological differences that show in behavour and achievements.
You can come up with hundreds of explainations of why some races do better than others but as soon as you accept that some races have evolved to have traits better suited for civilization the better. You can already accept it for breeds of dogs or other animals, now you'll just have to be consistent and apply it to the human animal.
Or you can try to think doubleplusgood and keep denying it. Your globalist masters will love it. Just please don't shill for more refugees.
Dropping this here about success of certain civilizations (I think).
https://i.imgur.com/R7VPOh4.jpg
Wonder if IQ limits the extent of culture.
http://www.akfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89225
In case the link above is gone.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6af_1311056443
The difference between Labradors and Pitbulls is 99% cultural.
There's genetic differences between dogs and humans.
I just followed the illogical SJW logic.
you dropped the R bomb on him!
Except pit bulls actually only have the stigma of being the violent dog when actually they are relatively passive compared to other species. The stigma makes people assume they're the worst Same as your bullshit framing black people ad just more violent than usual. Look at debates when cities want to ban pit bulls
Then how come people never use Labradors for dog fighting? All breeds are exactly the same. It's just harmful stereotypes. Makes total sense.
My point is you're just swinging the pendulum to your side of "reality" which is also bullshit. You do it because frustration with what the masses believe. You're both wrong. Pit bulls are not especially violent compared to many other "non-black" species
And this negates the fact of socialization which makes your dog metaphor completely useless outside internet circle jerks
The problem with "race realism" is that your average person doesn't know if a person is dumb because of their genetics or because they're just dumb. Intelligence is genetic, but that variable is affected by so many things its retarded to say "black people = dumb, white people = smart."
Also, I see no reason for anybody to think about or worry about "race realism." It serves no good purpose for your life and will only create conflict and get you in trouble.
Immigration Is something that affects us all. More dumb people from dumber countries= larger welfare state we need to prop up. Immigration from countries with similar cultures/race and IQ (very dependent on race) Should be a huge factor concerning who we let into our respective countries.
You do realize that, aside from the migrant workers from Mexico, the vast majority of immigrants that come to the United States, are smarter than the average American? They have better values, are more educated, and end up having higher net incomes. It's the Americans that are dumb, not the other way around. Also, immigrants don't take that much welfare - look at the numbers. Stop believing propaganda, it's not good for your brain.
"Race" is not a real thing and IQ is not dependent on it.
Citation needed. "Race isn't a real thing, goy" LOL, opinion disregarded.
Race isn't a real thing. It's a fake classification created in the 19th century by pseudoscientist to justify oppressive policies that discriminated against certain people. Otherwise, the concept of "race" is meaningless. What "race" is a half black, 1/4 chinese, 1/4 arab person? What if a white person is 1/16th black? Are they white? Black? Something else? Do you just keep creating "races" as you go along? Is a Russian person white? Because historically, they were not considered to be, and genetically they may be closer to a an Asian than an Italian person.
Also, nice job ignoring the majority of my post.
Replace race with clines, that is what people meant by race nowadays. Also I doubt that many people actually know the etymology of words that they are using.
The only caveat is people will just call you a "racist" and "antisemite," so you'll have to be prepared for that, which I am.
[permanently deleted]
I'll guard my foreskin with my life.
nobody wants to touch your dick dude
[permanently deleted]
It is pretty easy to tell if a persons stupidity is related to genetics or not. Look at their parents. Are they fat? Well read? Do they suffer from dementia in old age? Are the kids trying to not be their parents. If not, congratulations you have a heritable retard.
This is one of the best posts I've ever seen on TRP. It helps explain why TRP puts such a focus in self improvement and personal recognition.
The narrative thoughts you spoke about are a fantastic thing to be aware of so that you can find them in others and More importantly, in yourself. That's how you break free. As kids were fed our caregivers mentalities and we eat it up as we don't have the individual confidence or experiences to prove them wrong. The longer we follow them, the more rooted they become and the stronger we believe in them. It's like old people set in their ways.
A lot of TRP deals with women and that's how people start. The "True Love" narrative is so powerful because it allows people to focus their attention externally: "If I had my unicorn I'd look flyer her and make sure she's taken care of and always treat her right" is a guest for "at my expense so that I don't have to improve myself." It was fine in the past when society was set up to allow individuals to live a simple, happy, family oriented life. Now that that's been destroyed, some people are waking up and most are looking for another family. SJW's are that family. The religion that allows them to feel superior even if they're alone because "I'm only alone because I believe everyone is equal and most people are just racist/sexist/homophobic."
I also think this is also why we have so many more ridiculous things become accepted. All the different sexualities, assumed genders, all that nonsense has to come up because everything is becoming "accepted" and made useless so quickly that SJW's, much like Hollywood movies ironically, are running out of things to make interesting or point at and scream "look, a new issue." Eventually this will probably end us back in the political right because people are sick of this ridiculousness and the rehashing of ideas in the same form. Everything is cyclical. I don't believe in karma, but I do believe in consequences to actions and we're going have some really big ones before too long. Of course, not everyone will see them, only those who get burned.
What makes all this more interesting is that, for me personally at least, most of these things i only became aware of in the last several years. The rest of my life I never noticed any of them.
It's the same for me. I only became aware of much of this gradually over the last 2 years or so, but the change has been dramatic. I think after my ex (the one that led me here) I started looking for answers as to why my beliefs didn't work for me despite giving them my all. That's when I found the harshness of reality. I embraced it because I realized I'd been avoiding it my whole life, and I've become a much better person all around. It really is very simple, but it's hard because it means admitting that we aren't special. That's the fact we have to get over now.
Same for me here.
Especially when I had a girlfriend from 2009 until 2013 I believed the world was all rainbows and butterflies. And actually it felt like that.
Then she broke up with me out of nowhere, fucked Chad instead, ignored me, gave me a huge depression and then - in the same month I swallowed the Red Pill (Exactly one year ago) - the refugee crisis began to hit my country (germany).
And now everything looks like a big mess and my city is full of arabs.
Feels like falling into sleep and getting stuck into a huge nightmare.
And the worst part of it is that everyone around me is still liberal and many at my university are even wearing 'Refugees welcome' shirts on a daily basis. It's disgusting as fuck. It feels like a horror movie where only one person can see the demon and everyone else thinks he is crazy until everything starts to explode - and this one person is me. Damn, how much I would love to live in the USA, Russia or Poland even if those countries hate each other they seem to have some kind of an alpha male population while here in germany there is nothing but cucks and arabs. My grandfathers that fought for nazi germany are spinning in their grave.
I feel so bad for them. What did they die for?
For nothing but SJW-gayness and chants of Allahu akbar.
It's nice to hear that there are still Germans with some sense. It seemed most of you were happy to live in Eurabia.
Hey man great post but I have a slightly different theory you may consider:
You claim the governments want to purposefully collapse the welfare state with refugees but the welfare state is already collapsing without refugees. Most of these countries can barely keep a balanced budget. A system that relies on taking out debt every single year is unsustainable. Europeans are not having children anymore (the people expected to pay said debt), they will not be able to pay the retiring generations pensions or benefits.
I'm sure you've heard the theory that these refugees will eventually pay into the system by becoming productive members of society thus saving Europe from its demographic crisis. We all know this bullshit. These refugees are the scapegoat.
If people lose their pensions and healthcare there will be riots, so what is a government to do?
The politicians need somebody to blame for the collapse of the welfare state. They most certainly can not blame themselves for being so stupid. I see it going two ways.
There's a war related to Islam and nobody minds tightening their belts (losing social programs) during a war to help their country.
The second is that they accelerate the collapse of the welfare state with refugees so they have somebody to blame for there being no money in the pensions.
Maybe both will happen.
something like that:
The Death of Europe - How the Mohammed retirement plan will kill Europe.
Europe invested in the values of its welfare state. The Muslim world invested in large families. Europe expects the Muslim world to bail out its shrinking birth rate by working and paying into the system so that its aging population can retire. The Muslim migrants however expect Europe to subsidize their large families with its welfare state while they deal some drugs and chop off some heads on the side.
Why should 23-year-old Mohammed work for four decades so that Hans or Fritz across the way can retire at 61 and lie on a beach in Mallorca? The idea that Mohammed would ever want to do such a thing out of love for Europe was a silly fantasy that European governments fed their worried citizens.
Mohammed doesn’t share European values. Nor are they likely to take hold of him no matter how often the aging teachers, who hope he gets a job and subsidizes their retirement, try to drill them into his head. Europeans expect Mohammed to become a Swede or a German as if he were some child they had adopted from an exotic country and raised as their own, and work to subsidize their European values.
The Muslim migrants are meant to be the retirement plan for an aging Europe. They’re supposed to keep its ramshackle collection of economic policies, its welfare states and social programs rolling along.
But they’re more like a final solution.
Mohammed is Fritz’s retirement plan. But Mohammed has a very different type of plan. Fritz is counting on Mohammed to work while he relaxes. Mohammed relaxes and expects Fritz to work. Fritz is not related to him and therefore Mohammed sees no reason why he should work to support him.
European social democracy reduces society to a giant insurance plan in which money is pooled together. But insurance is forbidden in Islam which considers it to be gambling. European social democracy expects him to bail it out, but to Mohammed, European values are a crime against Islam.
Mohammed isn’t staking his future on the shaky pensions of European socialism. He invests in what social scientists call social capital. He plans his retirement by having a dozen kids. If this lifestyle is subsidized by infidel social services, so much the better. And when social services collapse, those of his kids who aren’t in prison or in ISIS will be there to look after him in his golden years.
As retirement plans go, it’s older and better than the European model.
Not sure where you're getting this idea that any Europeans are expecting Muslim immigrants to subsidize their retirement. I haven't seen anybody express a sentiment like that.
All I see are right-leaning nationalists that reject the globalist agenda to dissolve European borders, dilute the population and create social unrest fighting against virtue-signalling progressives with their heads in the sand.
You didn't see a lot of the brain dead people, now did you.
Here's one. It is the narrative, Achmed will pay for you when you're old and helpless.
That interview sent a chill up my spine.
A native Swedish woman laughing as she agrees that she finds no problem with Swedes becoming a minority in their own country.
Ezra Levant is a master journalist
(1) Pensions paid to retired workers are paid by current workers.
(2) Without Muslim immigration and higher Muslim birthrates, the population in Europe would be declining.
(3) As population declines, the number of current workers becomes too small to support the pensions of former workers without either (a) reducing pensions, or (b) increasing taxes.
(4) People are claiming that the influx of immigrants, and the high birthrate of immigrants will help keep the number of current workers high enough to support the pensions of retired workers.
1+2+3+4 = Yes, Fritz (and Jacques) are literally basing their retirement pensions on getting Achmed and Abdul to work to support them.
Immigrant birth rates taper off after 1-2 generations.
That first wave of immigrants aren't going to be very skilled. Immigrant algorithm says at least +1 to start to see ROI
This whole idea sounds too stupid to believe. Makes more sense that elites want cheaper labor competition or a reason to make a police state. Or perhaps their feminism has straight up cucked them
Ahmed
I didn't say that I believe it, just that this is the line of reasoning used.
I don't think your average European is expecting Muslim immigrants to subsidise their retirement - but, with ageing populations and indigenous breeding, there is certainly an impending demographic crisis, with non-working age population size increasing significantly and working age shrinking.
As a result, most European countries won't be able to support their pension systems in coming decades.
One of the solutions to this crisis has been to import a younger population - this has definitely been the case in the UK, which has imported millions from eastern Europe. Germany seems to be doing the same with Turkish and 'refugees'.
In that sense, the European elite is definitely expecting Muslim immigrants to subsidise their retirement.
I hear what you're saying, but disagree with the premise that the EU elite are doing what they are with any good intentions at all. They're not trying to fix anything, that's merely the rhetoric they put forth to cover their more sinister motives.
What seems most likely to me is that the Western countries pose the largest threat to their global agenda, so they're preempting the backlash by destroying western cultural identity. Eventually, europeans will feel no allegiance to their nations, resulting in apathy that will stamp out any possibility of a revolution before it begins.
Funny, I pay taxes and I have insurance in America.
What are Europeans doing that's that much worse than Americans?
I don't think that they necessarily need someone to blame for the failure of the welfare state. People will accept its failure as natural, just like we accepted the WFC and following bank bailouts as natural.
What they need is to create internal desire to axe it. And that's where the new rising right and the islamic ghettos come in. Akhmed will be Europe's welfare queen, motivating people to cut spending.
It's because of this that I've been entertaining the fact that Trump is the chosen one for the US. America has a lot of debt. A big part of Trump's record is that he's a business man and bankruptcies are a part of business. Running as a republican he'll be able to beef up our military. Which would be good to have if he decided to use those business practices on our national debt. He becomes the fall guy for the fallout. The military and possibly some civilians take the hit. The top of the pile guys sit comfortably as the US is ever increasingly enforcing it's #1 status through military might and accelerating the class gap expansion.
I Just wanted to Point out that "narrative" is pretty much "frame" for groups.
I often say that to get a girl you have to put her into your narrative
I would like to welcome you all to the Dark Enlightenment. As others have stated, and many of you will find out, it's red pill after red pill after red pill. I believe this may be the start to a new era. MAGA/MEGA
Here's a few links for anyone interested in delving into this perspective.
http://www.socialmatter.net
http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/?m=1
https://americanmorals.wordpress.com
This is the most important piece I have ever read on Reddit
I remember about half a year or a year ago the mods had this crackdown on this sub on banning all discussion that was not on sexual strategy as it was a sub only for sexual strategy. I could tell at the time it was pathetic because you see that TRP,economics,realisation that feminism is just one part of Marxism all go hand in hand. In order to better yourself as a man all round,its not possible to only discuss sexual strategy.
I talk about politics a lot but I always make the connection to sexual strategy clear. What I'm writing about in this post is still completely connected to the TRP core principals and concepts.
Do you believe Red Pill philosophy and Libertarian philosophy to be complimentary, or rather congruent with one another?
If men discuss something as harmless as getting laid, only feminists mind.
But when attention turns to social order, it becomes a bigger issue:
http://www.political-humor.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/voltaire.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Alfred_Strom#Misattributed_and_misquoted_quotation
I myself was banned for months just because I made one thread about the current state of man and how certain things like media and who is behind it caused the downfall.
I read somewhere that a key reason for what is happening in Europe is that by diluting national identity with immigration it becomes easier to further centralise power in the EU. Demographics is destiny.
Here? The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan :
Count Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi (herein Coudenhove-Kalergi) was born in 1894 in Japan, of a Count and Austro-Hungarian diplomat (Heinrich), and Mitsuko Aoyama (daughter of a major landowner and very wealthy family in Japan). He took Czechoslovakian residency from 1919, then French nationality from 1939 to his death in 1972.
Through his fathers extensive diplomatic contacts, his wealth, and his aristocratic ties to numerous powerful families (and their networks) - Coudenhove-Kalergi started a movement away from the spotlight of the public, but which gained massive and overwhelming support from the pawnbrokers of the time. This Pan-Europan Movement. Via his association with the Rothschild family, Coudenhove-Kalergi was introduced eventually to the Warburgs, a powerful American banking family who bankrolled the Pan-Europa to the tune of 60,000 marks (a fortune at the time).
In essence the Pan-Europa envisioned a New World Order leading to eventual One World Government, but installed in stages and over long periods of time to avoid scrutiny and the inevitable protest of the general public. The process was to be one of “Regionalisation”, where there would be 5 or 6 massive superstates, of which a European Union would be the prototype. The main purpose of the Superstates would be to centralise powers away from sovereign governments and undermine notions of democracy in the name of the ‘greater good’. To follow – American, Asian, African Unions – something the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) – a shadowy group with massive influence and no oversight or transparency (much like the Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission and others) – picked up on in their policy papers which drive US and United Nations agendas.
This is the idea that to create an EU superstate, the will of the people has to be diluted, subverted or destroyed. This is to be done slowly and incrementally. A ratchet of many small steps to disarm the public, each step – like a ratchet – cannot be reversed. Each step – proposed as a solution to some ‘other’ issue (trade, fishing, defence) – seems reasonable enough that it can overcome objections and be implemented. The movement is inexorably from A through Z. But the totality of the steps (destination Z) is never revealed, for the people would never agree to it.
The best way to achieve this is mass uncontrolled immigration, to homogenise the population and erode the power of national, ethnic or religious identity. The resulting masses will be busy infighting (ethnic strife and poverty) to resist creeping totalitarianism, and over time, a more mixed populace will be more malleable and therefore controllable, and a new ‘European’ identity will emerge.
The infighting also feeds into the Hegelian Dialectic (problem-reaction-solution) – because it distracts the public from what the Elites are doing as puppet-masters, and they can achieve various aims by presenting ‘solutions’ to the conflict dynamics they are setting up. In short – a mass of migrants sets up the opportunity to create Hegelian Dialectic trigger points to push the general population any direction the Elites want them to go.
A few examples:
-Want to bring in enhanced surveillance and police powers, martial law, redraft Constitutions, bring in integrated EU secret service and intelligence sharing, EU Army etc? fine – lets’s have another Paris massacre (or, more to the point, allow such an already planned event to take place to garner political capital from it).
-Want to silence and marginalise anti-EU and anti-immigration sentiment? plant saboteurs in their marches, to create violence, then get the media to spin it to malign dissenting political views by caricaturing them as Nazis.
-Want to clamp down on political criticism? create new Hate Crimes, threaten to take children of parents, threaten public shaming, pay Antifa protesters to cause trouble, bring in new censorship laws to control social media, etc – all sold to the public in the name of ‘combating extremism’ and ‘promoting tolerance’ and ‘humanitarianism’.
Funny - I think you just described the golden era Islamic caliphate.
Large swaths of nations unified as one with a central ruling government. Sort of like China today except beyond its borders.
No wonder the ruling elite get a hard on for the thought of a global World Government. Imagine being president of that!
No wonder then they might worry about Islam (long term; not today's migrant/refugee bs). Islam already has the ability to adopt that idea if feasible.
I was having a discussion on FB about these group of immigrants from Africa that were seen wrecking a few streets in Italy and whether or not it's acceptable to change our views on them based on this video.
Of course, there were hundreds of thousands of immigrants I think from the past few years that arrived in to Italy looking for a better future, so to simply say ALL of those immigrants act in the same manner that a relatively small group did in those street riots is of course ignorant.
What I didn't get though from the person I was arguing with was that they wouldn't accept the opinion that you can have a SLIGHT change in your view of these group of people, and that's not racist. Racism is when you treat a whole demographic of people differently when they haven't done anything. In this case, in the street riots video you could see close to a hundred people going in the streets causing havoc. I don't think this is a "oh well, only a few people did it" since it being close to a hundred people means something is going wrong within their community, hence their behaviour. It is not racist to acknowledge that.
Maybe it is something situational, maybe it is something from their culture to respond like that when they're not happy, maybe it is genetic (not the most probable one though). But one thing is clear, there was something wrong amidst their group, but hey pointing it out means you're racist, cause there can never be anything wrong with a demographic.
Also, I argued that to support the case that their demographic behaved differently than others was that:
a) They lived in Italy far shorter than other demographics and already commit these types of crimes, meaning crime rate is higher per time period.
b) Their population was far smaller than the Italian demographic, and similar than other demographics, yet the severity of this crime and the numbers shown in the group meant that it's not unreasonable to think that it can be a potential problem within the whole population at some time in the future since the number of people committing crimes like that is by a higher rate than other demographics.
Like a marauding army, but without guns, so people let them in.
Google videos of Chicago, Detroit, Compton, Ferguson and watch them together.
A pattern will emerge.
Also visit /pol/
I think it's pretty straightforward.
if you come to a country, you adopt their customs. If you don't like them, then leave.
I'm not quite speechless, but close. This is beyond fuckin brilliant. Do you have a blog or something with more of your observations and conclusions?
Thank you very much. I don't. Just posts to here on TRP. I've thought about doing more, though.
[deleted]
Please do- we need more content of this caliber here at TRP.
This is easily one of the best posts I've read on TRP this past year
You totally should! I'd study the shit outta your blog
If you're going to actually make something you should make a YouTube channel instead of a blog. Because 1. I personally like being read to instead of reading all the time and 2. a YouTube channel has way more likelihood of becoming popular than a blog would, especially if you have a nice voice. Though you probably don't care about becoming popular but hey if you're gonna do something, you might as well do it the way it'll reach the most people.
I was sad your post ended so soon.
I wanted to see if there was a money trail that involves a police state over the populace.
Have you seen the ex Israeli soldier who says American police depts are going to Israel to learn how they shuttle Palestinians? He goes on to say the territories are like a trial / testing site for new techniques. And he believes it's coming to America.
I don't know who you're talking about but I would love to see it.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=monF65fJIHk
Sorry for the mobile link.
The last 10 or so minutes is where talks about foreign police Depts. but it's good in its entirety also.
Even though I agree, few things just randomly happen on a big stage, your analysis is still not deep enough.
I mean, blind ideologies are certainly a huge problem. I'm even astonished how easy it is to have people agree on the very basic standards of society, but then they fight tooth and nails over small, unimportant details.
I'd take your idea and broaden it up:
There are some people trying or being the rulers/winners of society. They need to create situations in which from which they can build up their empire. A unified country is dangerous, because it's hard to profit from them (unless it's a dictatorship). Making people fight leaves them confused and without aim. They waste time fighting over crap, not seing the real problems. Smart and powerful people can exploit this. This is the first step. Getting into an angle, where you can effectively profit from the masses. And staying there.
The next step is powerful people fighting each other, struggling for global domination. This is what I think is wrong in your analysis of the refugee crisis. Who started this whole destabilisation process of the Middle Eastern area? The USA. Why? Because a unified EU is a horrible rival. Flood them with refugees and the EU will implode. As it did. I'd say the people in the EU are more prone to internal fighting than they have ever been. Countries themselves might collapse, if the pressure through refugees rises.
You don't necessarily win by becoming richer or more powerful. Sometimes it's enough to bring down your enemy, even at a price. Who wins? The US, who does't have to take care of the problem they created.
It's important to understand there are indeed gaps between people. But many of them are artifically created. The whole Muslism IS stuff is created by Saudi-Arabia. It's countries trying to fuck each other over and the normal people are paying the price.
Destroying these narratives and being able to stand on a clear foundation is the only way of finding your way in this modern age. Otherwise you will be drowned in crap, until you don't know left from right. You can't help but get lost, if that happens. And a lost person is easy prey for smarter people, using them as they want.
I've always known this and it always makes me depressed. Our world is an illusion, and we are all pawns. This might as well be 1984. The saddest part of all? The people in the system will never be willing or able to escape. Further, they won't even TRY to consider another point of view.
Or even the EU, as incompetant as they are. It was pretty transparent, actually. They have sea patrols on the main migration routes, but what do the warships do when they intercept a boat full of migrants? They help them into Europe! Not take them back to where they came from, not blockade the ports where they set off from, help them across. And then Merkel, who bears a very large responsibility for the mess, strikes a 'deal' with Turkey, but it is a 1-for-1 deal. WFT? How exactly does it help anyone if you ship back some of the people who made it into Greece in return for exactly the same number of people who haven't made it yet? And in return, the EU pays Turkey millions and fast-tracks their entry into the EU.
Totally insane, and why the UK needs to leave the EU, but I'm not expecting it. People are sheep, and believe what they are told.
GREAT POST on the refugees. I do think that having a permanent underclass that is comprised of a miniority race is a great way to get people against welfare. This creates far right movements.
I have been a LIBERAL my ENTIRE LIFE, and in 2009 I started thinking this, that the whole immigration thing is a sham. Why should liberals, who are about protecting workers, force them to compete with a bunch of scabs essentially? Immigration is bad and is only there to help the elite.
You're on the money but you need to broaden your historical scope a little, /u/down_with_whomever. Mass third-world immigration predates the refugee crisis, which is only one move in the big game. It goes like this:
Profit. Investors don't want steady profits, they want increasing profits. Technology can help, but technological development is difficult, expensive and unpredictable. A far more reliable way is to lower costs, and the easiest thing by far is cutting payroll. How? right around the 60s the elites realized they couldn't squeeze the native working and middle class too much without excessive social tension, so they had to do two things: export production to countries where people could be squeezed more and easier, and import third-worlders to squeeze at home. This is the motive behind the global liberalization of trade and massive pro-immigration policies.
The welfare scam. The biggest way in which the elites bought social peace with the native working and middle class was the welfare state, a generous system of entitlements that borrowed against the future generations' output to pay the current generation's benefits. People grew fat and happy and didn't care that the math didn't add up. Now the scam is crashing down, but rather than admitting to it and anger the native working and middle class, the elites are adopting an extend and pretend strategy by mass importing young third-worlders whose contributions help sustain the scam a few decades.
The truth is that there's too much money to be made in making low-cost goods using cheap labour, either imported immigrant labour or outsourced foreign labour. Why put billions into developing new tech with no guarantee it will be a commercial success when you can put a few millions into lobbying for more immigrants or 'free trade' with cheap-labour countries, lower your prices and undercut your competition? this is what's happening on the global scale, across all sectors, even in tech.
Gents, there you have it. Spot. Fucking. On. People call me crazy but the writing really is on the wall. I live in Europe and I'm not looking forward to the bumpy ride ahead.
The indoctrination is real. I was getting some tattoo work done and had a guy seriously tell me "I'm pretty sure calling someone a nigger is a hate crime". Keep in mind this was a burly, jacked, tattooed tough guy. I couldn't believe it and proceeded to go off on him about 1st amendment rights and that speaking a word is not a crime in this country, yet. If the SJ dubs get their way it will be like Orwells 1984 and North Korea all wrapped into one. Check your six.
I would agree with everything said. I hadn't looked at the European aspect much but it would make sense to move towards privatization of public services.
When I think of the sjw scene, all I can think about is Yuri Bezmenovs warning to America over 30 years ago.
https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA
So much this. People need to realize the Elites do plot against the common man. That has defined society for thousands of years, and it will not stop because you don't believe it is true.
I wish this guy was a "shill" for some sort of CIA fear mongering campaign but he isn't...Yuri hits it bang on 30 years ago and while we are all still catching up with what he is saying here the "attack" continues to do damage and grow beyond control.
Thinking of SJWs like a religious following makes a lot of sense, and helps explain why they do a lot of things that aren't in their own self interest.
The themes of this post are very much in line with Shadow Men by Dr Anthony Napoleon. I'm only about a third of the way through it, but would recommend it as additional reading based on what I've read so far. Here is the description:
If you have a link to this book somewhere, I and everyone else here would love to read it
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars - The Lawful Path
www.lawfulpath.com/ref/sw4qw/index.shtml
the post ww2 blueprint
Shadow Men is a book you can't unread. It changes you. I recommend it to everyone here.
You're only a third of way through? Oh man, the last third of the book REALLY gets interesting.
Hear me out. You know about the dichotomy between 1984 and Brave New World, I assume. A big amount of the discussions end in saying that 1984 doesn't apply and only BNW does. I say it does, but in the U. S., with elements from Bradbury's Fahrenheit. People are dumbed down, drugs are available almost like candy, no casual sex appointments yet but that feels like it's almost around the corner. On the other side, you have Germany. Thought police, illegal to hire prostitutes but legal to be one, denial of enemies, looking to make everything monotonous, arrests for fucking Facebook posts. Both are extremes in the opposite directions but both are dystopian as fuck.
FB is the biggest social surveillance network we have, right after Google. Perhaps Windows 10 will eventually start scanning your hard drive.
The US is somewhat protected by its legal tradition for freedom of speech, which the Euros don't have.
Just for your information most European countries have freedom of speech written into their constitutions since it was an important part of the ideas of the French revolution which in turn was based on the American revolution
But they also have hate speech laws. They don't have freedom of speech enshrined as a fundamental right like the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution does.
Really depends on how you look at it, for example Belgium has freedom of speech written into its constitution. Those laws differ from country to country some enjoy the same freedom of speech as the US some like Germany are pretty strict
So the ole Hegelian dialect. Good on you for writing a well constructed post. I hope other people become aware, but it's my personal experience that if you would even dare try to explain what you've said, or many other topics for that matter, to the average American they would willfully deny it. Keeping with the theme of our beloved Matrix undertones it's like that scene where Cypher is sitting at the dinner table negotiating the terms of his betrayal with agent Smith to get plugged back in. He takes a bite out of that steak and says "Ignorance is bliss". It's all sheeple out there bro...
Good post OP. Somehow you managed to be apolitical and just present the facts, complicated to do, when everything is about (generation) identity (politics), now.
I'm driven by curiosity. My present biases are irrelevant if I want to learn more than I currently know.
You miss one important link in the money chain in the immigrant crisis. The same organizations and activists that are crying out for refugees are the ones who will make money from providing social services and jobs as social workers. This is the same the world over, from USA and Sweden to India. The left wing also makes a lot of money from fuelling crises and nurturing anti social elements.
I absolutely love this post. For the past month or so, I was banging my head with the question: "how and why are those SJWs so irrational? How can they work against logic, against facts?". Seems obvious now - it's faith and their (SJW's) need to be accepted.
I archived and bookmarked this post, will probably print it and put on wall. Thank you again, down_with_whomever.
Excellent post. I had never thought about the idea of "Social Justice" as a religion for some people, since most of them appear to be non-believers. But then I realized that it is because they are non-believers that they cling so fervently to Social Justice as an article of faith. Because faith can ignore facts and logic and still reign supreme.
Also, it's been mentioned before, but those who want further study into PR/propaganda should look up Edward Bernays.
My recent post about how belief in Globalism creates concepts like Racism was based on a very simple and easy to understand thought.
This post has gone very deeply into several topics so it's harder to answer a single idea, but I will say it was a very insightful post with obvious clear understanding of what is going on.
Those with Power rule by creating Myths.
This has always been true, but the current high tech Blue Pill makes past myth making systems seem childish by comparison.
The Dark Luciferian forces (Globalism) have never in the history of humanity gotten so close to absolute rule.
This is the long predicted dajjal, devil, anti-christ, Baal, etc rising to it's highest power and influence and we should be aware of this historical significance.
Islam
Let's start at the end....
Muhammah is poisoned by one of the slave girls he is raping.
This is both a fact and openly acknowledged by Muslims. This is part of the story of Muhammad.
If we back up a little we find out that Muhammad had captured the entire tribe that this slave girl was part of and had beheaded all the males in a ghastly ritual of public execution.
Muhammad gets murdered by the slave girl he conquered.
So it makes you see how the religion has a deep paranoid base to it. You can't trust anyone. Even the slave girl who you rape repeatedly can turn on you so you are taught to not be Blue Pill and trusting.
"Islam is about conquest and the losers rest in peace... Islam is a religion of peace."
Globalists use Islam
The Globalists understand how useful Islam can be as a tool.
If you insert Muslims into places as "refugees" and you know the story of Medina then you know that Muhammad was invited to stay as "guests" by peaceful tribes in Medina. It was as refugees that Muhammad attacked the peaceful tribes and went about beheading all their men... letting them rest in peace.
So refugee status within peaceful tribes is actually central to the story.
It's perfectly designed to destroy the peaceful tribe.
Sufism
Sufism is the 777 religion compared to the original Dark Luciferian 666 Islam.
The original Torah and the Sufi mystical knowledge are similiar in this sense.
So if Islam were to have a future beyond the 666 it would be Sufism.
you and I disagree often but I will be the last one to argue with you about the true nature of Islam.
Islam is a religion of peace... it's just the meaning of "peace" is slightly different than people think. It's more like submission or conquest. The losers die and rest in peace.
Peace has a meaning more like failure... losers are peaceful and deserve to be removed so that the strong can live. The strong horse wins out against the weak horse.
It's very Dark Luciferian... but so is the Talmud, so are Globalist elites... there are many Dark Luciferian groups all working along the same ideas towards a single world covering Dark Luciferian kingdom.
The Illuminati is all about Dark Luciferian thinking too.
The Blue Pill is emotional indoctrination designed by Dark Luciferian forces to dumb us down and make us beta slaves.
It all fits together.
If you don't mind me asking, what is/was your career?
I was a Java programmer back from about 1995 through 2001 but I forget the exact times. Made all the money I needed between that and real estate in California during the bubble. I hit both bubbles at once. Cashed out. Haven't worked since 2001.
[permanently deleted]
I'm a really old guy... 55 years old. Gray hair.
I've had plenty of women over the years but was never tempted to go into anything permanent.
Somehow I seem to have always seen through women and I've just never found their nature (AWALT) to be the source of strong love.
The only time I did "fall" was to a Lucifer's Daughter type which was more about me reacting to her deeply manipulative attacks and control over me. It's funny how the more screwed up the female the more a man can "fall" into her hell.
I would have liked the pre-1950, pre-Child Support Laws era where you were simply the head of household and women were minor characters who existed in the background.
The modern woman places herself front and center and the laws back up that abomination so it's all very unattractive.
LOL @ how pathetic. Cmon Neo, you can do better than this lame attempt. Yeah I get it you need to make yourself feel better.
Here I'll help you :
Islam, as part 3 of the trilogy (aka the final testament), codifies what the Torah wanted in a world wide government. Loose borders amongst many nations with a singular power structure based on recursive hierarchy. Whose citizens are interchangeable and their race or nationality doesn't matter.
With that in mind the "Globalists" have a eureka moment and decide they need to transplant/quasi-adopt Islam into the west to kick start their New Word Order plans.
The globalists are clearly Dark Luciferian 666 types.
The Torah is all about the 777.
So, no, not at all.
It's because of the 666 nature of Islam that the globalists use it, but they aren't following the "True Torah" concept.
The Talmud is the same thing... 666.
When the globalists lose (which is the prophecy by all the religions) then you get a fairly stable 777 type world afterwards.
So we must get through these dark times to get to better ones, however, most alive today will not see the good times only increasing dark times.
We are on the downward slope... dumbing down and Blue Pill... headed for the peak of the 666 kingdom.
Everything Blue Pill is originated by the dark forces. (globalists)
I'm sorry but you're gonna have to explain to me the numerology.
http://gnosticteachings.org/courses/alphabet-of-kabbalah/723-vav.html
Basically the "5" ("Hei") is the beta male. Androgynous, foolish.
"6" is the Vav.
Example of Vav:
http://www.deonvsearth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/monster-666.jpg
Vav the "carnal" man. (the beast)
When you get to "7" ("Zayin") you are in a sense fully enlightened.
http://gnosticteachings.org/courses/alphabet-of-kabbalah/725-zayin.html
It's because the media is dead set on destroying Christianity and Christian identity by undermining it in every medium, mocking it's occasional failures and never mentioning how much good religion has done over the years.There are no atheist soup kitchens, food pantries or support group meeting rooms.
You can see this lack of identity in the young people drawn to the Virtue Signaling Religion, the social engineers have programmed kids in school and people who watch Hollywood media that they and only they, control what is esteemed as a virtue.
By telling boys, Caucasians and Christians that they have no culture of value, the sociologists (Cultural Marxists) have created a void of identity that has left generations of young people confused and insecure. The liberals are both the arsonists and the fire department.
To fill this vacuum that the CM's have created, the Virtue Signaling Religion was built around what I call the "Apotheosis of the Revolution". Apotheosis means elevating to the status of divinity, and a revolution is the changing of the default settings of society. By framing this continual revolution as being a heroic victim, they play to the self absorption of narcissistic young adults, and keep them in that mental state past what's natural, into adulthood and old age with the mind of a teenager. (That's why a lot of TRP theory can apply to liberals as well as women)
We can stand up for masculinity and traditional values, eventually proving by action that we are superior. Have faith in yourself and stand strong. Avoid useless media, video games, and pornography (it's mind control/conditioning). Reject these and make yourself great. MAGA.
I find a disturbing lack of Nietzsche in all of this group narrative.
Not all atheists are SJW. Or liberals. Or cultural marxists.
Exactly. I'm militant atheist. I don't submit to all of this pissy SJW regressivism.
The question should be do you reject the culture Christianity has created in the west. Western culture and Christianity go hand in hand. You can be an atheist and still be a cultural Christian.
Very true, the culture is a lot more things than just religion, and these other things should be preserved.
It's almost everything we call 'conservative'. And a few liberal things. And the scientific method (without the bias induced by grants).
Part of the point that I'm making is that it doesn't end here. There is always a reason why such things happen, when they are orchestrated from the top down. In this case it appears to be. And there must be someone powerful who directly profits from it.
There's a class of people who profit from it. People who are insecure about themselves have a tendency to waste their capital on frivolous things in the attempt to create a "material persona."
There's a 4 part film called The Century Of The Self that explains how merchants and wall street learned how to use propaganda (they changed the name to public relations) make people want to buy things they didn't need. The part (1) I linked is about Edward Bernays and is most certainly something you would be interested in.
By creating and satisfying people's basic desires, the elites can create ghettos of the mind to to keep people dumb and spending the majority of their capital turning Wall Street's cogs. WS is a casino, and casinos only stay open if people come and buy chips. Wealth creates wealth, like compound interest or usury in general.
So the "bad guys" you're thinking of are the international bankers and stock brokers who benefit from people wasting their capital. They create chaos so that people can't pin them down or rise up against them. Dr. E. Michael Jones has done some good work on the study of these people and their tools, mainly usury. I'm proud to say I've gotten a lot of my understanding of the subject, and morality, from this great man who has been buried for telling the truth.
I will watch that film. Thank you for the tip.
You definitely want to watch The Century of the Self. It's also right down your alley.
Watch this one too; https://youtu.be/tz8pzG02oxU
(((Usury))) and (((merchants))) and (((globalism))) and (((elites))) and (((wall street))) and (((banks))) Oy vey!
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy.
Religion is a form of mental slavery.
Nothing to do with "liberal jews destroying christianity". As the collective knowledge of humans grow, there is less and less room for woo-woo stuff that most religions promote.
The problem is, there is a requirement - in order to develop a good (in a broad, general sense) personality, you have to do your research, self educate etc. Most people are just too lazy to do it.
"religion is mental slavery"
It is what you make it. Many great scientists were Christian. And there are many people who are dumb and blind consumerists. When you remove Christianity, you remove a source of identity, and open up consumerism where you can buy your "identity." paraphrasing what Jesus said "he who has me, is without nothing."
It also opens up large state government as Jesus also said "leave unto Caesar, what is Caesar's. And you move from God and church ruling your life to the state running your life. From God punishing you to the state punishing you. The systems are the same.
Also read the Unabombers manifesto if you haven't. Ted Might Not be right on everything, but he's not far off. And he never said it, but LSD "mind control" worked. The globalists pushed it so they could break the cycle of the authoritarian personality, destroy traditions and culture and turn the world into global consumerist, instead of the fascist view of keeping everything, for the most part, in the country and doing what's best for the people, while not going full communist because people still need a natural hierarchy.
Bold claim. Elaborate please.
TL/DR: You are tied to the belief that if you do not follow certain rules, you will suffer after you die. The people who preach this also say what the rules to follow are.
Not necessarily in all religions. i.e. Judaism does not have the concept of a hell. It's even debated in Christianity alone.
Purgatory is an "invention" of the roman-catholic church and not biblical.
Biblically speaking, eternal suffering is reserved for non-believers as salvation is seen as a gift by the grace of God and it cannot be bought with good deeds, since Jesus Chrit already bought it with His death on the cross, but will only be given to you if you believe so.
You are aware that you can have a belief without following any leaders?
You are still basing your beliefs on something someone invented/said.
So what is it you are doing here in TRP?
Also that does not qualify as “mental slavery“.
he's a faggot nihilist, that's the only elaboration needed
'There is less and less room for woo-woo stuff that most religions promote.'
Then why is the blue pill so popular? It is all woo and it replaced christianity! The woowoo stuff fills an inherent need, there will always be a considerable amount in any generalized narrative, including science (scientism at the expense of spirituality is woo in the other direction).
Victimization as Power :
As the centuries passed, Christianity waxed and waned across the Middle East & Western world, and in recent years, has been in decline in its traditional stronghold, Europe and America. Secular Liberalism, with its ‘Humanist’ religious flavor, has largely replaced Christianity in these societies. The progression was one of ease; Christianity and Liberalism are similar in many regards, and as science begins to shed light on many of the claims that the Bible made, it has left plenty of room for doubt for those believers who believed more than the spiritual and moral lessons. In truth, I believe that Liberalism was an evolution of Christianity, a next step for humans who have learned much about the physical reality of the world and left behind the more mythological aspects of the religion. As Liberalism gains and Christianity declines, we see only the form change – the substance remains largely the same.
. . .
Extra read: When Progressives Get Religion
Absolutely, thanks for the links. I'm a big fan of Mencius Moldbug's concept of 'the cathedral,' have you read any of his work?
This is very much true.
Modern leftism is a development of christian theology without the god, particularly Calvinism.
Indeed, liberalism is a religion, only without a god. People believe in it, they do what they believe is right or good, and don't care about consequences.
Science cannot give purposes for life, so there is bound to be a religion or ideology.
Philosophy is the word you're looking for. And it doesn't require a god.
However, not even philosophy can give an actual purpose to life. Nothing can. Life is inherently meaningless, except for the subjective meaning you project onto it.
Christians really love calling ideologies that compete with theirs "religions". They usually aren't. I assume it gives Christians the feeling that their beliefs are just as valid as anyone else's. They're not. Secular humanism is founded on logic and reason. Christianity is founded on prejudice.
In any society over a certain number of people (anything bigger than a small town), the growth and function of that society are based on the mutual trust between the men of that society. They govern their families, land and capital based trust that is governed by prudence.
Prudence in this sense, the wisdom and ability to make sound choices, is a moral virtue that must be developed. It does not occur naturally. Religion exists as a framework to cultivate useful and practical virtues such as prudence in the chaos that is the human condition.
let's take that morality i just described. We know that a man is made of Reason, Ego and Passion. Well, Morality is common sense reason. It's rules of reason you can teach a person who lacks the life experiences and mental hardening to know the complexities of the world.
By the media attacking and undermining morality, and Christianity's ability to speak from a moral high ground, your common young person is left with ego and passion, as any observer can see. These arrogant idiots we see on the news violently attacking anybody who dares to think differently than they do are what Mao and Lenin called "Useful idiots."
Useful idiots will buy what you tell them they need. Useful idiots will riot when you tell them someone's "Literally Hitler"* Look up The Cultural Revolution in China and you will see exactly how the useful idiots have gone from livestock that buy worthless shit to Mao'bama's personal youth army. This has the potential to get even worse, and the groundwork was laid by destroying the only social force that could stand up to the Cultural Marxists, Christianity.
*Louis CK, the fat pervert from Mexico worshiped by vacuous chuckleheads.
There are studies that show children as young as few months distinguishing between good and bad choices (morally good or bad). There are scientific experiments showing that being "good" is better for you individually and for the collective.
No religion is needed in order to instill or promote good values or behaviors.
Does that "moral high ground" encompasses "believe or burn in hell" (exploiting human fear of death and lack of understanding of nature as the basis of a religion)?
If you mean "is 'the belief in the consequences of sin' a member of the set 'Christian values'?" The answer is yes. The nature of hell could be discussed endlessly without any useful outcome, but keep in mind that same set contains deliverance from that fate through God, so if one were to subscribe to that belief set there is a way around that through repentance and personal transformation.
If that negative value(to your argument's point of view) were to be accepted as a negative for the sake of argument, it still doesn't invalidate the overall functionality of the Christian Church(es) former political power in opposition to the Cultural Marxists. The absence of opposition to their attack has been seen as a concrete amount of suffering in most areas of mainstream society. We are not better off, we are more entertained.
As for your last point, the basis of western religion is not the exploitation of fear or ignorance, it is the empowerment of human beings against the chaos and evil of the world. Whatever personal problems you seem to have with Christianity could be better solved on another board, not this thread.
Great argument. Another one like this: Hitler pulled Germany out of economic depression, lets promote nazism b/c it has some good parts in it.
You wrongly assume "this world" is chaotic and evil.
Thinly veiled ad personam. If you can say "christianity = good", I can say "christianity = bad". Take your religious beliefs to another board.
Of course you had to use it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_Hitlerum
History is written by the victors. There are so many lies in world war 2 / the nazis etc that you would shit your pants if you were ever indulged with the truth. There is a good reason holocaust and Jew victimization is shoved down people's throats all throughout their young schooling. There is a reason we are constant reminded in movies and TV and all other forms of media about ww2, there is a reason it's so taboo to speak negatively of Jews. They want to be victimized to keep the spotlight off their actions. Did bad happen to Jews in ww2? Bet your ass it did. We're the numbers and events exaggerated? PROOF of that has already been unveiled but Jews claim it's a sensitive subject and don't want it talked about regardless of truth. ALL races have been through horrific shit throughout history and more people than Jews died in ww2 and in the holocaust...why is it there only emphasis on Jews though?
Jews have been exiled from every country they've ever inhabited and for good reason. It's no longer talked about as of the last century due to ww2 and if you even bring them up you're immediately silenced and made to be felt awkward. Jews were dismantling and destroying Germany before ww2...kind of like they are in current America. Isn't that weird how America is in the same state Germany was in 1920?
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"
That's an interesting argument. Let's flip it: do the 6 gorillion invalidate the immense success of the rest of National Socialism?
And what good have we accomplished freeing ourselves from it? Western civilization was built and nurtured by Christianity. When you remove it you only leave a vacuum that'll naturally be filled in, and whatever that is doesn't necessarily have to be a religion in the belief of a deity. I'll give you a hint, it starts with an M and ends with an X.
https://imgflip.com/i/15aqcy
[deleted]
Point me to something remotely scientific that confirms this.
http://ideas.time.com/2012/03/27/have-we-evolved-to-be-religious/
So it's a proposed idea, not an actual observation.
Incorrect, there are. The problem, is that Christians attempt to demonize atheists at every turn, and media doesn't highlight these humanist qualities in atheists.
Oh, and Christians can't make enough soup kitchens to make up for the damage their religion has done to our species.
True TRP will yield the truth that all religions are fabrications meant to keep a tremendous amount of power in the hands of a few.
This is for you, because this comment let's me know you'll get it. https://youtu.be/tz8pzG02oxU
[permanently deleted]
[permanently deleted]
Your people consider anyone non-Jewish as "Goyims", what are the Goyims purpose here on earth according to your people?
You should watch some Kevin MacDonald
Yep. TRP is ripe for the fashing.
https://youtu.be/tz8pzG02oxU
https://youtu.be/tz8pzG02oxU.
watch.
Religion has been dead for some time now. Why kill something that is already dead
Above that the claim that religion is responsible for the most severe atrocities commited by human beings is also a frequently perpetuated lie.
Stalin (20 million), Mao(45 million) and Hitler(50 million) all were atheists and they killed for completely secular reasons. No crusade comes anywhere near those numbers, not even combined. Even the Thirty years' war, only demanded 2.1 million casualties.
Regarding the common claim of Stalin killing 20-30 million in his repressions - that is a lie. Where did it originate? Follow the money. It was an American invention during the Cold War, that is now perpetuated as fact. Both sides shit on each other, the American side is the last standing. The true number lies between 800,000 and 3 million.
Not being a Stalin apologist, but if you are going to cite numbers, make sure they are correct.
Not as easy as that. Those numbers are still subject to ongoing discussions and high numbers are not only propagated by Americans.
Three million is the least estimated and by the way just the death count of the cleanings.
High numbers are generally suggested by Western Historians (from countries allied with America in the Cold War). 800,000 is the lowest number i've seen.
800,000 is just the lowest assumed number of people actually having been executed. Many more died of various other reasons in the Gulags, as well as because of forced resettlement.
Numbers by Russian author Wadim Erlikman:
Stalin's biograph Dimitri Wolkogonow estimates 19,5 to 22 million deaths by Stalin.
German scientist Gunnar Heinsohn estimates at least 20 million deaths.
Well, if we attribute the deaths from famine throughout Russia and Ukraine, forced resettlement, deaths from cold to Stalin we still wouldn't get above 10 million. I think that is ridiculous to attribute these deaths to Stalin personally. We should be looking at the numbers of people executed directly, by his order. Because by that logic, we can say that the early US Presidents were worse than Stalin because of all the Indians that died due to the government sanctioned resettlement policies. Yet we do not do that.
Also, you do realize that 30 million people killed by (or attributed to Stalin) would be a huge blow to the economic output of the USSR. It would be a huge hit to any economy. Moreover, if we assume 20 million number to be true then (like after WW2 where comparable numbers of people died), every family would have felt the effects as would the country as a whole. Most families from Russia and Ukraine have lost a family member to WW2, yet you'd be hard pressed to find a family that lost a member during Stalin 'repressions'.
Yes Stalin did some shady shit, but he was no idiot. He understood that killing a 20 million people would mean death to the fledgling Soviet economy. We did not see the death of the economy, but the opposite. Unparalleled growth for its time. An economic miracle after WW2. If we add up (using your numbers) 25-30 million dead during WW2, as well as 20 million from Stalin's repressions (with men being the primary demographic dieing) then who is left to work? Who is left to rebuild the economy and turn the country into a superpower?
Christian culture is what enables this behavior. The universalist doctrine of Paul's christianity subverts human beings' natural in-group preference. Yes, most of these people are atheists or secularists or "humanists" but they grew up in a Western world that has morales and norms defined by christian theology.
The Europeans and Americans are basically putting themselves on a figurative cross to absolve themselves of the "original sin" of racism, apartheid, naziism, colonialism, and slavery.
Christianity is a middle eastern religion that invaded Europe almost two millennia ago and it paved the way for its sister religion to do the same now as it evolved into more and more tolerant versions of itself.
Imagine there's a levee between your town and a floodplain. You don't like aspects of the levee, so you decide to demolish and remove the entire structure.
Now you're left with your town and all of your investments unprotected from the inevitable flood of the area, because you didn't have a replacement for the levee before you demolished it.
Christianity isn't perfect, but it's the only thing that's ever worked to protect western society from the saracen. You don't do away with a vital structure you don't like without a suitable replacement.
Oh I absolutely agree with you that tearing it down without a proper replacement is a huge problem. I'm just saying that there are aspects of Christianity that remain which contribute to the problem.
Basically, the good & important parts of christianity were discarded and its weaknesses were retained. Worst of both worlds.
Context can be found in scripture to fit anyone's confirmation bias.
The best book to read IMHO is Proverbs. Always redpilled, it's a book dictated as advice from a wise man to his son. Easy to pick up at any part for daily reading.
Proverbs 5: 3-4
"For the lips of the adulterous woman drip honey, and her speech is smoother than oil; but in the end she is bitter as wormwood, sharp as a two-edged sword."
Lots of good stuff like that. Look for what's useful in all things.
Actually the part that follows that is also relevant:
"3For the lips of the adulterous woman drip honey, and her speech is smoother than oil;
4but in the end she is bitter as gall, sharp as a double-edged sword.
5Her feet go down to death; her steps lead straight to the grave.
6She gives no thought to the way of life; her paths wander aimlessly, but she does not know it.
7Now then, my sons, listen to me; do not turn aside from what I say.
8Keep to a path far from her, do not go near the door of her house,
9lest you lose your honor to others and your dignity to one who is cruel,
10lest strangers feast on your wealth and your toil enrich the house of another.
11At the end of your life you will groan, when your flesh and body are spent."
The love of money is the root of all evil verse is really prevalent when you really put things into perspective..
I've had a very similar outlook on the current situation as you for the most part.. you've articulated it better then I ever could though.
I think the establishment is really arrogant if they believe they can control radical Islam.. To be honest I think that is going to screw them over as well.
Like most fundamental drives, it's also the root of all good. Without the profit incentive, humanity would have barely progressed past subsistence agriculture. It's true that most scientists don't work to make big bucks, but the processes that take scientific discoveries and turn them into technological improvements do absolutely operate based on the profit motive.
Ex-Muslim. Even moderate Muslims have difficulty being controlled. There is always a prevailing feeling of 'otherness' that is almost a pre-requisite to identifying as Muslim. That alone is a very real and serious threat.
I don't come here often but this is a solid theory for sure
This is the best summary I've read about the refugee crisis.
One open question is if the "architects of migration" planned it as one of the objectives for the military incursions in the Middle East and Libya, or just seized the opportunity. It will likely make Europe less economically competitive against the US, as investment and labor will be allocated more towards coping with immigration.
Anyway, there is more to it than the EU governments publicize to their constituency. There must have been long planning and organization for the refugee centers, recruitment for the refugee workers...
One thing surprisingly few wonder is, how hundreds of thousands of refugees can travel in trains and buses through the whole Europe. They wouldn't have gone far from the southern borders without government orders to transportation administration.
A good post, and a breath of fresh air, but it falls short of naming ((who)) is actually doing this.
Non-1% Jews get shafted almost as bad by the system. Remember, globalists thrive on division, so don't hate.
Remember Most X are Y =/= Most Y are X
If the majority of globalists weren't Jews, I'd consider it.
Do you think the average Parisian Jew is benefiting from the gangs of angry Jew-hating Arab Muslims swarming his home?
If anything, it just gives the bad globalists just another smokescreen to hide behind.
No, but the average Parisian Jew has more incentive than ever to move to Israel, which is something being encouraged worldwide as nation after nation is flooded - by globalists - with violent savages.
It's more like the non-10%.
Besides, the low-socioeconomic status ones have a privileged opportunity to rise in society with the support of their ethno-religious network if they get a college degree.
Great post! Have you looked at the sandy hook narrative before? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oD0z275nQnM
The guy Gene rosen caught rehearsing his story is the most damning of the whole 3 hours so here is the 90 second best evidence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igfczc6m5M4
(by good-samaritan statute of connecticut law, he would have to report a teacher being shot as soon as students told him -- so he had to say the students said nothing for 10 minutes but just drank juice)
Amazing post, thx for writing.
Damn. This is some good content. Puts out many their theories and thoughts I've had, presents them in a manner my dyslexic mind couldn't. And then proceeds to expand and include ideas/theories I never thought of.
It's vital to get a grip on the psychological dynamics of virtue signaling.
"Virtue Signalling"... great phrase. And SJW as religion... yes, absolutely.
Reminds me of one of my favorite quotes: "You cannot reason someone out of a position that they didn't reason themselves into"
The West is in real deep shit, isn't it lads?
Before you jump down my throat as black lives matter or SJW or whatever, don't, I'm not, but I had to run the numbers on whites are killed at a higher "rate" than blacks by police.
If as of 2015:
Population: 321M
Whites are 72% of population
Blacks are 13% of population
Whites killed by police in 2015: 502
Blacks killed by police in 2015: 250
That's a rate of blacks being killed at 2.7x more
How is that even close to the same rate? I guess it all depends on what "rate" and "in proportion to what" you use. In proportion to violent crime, etc the "rate" changes, but that's not what you said. To straight up say they are killed at a higher right is flat out false.
Edit: formatting
You have to add crime rates to make a true assessment
While agree to an extent I also have my own hang ups about it. When black and white teens both use drugs at the same rate, but blacks are strung up on drug charges far more often, adding a crime rate isn't exactly accurate.
However I can't argue too much against the violent crime rate.
That comes down to where drugs are used. White kids are smoking pot in basements, black kids are smoking in the streets. Who has a better chance of getting busted?
There's probably more to it than that.
Yes, prior arrest history and demeanor also factor in
yes, the state has replaced father figures in urban black communities.
Check out the rates of parental investment in African countries, it's low. It's a genetic thing probably.
Yes there is more to it than that.
But what do you suppose the 'answer' is? I think blacks in this country are conditioned from birth by the media/entertainment complex to be more likely to commit crimes than other races.
There's also the images of young black men who do have money doing everything they can to squander it as quickly as possible on ridiculous shit like jewelry, mansions, fancy cars, drugs, and gold diggers.
Look at all the professional athletes that make more in a few years than most people would make in several lifetimes and they end up broke. Yes some are smart with their money like Jamal Mashburn. But for every one of him there are hundreds who end up destitute.
the bottom line is other than in very sporadic and superficial ways black youth are encouraged to be angry, feel like victims, and make incredibly poor choices. Then the people responsible for this come back and lead the SJW movement.
Why are you being downvoted when you're exactly right?
People act like a white guy could just roll down the street hitting a crack pipe and a policeman would pull them over and just be like "oh, hello fellow white person, you're free to go thanks to your whiteness".
Unless the argument isn't that white people are getting away with using drugs in front of police officers and is actually that the WHITE RACIS POLICEMANS are pinning fake drug charges on innocent black youths. Which in that case obviously I can't disprove that awesome theory so hey maybe you're onto something!
People are stupid and can't deal with reality. Inner cities have a much larger police presence, you're far more likely to run into a cop in the city versus suburbs. Most black drug users are in the city, it's ridiculously simple logic.
It looks like you are right, that it is higher numbers but not at a higher rate. I could have explained that section better.
Blacks make up 13 yes but should we take into account that half are women and then another half off men due to them being incarcerated? That means only 3% are black men
Black males also commit 2/3rd of violent crimes in the U.S.
Whites are 60ish percent of the population, excluding the 40ish million Mexicans and other Hispanics (mestizos) here illegally. The government fudges the numbers by calling the mestizo population "White".
Good job skipping over the Race Realism and Jew landmines. Also great post.
I laughed at "Jew landmines "
This is a very interesting set of FACTS that link a lot of things going on:
"
They have destroyed our pride in our history, and a nation that loses its sense of history soon ceases to be a nation.
They have labeled our beloved Founding Fathers as "racists" and "white slavers", ignoring the great representative republic that these men constructed.
They have promoted multiculturalism, celebrating every culture-no matter how backward and barbaric-except for Western white European culture. As Jewish Marxist intellectual thug Susan Sontag stated in a poisonous rant "The white race is the cancer of humanity."
They have driven the Christian faith and heritage from the public square by utilizing their countless criminal cadres of ADL and ACLU Communist lawyers. Our children will soon grow up in a society wiped clean of any vestiges of the Bible, Christ or the cross. However, the menorah is still allowed in the White House for Hannukah celebrations. In fact, the Jewish religion is the only faith that can't be mocked openly in Hollywood entertainment.
They have torn our borders open, permitting, indeed cheering, the Third World dregs who will soon replace us as the majority. The Javitzes, the Lautenbergs and Cellers meticulously designed the legislation (Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965) that will genocide us. They have done all this while simultaneously-and with no sense of irony-supporting Israel's "Jews-only" immigration policy.
They have created, pushed and profited from pornography and perverse entertainment. The "Chosen" make up 90% of all American pornographers. The Hollywood they run has mainstreamed wife-swapping, common law marriages, pedophilia, scatology, licentious sex, drug and alcohol abuse and self-indulgence. Bestiality will be next on the list. In fact, they are already releasing a documentary portraying men who have sex with horses.
They have brought homosexuality out of the closet and into our faces. Sodomy is shown in their media and movies as normal, healthy, enjoyable and something to celebrate openly in as brazen a fashion as possible. They have founded, funded and fronted every homosexual advocacy group in America. To oppose the flaunting of buggery is now considered "old-fashioned" and "reactionary."
They have brainwashed our children. With their control of the institutes of "higher" learning, they have filled the minds of the young with Marxism, Deconstructionism, relativism, anti-white self- hatred and lies about "diversity" and non-judgmentalism. These sundry "isms" are the pernicious lies that have jettisoned the positive "isms" that once bloomed in our society: patriotism, altruism, individualism, nationalism, etc. Jewish academics like Noel Ignatiev now fearlessly call for the "death of whiteness" with nary a squeak of protest.
They have subverted our government. With Zionist control of media, both print and television, the two major political parties and the highest echelons of government, our foreign and domestic policy has been steered away from the interests of the European-American majority, rendering us incapable of self-preservation. The war in Iraq, the 9/11 attacks and a possible clash with Iran in the near future, are all results of the Zionist subjugation of the most powerful nation on earth, and the prioritizing of Israel's concerns over those of the United States. Our taxpayers now fork over nearly six billion dollars a year in money and weaponry to this rogue state, with little to show for it except the hatred of the entire planet and the punishment of higher oil prices from the Arab world.
They have force-fed the propaganda of radical feminism to American women and girls. Thanks to the steady diet of anti-male, anti-marriage and anti-family books, lectures and college courses from the likes of the Steinems, the Friedans and the Abzugs, many women now see the prospect of marriage and child-rearing as an impediment to their liberation. This has resulted in a sharply decreased gentile birthrate. "
They have made abortion into a sacrament. Planned Parenthood, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) and every other leftist pro-abortion promoter and provider in America is run from top to bottom by "the Chosen". Unlimited and unregulated abortion on demand is lauded and touted in the controlled media as a positive social good for the United States. Thirty-four years after Roe v. Wade and with over 40 million abortions under their belts, these same groups still cheer and applaud for more. And with most abortion rights organizations top-heavy with Jews and a large percentage of abortion doctors also being Jewish, they have definitely made a killing out of killing.
They have sold us the packaged and deliberate lies of egalitarianism. All races are equal in intelligence, morality, accomplishments and potential, except of course, for one. The Jewish "race", as their own leaders refer to their people, is declared by Jewish anthropologists to be "superior." The lies of Montagu, Gould and Franz Boas have infected and displaced true science. According to these charlatans, Jews are uniquely intelligent, uniquely moral and a group that stands above all other groups in its supremacy. They truly believe they have a God-given right to rule over us. To criticize their pernicious power is the most egregious societal taboo. It will result in the loss of reputation and livelihood and remove any individual-no matter how acclaimed they once were-from the realm of "respectable" society. "Our race (speaking of the Jews) is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves." - Menachem Begin. (Israeli Prime Minister, 1977-1983)
They have propelled forward and profited from the social experiment called "racial integration", a failed experiment that is killing European-Americans. With extremist Jews at the helm of the black civil rights movement, "headed" by their pawn, Martin Luther King, Jr., a charlatan plagiarizer and philandering minister whose speeches and writings were the product of his handler, Jewish Communist attorney Stanley Levinson, the rights of white Americans were steamrolled. This was done with the help of a pliant and gushing Jewish media bound and determined to decrease the power of Euro- Americans forever. These Jewish extremists founded the NAACP and headed it until the 1970s, not out of any benevolence toward blacks, but only to use them as a "proletariat" to finally seal Jewish hegemony over the institutions of the United States in the long run, thus guaranteeing the weakening and dumbing-down of white education and increased violence, rape and murder of the white majority. The 60% of violent crime committed in this country by "African-Americans" is then covered up or buried by the mainstream media, now firmly in Zionist hands. This, in essence, is an attempt to hide from the livid eyes of whites the abject failure and devastation of "integration."
They have seized our language and steered it to the purposes of propaganda, with a little help from the Zionist-controlled idiot box. A "racist" is now someone who is appalled by black crime and the brutalizing of white women and children by violent rape and murder. It is anyone who doesn't want white people to be wiped off the face of the earth forever. An "anti-Semite" is no longer someone who hates Jews, but someone the Talmudic Jews hate. Any soul who dares to mention aloud any aspect or plank of their sick and ghoulish anti- European death creed now leveled against us is likened to a Nazi goose-stepper sans the arm band and brown shirt. This would include a sizeable cross-section of the population who are now awakened and becoming hyper-aware of the reality of Jewish supremacist perfidy.
They have controlled our currency with the counterfeiting scheme that is the Federal Reserve, its umbilical cord of sustenance interfaced with the Jewish Rothschild banking cartel run from the financial nerve center of world Jewry located in London, England. Since 1913, and intermittently on and off again throughout US history, tribalist Jews have sunk their vampire fangs into the currency of our nation. This nexus of dominance, more than any other, must be broken, smashed, its reins handed back to the people and the government of our country, rather than a private corporation operated top to bottom by power-hungry greed-head Jewish extremist money-men and international bankers who are in all truth, globalists and internationalists, intent on robbing the American people of their livelihood and their birthright, just as our Founding Fathers warned us they would. Until we get this banking power off of our backs, we will never be free of Talmudic tyranny. We will instead be bankrupt and subservient to their evil power agenda.
And on and on it goes. Everything on this list can be easily verified. Jews, mostly Zionist in nature, have spearheaded every movement or cause that now threatens the destruction of European / white people and brings us to the edge of extinction and annihilation. And now the leviathan of Zionism and Talmudic Judaism extends its tentacles into every facet of our country and indeed into almost every other nation and culture residing upon the earth. With its expansion comes the debauching and sundering of all peoples, all heritages and all traditions. What will we do to stop it? Will we fear and quake before the strawmen buzzwords of "anti-Semite" and "hater", or will we stand and battle for the survival of civilization? It is up to all of us, Christians of both the right and the left, moderate Muslims who eschew violence, anti-Zionist Jews of conscience and indeed people of no particular religious persuasion. We must rage against the dying of the light, but that is not enough. All of us must kick at the evil and the darkness of Zionism and Jewish supremacism until it bleeds daylight.
How the fuck have you not killed yourself by now? Merely taking classes in sociology makes me want to end it all. I couldn't imagine the hell that teaching it must be.
sociology is humanities.
social science is history, political science, economics... these are still serious academic disciplines
You're a very smart man. I hope that at the very least you're not wasting your talents in a public school somewhere.
you don't know how I identify, shitlord. this triggered me.
On a more serious note, no, I'm not in a public school. I would love to talk more about my specific experiences as a teacher but I don't want to give away my identity.
And I'd love to read them, but I understand.
The end game to just about everything you mentioned is the extinction of white people. The same people that own ALL media own the banks and wield unimaginable influence in politics and all other outlets of power required to rock the foundations of the world.
I often ponder the question of wether or not a gilded cage is really cage at all.
I see all those Aids Skrillex and their virtue signalling and realise that an entire system has been created to fulfill these people's needs. They are trapped, yet they have a hamster wheel which they are happy to run on. Does this mean that trapping them is a bad thing?
The Matrix was such a good movie. The Red Pill/Blue Pill metaphor is perfect.
I remember when I was a young teenager and I first read Rich Dad Poor Dad by Robert Kiyosaki and he talked about how Land used to equal wealth and power, but in the information age, information equaled and power.
At the time I didn't realise what that meant or how I could utilise it for my own financial gain.
Now I see.
information = knowledge to trade on financial markets ahead of big announcements
deleted What is this?
Of course you should be critical of my post, as with everything you read.
However the word "conspiracy" is sometimes used like the word "racist," to mean "you aren't allowed to talk about this." I think it is very much worth talking about.
I can see how the right could use this to come into power. But this crisis was created by the left. Why would they do it for the benefit of the right.
Because the left and right aren't actually separate entities. They are both participating in a system with power in both. It really is a democratic system, that really does have camps of people on either side, but the two sides are played against each other and manipulated. I'm sure you've watched Fox News, for example. The right wing is full of insanity too. Full of examples of them getting used by major corporations, cutting environmental regulation or financial regulation, drug war prison industrial complex... that's right wing territory.
Because BOTH sides are being influenced by forces more powerful than political parties are. In this case, that force managed to find a way to make both sides useful:
The right to have the political fan base to being angry about terrorism, foreigners and want to kill welfare and increase the police state.
The left to have the political base to be able to bring in those foreigners and terrorism.
Already the "right" is portrayed in European media as a terrorist front which the "people" need to be protected from (with Internet surveillance, hate speech laws).
The right in Europe is only a grassroots movement, whereas the billionaires own the left (and the media).
This was very insighful. Im doing some research on some of the Ideas and points you made. Please write more!
Those who have power. They don't want any kind of danger for their wealth maybe?
Tour de force writing and analysis. It is the sad truth that greed is corrupting everything. TRP is based on the fact that old structures designed to control and positively channel base human instincts towards collectively positive goals - such as honour codes, civic duty, nobles oblige, welfare state and marriage 1.0 were rapidly changed and knocked down during the revolutions of the 20th century. That's partly due to science and technology, society and economics - everything changing in a really short space of time. Ultimately we are still hairless apes trying to fuck and accumulate resources and fight off outside threats. As systems we surround ourselves with and tools we use get more complex, the damage we can do by being collectively short sighted gets greater. Really, in the 21st century it is dangerous to trust human politicians and business leaders and elites. We will need benign artificial intelligence to lead our species soon or we will wipe ourselves out like over breeding bacteria in a petri dish.
There is a layer below money so to speak: power. Money is only there because people have the power to issue it, and decide how much of it is issued.
Follow the money, it's flowing to Wall Street.
Thanks OP for a great post! It's a really divisive issue here in Australia regarding refugees. As most know Australia is the only country defined as a continent; and for years we've had The Foreign Policy of turning back refugees on boats trying to flee here. Current policy is to relocate refugees to detention centres "off shore" to process their asylum claims. The media coverage on the issue has been interesting due to the fact we have a national election in a few weeks.
It's a contentious issue and so far has really demonstrated not only the power of the media, but those in the upper echelons of society whom control most of the power. How the machine/establishment works and obscures your views of it.
If you watch and especially read several sources you're able discern a varied and I believe broader view of society, and the world at large. I think it's important to diversify your information sources to enhance your world view. Similar in the way TRP open's your world view of sexual strategy.
Australian people kick ass and are still honest enough not to be too SJW - but it does worry me that it's catching on there more and more.
I devoured this post, great insight and simply but well explained. I think a society where women have all hell loose and where men are shut down is a society that's easier to control, where the feminine hivemind takes over and can be used as the driving stick of the masses. You don't need to rationally convince them of Anything, you just feed them the emotional bullshit that's gonna make them how You Want them to be. Women keep blue-pill-fed men on the ground and the Powers keep women in line.
You always make sense, down, and this post is no exception.
All these identifiers exist as a means of division. Honestly, who cares if you're a philoraptror F-18 otherkin? No one does except for the people in whose best interest it is to point and say , "Hey, look at that freak over there." Those same people will point in a different direction and say " Look at these bigots bullying someone for expressing who they really are." And as these two groups hem and haw and argue, the person who created the drama casually sneaks up and picks everyone's pocket and walks off laughing at how stupid everyone else is.
Apply this scenario to anything else--race,gender,nationality,religion e.t.c and you'll quickly see a pattern of rich and powerful people inventing and crating situations so that they can benefit from the continued ignorance and in-fighting of the people.
Heck,look at Africa. Nowhere else will you see a more masterful implementation of divide and conquer than there, and it's been transfered to the western world now, where identity politics and virtue signalling are the norm.
Whenever you see some row happening over one thing or another,ask yourself this: as we're doing this, what are the rich and powerful doing/ how are they benefiting. The answer might surprise you.
Which is another reason why the people in power want to import massive amounts of people from different cultures, look how people fight within their own family or amungst their own people.
Having "diversity/mult-culturalism" will make this 100 times easier to divide and conquer. "Diversity is a strength" is a complete lie, if you do a little bit of research you will find that out quickly.
I would recommend reading The Crowd by Gustave Le Bon, it shows when people get into the "group" mentality it will drastically lower the individual's ability for critical thought.
It does not matter how intelligent the individual is, we are all guilty of this. It is in our nature, those in power know this and they use it for their advantage.
There are real biological divisions, caused by thousands and tens of thousands of separate breeding and cultural development. If they were to "unite", it'd be something like India with caste divisions. One group, from leaders to the lowest members, seeks to dominate others and collect the economic and sexual benefits thereof.
Likewise, men and women have conflicting interests. Traditional marriage was a good compromise (both sexes were suppressed), but the elites advertised women the lie that they could have everything. And today mostly men only are suppressed.
"Follow the money" is Wrong. After you hold a few billion dollars in your hand--it stops being about money and elevates to another level. Think about it.
This is an attack on Europe and Europeans and white people in general.
Swallowing the red pill on feminism at a young age led me through race realism and antiglobalism later on, I went from a neoconservative to a paleoconservative toa paleolibertarian to a national anarchist to a national socialist to a national bolshevik to a fascist to embracing romanianism and the iron guard like I do today. Took 24 years since I was 12 in 1994 studying geopolitical stuff
you sound like someone desperate to find an identity. Why bother with "isms"? I don't.
Seem to forget it took 24 years for me to reach a conclusion
Beautiful post.
This is why I love this sub. Not the sex, not the women, not the power talk. This, the open discussion of global issues. The real reasons behind the passage of events.
It seems like TRP Is becoming more of a general "right wing" thought system. That's disappointing for me for several reasons.
1) While a lot of the stuff on the "right" side of the political spectrum are true, a lot of is bullshit used to control people, the same way left-wing thought is used to control people. The "globalists" you claim control the world own the right wing just as much as they own the left wing.
2) intelligent people keep all these things separate in their mind. Race is a different thing than gender, which is a different thing than economics, which is a different thing than foreign policy, etc... The idea that "everything is related" is called intersectionality and is a feminist idea. TRP shouldn't fall for that. All these issues are complicated and unless you want to set up dedicated forums to discuss each one, its better to keep them apart.
[permanently deleted]
I get this kind of comment a lot. I'm not a neo-nazi nor a fascist (as some people seem to be), this (about Jews) is not the argument that I'm making, and I've never seen a convincing argument for it, or really any argument besides "lots of jews work in media / etc." and "educate yourself!"
I've seen quotes from the Talmud that say the most vile things about jesus as well as quotes saying anyone who isnt a jew is a goy (cattle) who they are free to exploit. Wish i had the pics for it but they're there
Maybe back in Hitler's time. Today it's a hybrid jew-white class of nation-state-less international globetrotters and joined by other elites from around the world. For instance, the jewish (Ashkenazi) intermarriage rate is 71% and the jewish (Ashkenazi) TFR is ~1.1.
Hence: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/are-us-jews-assimilating-out-of-existence/
It's taboo to speak negatively of Jews, even here in a private forum we still feel guilty. Isn't brainwashing a hell of a thing?
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"
I'm not talking about Jews.
You are though. Media, putting ideas into culture and taking them away, banks, "white guilt", etc. Who do you think owns the media? The banks? Who do you think is spearheading white privilege / guilt, SJWs etc etc etc? If you sincerely do not believe it is Jews I am curious as to who you think you're talking about? I can back it up with facts if need be, but I thought it was pretty common knowledge?
I've found that a lot of times words like "big government" or "globalists" are "nice words" people put in place over "zionists" / "Jews".
This is all related to Zionism which is Jewish Supremacy.
Interesting. I agree with a lot said. Started realizing these things anywhere 8-8 years ago. Things are falling into place for me since the past 2-3 years.
My solution so far for myself is just to make so much money that I'm on the side of being the oppressor/corporation/the bad guy instead of being on the side of being oppressed or the one suffering.
Do you think thats the only solution to save people like ourselves or are there other alternatives? What solutions have you thought over the years that you think can protect you from the matrix of this rat race?
Unless you're ethnically related to them, you're not welcome to the club.
I don't buy into large-scale conspiracy theories, not because I trust people, but because I don't think people are smart enough, competent enough, and work together well enough to pull them off. You totally lost lost me with the idea that the migrant crisis is part of a plan for a right-wing, authoritarian crackdown. That might be the result, but it was never the plan. The idea is incompatible with your other explanation re: virtue signalling, which I totally agree with. Disregarding large-scale conspiracies, what we're left with is a web of self-interest. Others can disagree, but, to me, that's the red pill: that no one is at the helm; no one is steering the ship.
That doesn't mean the system is purely anarchical. Powerful actors do exist and do exert influence.
you misunderstood me. Not crackdown. A pretense to cut welfare as we do in the US on behalf of corporatism.
Ya, but what does that have to do with male sexual strategy?
When you swaller the Red Pill as a guide for sexual strategy a whole host of other illusions come crashing down with it. The evils of cultural marxism and the frankfurt school included...which has a hand in all of the illusions that the masses have been brainwashed into believing.
The people behind the "refugee" crisis are fewer than you think and meetings like Bilderberg etc. help them to network and to convince media and politician stooges that they invite to push their agenda.
Billionaire George Soros was linked to large scale efforts to get migrants over to Europe for example.
http://news.sky.com/story/1551853/sky-finds-handbook-for-eu-bound-migrants
How do you explain the SJW takeover of Reddit?
I mean, these people are drooling imbeciles, yet they were capable of conspiring to seize hundreds of subreddits using doxxing and other tricks.
Brains isn't really a prerequisite for a conspiracy; just having the balls to do whatever-the-fuck-it-takes to win.
I mean, sure, brains don't hurt, but they aren't really needed for most conspiracies.
Things like the European Union, or even the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, don't come out of some lone public servant's mind. The working class people don't want them either, they are advertised in the media for years (the EU) or kept in silence until it's almost too late to oppose it (TTIP).
Only the leadership of a political party needs to take orders from private interests. The rest of the party and the public administration controlled by it can be clueless, but still do their bidding.
Large scale in what sense? The amount of people participating in them knowingly and willfully? Or a movement generated by an elite few with political and financial pressure in the right places, followed by the masses?
deleted What is this?
[permanently deleted]
One should stand his ground. Support local resistance. Revolutions are made by angry young men.
Although escaping to a 3rd world country can be tempting as an idea, there is no future in them. You'd be an oppressed minority there, with 2nd class citizen rights (not allowed to own land or business in many Asian countries, for example). Some try to bypass it by putting the house in their local wife's name, and we should know how that goes...
In general, foreigners are not welcome anywhere but in Northern America and Western Europe.
Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone.
Though, to be fair, the only countries in Asia that offer a standard of living similar to the West are also free of anti-foreigner laws and it is possible to become a citizen.
I'm counting Singapore/HK, Taiwan and Japan in this. South Korea's extreme xenophobia and racism makes it a nono, despite its material prosperity.
THIS IS NOT AN EXIT.
Enjoy The Decline.
Enjoy the Destruction
That's even better.
Why sit passively by and watch the Blue Pill dumb down everyone when you can actively destroy the Blue Pill by waking people up.
"Kill the Beta" means the same as "Enjoy the Destruction".
The pleasure is in the destruction of the Blue Pill mythology.
Learn to fight the mind war.
This place is good for that.
If you try to enlighten brainwashed betas though it's like arguing with a person about religion. You'll just piss them off. I'm not sharing anything red pill with anyone who doesn't demonstrate to me very clearly that they are already starting to question and think and search out this kind of knowledge.
You can think of it like a Game where you "wake up the Beta".
The new sport... "Kill the Beta" to wake up the Red Pill inside him.
It's not easy.
Deception and treachery is advised. (for his own good of course)
that's a good point. I'll try to think of ways to do this.
Game is control of another person's emotions.
Use Game to lead him toward enlightenment.
That's an old Buddhist Guru trick... you figure out ways to configure the situation so the (in this case) beta finds the answer without telling him directly.
The Matrix has many "glitches" which you can make into jokes. The beta will laugh at the joke and only comprehend it much later.
Good luck... happy hunting.
Ride the tiger
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ride_the_Tiger
No. KGB/FSB has a wide network of agents and useful idiots in EU, with many media sources. EU countries can't close borders because that's what KGB wants. Bombing in Syria is a good lever to create big influx of migrants to EU. FSB/KGB started financing kurdish terrorists some time ago(they don't finance normal kurdish organizations, only extremists).
no..that's what israel wants.
Israel too, perhaps.
If it's the only way to show what is Islam and who are Arabs(semites), then let it be so.
Most migrants aren't even Syrians. Aside from that, to insinuate that the EU can't close the borders because that's the KGB's desire is fucking retarded. The EU is allowing these migrants in because the elite at the top of the EU are following the plan for European destruction. Read up on the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan. If anything, the interests of the citizens of the EU are very closely aligned with those of Russia in the context of mass immigration.
I bet you thought the Ukraine coup was a legitimate grassroots movement too.
This was super long but I enjoyed every word of it. I know there are people here that don't believe in conspiracy theories but tell me how all of these matters are not conspiracy theories?
On one hand I think the best way to start fixing things is to make one big bank owned by the government where people can get loans and open savings accounts. The income from that will enable the government to lower taxes substantially, while also fucking over the Wall street shits that are pulling the strings.
On the other I think we may want to address the race issue sooner rather than later, especially because of the group of people who behave as a race that are largely overrepresented amongst the puppeteers (there's a reason stock traders talk about the "goy ceiling" in Wall street.
To add to your coverage of virtue signalling: People also adopt social justice ideology because it also offers internal validation. By adopting SJ ideology, they conform to modern society's moral conditioning and feel good because of it. They get to think to themselves: "I'm doing the right thing and I'm a good person".
I agree 100% with one slight disagreement: the two-party system is not a willful construction only to create a smokescreen. Reality is always having two ways of interpretation, simply put: an emotional and a rational. (The emotional one is more authoritarian, hierarchical, black-and-white, traditional, hence rightist and values aggressive child-rearing tools - the rational one is free, egalitarian, tolerant, hence leftist and proposes laissez-faire - abandoning - child-rearing. And individually we have different mixes, but for mass consumption we do need both sides: the Red Pill and the Blue Pill must both be there to chose our personal mix of it. I do not see any other way. Of course maybe I simply do not think that the refugee crisis was organized by greedy capitalists - Soros as they say in putinist EU countries around Russia - to harm Europe with the social/ist/ welfare state. No, it just has happened at a time when the German national pride could not - yet - live with the image of "refugee camps" (due to the Nazi past - and Russia did want to create the division of the EU by re-creating its influence zone on the Eastern European plains where new national states were naturally opposed to the migrants and yes we were able to build the Wall (fence)in 5 minutes. /But Basic Income movements will also sprout and everyone will be on welfare unconditionally. Yes, Right Wing Parties will spread everywhere and the new immigrants will be repatriated./ There is one way to step out of the mainstream indoctrination: we must repeat the Red Pill that emotionally there are inequalities among people (ethnies, "races") or subcultures: American Puritans started non-aggressive childrearing earlier - in the Sixteenth century - than other people (following Jews who started it even earlier) - and Muslims have stopped emotional evolution due to female circumcision. Hence there should be legal equality /maybe/ - but there is simply nowhere equality on the level of emotional maturity ...So emotionally imbalanced and immature people must be screened - migrants or native - and I can imagine a hierarchical society in principle where you cannot vote - and cannot be elected - if you do not finish successfully a therapy where you learn to build up a non-compulsive adult new self. The atomic bomb is too dangerous to let present ("democratical") political processes in place that leave immature masses' representatives to decide about serious issues. On this emotional evolution there is a well-documented site at psychohistory.com whose editor /Lloyd deMAuse/ should be a source for Red Pill fans. (He is despised by SJW - you cannot get a Ph D if you quote him in an essay, I just have experienced this kind of censorship...)
Let's start a thread or a sub to follow the money?
Divorce rape and child support enslavement are real. I didn't use to believe in these things, yet - thank god i have not been subject to either- it is not meant for justice.
BUT (yes, big but)
Many red pillers here forget that for a very long period of time men who were unhappy with their lot with their family would just jump a train to California,change their name from Mason to Maston, and get a new younger wife and start over. No internet, no facebook, no national data bases and a man could easily just start again.
And many men would love to trade the 35 year old for a nubile 22 year old.
This led to pink ghettos and children abandoned during periods of economic duress. No trying to be racist, but i have heard that the Irish men of the 40s and 1950s used to make it a practice to abandon a large family.
The laws were changed to protect women and they now punish men. I have not checked but i have been told that men are starting to get a fairer chance in some courts -- but that, of course, is not enough.
just saying it is not a conspiracy all the time.
Are you allowed to mention the Jews, on reddit, without being banned yet?
I mean, I love EVERYONE, but those motherfuckers are on TOP and almost nobody talks about it anymore.
Very interesting & well organized and supported arguments. Can't argue w sjw types (or even certain "identities" because the rules or laws don't apply to them). But it applies to everyone else. I feel like their arguments often are triaged w the litmus test of if it does not explicitly mention that the law beneifts this group (anything other than majority) then it's ( wait for it) sexist, racist, fill in the blank.
As someone coming from the ex-Soviet Union I am astounded by the similarities. Where you have the Social Justice Religion, you had the Communist Party. Where you have ridiculous amounts of paperwork, you had slow and non-manueverable State appartchiks. Where you have Social divisions based on wealth, class, gender and whatever else; you had divisions based on belonging to rhe ruling class or not. Where you have science attempting to push the frontiers of knowledge you have pseudosciences like Sociology gaining traction, there you had the science of Marxism-Leninism. Where you have the rich and powerful betraying America, so did the rich and powerful betray the Soviet Union. Gentlemen, let me open to you a little secret - the Soviet Union did not fall because the system did not work but because it was betrayed by the Elites who figured they could make more profit from destroying the system than be letting it exist. We are seeing the same thing now in the West.
Lysenkoism is the best example of how political correctness lead directly to a complete shutdown of legitimate research.
Good post OP but you realize that nothing is free.
"Never explain through a conspiracy that which can be justified through mere incompetence."
The only thought more scary of a vast secret cabal pulling the strings from the shadows is the thought of the planet hurtling through space while the dominant monkey-like species is blindly flinging feces around.
I've volunteered with an NGO in probably the biggest refugee camp in the world .The host government wants to close it but the amount of opposition from the West and UN employees is astounding .Millions of dollars are spent on refugee welfare despite their countries being peaceful .The employees of the various NGOs earn tens of thousands of dollars a month and live in expensive gated estates ,dine in 5 star hotels,drive luxury SUVs and take their kids to some of the most expensive schools in the world .A lifestyle that they clearly can't afford to live in the West .This post puts everything in context
Can you provide a source for the "more white killed by police than blacks." statement? This will really rustle some of my co-workers jimmies.
http://www.colorofcrime.com/2016/03/the-color-of-crime-2016-revised-edition/ Look under the heading Police Killings of Blacks.
You are on your way to some things, and you have most of the important aspects of this figured out. What you should check out is cultural Marxism. It is the sjw religion in pure form. It is a Jewish ideology, and much like other Jewish ideologies it demonizes what is previously normal, such as allegiance to one's family, pride in one's Identity and people, nationalistic feelings, sexual mores geared for the production of stable nuclear families, gentile religion, etc. This intellectual strain reads these natural inclinations as "authoritarian" and sees them as a threat to the Jewish (and other minority, but this is a cover) in-group. This is why the Frankfurt school of social research, Bosian anthropology, Freud, the new York intellectuals, the AJC, ADL, SPLC and many other generally liberal intellectual currents have promoted that which normalizes what has been traditionally regarded as degeneracy. It makes the host people and nation weak and guilted so the Jewish in-group is safe, and able to use its high intellect and gift for media and finance to extract wealth. It's more instinct than conspiracy, I hope. Cultural Marxism reframes the previous divisions of Marxism (workers good / capitalists bad) in terms of race (Europeans bad/ minorities oppressed and therefore good). Look into the book "Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald. You are of course not allowed to read him because he is "anti-Semitic" for noticing that the intellectual currents behind American and European cultural decay are Jewish and liberal.
You'll notice that the media (which does the double job of promoting degeneracy AND propaganda) is vastly disproportionally Jewish. Same with pornography, organizations which promote sjw politics, billionaires, banks, liberal professors, neocons and communists.
https://youtu.be/tz8pzG02oxU is a documentary explaining this. You can watch it if you aren't scared by the term "White Nationalist" or the idea that you are a racist heretic evil white meaniepants!
Why this book ("Battle for the Mind" ) was created! This is read by almost each and every marketing employee.
Following the money leads straight to the Jews.
Man am I sick of you fucking idiots.
Not an idiot; my IQ is ~160. Who do you think controls Wall Street, Fed, mainstream media, internet, Hollywood, and academia? Who's behind Communism and Feminism? Follow the Shekels.
This is late but a great documentary to watch is one from Micheal Moore:
Capitalism: A Love Story
Here you clearly see the influence and power money has. It's very eye-opening.
When you start to follow the money, all roads lead to jews
Although this really isn't the place for this kind of commentary, this is some decent content.
Maybe a board for non-sexual strategy topics for Red Pilled posters would be good? I enjoy reading and engaging on this kind of stuff without having to deal with cucked idiots whining about social justice.
The mods could delete political talk if they wanted to, but it has appeared to me for quite a while to be fair game. And honestly I think it develops the subreddit quite a bit.
I also don't agree that it's not the place. We can talk all day long about WHAT blue pill is. but WHY blue pill is is also part of it.
I'm just suggesting that we create a non-topic board for various non-scope issues we all like discussing.
Until then I don't see a problem with it.
How is this about sexual strategy? From the top of the sidebar:
There are plenty of places to discuss red pill ideas that aren't related to sexual strategy. This isn't one of them.
yeah well your comment also isn't about sexual strategy so how do you like them apples.
Looks bad that this stuff gets up votes. Most people understand there is political corruption, but conspiracy theories are for fools and makes TRP look like a group of fools.
Yes the SJW's are annoying, but so are the actual racists. Just like conspiracy theorists they pull out little facts to fit a preconceived narrative.
[deleted]
One thing I am now wondering is this: in Europe, who should I vote for? The left, which is in favor of illegal immigrants but also in favor of public systems, or the right, which is against illegal immigrants but in favor of privitization?
Following your line of thought, voting itself becomes contradictory.
The left/right dichotomy is a farse. Vote with your feet and money.
This is what I've been doing for my whole career.
And guess what: if you work abroad, if you make under 100k a year you don't have to pay taxes.
If you're not an American citizen and you work abroad you don't have to pay taxes at any income.
exactly.
This Op guy is really not a smart person . Read his other replies. His understanding of concepts are poor and lacking .
... or Fillipino or Eritrean... But who cares about other places?
Only places worth caring about.
I noted them for completeness.
There will be no true "privatization" in Europe because Europeans love government regulation. In a truly privatized market things would get better for you but that will not happen. What will happen is it will be a "regulated" private market and will allow for regulatory capture by the largest and most resourced companies like you see in the United States with the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). Insurance companies are raking in the dough and premiums have gone WAY up.
It's more or less irrelevant to debate what is a "truly" privatized market when the government frequently colludes with businesses on their behalf.
That is already happening. There is a pressure to move healthcare to private companies owned abroad,who arrange taxes and profits so that they money won't stay within the borders. In my country, our education systems and ownership of natural resources - goverment owned lands with deposits, forest, water are structurally being adjusted so that privatization and selling of will be possible. Also, infrastructures like roads and power-networks are being sold off. They reason, to pay off loans required to upkeep the social services, whose bill is constantly increasing thanks to low-skill immigration. All of this is about grabbing the public funds to the owners of international corporate chains. Some sectors, natural monopolies, provide better value for citizens and society when provided by the goverment or when heavily regulated.
Europe under attacks of economical warfare which will cripple the welfare socities that are the base of our success, while we are meddling about minor social issues.
It dosen't matter if you vote for left/middle/right/liberal or conservative, as long as they are aware and against globalist economical threats. Alas, those who have biggest campaigining budgets, surprisingly seem to favour deregulation and opening the commonly own assets for commercial exploitation.
Just a comment - ask yourself who benefits from population growth. Maybe people with more than one house (and maybe stocks)? Maybe wealthy older people (who will benefit from house prices, and rely on a large young population when they retire)? Sounds a lot like a vested interest - people who have an incentive, and know they have an incentive. And of course, banks, because we know what happens to them in a housing downturn. It also sounds like the personal circumstances of a lot of legislators and senior public officials.
Love your post, it does a great job of challenging the liberal/conservative dimorphism so often talked about here.
So many of us here learned to re-evaluate the sexual/gender interactions but wasted that RP mentality when it comes to all the other sectors of our society. I also like to think about things how your post outlines but I often find myself slipping right back into my typical liberal tropes if I am not careful. I need to stay skeptical and examine everything through a RP lense. It's important to always challenge what you think you know.
Hell, women create narratives to suit their needs. "He wasn't right for me", "He didn't understand me", "I want to experience life". Most of it is angled at convincing other people they're right and they're the victim. But if you lay out logic and accountability, they lose their minds. The hypocrisy is unbelieveable. But this is the world today.
Solipsism in the 21st century.
Brilliant post!
In Germany the media always played anyone that was working for a salary which is taxed to the max regardless of low little you earn (50ish percent) against the welfare receiving underclass.
The storyline goes: They're too lazy to work, often work for cash on hand while you guys pay for their living. Work is virtue, which is pretty close to an old nazi slogan used in the labor camps.
Nevermind that those that pull the strings pay next to no taxes.
Welfare receivers barely live better than people in prison though - except the prison is outdoors and the supervision is not 24/7 and the only available jobs for most welfare receivers pay barely more than welfare because manufacturing moved away to China in the 80s and the socialist system with it's gazillion regulations and tax to the max is rigged in favor of large corporations.
The goal is envy, even though welfare only makes up about 15% max of the tax spendings and even welfare receivers pay lots of taxes on housing, utilities and consumption.
Now "refugees" are used to distract people from the ever growing move towards a sovietization of the country (welfare that just keeps people alive in shitty housing blocks) as more and more jobs pay less and less.
The future isn't looking too bright boys and girls and I see a civil war or even more totalitarian state (or EU power grab as a move to some kind of globalist government) on the horizon...
Brother,
With great respect, I honestly think you’re way off. And I say that, as indicated, with respect for you and your post. I’ll stick to logical points only, and hopefully you’ll see my view even if you don’t share it.
The bottom line I believe is this: you’re overreaching. There are no coincidences, and no conspiracies either.
[Gah. too long for one post. splitting in parts]
Alright:
Cui bono. Who benefits? The oldest, and usually very reliable, analysis. The problem is when you apply this guide, which works great in micro analysis to macro situations. It fuels the conspiracies.
Let me make three points:
Consider Pascal’s three-body problem. It essentially states (paraphrasing) that as the amount of players in a system increases, the amount of information required increases exponentially. Example: You’re playing pool. You hit the white ball and have a certain certainty that it will hit a second ball, and that second ball will hit a third and so forth. You have a certain certainty that the second ball will hit the third and an error margin of, say, an inch either side. When that third ball hits the fourth, the error margin will be twice as big. To get the error margins down to one inch each side of the fourth ball again, you will need four times the information you had before. And so on. By the time you are at the ninth ball, you require the weight of every person in the room to have the same error margins. At the 27th ball you require the location and velocity of every particle in the universe. This is why you cannot analyse macro like this. No one can. It’s also the reason why stock brokers are no better at picking stocks than monkeys are throwing darts at a board. Too many players in the game. Vice versa, cut bono works very well when analysing micro transactions, i.e. contracts between limited parties, office politics, women, etc.
Occam’s razor. This rule essentially says that in any situation, the simplest solution is likely to be the correct one.
Affinity for patterns. You’ve probably read Taleb on this, or Kahneman. Basically, humans have an affinity to find patterns and dislike to accept randomness. It’s a human trait. Everyone has it. Every human suffers from this cognitive bias. There’s real science in this. We are not genetically predisposed to accept randomness, but instead to see patterns.
Also, interesting article here on cui bono: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/21/opinion/21iht-edcohen21.html
Well. Let’s not disregard the media’s bias to reduce everything to lowest common denominator and sticky soundbites.
Some people did. You evidently read/heard them. But they didn’t get the coverage. This has to do with Occam’s Razor. Rather than being a conspiracy, I see the media wanting to appeal to the largest possible audience, which required a lack of nuanced analysis.
Again. Occam’s razor applies. A simpler story is this: the people in the banks were smarter than the people in the government. The smart people screwed over the dumb people. So it has always been and so it shall always be. There’s no need to read more into it.
Same thing with the bailout: Was there a big thought-out plan that included a bailout from the get-go? Maybe. Or is it more likely that the bankers and ratings agencies knew they were playing with fire but the money was just too good not to? They probably knew that at some point the music would stop, but also that when they did, they counted on the fact that they could out-think and out-talk and out-wrangle their way out of it… because they are the smartest guys in the room. Which is what happened. The latter sounds more likely, does it not?
In theory, yes. In macro, however, there are too many players to get this done very effectively.
Good definition.
Which is not a conspiracy. Kellogg’s want to push the narrative that breakfast is an important meal. Because they are in business for profit.
Of course not. They pander to their respective demographics.
Bingo.
Eh. Or by people with too much time and imagination.
The arab world is no different, incidentally. Except that the narrative there is self-feeding, there isn’t much topdown organisation going on.
I’m with you there.
[deleted]
[deleted]
"Imagine how much money you could make if you privatized a completely public healthcare system? And then started charging tuition for a formerly free higher education system?"
There is no such thing as FREE education. Somebody pays the teacher. Somebody pays for the materials. If you don't pay for it, somebody else is paying for it.
You are a social studies teacher? Do you work for free? Or are you getting paid? If you are getting paid, how can you claim there is "free" education. If you are getting paid, you are propagating some of the lies. YOU are not thinking for yourself.
Thus your arguments lose some of their credibility.
Who profits? The Clinton household net worth (not the foundation) is estimated to be $120 million. Tell me what they have produced that is worth this amount of money. That's part of your answer about "who profits".
no need to be a semantic turd. you knew that I was referring to public education in the sense of it being publically funded and not charging a tuition to those that attend. not that I think the funding was magically borne from the air.
.... so it's not free
lol you're not a smart person like a lot of people are claiming in this thread .
All this money talk yet there is no money framework or economics, politics and or philosophy. This post is a massive waste of time and it reveals nothing significant and worse its blanketed with populist sentiments found in mainstream media number two called the alternative media.
Its simply incredible that almost no one can process that the system we're in is better then the system it was a decade, a century or a millennia ago. The most significant improvements in the system occurred in mass increments after WWII and the new deal reforms. Yet no, mostly because of a perceived scarcity of vagina thought docket has been wiped clean of heartless Vulcan logic and superseded with the high social value garbage of media narratives/propaganda.
The system we're moving towards is far better and people "red pilled" or still in the multitude gargling it down will be willing participants towards this motion because of their utter ignorance to the system they live in. It truly is for the best that we're moving towards a better system, not a perfect system but a system better then the elder.
It was a social studies teacher that first told me that 6 million plus jews were slaughtered by Hitler during WW 2, I hope you're not telling these lies to your students as well, lest you be part of the problem my friend.
I talk about race a lot but I am far from one of those people that thinks the holocaust did not happen. People can dispute the numbers if they want to, I have no problem with someone looking at primary sources and drawing their own conclusions about the scale of what happened.
But I have no special obsession with Jews or WW2 or the Holocaust that a lot of people interested in race seem to have. You can think of me as part of the problem if you want to, it makes no difference to me. Everyone has to make up their own minds about what they think.
So do you just avoid telling your students how many jews were killed then? I'm curious because you want people to make up their own minds but at the same time I can't imagine how it's possible for you to avoid planting ideas in your students' minds. And those ideas are gonna be bias cause you're also indoctrinated.
edit: spelling
Also, you must have some pretty smart students if they're researching primary sources and then "drawing their own conclusions". I wasn't that smart.
Too many of your opinions are expressed as facts.. Man I would love to know where you get your stats from. You come across racist and Islama phobic . Are you saying 5% of Muslim immigration are isis??
I'm from the UK where the police and the crown prosecution service admit they're institutionally racist. Where in some years black men were 8times more likely to die in police custody per capita than white men.
It's also interesting what you say about information control. As with police statistics .. As it's easy to find out which race commits the most muggings .. But finding stats on paedophiles by race.. Is like trying to get blood from a stone.. Anyways
In the UK I think there is a white male/female privilege in dealing with the police. And in the "upper echelons" of society . Let's say you'll do better off if you went to Eton .
But you're right when you it's not all about white male privilege .. Especially since we're not all white male and privileged .. Kinda obvious really
Then another question is who makes money from the redpill
you think that theredpill is establishment?
pardon me, but:
lol.
One guy here sells t-shirts. It has provoked protests in the past.
This is amazing content, I will however throw in that there is a white male privilege. 6'2'' Blonde hair blue eyes in sales...
Excellent post. Thank you for this.
I disagree with your theory.
The left are those who wanted to house the refugees. The right did not want to house the refugees.
Therefore, it was the right who schemed this plot to destroy the left? Wrong, the left simply imploded with a bad idea.
Do you know what happens when there are two groups on a spectrum? One side has a bad idea and those who notice the bad idea shift to the other side a little. Rarely is it the other way when a side had a good idea that people shift.
No rational mind would create a new lowest class. With poverty comes crime, who gets robbed then? The people with money. With the growing disdain for 1%'ers it is entirely bad strategy to increase the population of your haters.
Great post. Here's my take, which no one asked for, but meh you're probably reading this while taking a shit anyway:
I think you've nailed how it's going to pan out, and even explained why it's happening, but are incorrect in thinking it's a conspiracy orchestrated by evil geniuses. Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity.
Eventually, all that privatization will happen, and Europe will never get rid of the horde of angry, unemployable immigrants. But you've given politicians far too much credit by giving them the benefit of the doubt and thinking there's a master plan.
The group-think that men are stupid and women are nurturing has led to Germany having a treasonous fat pig in charge of the country, and has turned Sweden into the morbid punchline that it is. What's happening is the most obvious possibility: shitty, naive leadership is being manipulated and abused by an influx of a misogenistic society that are acting in their self-interests.
Everything you wrote will happen, but the money to be made is as a result of the mess these fucking retards created, and not actually the long-term plan of hand-wringing billionaires having Satanic paedophile orgies.
That's the point though. The Oligarchs know there would be two possibilities in Europe and both give them unprecedented power and money.
The way I see it is there will be huge Civil conflicts occurring soon. The world can't survive like this. Capitalism has been used to enrich the few at the expense of the many, and the few won't stop because the many are starving. If the few get their ways, with automation they may not want us around. Who wants to pay for billions of useless people that weren't born like they were? That is their line of thinking and that will spell ruin if it unfolds.
I still see the shitty outcome as the accidental result, and not the successful plan all along. This is the Red Pill subreddit - remember that most people think all women are snowflakes, Islam is Christianity for Brown people, etc. Politicians stay in power by catering to the masses. The masses are idiots. As a result, Europe's liberal feminist sensibilities opened the floodgates to the ultimate victims of the evil white patriarchy - poor innocent brown people who, on the moderate side, organize arranged marriages and can see how suicide bombings are justified
I agree with Civil unrest. Germany's gun sales have gone up. I don't think the fault lies in a Capitalist society, but in a Welfare state. People don't want their money going to people they thought / were told would be grateful to enter their country. Ditch the benefits and make it clear they contribute or leave.
Such idiotic sentiment leaves an easy loophole for exploiters.
The highest leadership in dominant parties is not stupid. They mostly have to be sociopathic or highly capable for social manipulation to rise to such a position (or simply from families with elite connections).
If you genuinely believe that it's less idiotic to think that there is a faceless group of elite puppetmasters, that operate in complete secrecy, in a day and age when the presidential candidates are scrutinized under a microscope daily and insulted by leaders of other countries who stand to gain financialy depending on which candidate wins, then you're ignoring huge amounts of evidence and motive that the people are flawed humans, not conspirers. They can't delete emails without it being known. A plan this huge would take literally decades, dozens of conspirators, complete cooperation, and no witnesses. That happens in movies, not in real life.
Ever met rich people that led a sheltered, private school life? They're some of the most naive people in regard to how the real world works. Being raised wanting for nothing, in the think tank of "don't ever do anything that could be seen as racist/sexist" leads exactly to a mess like this.
This is nationalist. Nationalism has nothing to do with trp.
[deleted]
I'm not sure how you think that I'm writing a narrative that benefits me. I'm just making observations about the world.
Are you talking about Gay Lube Oil? Guy thinks the US government is behind every ill in the world.
I'm not talking about him. But just like the SJW's, the "anti-American" crowd are the useful idiots of other nations.
You cannot imagine how convenient it is for the dictators and corrupt oligarchs of other countries to know that their constituents, often incapable of critical thinking or source-checking, will accept any lazy finger pointed at the US so that it can absorb the blame for things their own leaders are doing to them.
Russians tend to be especially susceptible to this kind of thing because they are extremely proud, a pride fueled by a need to compensate for the shame of not being able to reconcile thinking they were a superpower and then discovering in the 90's that they are very much not.
It takes a lot of mental gymnastics to simultaneously think you are ultra-powerful and also weak enough to be pushed around by invisible forces at a whim, to love your nation while knowing that the most destruction your nation ever experienced was at the hands of your own government. But these are the kind of mental gymnastics you need to believe that "everything is their fault, nothing is our fault, they are always wrong, we are always right" which is the cornerstone of modern Russian nationalism.
I don't know what GLO said about this but I would take his political views with a grain of salt.
All it takes is a portion of your economic and government elites to co-operate (or dare I say, conspire) with foreign capitalists. These elites don't even have to be of your own ethnicity, if the society is tolerant enough.