TheRedArchive needs help
With 700,000+ posts and 16,000,000+ comments archived, and new Red Pill content being added every week, keeping TheRedArchive alive and discoverable to everyone is starting to become very costly. As a 20-year-old student who just moved out and is living independently for the first time, keeping TheRedArchive alive is beginning to cost me much more than I thought.

Therefore, if you appreciate the website, have gained a lot of knowledge and insight from it, and want to show your appreciation, you can do so by donating any amount that you want via the options below. The money will be used on the expensive monthly host bill and any future maintenance of the website.
Thank you, and I wish you all a successful 2021 and a good luck with achieving your goals and dreams!

Best, /u/dream-hunter

Voting for a women based on her gender isn't "feminist."

Reddit View
Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy link
PDF EPUB TXT PNG
[deleted]
November 8, 2016
811 upvotes
TheRedPill

My entire feed is filled with #Imwithher and "Can't wait to vote for the first female president," and "Making history." There is nothing about issues, just gender.

  1. If feminists were about gender equality the gender of Clinton would not matter, because the genders are so similar that one cannot determine an actionable difference. They have asked us to view high level corporate jobs in this way.

  2. If feminism was about gender equality, it would be called gender equality, not feminism. I have tried asking many women why they refer to their movement like this, because it excludes men and all I have heard in response is that I'm a misogynist, whatever that means now.

  3. I see the fear of people afraid to speak out on this. Do not fear losing those who want you to fear questioning their ideologies.


Post Information
Title Voting for a women based on her gender isn't "feminist."
Author
Upvotes 811
Comments 150
Date 08 November 2016 08:34 PM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/39509
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/5bvr9t/voting_for_a_women_based_on_her_gender_isnt/
Similar Posts
Loading Loading

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pillfeministfeminism
Comments

[–]overshoot3 142 points142 points [recovered] | Copy

They probably think voting for someone who is the major cause of the armageddon perpetrated against whole countries like Libya and Syria, resulting in the death of thousands of women, is the best way of empowering women.

[–][deleted] 51 points52 points  (11 children) | Copy

I was contemplating why so many people are okay with voting for an openly corrupt politician. It occurred to me that they too know the two party system has been in a stalemate. Women view Hillary's obstruction of the law as an example of somebody who has enough influence to break a "corrupt patriachical system". In short, fight corruption with corruption. She is their way to power.

edit: Although I do not believe there is a patriarchy*

[–]2kez8862 points63 points  (2 children) | Copy

Thats giving them too much credit. IMO they simply have no idea about all that shit and just vote for her because she's a woman and trump is a 'misogynist'

[–]Ranger_Mitch19 points20 points  (1 child) | Copy

Chillinfosho makes a good point, but seriously, this. "You go girl!" + "Fight the power!" + half the population has an IQ below average = They're with her.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

If you ever want to trigger a woman beyond belief, show them the numbers that prove men's IQs ride both ends of the spectrum. The smartest and dumbest people are male. Women all hover around average.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_201636 points37 points  (5 children) | Copy

Wrong. They know.

This reflects on the average persons character. They are immoral, unethical, self serving, lack integrity, and corrupt.

They are lazy pieces of shit just like Hillary is a piece of shit. It takes discipline and suffering through pain to do the right thing. Our entire modern world is based upon pain aversion and you see the result all around us.

[–]systemshock869 9 points9 points [recovered] | Copy

They think that their road is the high one, and they are OK with whatever corruption it takes to ensure that they win. They have been told by all their trusted sources who the bogeyman is; he must be defeated no matter what. Fuck laws, fuck honesty, fuck protesting Wall Street and the media monopoly..

It's disgusting how people will dump their convictions and turn a blind eye to crime in order to keep a meanie butt out of office.

[–]ioncehadsexinapool2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Low T is a real problem in America

[–]INTHEMIDSTOFLIONS0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

I wonder if you think the average person is still this way considering the results.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_20160 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Yes I do. Trump did not win by a landslide. Large margin yes. But let's assume something like 40% of people still voted for a patently corrupt individual. That is fucking scary.

[–]Xavhorn4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Do you really think that all of Hillary's votes are legitimate. Have you seen the Project Veritas video? That bitch has more votes than she should've had and she still lost. Just goes to show how much people hate her.

https://i.sli.mg/QTv0dT.jpg

[–]_the_shape_9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

To answer your concern with one video, I'd nominate this clip of Hillary being chucked into a van as the most accurately symbolic representation of those voting for her in spite of the continuous stream of scandals connected to her.

It really didn't matter how crooked she might happen to be - this was the watershed moment to shove a woman into the White House (policy, health, and ethics indisputably coming second to her being a woman) and no way in hell was a man who used the word "pussy" and clearly wasn't a submissive cuck to the Feminine Imperative going to win the throne while also depriving her of the chance (thus the "It's Her Turn" slogan)

[–]Echoes_and_madness6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's a straw man fallacy. They created this enemy called 'patriachy' so they had someone to blame and now it seems there's weak minded gullible people following suit and believing this shit as well. It's a feminazi empire and we get to live in it.

[–]Ranger_Mitch13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy

While the primary victims of war are (obviously) the women who have to see their fathers, husbands, brothers and sons die, with a significant portion of the male population dead, there are SO many more available opportunities for women after the war! It is a simple necessity. Therefore, effectively, war empowers women!

/s

[–]_the_shape_6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

You, shitlord sir, it seems, would find the DraftOurDaughters memes to be up your alley. Check them out, if you haven't already.

[–]pootinesque 7 points7 points [recovered] | Copy

This is what fucking blows my mind about all the pseudo-Feminists, they cannot internalize nor accept the DAMAGE that Clinton has brought to brown (Libya, Syria, Guatemala) and black (Haiti) women the world over.

It is chauvinism of the worst sort.

[–]Kingman72 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Because so many only want a woman president to serve their own ego. They could care less about all the men and women over there who would be killed by that war monger.

As long as they don't have to see it first hand, they don't give a shit what happens to all the brown people over there.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

She also stood by her husband who raped and sexually assaulted a bunch of women, while also using his power and status, to get Monica Lewinsky to blow him.

[–][deleted] 180 points181 points  (39 children) | Copy

Honestly. It's sickening seeing all these #Imwithher posts on my facebook feed.

[–]ek199585 points86 points  (20 children) | Copy

I'm staying off social media as much as possible over the next week or two. People are absolutely fucking clueless.

[–][deleted] 120 points121 points  (15 children) | Copy

They really are stupid. They don't realize that the Clinton Foundation literally collects money from countries, that treat the LGBT community and women horribly. Yet Trump says pussy and they go nuts.

[–]ek199553 points54 points  (7 children) | Copy

The Clintons are essentially a mafia, and nobody fucking knows it, nor do they even want to listen when you try to tell them. The "foundation" is just a cover for basically a gang. Hillary is playing her voters like a fiddle.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (3 children) | Copy

Exactly. Just watch the Clinton Cash documentary and it explains everything.

[–]Luckyluke234 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

i'd love to do you have a link

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LYRUOd_QoM

[–]TaylorWolf25 points26 points  (2 children) | Copy

Strait up the same Mafia that HW Bush and the CIA were involved in... People forget HW bush was director of the CIA then Vice President under Reagan for 8 YEARS (pulling the strings a-la Dick Cheney) before he became actual president for 8 YEARS.

Clinton allowed drugs (that the CIA were trafficking) into Arkansas while he was governor. Then he became president for the next 8 YEARS. The Clinton-Bush debates were a joke you can tell they are homies.

The same fucking Cartel has been running shit since they shot JFK

[–]war-admiral15 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy

HW was president for 4 YEARS

[–]TaylorWolf1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Still you gotta throw his name in the mix when you talk Clintons

[–]Swallowed_the_pill21 points22 points  (3 children) | Copy

Clinton was publicly against LGBT rights all up untill 2008, and probably still is. She justs knows that it's political suicide to be against it.

[–]1kick60 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Clinton is a lesbean. Weird to be against your own rights.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Not at all. Multiple senators with gay/pedo connections prove otherwise.

[–]1kick60 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

You might have a point. They probably think they're above reproach.

[–]OldNickMiller1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It wasn't that he said pussy, at least for me the bad part wasn't the word itself, but I get from where you're coming

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I am stunned by the other side's ignorance of documented, verifiable facts regarding the CF and other problem Clinton activities. It really goes to show you how the MSM has utterly and completely brainwashed these allegedly 'open-minded' people are.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yep and should you disagree on ANY issue, no matter how important it is, they call you a bigot. Liberals piss me off so much. So fucking happy Trump won. I also made money on that prediction through PredictIt

[–]WhatUPbRUTSKI2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I killed my FB a while ago- couldn't deal with people.

[–]Sinborn2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I've been off fb for the past 2+ years. Trust me, you won't miss it.

[–][deleted] 55 points56 points  (8 children) | Copy

I was proud of my sister for at least not voting for Hillary (she wrote in her own answer)....

Then less than 1 day later, she posts some fat acceptance bullshit. It's like... you stupid bitch, you couldn't let me be proud of you for 1 fucking day, could you?

[–]ek199519 points20 points  (6 children) | Copy

Not sure if it really applies here, but, AWALT.

[–]LandoChronus17 points18 points  (5 children) | Copy

It always applies, all the time.

[–]Orig_analUse_rname17 points18 points  (2 children) | Copy

ALL WALT. Don't you boys get it? Your mom, your sister, your wife. Even granny.

[–]1Sir_Distic5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

I really hope that was your phones autocorrect.

[–]Forcetobereckonedwit2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I dunno, its pretty funny as All Walt.

[–]FractalFactorial11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy

Typical virtue signaling. Happens all over my university, even during lectures people will crack "LOL TRUMP" jokes.

People don't acknowledge Hillary's flaws whatsoever. There's some popular posts on FB along the lines of "INVESTIGATE 6 TIMES, FOUND INNOCENT 6 TIMES". Only problem is that that finding is utterly bullshit because its based on her "intent". Its a blatant double standard, she deserves to have had charges applied.

[–]ioncehadsexinapool1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well according to trump she'll be in jail once he gets sworn in

[–]WilliamBott6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Now that the election is over and she lost, they can all #GoWithHer back under a rock.

[–]Heizenbrg8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

Why do you even have Facebook? It's already enough to hear your coworkers talk about that feminist woman enraged With Trump or the trump fuck boy spewing bulshit on his feed.
J

[–]generallyaprick1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Your face book feed should be a salt mine by now in that case. Mine certainly is and I'm from the other side of the world. Had a good laugh at some of it.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

It really is. The butthurt is so real. You would have thought all of their loved ones or their favorite dog (which I love dogs by the way and want to own one someday) died.

It's like almost my entire Facebook feed is on suicide watch.

[–]evoblade1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Anyone who posted that on fb feed if I had one would be unfriended.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_201663 points64 points  (9 children) | Copy

#DraftOurDaughters #ImWithHer

[–]BluestBlackBalls13 points14 points  (3 children) | Copy

Are these new recruits going to be part of the infantry, on the front line, tip of the spear?

Or are they gonna be secretaries, sous chefs and work behind some boards?

[–]Hillarysdilddo_201610 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

True.

my inner shitlord says front lines. Die for Libya, Syria. While we stay on the mainland lifting and making profit.

But as you mentioned reality is it will always be the men bleeding while the women take the non combat roles.

[–]Jester25521 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The latter. You have to actually be able to uphold the infantry fitness standards and we all know that won't happen save a small majority!

[–]ioncehadsexinapool1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I hope they're not on the front line. Psychological research proves that weakens things not because of the woman's ability, but because of the natural instinct of a man to protect a women, aka endangering the squad because of primal instincts that could easily be prevented

[–]landon0428 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

stupidest shit ever, since i never registered for draft once I turned 18 i got a letter, basically just a reminder.

it's easy to do it on the website, and on the website it showed the thing about requiring women to join the draft. and it failed.

just thought about it, if that shit happens with this corrupt shit, i'm flying far away, no reason to sacrifice your one life for a country that just wants to take your resources/money any way it can from false rape/child support/alimony and does not respect you at all.

imo i don't understand why anyone here promotes joining the army, your "honorable" death was not honorable, you have 1 life, and you think people give a shit back home? lol nope, country has more issues like corporate equal employment of womyn!

[–]Hillarysdilddo_201612 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

Of course. You get it.

Name the last war the US fought for defense? Yeah... Exactly.

Go fight, die, or get maimed so some POS globalist can get rich.

No.

[–]_the_shape_1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Possibly some of the greatest memes I've ever seen in my life

[–]RagerzRangerz2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Drafting women is a plot by Hillary to get as many troops as possible for a war with Russia.

Semi joking. Semi serious.

Edit: wrote I'd instead of is. My autocorrect is fucked up.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_20160 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

No. This is entirely correct.

Plus women always defer to authority. Traditionally this was the patriarch. Now it has been usurped by the government.

With women soldiers orders will be carried out without an afterthought.

But yes. Primary reason is to double the military force for all out warfare to fatten globalists wallets.

[–]1TimmyTurnersNuts39 points40 points  (1 child) | Copy

Man enjoy the decline. I see this shit all on my feed and I know the truth, you know the truth and deep down they know the truth. Feminism is bullshit. Hilary is bullshit amd voting is bullshit. Watch the world burn and have a nice cold beer nearby. Fuck it.

[–]Orig_analUse_rname15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy

I feel compelled to try and change things. But deep down I know you are right.

[–][deleted] 39 points40 points  (0 children) | Copy

What's my qualification? I have a penis.

  • How all the "Imwithher" people sound.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (1 child) | Copy

My mom literally just voted for Hillary because of "sexism".

facepalm

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

AWALT, even your mom. My worst awalt realization waking up.

[–]lqtys17 points18 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is called: Gender Bias

They vote for a female just because she is a female. And it just feels right. FEMEL EMPOWAH HUGA HUGA!! FUCK YOU MAEL LOOOSERS!! HUGA HUGGA gives a middle finger up

[–][deleted] 17 points17 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

Because there will be nothing left afterwards.

[–]2comment7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

With Hillary's health issues, I have a feeling this will essentially be Bill Clinton's 3rd term.

[–]TheRedLadle1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Hopefully Merkel will be gone when/if the US elects a female president!

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon41 points42 points  (4 children) | Copy

The UK had a female prime minister.

After 11 years of that, noone asked for a woman to run things again.

[–]RedMoonAscendant7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

You are being sarcastic, right? Is there some hope that the cuckistan of UK will turn around?

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

No sarcasm.... time will tell how awful the current female leader is, too early to tell yet.

[–]OliMonster0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

And when we get given another one without being asked, she makes a hash of everything anyway.

For those that aren't aware, she's been driving through Brexit as though the referendum was legally binding, and she's doing everything in her power to stop Parliament having a say. Plenty of Little Englanders have been realising it wasn't all scaremongering, so there's a good number of people who want a do-over.

[–]ihateporkbuns-4 points-3 points  (0 children) | Copy

hhahaaha, alright that's just a silly argument, even though im rp. Cmon -_-

[–]bigcitytruth19 points20 points  (0 children) | Copy

No shit. Women like her because she's a woman. How many women choose ANYTHING based on well-thought-out logic?

[–]maniclurker 30 points30 points [recovered] | Copy

It's not feminism. It's sexism.

Feminism is supposed to be about equality and civil rights. Most "feminists" are just female sexists.

[–]Conceited-Monkey9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy

I thought the whole idea of equality was to vote for people based upon their character, ideas, and platform. Gender should be irrelevant.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah its almost as if progressives aren't concerned with equality. Its almost like a gambit for political power and authority. In some weird way its like they're more oppressive than the people they're demonizing. Strange huh?

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

You're wrong.

The entire movement behind voting for a female just because she is female is about pressuring people, shaming them, excluding them, declaring them traitors, enemies, sexists, etc. if they don't follow the preference of some vast, impersonal hivemind.

That entire strategy is feminism in a nutshell.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

I'm not super into American politics. But yeah, voting for someone based on their gender is dumb.

[–]red-pill-man5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

It isn't feminist. It's sexist.

But women won't see their hypocrisy.

[–]Theophagist15 points16 points  (17 children) | Copy

It very much is feminist. Feminism is nothing but another springboard for socialism.

[–]OliMonster1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

What nonsense is this? McCarthyism was dead and buried years ago, socialism isn't the boogeyman. You can't call things socialist because you don't like them... Explain to me how feminism leads to socialism.

[–]Theophagist2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

McCarthyism was dead and buried years ago

And the commies are back. Living in the East Bay, I can easily tell you from the top of my head the names of several openly communist shops and organizations. No one is exposing and chastising these anti-American rats.

socialism isn't the boogeyman

King Obama was clearly a socialist, even literally admits wanting to go "Full Bullworth" at one point.

Explain to me how feminism leads to socialism.

Listen to their rhetoric. Then look at socialist ideology. I can't give you a lesson on the destructive forms of government. I can tell you however that feminism was not Susan B. Anthony and her suffragettes (voting wasn't even really a gender issue, but that's another story.)

Feminism as we know it was started in the 60s by authors such as known Marxist Betty Friedman. All the talk about oppressed/oppressor classes, worker equality, an unhealthy obsession with the plight of the proletariat (with women replacing proletariat), the whole thing is a load of Marxist claptrap. Bad for women, bad for men, bad for freedom.

[–]BENDERisGRREAT22 points23 points  (5 children) | Copy

Why do you think Obama is President? 95% of blacks voted for him but they clearly arent racist

[–]interestedplayer11 points12 points  (3 children) | Copy

[deleted]

What is this?

[–]BENDERisGRREAT6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

the statistics from the previous election were about 80-85% voted democrat I believe. Anytime its as high as 90 something percent theres prejudiced going on

[–]1kick61 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Far more blacks ACTUALLY VOTED when it was Obama.

[–]BENDERisGRREAT0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

They just said African americans voted 89% for Hillary. Dont you think impartial voters would have voted stronger to keep the bigot labelled Trump out of office than they would have to keep a war hero out?

[–]OneInAZillion4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

Pretty much this, except it's "she's a woman WOOOOO"

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

lol. alternatively

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1x4JkZTfPs

[–]Swallowed_the_pill3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Looks like a feminist to me!

[–]DaSquariusGreen5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

True "feminism" comes from understanding the inherent strengths and weaknesses of being female, and working to maximize your atributes. Exactly how the men on this forum try to improve themselves as individuals.

Current "group identity feminism" is literally just Marxist Collectivism rebranded. Individual members are actually worth far less than in any "patriarchal" system. You stray from the herd narrative, you are dead to them.

[–]evoblade3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Misogynist means I disagree with you but it's easier to call you a name than debate.

[–]sonder_one3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Proudly declaring that the candidate's gender is a big factor in your vote makes you sexist. Period.

[–]Pastelitomaracucho3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

I would never vote Trump. But watching the man win just to see all the salt landslide ravage through the Internet is going to be very entertaining

[–]TheRedStoic2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy

Time to start black knighting op.

"Only if you cover your ass though"

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (6 children) | Copy

I don't really know what this means.

[–]AttackOnKvothe4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy

Sometimes, acting against what the society you live in states is the norm, can get you in a bad spot.

EDIT:

Rule 38 of the 48 laws of power:

Think as you like, but behave like others.

What I mean is, in the long run, people are more likely to forfeit you than to stand by you that way (99.99% of people are blue-pill plugged)

[–]that_star_wars_guy1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Rule 38 of the 48 laws of power:

Think as you like, but behave like others.

[–]AttackOnKvothe1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

That's it, thanks and sorry for being too lazy to search for it. 00:12 right here now.

[–]1kick60 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

That's part of why a Trump win was so unexpected. People acted like Clinton supporters...until the voting booth.

[–]TheRedStoic0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It means breaking law 38. I do it occasionally, but only when I'm the biggest smv in the room and the other person is already agreed to be insufferable.

It can be fun to take people apart sometimes.

However, I can't recommend this outright, in the overwhelming norm, you should follow law 38.

[–]AnarchyInAmerica20172 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Enjoy the decline and take advantage of it at every opportunity. You will all be liberated soon...May you all suffer.

[–]Hitlers-Happy-HR-dpt2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

It is if you recognize feminism as the supremacist movement it is

[–]RastaTeddyBear2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah, I don't understand either. A lot of people voted for Obama so he could be the first black president, and look "how bad" that turned out. (I was anti Obama in 2008, but I've come around) It's just another case of history repeating itself.

[–]redbearsociety2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

It pisses me off too - imagine their outrage if you said you were voting for the man in the race.

But, Trump is anti abortion(Fuck that, no one night stands in america ever again) etc and Hillary isn't. Thats an issue that is a deciding factor for a lot of women so many see Hillary as standing up for women's rights and aren't just voting for her because of her gender, even if thats what they say. Can't expect women to be nuanced about this shit.

[–]stawek2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy

The real question is: how did he do it despite 90% of press and tv against him.

It raises the issue of free press: could free press be possibly as biased as this? could free press misreport polls with such a huge error? is there any free press at all?

[–]thor_away921 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The real question is: how did he do it despite 90% of press and tv against him.

Answered your own question. A lot of us on TRP have actually talked about how Trump said left field shit just for the publicity...and it worked.

Edit: he's also rich

[–]pizzalover241 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

A vote for trump is not necessarily an endorsement of trump

[–]robbiedigital0011 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

It shows how social media has crushed the main stream press's monopoly on controlling the narrative.

[–]stawek1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It does show the lamestream media collapse, true.

The other issue is more important though:
* 50% of population votes Trump
* 10% of journalists support Trump (this number is pulled out of my ass, obviously)

The implication is disturbing: media owners are acting against their own economic interests, by alienating themselves from Trump supporters. A free media can't do it, because they will go bankrupt in no time. Only media controlled and sponsored by larger entities can handle the losses.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_20160 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

No. There is no free press. It is all state propaganda. Sure they don't report to the executive branch but they report to those that fund the executive branch. Get it?

All media is brainwashing. You have to pick through it for nuggets of truth like mining for gold.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I called out one of these on Facebook tonight, her response was to accuse me of trolling. Told her it had nothing to do with gender and explained my beef and she blocked me... Also kept throwing out #mansplaining... Whatever the fuck that means

[–]kanyewost2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

The mark of someones character is how they react to defeat.

The fact that Hilary did not even give a closing speech to her supporters show how she viewed the people...

[–]graffix132 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

She was too 'upset' and 'emotionally distraught' to face the music and be a good loser.

Can you imagine, IMAGINE, if a male candidate did that? He would be labeled a coward and a sore loser.

[–]Redbeam1002 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Maybe you haven't realized that women see feelz over reelz and that's why they have never gotten anywhere in human history. Hillary is a corrupt fuck. 99% of those who voted for her did it because they got butthurt at whatever Trump said which was basically free publicity. Fuck feminists, they're nothing but pond scum they won't achieve anything and will surely die alone.

[–]WilliamBott2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

all I have heard in response is that I'm a misogynist, whatever that means now

It means you have disagreed with a "womyn" and you are therefore wrong and since you are wrong you are a misogynistic, woman-hating racist xenophobe that needs to check his privilege, shitlord!

[–]jochorocho 14 points14 points [recovered] | Copy

i know im going to get downvoted, so i'll just say that this is not my opinion, just a reasonable reason why feminism is called feminism.

Feminism comes from the belief that women have been historically opressed and are still today (whether they are or not, i'm not saying i agree with this statement so hold your downvotes). so, just like when we tried to end slavery and segregation we said "abolitionist" instead of "racial equality", they are saying "feminism" instead of "gender equality".

i think we can all agree that women were oppressed before, but right now it's pretty debatable, or at least there's a lot of discussion (even though in this sub most people believe they are actually privileged)

[–]Hillarysdilddo_201621 points22 points  (2 children) | Copy

i think we can all agree that women were oppressed before, but right now it's pretty debatable

Down voted. Women were never oppressed. They served a role and men served a role. And it fit with the natural order of things.

Now women are "liberated" and you see the consequences of those actions.

You don't let your children run the house. Just like you don't pretend a woman has the same rationale as a man.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Agreed, to an extent. Pretty much all of the feminist ideas of "patriarchy" and other bullshit that they promote like slut culture and blah blah are all awful and absurd.

However, women should have had the right to vote. I would absolutely agree that USUALLY they're not as logical/rational as men (pretty much solely due to emotions), but the truth is is the average woman is just as intelligent as the average man. In fact, women have a much larger population of average intelligence than men do who dominate both the lower and the upper spectrum of intelligence.

Other than that I agree.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_20160 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I disagree, with respect.

You are correct with regard to IQ distribution. However even with IQ women are prone to thinking differently. They fail to identify threats, and focus on appeasement. They look to authority rather than towards self reliance. Most women lack intellectual curiosity that drives many men. For example their political knowledge is superficial. These lead to horrible outcomes.

 

Finally,

If you eliminate the woman vote liberals/progressives/illegal immigration don't even exist. Progressive votes would drop from 50% of the population to something like 5%.

[–]Daddie01 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I agree, anyone saying that is an fucking idiot, don't even waste your time arguing with them.

[–]Truth_Himself1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Obama didn't go on a rampage, telling everyone to vote for him because he was a man and because he was black. I guess Hillary thought she could just ride the double-standard into the white house. But why pander to feminists who were going to vote for you anyway?

Her campaign was flawed tactically from the beginning. Then her "basket of deplorables" line just made it worse. We will look back on her saying that the same way Romney's line about "47% of the country want hand-outs" cost him the election in 2012.

[–]JanteIllegalen1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

What's the consensus here on female in-group preference, it's biological right?

[–]Kiltraki1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Feminism is not about equality. Feminism is about improving women's rights on the assumption that there is inequality, which there isn't. In fact I'd argue women are privileged in today's society, and receive better treatment, both through policy and through cultural attitudes.

Egalitarianism is true equality. If someone wants equality of all people, they are egalitarian, not feminist. Look to the French Revolution - liberte, egalite, fraternite translates to liberty, equality, fraternity.

The name feminism itself gives it away that it's feminine (i.e a women's movement) and anyone who says otherwise is being purposely disingenuous.

No one should ever buy the argument that feminism is about equality. Both in definition and in practice it couldn't be further from the truth.

[–]Stythe1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I don't know ice about either Trymp or Hillary, but everyone seems to shit on Trump for what he's saying while there seems to be a deep seated dislike for Hillary. What amuses me is people that tell me they wanted Hillary to win say she's the lesser of two evils (which doesn't seem accurate) but even if it were, the absence of bad doesn't make one good.

But then everyone who seemed to want Hillary to win is either a man-child trying to act enlightened or a woman from what I see, so whatever. The whole thing is enjoyable for me though, since I get to watch people lose their shit. Haha.

[–]Reality_Facade6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy

I agree with very little posted on this sub, admittedly I'm typically here for laughs. But I agree 100% with this. It's fucking stupid to vote for someone based on anything other than their politics. I said the same thing about Obama. I knew at least a dozen people personally that voted for him simply because he's black.

[–]rigbed2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

You're only doing yourself a disservice by disagreeing with this sub.

[–]Ranger_Mitch13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy

Each man chooses his own path. Forcing beliefs on someone rarely works.

[–]Xavhorn4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

This bullshit is exactly why women should have never been given the right to vote. Giving the women the right to vote was the first catalyst in the descent of society. Women will always support expansion of the state and the welfare system.

I'll go even further. Women shouldn't even be in politics. Look at what Angela Merkel did to Germany. Completely cucked a nation. Politics should be left to men that know what they're doing.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Germany out of all places. A beautiful country now infested with white-guilt pussies and refugee scum.

[–]ImmmOldGregg2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Anyone who voted Killary is a cuck and we should laugh at them while we plow their wife while they watch.

[–]Fedor_Gavnyukov1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

tag me in bro, i think its my turn

[–]1PantsonFire12340 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

What all these degenerates fail to understand is that they can't win this way. The leftiods, subhumans, fembots and nu-males are beginning to realize that in their everlasting cuckery they sacrificed their own power to make a difference. If humans were capable of surviving by being inefficient nice yet corrupt losers then it would have evolved to do so.

This is not possible however and it shows the moment a stronger player enters the battlefield and destroys the weak. That's what happened yesterday and it was glorious. I watched the butthurt tears on The Young Turks Network and elsewhere. They all echoed the same sentiment.

Suddenly they were mad and they felt like they had to make a stand, to man up. They began talking about playing dirty like their republican opponents. They told their viewership that their party would "quit being nice". Ironically in that moment they all became a little more red-pill.

It was hilarious to see because for the longest time it was us that were in their boat. Our voices weren't heard and our lives changed for the worse. We clawed our way back through movements like this sub, Trump, RP-message boards and within our own selves. The light is here and the dawn of a new day makes everything look a little better.

Good times will slowly begin rolling as 2016 turns out to be a great year for those with clear minds. Both personally and politically. Even some of the biggest upsets in sports history have been happening recently. The collective human psyche is beginning to wake up and realize that thoughts can shape reality. It's an exciting time to be alive after the dark veil has been lifted from our eyes after so long.

Now these same people who lived their shameless lives will feel unheard and defeated. They will eventually learn to turn RP themselves. And when they do they will become like us.

The blue pill was always flawed to begin with, it never could achieve 100% acceptance. Now the revolution has come

[–]Echoes_and_madness0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I wonder when she starts WWIII will they still be saying #Imwithher?



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter