Drop your cocks and grab your socks 'cause it's that time of the year again: the media discovers women cum the hardest when they're treated like worthless pieces of fuckmeat.
This time Vice steps to the plate to get peppered with supersonic redpills courtesy of PornHub, Google big data analytics and (surprisingly) a university psychology department:
New data reveals that women in their droves are searching for porn with tags like "extreme brutal gangbang", "forced" and "rape"
Oh noes, but what about muh choreplay and "respect"?
While men still search for significantly more porn than women, search rates for these more extreme types of sexual content are at least twice as common among women than men.
B-but that must be because the patriarchy represses women and that's how they cope...
The researchers then investigated if the women's fantasies were indicative of "sexual blame avoidance", a hypothesis that women socialised by our slut-shaming culture chose forced sex themes to negate feelings of shame and guilt. The opposite was found to be true.
Oh crap.
"If there is a genre of porn in which violence is perpetrated against a woman, my analysis of the data shows that it almost always appeals disproportionately to women"
Misogynist!
Researchers found that 52 percent of the women had fantasies about forced sex with a man, 32 percent about being raped and 28 percent about forced oral sex with a man. Overall, 62 percent of the women reported having had at least one fantasy around a forced sex act.
Miso- oh wait the principal investigator on this study was a woman. Uh... internalized misogyny?
And there we go, MIND BLOWN: it turns out that women prefer to be fucked by alpha males in relationships with a completely lopsided power dynamic. After all that's only a measly 99% of women's relationship porn (hello Fifty Shades, hello Twilight), so we really did need some more data to completely forget about this by this time next month, when the media will again pretend that this is shocking owing to how it doesn't fit in with the feminine imperative.
As for us unrepentant shitlords and woman-haters, the old adage remains true: watch what they do, not what they say. As much as bloopies would love for that to be the case, women don't flick their bean to fantasies of gentle lovemaking and equal relationships.
There is a Netflix show about porn, and the first episode is hilarious to watch. It's showing empowered women making beautiful porn, where the female rule is one of power, men serve her, they don't need to orgasm only her, there is no hair pulling, no choking, no degrading of the womyn. One of them even blue balls a porn actor. Then they lament they don't have a budget, that the other porn where girls get swirlies and degraded are making more money. They surmise it had to be because men are pigs and want to see the girls degraded, humiliated, used as fuck toys....
They never stop to think that even lesbians don't want to watch their drivel. That the people who want to see girls degraded are the girls watching the porn. I have no desire to give a girl a swirlie, absoluetly none. They get off on being degraded, used, held down, choked, hair pulled, used as fuck toys, knowing their holes are "owned" by an alpha male. Show me some tits, ass, and snatches along with activity rather than some fucked up fantasy and I'll watch it. A girl can masturbate for me and I'll watch, no degrading shit needed to get off.
What do girls want from me? What kind of pics and videos do they send to me for ideas? Bondage, s&m, abduction, choking, hair pulling, forced orgasms, forced oral... and the list goes on and on. My 45 yr old who makes more money than I do, can get any soft hands rich guy she wants, is actually strong and independent, absolutely loves to be my fuck toy, my sex slave. She likes nothing better while I recover from fucking her holes than to curl up under my arm like a frightened squirrel, running her fingers through my chest hair, rubbing her face and tits on my beard, always wanting "more" even after marathon sessions where she gets uncountable orgasms over a couple hours of fucking in various positions. Always more.
She likes all the things I do with her, even if these feminist twats say it's degrading or misogynist, I grope her tits or ass when we pass, I call her a slut, I pick a hole and fuck it, sometimes briefly wherever she is in her house. She sends nudes on demand, at any time that she can do it without getting arrested. She says I own her, her holes, she is my fuck toy, and that she will not tell me no. Eager to please me, whatever I want, she does. A tough hands blue collar man who lives in a shipping container house making less money than her "owns" her body and holes.
So how the fuck do these stupid twats not know that girls like this sort of thing? They do know, they want the same things from men, their cunts get wet from the same things. They deny it I public, because being submissive is not strong and independent. It's nothing more than a shit test to see who ignores her bullshit and who simply acts the way she wants him to act.
blog of this journey would be amazing haha
thumbs up
honest to god, I like some light roughness, but i'm definitely not into the really nasty shit. It's hilarious to me that women are the biggest consumers of it rofl
Bitches love it when I piss on their tits. Women don't want respectful sex that's plain old bullshit. The more shitlord you are, the better.
If you don't mind sharing, what other nasty stuff is in your repertoire?
Haven't gone down to taking a shit in her breasts cuz ain't an Arab Prince... But I once had a bitch shit in her panties tho.
Man I was not ready for that hahahaha
Umm, how exactly do you work your way up to that?
I feel that information would be useful to get all sorts of other stuff happening.
Yeah, it took me a while to figure this out.
I wanted sex to be intimate and sex felt better when I moved in and out more gently because I could feel their body against mine. Rough and fast made me numb and I couldn't savor her body.
I made the mistake of thinking women were like men. They obvious aren't and hard sex/nonintimate feels better to them physically and psychologically.
I'm not nearly as experienced with women as the average TRP-er on here so I could be wrong, but I opine that there could also be a factor of a huge divide existing between the conscious mind and the subconscious mind (which involves the body's reactions) in women. We men know exactly when we're aroused. But as far as I've known from the little experience that I've gained, women hardly know that they're feeling aroused until it's already too late and they're sucking off their seducer's cock. I mean, I always thought that's how seduction works?
They did a study where they had sensors to determine male and female arousal. They then showed the participants images/videos and asked them if they were aroused. The men were aroused when they said the were, and aroused over the normal stuff you'd expect. Women were aroused by pretty much everything from gay male sex to animals fucking and their verbal response did not correlate with their measured bodily response.
This one caught me by surprise. Caught one mistress twat-slapping herself while watching hardcode gay gangbang porn. I was all "wtf?" Her response? "I really like cocks, what the fuck else am I supposed to watch?"
Found an old vhs tape of my ex's which had hardcore gay male sex on it. Wondered why she would watch it but the comments and study findings here confirmed what I thought.
This doesn't directly imply that they didn't know they were aroused. They could be lying just to save face.
I could get turned on by a rottweiler fucking a woman and that would make my friends laugh or say "ewww!" at me and I wouldn't care; but if a girl is turned on by that, she could NEVER tell it to anyone but their closest friends (and maybe not even to them) for fear of staining their image/ reputation.
I have a 31 year/old that's the same way. After the first time we fucked where she came three times while I choked her, she said I can do anything I want. She leaves her house unlocked at night when I'm in town, just in case I feel like stopping by. I "snuck in" and woke her up once by shoving it in her ass and putting my hand over her mouth. She came almost instantly.
I give her picture and video tasks throughout the day and week to complete. I tell her what to wear and how to pose and give her a time limit to send them to me, otherwise she gets punished next time. Many of her tasks are public, such as while driving down the road or in a public bathroom.
Her ex-husband wouldn't even spank her and meanwhile I'm over here fucking her mouth while she's tied to a chair with nipple clamps and a vibrating butt plug.
Nearly all the women I've been with have enjoyed at least some form of degradation. Most became insatiable once they realized I wasn't afraid to use them like they'd always wanted.
Have fun rolling the dice. Thats not a game I would risk playing, personally.
The minute you get tired of her and blow her off for newer younger prettier girl, guess what buddy, you are now a rapist.
She explicitly said she wanted it. I'll be ok.
We'll see if she still wanted it when you leave her for a younger girl. Good luck.
I know this is a common horror story narrative on here, but not every woman is just waiting to accuse dudes of rape.
That being said, I have mountains of evidence of her saying in undeniable clarity that she wants me to do these things or that she loved it when I did it.
I appreciate the concern, though.
Exactly. Do it, but protect yourself. (Duh)
Plus, it's just fun. There's nothing like both of you having a primal good time. Absolutely nothing wrong with it and I only put the foot down on what I personally don't like.
This man is correct. You need to document her consent every single time.
I see the long dick of the law still fucking him somehow. I would NEVER do this.
I've taken to making audio recordings of all my sexcapades with women. May not be legally binding, but it's good to have.
And this is how you keep a filly firmly in your stable. They need to be doing things for you even when you aren't around.
I've just spent two weeks on a jury for a rape case, and I'm now paranoid, thinking about how everything would play out in court.
As always, send her a text message afterwards and get her to reply. Get her to send you e-mails going into detail about her fantasies. Also, it might help if she gave you a key or a keycode. For your birthday, get her to buy you some bondage gear - rope/handcuffs etc, and have a photograph of you and her together holding the gear and smiling.
Like I said elsewhere, I have mountains and mountains of evidence of consensuality for everything we do.
I appreciate the concern.
What was the outcome of the case?
Acquitted by majority - his word against hers. Never seen a guy look more relieved in my life.
So basically, no evidence to support the claim. What state?
Just shoved it in? Without lube? Sure man.
Oh is that how this works? I have to tell you every single step of the process for it to be true?
I'll be sure to do a 10,000 word FR for you real soon, sweetheart.
This sounds interesting. Can I get a few examples? Maybe point me to a resource I can read for more info?
Resource? Not really. I'm out of town quite a bit, so this was something I came up with to kind of keep her engaged psychologically when I'm gone. She gets sad when I don't give her tasks at least on a semi-regular basis and the sex somehow continues to get better and better each time, so it must be working.
It really isn't that complicated. I tell her what to do and how to do it and she does it. If what I want is complicated, I'll send her a pic I find online, say "replicate that" and she does it.
Video tasks are in the same vibe. "Send me a video of you with both tits exposed for at least 30 seconds somewhere in public with people visible in the background or nearby. You have until tomorrow night" or "touch yourself to completion while in traffic in the daytime. The view must show your pussy and your face at the same time and I must be able to hear you cum. Put in the butt plug before you do it. You have until Friday"....you get the idea.
I consider myself bisexual and it's of note that when I hook up with other men, this is exactly how I desire to be treated. There is a strong desire to be dominated and abused. Just held down and fucked at his will Even to the extent that it's rapey. I must say it appeals to something in us biologically. It's how the sexual dynamic exists naturally. You're either fucking or being fucked. It has to be intense and it has to be animalistic.
"being fucked" has only a negative meaning to men, not to women. For women the "being fucked" part is as natural as it gets. This is something men dont understand.
This leads to some of the biggest Bullshit in the "Sex Economy". Men, thinking that women think the same way as they do, think that a woman is "sacrificing" her "honor" to fuck with them. Since "being fucked" is something a man considers bad, any woman willing to "let herself be fucked" must surely do this under extreme sacrifices (like he would have to if he were to be "fucked"). Hell, there are even poor bastards out there, that think that women can have no fun with sex and that they are only doing it for them (surely buying her something expensive to make up for her "suffering" is the right thing to do right?).
Those poor sobs dont even realize that they ARE actually the ones being fucked.
Needless to say, its quite stupid. You, as a bisexual, have the luxury to know both sides and you know how "being fucked" can be immensely satisfying. From a rational and "free of morality" standpoint, you are doing the best thing a man can do. You experience a part of womens sexuality and then can use this knowledge to lay the best women out there.
Sun Tzu would be proud. :)
Sadly my own "bisexuality" faded away after some experiments in my youth :/.
A lot of people generally don't get it but you definitely do. Yeah as much as I want to bend over a girl with a nice ass there is an almost equal satisfaction to having that done to you, and when you have that perspective you can definitely tap into what a girl wants from you. What do I want in a guy? I want a masculine, athletically built guy who's well groomed, who's taller than me, older than me, who's assertive, who also very clearly objectifies my body, and fucks the shit out of me when he wants to. I can translate that into the female experience and that's what they want. It's good perspective to have.
And that's the distinction: you are either getting fucked or you are fucking someone. One act is completely dominant, the other is completely submissive. There's no equality there. But it has to be that way. So remember you have to be in control, because you're fucking them. You have to be assertive, and you have to go after what you want and take control. That's what she wants, because that's her role and that's your role, so your job is to mercilessly fuck the shit out of her and make her worship your cock, because that's innately the most satisfying thing there is to her. To be fair, I didn't realize this until I started messing around with guys.
I like to imagine that women act like the little crying girls. There was another endorsed user on here who told a short story about his daughter crying, he called her bullshit and she tried to surpress her laugh and continue crying to convince daddy. Eventually she started laughing because she couldn't surpress her laugh anymore.
It's the same with women. They want to show a face in public to hide their true feelings and desire. You just need to be the guy that gives positive feedback and no negative on her outing herself as she truly is, so she's actually comfortable and actually does it, which is what you pulled off.
Congratulations, she's not degrading herself, you are. "I have no desire to give a girl a swirlie, absoluetly none." And yet here you are...
OP is a moron. Women don't watch porn.
You have to be a bit careful on the internet dude. Since no one can see your face while you are commenting, it's hard to differentiate between literally meant statements and sarcasm.
No male dominance, no Tingles.
It was a lot easier when it was "normal" for men to be men and women to be women. All this "inverted reality" Blue Pill mythology makes it all more difficult to just live our lives successfully.
Actually quite the opposite. It's a societal shit test. Alphas will fuck and pillage whenever. And women know that, they love the imutable will of the dominant male.
The feminism social norms just increase the barrier of entry into the secret society so that no beta cuck can demand her princess suck his cock just like she did to the other 2 chads 10 minutes earlier.
It's very hard to be Alpha in a society that is losing it's middle class so that pretty much everyone is a slave to globalism.
Only those who have independence in finances can be in that top percentage.
Chad Thundercock might have a job where he is a slave, but he manages because he creates Tingles in a momentary situation with women. He must get away from the woman before she begins breaking him down and starting that tragic slide into beta.
A true top one percent Alpha is in the preferred situation.
This reminds us why the whole Globalist Tyranny needs to die... it is bad for 99% of the men.
No, globalism is a choice. Living off credit is a choice and becoming a wage slave for an iPhone is a choice.
And that you can sense.
But sociopathic black pill deconstruction aside.
Speaking strickly of sexual strategy. She just needs a dick. Give her the dick. After the second 50 shades movies all you have to say is I want a pet, or post a pic with a girl in a collar in your dating profile(obv have u/Omlala's ab selfie) and your inbox blows up.
Brave the shit tests, the kink shaming and the vanity shaming and by the end of the week you filled your dating roster for the year.
Globalism also enslaved women. Men, alphas have become entertainment, they want it fast and hard and if you can deliver you, the very much average YOU. Has more sexual opportunities than a sultan of previous generations.
Enjoy the decline, this is the only one you will ever gonna get.
There are two ideas:
I'm personally of the second mindset.
You are free to Enjoy the Decline... we have no rules about that here.
France is "Enjoying their Decline" with the election choice today.
To me that result is tragic because it means the French people have given up.
[permanently deleted]
The Founding Fathers managed to create a pretty nice Republic for a hundred years or more.
Other civilizations have been successful too.
No, I'll decide to "Enjoy the Destruction".
Truth in life is just something more enjoyable that this globalist filth.
It's like when Caligula ruled Rome... I'd like to see Caligula removed.
(same idea... corrupt elites)
Now maybe after Caligula is gone the Republic is never restored (and at this late stage I doubt we could ever get there) but a Vespasian type emperor (much like Trump) can make for good times.
I'd prefer the Globalist Tyranny is destroyed, but I'll accept Trump just slowing them down a little.
Giving up implies that you know there is a problem to fight against, but you're too scared/tired whatever to continue.
Lots of people here genuinely think the UE is a great thing, that leaving the Euro means economic doom, or worse, going back to the time where European countries fought each other, WW2 and WW1.
Anyhow, my point is that it's not giving up, it's ignorance.
People are so heavily brainwashed by the Blue Pill mythology it's in their mind "enlightened" to be virtue signaling as you surrender your country to globalism.
France surrenders... and then pats itself on the back and says:
"We surrender and that makes us great."
...it's not any different than any beta male surrendering as an orbiter to a woman.
They will blame this on "rape culture", say that "our society's objectification of women reinforces these negative fetishes".
Just watch.
Oh noes I am a perfect magical woman amazing in every way. If I discover something about myself that I dislike I must externalize it onto a real or imagined entity.
Nope. This is part of the feminist agenda to normalize female degradation and abuse as "healthy" and "empowering" to women. Being choked, slapped and spat on used to be "oppressive" and "patriarchal", but now the new spin will be "consent" and "my body my choice" just like it is with slutwalk and rough sex.
This article is indirectly telling women that "it's okay" to be sexually degraded, because notice how no one in the article is saying it's a problem that needs to be fixed.
I wouldn't be surprised if in the not distant future, there'll be a romance novel about a white woman and her Muslim rapist with the same level of success as 50 Shades of Grey.
Because ivory tower/SJW feminism is just another moral system. And one of the most compelling moral debates is the sexuality of the indespensible gender.
There's something generally egalitarian about rape; it's the historic spoil of war, and most men can over-power a woman. So in ways rape fantasy is an antithesis of feminine hyper pre-selection.
Before anyone says ''but a woman's forced-sex fantasies only involve high value men''...remember it is an evolutionary throwback, a true primitive urge, and that stems from days where weak, dumb, unfit men would be dead. The terms of more aggressive and war-like societies (tribes) determined fitness.
In our cushy civilization, any idiot survives and materialism plus female choice determines male fitness.
This is why an acceptable rape-submission story like 50 Shades becomes so popular (when there is tons of rapey erotica out there). 50 shades has the happy ending of a normal family life with an impossibly wealthy man and his helicopter. The undertone of the book is highly specialized civilization itself.
The ''Tarzan'' series (also rapey), originating in the early 1900's, is more on the mark; sexuality is an escape from civilized-being and in touch with primitive instincts. No need for elaborate endgame, just:
''Me Tarzan. You Jane''
Not quite.
Remember, this study is a collective statement about women. Women will respond to this with accusation and blame-shifting.
When an individual woman gets outed for having a rape/abuse/humiliation fetish, her internal rationalization for it will be that it is empowering, just as you described.
The defense that is invoked is a matter of scale.
Of course it's okay to be degraded wtf are you talking about you shitlord!
"We need to ban porn for its misogynistic content"
Its a survival mechanism built through millions of years of evolution. Females not submitting to a dominant man meant death, hence those genes didn't pass. Those females who instead of protesting, enjoyed it, didn't get killed by the male.
That's why women are attracted to psychopathic or threatening looking or big men. Not getting attracted to them meant death. Also if that dominant man will view a woman as resource then he will also protect her from other men so he can have her by himself. That's why also women's love is reserved for not those men who will love back, but to the dominant man only.
Judging women for their behaviour is like judging a crocodile for eating your hand when you put it in its mouth. What were you thinking, this is what a crocodile is supposed to do.
Don't judge or be angry at women. Also don't love them.
Perfect logical comment to stop me indulging in my emotions and slipping back into the BP narrative.
Sorry, but the above is poor advice. No woman is going to love a soulless robot devoid of any emotion. Nevermind that is a physical impossibility, as all men have emotions. The objective is to understand your emotions and not let them rule every impulse.
For any LTR or marriage to work there must be emotional energy involved.
I agree with what you say. I didn't imply any of that in my comment.
Was directed more at the comment above yours.
Woman is going to love a man who strikes emotions in her, not the other way around. And why are you assuming that dominant men are emotionless. Though, they do tend to have more control over them.
I never said dominant men are emotionless. A few users above were essentially saying being an emotionless robot is the best, and I was disagreeing.
There are times when the wife wishes I showed emotions, but if you play your cards right you can get away with not having to.
If that is true then what about the women that love serial killers like Charles Manson? You're partially right, women do enjoy exploring men's emotions. However, the emotions they like to find are stoicism and confidence which pertains to dominance over them as OP has stated.
[deleted]
Please define what do you think "insane" means.
I agree with u/sup1337hax. Women don't like emotions aside from stoicism which is really just the manifestation of very limited emotions.
Charles Manson wasn't the only one. Ted Bundy had lots of female admirers at his trial - also got married while in jail. Richard Ramirez had TONS (read rockstar level) of female fans. Jeffrey Dahmer (who was gay) collected 12k from female pen pals.
here's one small article about. There's tons. women love psychopaths. http://crimefeed.com/2015/06/serial-killer-groupies-murderers-fans/
and so are chicks who enjoy rape? lol amirite or am I right?
If you want anything more then a short fwb relationship with a woman then you need the beta. Only damaged women will stay with a psychopath for longer, yes they find it exciting (dopamine) but they have trouble developing long term feelings for him (oxytocin).
Read "War Brides" on Rollo's website
? Why would anything in this thread cause you to want to slip back into the bp narrative?
I never said anything in this thread would do such a thing.
Why would your hypothetical caveman kill a woman who wouldn't let him fuck her, if he could just rape her, thus ensuring he could pass on his genes? If you're trying to make an argument based on the human imperative to reproduce, that's a huge hole in your theory.
there's really no hole here. Enjoyment does 2 things 1. Prevents violence 2. If it's an enjoyable experience it could prompt a "caveman LTR" where the alpha caveman wants to continue the enjoyable sex. That would give the woman his protection as well.
He was raping them anyway. He killed the ones who were protesting too much, or didn't sexually satisfy him.
During sex when a man puts his hand around the neck of woman she gets turned on, its not in her control. Its her primal brain telling her that her life is in the hands of a man, and if she don't satisfy him then she'll be choked to death.
Easy (and true) answer : because that caveman know that a brutality forced / raped cavewoman ( if impregnated ) will probably do not accept the baby at all and that means that the rape's baby will be very probably in life danger from her 'negative attitude' . That means that, if he / she is born at all, very probably the raped cave-mother will let append a 'fatality' upon the baby from simple hate/ unintrest. Better kill the 'uninterested' cavewoman and impregnate another cavewoman that, at least, show some sign of acceptance / resignation. That other cavewoman offer better survival prospectives for the baby.
Women who enjoyed the rape = no PTSD, healthy offspring.
Women who got psychologically destroyed by the rape = extreme increase in birth complications and general health.
So I'm a girl who just browses RP out or morbid curiosity that people actually say the things they say here. But this comment just made too much sense for my comfort
Don't let this comment became the rationalization for poor life choices. My comment was targeted towards angry men only, so they become less angry.
Yes, its in the instincts of a girl to feel attraction towards a violent person. So is in our instincts is to feel angry and kill other humans. Following our primal instincts doesn't always produce good results, especially not in an egalitarian society.
Just don't feel guilty to feel such attraction, but also have at least such control to not get abused. Men like me are always looking for weakness in other people, and once we sense it, you are fucked, sometimes literally.
It is really interesting to hear you talk about that in such a way. To just call say, "men like me," with a casual warning, hah. I appreciate it, though. It gives me some insight into my past, I think. But I've been with a pretty easy going guy for about 8 years now, and so that old cycle is broken. I wish I could say the same for some of my friends.
Exactly bro. I'd go as far as to say that don't love Anyone else but yourself.
Since this was an evolutionary process, do you think we'll see women pass down different genes to new generations because they're trying so hard to convince themselves and men that they want to be dominate now?
If you could spare a moment, I'm a clueless idiot, but I've been pursuing a lady as of late who has an incredible body but an obsession with another man for the reason of "He loves me, and no matter what I do he still loves me."
I've tried to figure out why she would desire that when I've been acting as Redpill as possible. Just it be clear, I'm not obsessed with her, just curious.
Because you are just not attractive enough to her.
Huh. Well thanks. Back to the gym it is.
Acting redpill isn't always enough, especially if the other guy is also redpilled but taller, stronger, more handsome, etc.
Things is, he's none of those things. It's just the way he treats her.
I'm all of that but autistic as fuck. i had women tell me they feared me.
Yea, you need to work on that my man.
You also have to be socially dominant, not just physically. Which requires to be able to read people well. Being autistic is an obstacle for you, which you have to work around.
Yeah sorry but this is complete bullshit. All of you who post year most likely have never been in a relationship, and have never had sex. Pretending to be an alpha dickhead will make you lose your SO, guaranteed, from firsthand experience.
You can be the nicest guy in the world and still be alpha.
The key is to be assertive, not aggressive.
Whatever helps you sleep at night. You'll come around eventually.
Yeah if you're pretending you will definitely lose her, becuase you are just pretending but are a loser in reality, your post in relationship advice being a prime example. That's not alpha at all lmao
"That's not alpha at all lmao"
Its cringe that you have to pretend to be alpha. When has that ever worked out well. And I did lose her
Did you read my comment, it's not pretending. It doesn't work if you're pretending.
So how often do you regularly beat women?
I do very often, I don't see anything wrong with stranger raping women or beating my ltr and forcing to bring women over for me to rape, but I am always being censored on here for pointing out that being violent to women should be encouraged
Even murdering a women is totally natural
I never got why we don't all agree on this
I am glad this is out in the open
If you spend your life smashing a three C-cell battery powered dildo up against your clit.. it becomes desensitized and they have to go further and further into fetish/fantasy land to get their orgasms.
They use the Hitachi magic wand, it plugs into the wall.
And with that fucker on their clit, they don't need any other stimulation to orgasm. Literally nothing. It's just gonna happen, she's little more than strapped in for the ride at that point.
And yet they are still choosing to look at violent porn...
"The wand can't slap me like Chad does..."
....and those women wonder why a man can't satisfy them.
If they're complaining they're not satisfied, it's because they are not attracted.
No amount of attraction is going to supersede 3200 rpm. Why do you think used up porn stars can't enjoy average sex anymore.
Sadly (disturbingly?), this is a product that is owned by about half the women I know...
TIL this device actually exists. I thought it was a joke.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitachi_Magic_Wand
I heard they actually quit putting the Hitachi name on them because girls used them in cams so much etc.
"Because of its concerns about having its name attached to a popular sex toy, Hitachi decided to cease production of the Magic Wand in 2013.[11] Vibratex director of operations Eddie Romero told Engadget that Hitachi is an extremely staid company and was uncomfortable being associated with the best-selling masturbation aid.[11] Vibratex persuaded Hitachi to continue manufacturing the device, to rename it the "Original Magic Wand", to use lighter, more durable materials, and to omit any reference to Hitachi.[11] The newly named device returned to the market on 25 June 2013, with improved engineering and modified graphic design on its accompanying box.[19][73] It was sold as the "Original Magic Wand Vibrator" by Good Vibrations.[73]"
Hell I would have left it if I were them. That's great way to get brand awareness!
I love my Hitachi wand....soooo this Hitachi fridge MUST BE nice!
The fridge barely fits in her cooter though.
I just spit my coffee. Damn dude.
It's intended purpose is simply to be a massage gadget, not specifically a sex toy. Companies often want to maintain their brand over taking the risk and making more money with a rebrand. In this case it's literally THE sex toy so they should just fucking rebrand and get that money.
I wasn't being serious, hence my joking phrase line. But yeah they need to re-brand it and crush the market.......or is that smash the market.....either one will do I guess.
Camgirls still call it "the Hitachi" anyway.
I remember writing a comment or something about this a while back, it's another thing that's ruining girls but not as talked about.
If you think the effect of porn is bad for boys... just imagine how girls are affected.. nobody is even talking about women's relationship with porn... other than "YOU GO GIRL" rhetoric.
I can't complain. Gives me a reason to be brutal. The real problem is when they stretch their vadges out with dildos
Eh, most women I know just use their toys for clitoral stimulation, but I'm sure there are those out there who gape themselves while alone.
This comment seems naive to me. I agree that repeated masterbation leads to some sense of desensitization, but I don't see this as the reason for inspiring attraction to violent porn.
I've been jerking it my whole life practically and I don't get more excited by violent or abusive porn.
I think the implications of OP's post are more meaningful than just: "women masturbate too much so that they need more violent porn."
OP did a great job of tying the data back into red pill narrative: that women subconsciously crave male domination (alpha) over their bodies (by "that guy" of course). Turning to violent porn to fulfill what they have been denying overtly.
[deleted]
Dude youre totally right. The feminist narrative in the West has definitely proliferated stigma around females embracing their femininity. It's easy to see this contributing to them seemingly never being happy, always complaining, being disloyal and manipulative, etc. Still, I think it's possible that the way men constructed and ran society (the male imperative flourished at the expense of the female imperative) women felt and still feel excluded, as if some invisible force keeps holding them back (the "patriarchy").
I think women are afraid to let go and be women, and I think it's because doing that involves opening themselves to a higher level of vulnerability than they perceive they can afford to allow. We've stopped being gentlemen, we play the numbers game and look for the quick pump and dump (any 5s and 6s in the house? Hit me up after the show), we treat women like objects because we can't treat them like women anymore. It's become this shitty self-reinforcing cycle that slowly tears at the fabric of society and endangers the concept of creating/maintaining a family unit.
I'm dragging this on but I guess the point is that it's not entirely women's fault. Men are assertive and we change and take initiative and keep going after the women trying to realize our male imperative, but at the same time they're cautious and they know they're the weaker sex, so they're changing and adapting as well. How this interplay will morph through time: right now it looks like it's leading to more and more deception from both sides.
You're correct that the female orgasm, and to a certain extent the male orgasm, create a strong bond between individuals. Vibrators and masturbating can threaten that.
But how is this relevant to violent or abusive porn watching?
You went on a tangent into cultural sexual practices, sort of randomly.
Removal of responsibility is a feminine trait. The ultimate form of sex without responsibility is this. Common descriptions of women's encounters: "It just happened...," "We somehow ended up in his bedroom..," "I had been drinking...," "I was very confused during that time..," "He took me...,"
if you're a high value man, most women will let you do whatever the fuck you want and theyll love you for it (within reason). News at 11
Until you stop talking to them - then they hate you
What bothers me about this post is the implications. That women desire to be forced into sex. Yes, many women have forced/rape fantasies with men they trust and respect to carry out those scenarios. But it should be made clear (because to some people it's obviously not that clear) that unless there is actual consent....forced sex and rape are still wrong.
A fantasy is a fantasy. Rape is rape.
A good message to bear in mind
I read this sub a lot for interesting things like this so thought I'd contribute here by saying I can confirm just about every girl I've dated has admitted to having a rape fantasy. I don't think it's quite as far as them walking down the street and hoping some random dude just snatches them up and rapes them, but definitely wanting the man they're with to just fuck them against their will.
Err... so what's the difference "between forced sex with a man" and "rape" according to this researcher ?
I'm guessing the same reason why the question "are you homosexual?" and "do you have sex with men?" get different answers. It's about a gradient of porn and sex. Some men might have sex with transsexuals or cross-dressers, and not consider themselves homosexual, for example.
There's very few 'rape'-rape porn. But, there's plenty of BDSM with shackles and the girls movement being restricted.
And this is why some things on this sub are not ok for beginners. They have absolutely nothing in common, and it's stupid dangerous to mix them up.
Forced sex is a certain kind of sex. In a LTR you can even rationally discuss if you like it. In a ONS it's a bit risky if you misread, because there is a chance of a bad experience. (not always - last week my arm literally got tired from chocking a girl, and she still kept putting my hand on her neck. That was pretty clear).
Rape is rape, and this unfortunately also includes "we had a drink, she changed her mind, I didn't" kind of rape. You really don't want people thinking forced sex applies in this situation.
[deleted]
Exact. The only point is if she likes the guy or not.
LOL. Saying 84% of women have fantasies about rape is a bit much. It goes down better if you find a clever way to split it up.
All women want to be raped by a Hanson guy. Period!
Fantasy is a lot different then what one can expect and even enjoy in the real and "Once had a sexual fantasy about" is a lot different then only wants to have this type never mind having it at all. Really, I can't think of a more vanilia fantasy then dominant hunk trophe... it is barf inducing schmaltz.
Indeed, and this study shows what real life is lacking for women.
i have a main and 3 plates. two of the plates are 'professional' career-driven, "you go girl" types that crave, love, and request to get COMPLETELY dominated, taken, and fucked like an animal.
the other plate is from the hood... she doesn't like it as rough but is super duper submissive; i can do ANYTHING to her and she doesn't give a single free gov't fuck.
my main is a mixture of both of those types.
here's my angle: when they take off their clothes, they are simply animals... and want to be treated like animals. you can't be human and fuck an animal... you have to TOTALLY dominate them, take FULL CONTROL and do whatever the fuck you want with/to them.
every woman i fuck loves specific detailed pointed direction about what i want them to do. and they all do it.
Man, this is how we use data to tell a false story.
You've gone and taken a valid point and created a massive opening for an obvious counter point, effectively ruining your argument.
Yes, women like rough sex. If that was your point it was a good one that needs to be repeated here every so often.
But here's the mistake you made: the article and nearly every porn article says men still watch way more porn than women.
That's because visual based porn has always been the realm of men the same way twilight and fifty shades of grey were read mostly by women.
Imagine a poll that measured the guys who bought fifty shades of grey and then no matter how small that number was, NBC or Vice used that sample to say LOOK MEN LOVE CHICK STUFF.
No, the dudes who bought twilight love chick porn, not most of us. Same thing here.
The women who watch porn, women I advocate staying away from, enjoy a heavy dose of rape fantasies. But the rise in rape fantasies has nothing to do with women and everything to do with modern feminisms goal to turn women into douchebag males
Exactly right, we cannot fall into the feminist/SJW pattern of only using half an argument. You have called this correctly. Only the porn watching percentage of women have this tendency which leaves us with a fraction of a fraction.
There's no way to prove a rise (or fall) in any type of fantasy. Unless it involves dressing up as furries. But there were pagan cultures which had holidays where men wore wolf-skins and chased the girls around so...is that a precursor to furrie fetish or enacting the beastial aspect of human nature? (which is rapey)
Whilst this is interesting, there is still the reasonably plausible explanation that the smaller percentage of women who watch porn are considerably more likely to be on a freak tip. At least may account for a part of the numbers
Just want to put that one out there, s'all
Wonder why mass immigration into Europe is supported by the masses, yet makes no sense culturally or economically? It's because unconciously the feminine psyche wants a restoration of masculine influence. They're not getting it from their androgenated male population, so they're importing it. Simple as that.
Is chore play the one where she fucks the plumber?
"internalized misogyny" is a bizarre and unintentional sexual innuendo. For feminist-misandrists, a cock IS the symbol of misogyny.
In that line of thinking, any psycho-sexual play women might enjoy, becomes symbolic of degradation and subjugation. The reality is, for any gender, sexuality has a 'dark' side and is always intertwined with aggression. Sex fantasy often has little to do with how people live outside of the bedroom or after they orgasm.
Attributing porn habits as evidence of reality is mixing fantasy-reality too much. Men enjoying rough porn isn't evidence of ''rape culture.'' Women enjoying rough porn isn't evidence of how she wants her real life relationship dynamic. There's no mutual exclusion involved during consumption of erotica.
Excellent observations, or rather a summary of basic truths about human sexuality.
What happens in the bedroom, stays in the bedroom.
Yes, essentially these issues are just another variant of ''the personal is political'' bullshit. It's become entrenched in cultural philosophy to a tragic level. It's replacing things like religious guilt. Some people might wonder if they are going to hell for having dirty thoughts, some wonder if they're a ''real feminist'' or a closet sex offender instead. I don't like religious moralising, but I think it's a lot more healthy to confess to a priest than to politicize sex fantasies in the public sphere.
The fact that it's a curiousity that adult women have rape-like fantasies, as if it requires special justification, says a lot in itself.
I don't understand this, but I'd like to. Can you explain it in layman's terms?
I might, what part dont you get?
if youre not rape-fucking your women, nor choking, spanking, spitting on, cursing out, biting, etc. them, you are about to get cucked if you haven't already.
Next time you're rearranging a girl's guts doggystyle, grab her hair with malicious intent, bury it in a pillow/floor, and make her picture her eating pussy.
It has nothing to do with porn neither. Porn exists because of our nature, our urges, our biomechanics.
We programmed attractive porn, not the other way around.
They say we all live in Rape Culture, every society does. The further we stray from the Man-dominant/woman-submissive dynamic, the weaker the genepool/bloodline.
Just remember to EARN the Right to Rape by being of high value.
So what's the biological reasoning behind cuck porn being popular (or at least popular enough to be known)?
It isn't among the normal population. You ask most straight woman their fav porn and the top 5 will be Rape, gangbang, Lovemaking/x-art, Amateur/casting and Lesbian in the top 5.
Look at 50 shades series and its immense success. They dont care about anything else. No cuckolding book/series has ever trending in our history
Ask any guy his top 3 and it'll be like Teen, maybe MILF or 3sums, and Lesbian.
All this wild shit you see "popular" on pornsites are sponsored - brought to you by the exact same people who told you Hilary was up winning up on the polls. But this is another post for another day
Oh, I get what you mean. It's like the "trending" label on other websites
First you need to remember that the academic field of psychology has the lowest university entry requirements for a "scientific" field, so it's practiced by people you wouldn't trust to fix your sink. Second, studies like this have so much self-selection bias they basically are meaningless. There's a hell of a lot of porn I watch which has nothing to do with my character. 90% of the stuff on brazzers I wouldn't want to do, that is risk AIDS by fucking the random whore doctor etc.
I would generally disregard any psychological theory that attempts to make broad generalisations about a group that numbers in the billions, especially about stuff like this.
Even a lot of the stuff legends like Jordan Peterson talk about is not really considered legitimate science as it's not repeatable or falsifiable. The Stanford Prison experiment is the best example, it gives a different outcome every time it's repeated with a different group of people.
Ya, a ton of it is probably determined by the sort of suggestions that the site offers up.
I'd say 90% (and that's being conservative) of men aren't being rough enough sexually to a woman's liking.
I've been wondering, i grasp the idea of redpill and why it works but I'm yet to put it to practice. Why does it feel like it's wrong and somehow punishable to behave according to it, even though it's what makes far more sense as a man? Have I just been brainwashed and still am BP?
It's just whats programmed into you. Try it fully, no half assing, and watch your life change almost immediatley
Women want 'enlightened' dominance and control. They want to play-fight the fight for dominance and then submit - this is the very core of their sex fantasies.
They aren't rescuing the prince from an evil woman. They fantasy about Bowser kidnapping them, raping them, and then Bowser becomes Mario after sex.
You have a link? I couldn't find it on their site.
https://www.vice.com/en_nz/article/why-are-so-many-women-searching-for-ultra-violent-porn
Vice was great a few years ago then just took a huge shit.
Slightly rhetorical, and I already know the answer, so I don't know why I'm asking this. But why are researchers in these fields allowed to
forceplace their batshit crazy SJW personal opinions into their research?All of the peer reviewers and people that review research grants are all liberal SJW professors too
Anyone who has ever been in a sexual relationship with a woman and had serious conversations with her on the topic already knew this.
Anyway:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i54XZtnMAEg
Here's the article:
https://www.vice.com/en_nz/article/why-are-so-many-women-searching-for-ultra-violent-porn
This honestly surprises you guys...?
I've had every single LTR and plate I've ever been with tell me "choke me, spank me, pull my hair" once in the bedroom.
Of course, they bullshit the other 98% of waking daily life.
I had this one girl that told me I was a pissy for walking away from her bitch tantrums. One time I told her I was about to slap the shit out of her when she was yelling and throwing shit around, but just left instead. She later told me that I should've beat and fucked her. Lmao. I'm not risking domestic violence charges over some pussy. All women like being roughened up, but some are straight up fucking insane. Don't fuck with crazy.
How do you know the gender of the person searching for porn?
The wine stains on the keyboard.
Same way they know the gender of the person searching for anything, massive data analytics: your web behavior easily reveals your sex, age, location and more. Google is extremely good at figuring this stuff out, it's how they built their advertising empire.
This. Google Analytics is integrated into damn near every web-page. Use the Ghostry add-on to block analytics/trackers.
Look at the information that Google analytics provides. Take into account it is only what they release.
They also easily know your sexual preferences, music tastes, hobbies, interests, job and health issues, your religion, and your race, that's just from your searches.
If you pair that with info people give out voluntarily on social media, they know everything about you.
Some people make accounts on these sites... plus Facebook stalks you and tells them your info.
Don't have links to sources because on mobile, but I've read before that one of the worst things about women getting raped is that many of them actually end up enjoying and fantasising and masturbating to it after: it really fucks with their minds because they know it's bad, but it feels so good to them.
Women's rape fantasies wouldn't seem so weird if men were ''allowed'' to admit to rape fantasies without being charged with a criminal offense or otherwise socially banished.
I'm always curious what white RPers feel about female interest in big dick and 'BBC' porn seeming to grow. I have a feeling you won't be redpilled on race but you will when it suits you.
Have they make a study about how much men actually LOVE Cuddling? Because this is the other side of the coin.
When men talk among themselves about their "sexual conquests" then they sure talk about how they "rocked her world...hard of course". They never talk about cuddling or other "soft" pleasantries, do they? If the topic comes up, then its usually "what are you gay? HAHAHAHA" insecure type of response you mostly get.
Sorry Fellas, just like women talk about nice and gentle sex but go crazy when the right guy in the right moment pushes the right buttons, men gladly and joyfully become "cuddly Teddy Bears" when the right Women and circumstances "allows" them to.
More truth bombs from our esteemed TRP on scene reporter u/G_Petronius
I had a plate who loved porn. I guessed that she liked group porn. Her exact words "my sexual fantasy is to just be destroyed". I actually found that to be a turn off and I did not see her again.
i would love to dog a dirty bird like that. I wanna be last though once her vag and poop chute is full of my bros piping hot cum
Degenerate fucking cuck. You were posting in the blue pill how you were banned in here, so fuck off.
Sounds like some good research. At the end they're all like "well I guess we'll never know why" despite the obvious mountain of evidence..
I'm into kinky relationships, and many hookups of mine have been into kink and have had full blown bdsm relationships before. I date women in their 20s, and it's like 40% at least. They wanna be helplessly gorilla fucked, but many men out there just aren't laying it down like they should be.
because girls have same brain as men so at first they want to see normal soft porn and after few years of watching porn they looking for dildo african midgets anal rape....
brain is clever always looking for something new and exciting...it never ends when you watch porn every day...
glad Iam on no fap for about a month
Can someone link the study? I need to read and share.
This post reminds me of an article I read on cracked.com a while ago (yeah I know a humor website isn't the best source but as a rational thinking male most of you will know that you shouldn't attack the source but rather the content, and the content is solid) about an author's experiences writing erotic fiction.
The gist of it is that the overwhelming majority of erotic fiction readers are female (because men prefer visual stimulation ie porn vids whilst women prefer their erotica in text form) and in his words "If rape fiction was available on Amazon, it would sell more than everything else put together: I make my money from incest because it's so wrong. The more messed up the story is, the more it'll sell".
To get around the rape ban authors have had to find creative ways of writing "rape-not-rape" stories such as "mind-control" where women are forced to have sex through mind altering powers.
girls like getting choked out what else is new
All girls from all walks of life, want to be fucked hard and rough. Fuck them hard and rough. They'll do anything for you, atleast while it's your turn with her. She's still not yours.
Im a girl that watches violent porn. I started out as a little girl watching it. I think it helps normalize the times I have been raped. I lost my virginity at 13 when an adult gave me alchol for the first time. It helped me still feel "loved" even though I grew up in an abusive household. There is a lot more focus on what the man is doing and leaves the girl as passive unlike regular porn where its a girls tits bouncing for 15 min (like common im not gay) i dont think its necessarily the violence. Its the adrenaline rush you get from the fear that makes your blood flow. Like stealing something. Your heart pounds. Most porn is just full shots of women with the tiniest amount of dick. And the guy isnt even attractive half the time. Regular porn sucks for that. Like not even the porn stars fucking can get off durring the shoot how could I? Amd if you watch a lot of bdsm or rape porn or even the weird Japanese shit there are way more use of vibrators or erogenous zones being played with instead of the girl getting throat fucked then pounded dry for 5 min. Its not all about rape and violence like men brush it off as.
This is a kind of survivor bias. The women who are sexually inclined enough to want to explore their kinks are more likely the kind to be inclined towards harder things. Versus men who are obviously more visually wired and the vast majority of men want to see porn of some kind.
Click bait. Tired of it.
On a side note: Many of those bitches complaining about toxic masculinity nurture submissive fantasies to compensate.
I assume you are quoting a study. Can you me link to it?
Wow. I'm totally like so blown away omg. We didn't already know this at all
Did she also try to find out the statistics of female-friendly porn?
Is there a link to the article
Does 'ultra-violent' include water injection? You know what they say, "keep your friends close, your enemas even closer."
I had a gf who literally wanted me to fight her in bed. the more she resisted the more she loved it
still hits me up a year + after the break up
strange one's, are these wimminz
It has me surprised too.
My FWB's biggest fetish is rough sex. She once mentions that she wants me to choke her pull her hair and slap her face.
Another point, on my POF profile I have come across a lot of women that was to be DOM Slaves, like regular girls not hookers or cam girls. I didn't think much of that until I read this tread.
Holy shit you guys think you're so smart. Leave evolution to the biologists.
go talk shit to the people who conducted the study.