Feminism is not a monolithic ideology. There are many breeds and degrees of it.

But it is a monolith in its means: a shit-test that turns into mass-cuckolding if not checked.

It is no more petty than any other shit-test. It should have been stopped when women petitioned for the 19th amendment, but it wasn't stopped and has now turned into a global phenomeon. Truly, it is man's fault for letting it happen. If you argue anything but, you are arguing that women have far more power than they really do. What can a horde of 120lb weaklings do to the vast majority of men?

Nothing, unless helped by other men capable of killing the critics and threatening them into submission.

But I get ahead of myself. The solution to feminism is simple and you're all engaging in it right now, but it's interesting to see the nature of women in this exodus from conservativism.

One interesting observation is the focus on criticizing slut-shaming.

There are a few motivations behind it.

  1. It allows low-value women to obtain higher quality sperm. Traditionally, a low-quality woman would have a harder time getting cock from a high value guy. She has only her pussy to give, so she would give it up quickly and hope for a baby, but in a conservative society, she would be stopped before she even started by the fear of slut-shaming. The penalty of adultery (she would probably be married or he would) might even be death. But if a society becomes liberal enough that it convinces us to accept slutty behavior, she can get fucked by a high-value guy with little repercussions, at least in the short-term. What's more, is she can outcompete more beautiful women who are more conservative with whom they fuck. The high-value guy is going to take the easy pussy. She may or may not be able to lock him down, but her chances are much higher if she's regularly giving him bomb pussy. I have myself ditched much hotter girls in favor of easy pussy and been seduced by it into thinking, over time, that maybe she's hotter than I originally thought. This is nothing more than feminine seduction. A woman is only as hot as the moment you see her. Whoever is hotter between two women upon first glace will always have the capability of being hotter through her own seduction.

  2. When slut-shaming becomes taboo enough, higher quality women will also take advantage of it. Now, the highest quality women will usually have low partner counts their entire life and rarely hookup, but depending on their environment and upbringing, the lack of slut-shaming looks increasingly tasty. She has a lot of options and no one will care in the least, save the 1% of the 1% who treat sex like a eugenics project (as they should), and some of those options are very attractive. She will then sleep with more men than she normally would in a more conservative society, because it allows her to increase the quality of her progeny.

  3. It increases women's standards. With so many options, even the lowest quality women can be more picky. In recent history, dating has never been as hard as it is. I think this is agood thing, because a challenge is fun. For guys who want to live in some conservative time where you're guaranteed a decent wife and family, it isn't great, but for the ambitious, and for women, this is a great time to be alive. I think it's dope.

Because of the aforementioned premises, I'd argue that the men created in these times are probably of the highest quality. Because competition is so stiff, men who want to succeed are forced to go far beyond the thresholds of success they would have in more conservative times. Instead of a small circle of royalty and aristocrats succeeding, we now have mega-pimps coming from all walks of life and even trouncing traditional royal families in wealth and power.

Which is to say, in the end, criticizing slut-shaming is about opening the gene pool. More available semen for the most potent mixes. Women are smart for taking advantage of the situation. If you were a woman, you'd do exactly what they're doing.

In liberal times, the average quality of man goes down, but the extremes are extended. You have some of the worst and some of the best in history come from this epoch.

In conservative times, the average quality of man goes up, but the extremes are trimmed. You have a great many good men, but few great men.

It's a trade. This time is neither worse nor better than any other time. There was and never will be a Golden Age. Observe the present, understand it, then profit.