This forum is starting to fill to the brims with men that can't wait to spit out "you're not red pill, you don't determine what is or is not red pill."

And I don't, however, the sidebar does. And the sidebar is clear.

1) "Do not move in with women you do not intend to marry within 6 months." -Rollo

2) Do not get married.

MRP & LTR flaires are garbage filters. They're why craigslist had an adult services section, so hookers weren't posting in W4M. TRP is as a system inherently STR oriented and for good reason, it's designed around attraction, not the desires of male romantics.

How many guys in MRP that have turned their family around would get married again? If you give these guys time machines and say they can still see their kids whenever they want, they're setting it to the last night they didn't get her pregnant, right about the time their lease is up and that's that. They're walking out that door with a smile that can only be matched by her when she steps on his back 5 years later after 2.0 children, to get an extra couple feet to grab onto that branch and golden parachute onto the hard embrace of a hundred cocks.

I realize this is Donnie Darko esc, deal with it.

I would highly encourage you to read Changes in Women's Mate Preferences Across the Ovulatory Cycle.

It is clear from this meta study that women do not have any such preference for something akin to "alpha bucks." All descriptions of "alpha bucks" from blue pilled users trying to masquerade as anything but, are high betas.

High social status men using said status to attract mates with the promise of long term comfort. Beta game 101.

Women look only for short term or long term partners. What is "alpha bucks" to her, is a man with all short term mate features, who is willing to give her provisioning (comfort and security). A blue pilled, alpha male.

Also a contradiction. A man with options, who won't exercise them. Someone who can get the milk, but instead will buy the entire whale.

But we know what happens to blue pilled alpha males, we call them naturals. They suffer the same fate as all blue pilled men. Do not let their abundance or notch count fool you. This is not a conflict with red pill theory, it is confirmation.

Women are not built for long term relationships under the male conception of love and honor. You can not escape this, only conform to her STR requirements and enjoy your time while it lasts. And as long as she has enough comfort with you, she will let you persist.

The notion of providing comfort, then giving STR traits to her is backwards and your blue pill desire will eventually be exposed to her in some moment of weakness.

You don't get to create a solution to a problem that doesn't solve it. You either fit the role of genetic contributor, or provisioner. The only long term solution is true abundance, in your mentality and at your disposal.

When the term provisioning is used, this does not mean you pay for her, literally. It means that you offer comfort and security in exchange for mutual exclusivity. If your relationship depends on your figurative fidelity, then you are BB. If it depends on you making her feel comfortable, you are BB. If you also pay for everything she does, and your relationship is anything other than traditional, then you have a local mail-order bride.

Implied male fidelity is the foundation of nearly all LTRs. So by extension, LTRs almost unanimously mean you are blue pilled.

The only LTR that conforms to the red pill framework involves a woman who gives you exclusivity, without asking for requiring it in return.

Eagle eyed, dick swinging users saw implied and knew exactly what was being said here.

This is the only arrangement that does not involve male disposability, but instead mirrors a man's position. This is not a male dominant position in an LTR, it's merely power neutral.

I can not tell you how hard this will be as a blue pill man to understand this.

A one sided open long term relationship, as a man, is power neutral. All other relationship structures, all of them, women hold the power. Short and long.

That's how huge the power disparity is, and that's how far you have to climb.

And only then, are you in an optimal attraction position, there are still administrative and other issues in terms of having an actual advantage in terms of the power exchange.

This is the only arrangement that does not offer provisioning, but has a long term orientation.

This is the foundation of male disposability that most users do not want to understand.

  • When you plate a woman, she plates you in return.
  • When you offer commitment to a woman, she revokes attraction in return.

When a woman offers you her exclusive devotion to you in return for your love without your explicit fidelity, you won't see other women because you love her so much, but because she'll give so much of herself to you, that you won't have the time or energy. Once you reach that point, you will understand women, so you will not be able to love women in the way that you loved them before. Because what you thought was love, was instead, weakness. A need for external validation, using sex and romance as that validation that you deserve love and attention. The extent of loss you feel when a woman leaves you is directly proportional to the extent you use them for validation.

When women do not validate you, there is not a sense of loss, but instead an understood closing of the metaphorical book as it is shelved. You don't think about whether or not the book will ever open again, unless you decide that you've outgrown it. Then you might decide to never open the book, but feel no malice about that decision.

This is the only arrangement in which both parties are mutually disposable, both have the duty of performance and neither are in a suboptimal attraction arrangement.

"But this is impossible!"

No... it's not. But it will show you how far away from an optimal arrangement you are. And when you get there, you'll understand women.

But no longer love them.

And because ultimately, women no longer validate you. They only offer what women are looking for, a good time.

You are selling each other, at this point, the same goods. And existing within her world as she understands it. She understands abundance, a good time and disposing of a useless mate. She understands temptation.

Until she understands you in the way that you should understand her, you're walking dead.

This is what it means to have an external locus of control.
This is what it means to live without covert contracts.

When you understand this and feel it deep inside your soul, your infantile view of women and longing for validation will die. But from this, a fully actualized man will be born.