Sluts and the City: A Carousel Rider's Regrets

Reddit View
June 8, 2018

Did a takedown of this for laughs. That said, what our culture has become is a shame.

Dating columnist reveals how ‘Sex and the City’ ruined her life

{Something else} ruined her life. Because no Hamster accepts responsibility.

“Sex and the City” premiered on HBO 20 years ago this week, imprinting on a generation of women a love of fantastic fashion and dreams of their own Mr. Big. Among them was Julia Allison, who moved to New York in the early 2000s to live the Carrie Bradshaw lifestyle.

Move to NYC, ride a mile of cock, and find "Mr. Big" and live happily ever after?

Not so fast...

But her pursuits sent her, ultimately, down a path of unhappiness and unfulfillment. Looking back on how the show’s ideals negatively impacted her life, Allison, now 37, tells Doree Lewak: “If I could go back and do it all over again, I wouldn’t.”

A Carousel Rider's regret....

Ten years ago, on May 27, 2008, I was on top of the world.

Ten years ago, she was 27, not 37, and her pre-WallSPLAT! suppleness was not yet a distant memory...

I was riding in an Escalade en route to the “Sex and the City” movie premiere

Probably riding more than just an Escalade, generally-speaking.

When the SUV door opened, I stepped onto the pink carpet in my Allison Parris dress and Chanel bag. I felt like a star. I felt beautiful. I felt proud. I was rubbing shoulders with celebs and the goddess herself: Carrie Bradshaw, a k a Sarah Jessica Parker.

How does she feel now? Broken and Regretful.

I went to all the glam parties, was fodder for gossip sites, had signed a deal with Bravo for a reality show, and dated been used as a cum dumpster by more than my fair share of Mr. Bigs.


I was considered by many to be Carrie Bradshaw 2.0.

"Carrie 2.0 - the Trashier, Bravo TV Version". Not something to aspire to. At least she wasn't "Carrie 3.0 - Newark Hookers On The Edge". Not yet, anyway.

And I was happy to be given that identity for a while, but it was all a lie. At the premiere, I also felt like a fraud, insecure and embarrassed — like I didn’t belong.

And the lie rubs off and the truth shows through.

I grew up a nerd in Chicago, more likely to duck into the library than talk to other kids at recess. At 12, I thought I would never be kissed. (Boy, did I make up for that later.)

Translation: At uni, I was a Giant Whore.

I was a rising high school senior when “Sex and the City” debuted in 1998, and I was instantly enthralled. I wanted to be like Carrie and her friends: I wanted to be glamorous and beautiful and dress well and have lots of dates.

^ Note the destructive nature of pop culture. It fucks up guys, too, but men were mostly immune to "Sluts In The City"

The show was my road map. Of all the die-hard fans I knew, I was the most influenced by “SATC.”


At Georgetown University, where I enrolled in 1999, I started to wear dresses and learned how to do my makeup and curl my hair. The newfound male attention I received felt exhilarating.

Remember that "Giant Whore" thing? Yeah, this is the payoff.

I even started a dating column for my college paper called “Sex on the Hilltop,” which was modeled after Carrie’s column in the fictional New York Star.

/Double Facepalm

Based on what I knew from “SATC,” I expected the city to sweep me off my feet. I envisioned nonstop brunching and shopping.

Translation: "I was retarded."

When {amNew York} finally hired me, I made $50 per weekly column. I later moved to Time Out New York, where I made $750 a week — a huge improvement, but still not enough to buy Manolos and barely enough to afford the $2,500 rent for my 400-square-foot apartment in Hell’s Kitchen.

This is important because....

I lived on food bought for me on dates and the occasional bodega tuna sandwich.

Reminiscent of Notorious Food Hooker Jessica Sporty. Jessica was "saving" $1200/mo, but evidently never saved up enough for a nose job.

Different men I dated gave me YSL shoes and status purses, just like Big did for Carrie on “SATC.”


I went out with a prince: Lorenzo Borghese from “The Bachelor.” I even dated the British ex-boyfriend of “Sex and the City” creator Candace Bushnell — the original Carrie. He was one of a few men who comprised the composite character Mr. Big.

Didn't marry him, though. Gargled his splooge? Sure. Wifed up? lulz

In 2008, my two best girlfriends and I had just filmed a Bravo pilot for a show called “It Girls” (it wasn’t picked up). We were all invited by a 40-something billionaire to his Miami mansion; he even sent his private jet for us. It was just him, the three of us and his butler and chef. I don’t think this man was used to being told no, and he started chasing me around his mansion. I finally had to lock myself in the bathroom. The worst part: He sent us back on JetBlue.


These days I work as a change activist, mounting summits for world leaders and serving as an adviser to startups and entrepreneurs looking to better the planet. I’m finally living a life of integrity, and I’m attuned to my values. I never heard about values on “Sex and the City.”

Um...Yeah. "Change Activist". Dafuq does that mean? She puts a lot of hashtags in her Twatter posts?

But dating is not front and center in my life anymore, although it was all I talked about in my 20s. That’s pretty one-dimensional.

Yeah, and also her dating life dried up, so....

Last year, I ended a two-year relationship with a man who ultimately couldn’t commit and wanted to be polyamorous.

Translation: "I wanted commitment as my vagina-odometer rolled over to the next century. He was like 'How about no.'"

Again, “SATC” and the “lessons” it taught me is the culprit.

"No Hamster Left Behind!!!"

The show wasn’t a rubric on how to find a lifelong partnership. If I was more grounded and had honestly assessed whether this man was a good partner for me, I don’t think we ever would have dated.

Someone hasn't quite figured out that she's unwifeable, yet.

Crushed and needing to regroup, I took a sabbatical and lived in Bali for eight months on a healing journey. I was also celibate during my time there.

Translation: "I couldn't even give it away for free anymore."

I do wonder what my life would have looked like if “Sex and the City” had never come across my consciousness. Perhaps I’d be married with children now?

And her prune-womb, forlorn and unused, cries out of the children she never bore.

Who knows, but I can say for sure that, as clever and aesthetically pleasing as the show was — and, as much as I agree with its value of female friendships — it showed too much consumerism and fear of intimacy disguised as empowerment.

The truth comes out.

It’s like candy: In the moment it feels good to eat it, but afterward, you feel sick. Whom you’re dating, what you’re wearing, or how good you look at that premiere — none of that s–t matters unless you genuinely love yourself. Solid relationships are what really matter.

And the Ginch thought of something she hadn't before.

The meaning of life isn't purses and shoes

Or film premieres with a list of "who's whos"

"Maybe I shouldn't have been a big, giant whore,"

"Maybe life was ... perhaps ... about a little bit more?"

Truth be told, I wish I had never heard of “SATC.” I’m sure there are worse role models but, for me, it did permanent and measurable damage to my psyche that I’m still cleaning up.

And there it is. The knife through the heart.

I want to be a different role model from the one I got. Two months ago, I started seeing someone I never would have dated 10 years earlier. Back then, I wasn’t looking to get married or seek a lifelong partner, and that was a mistake. This man is a very reasonable choice, and I’m at a place in my life where reasonable is very sexy.

How'd you like to be that guy. She's fucked the original "Mr. Big" and some fake prince but you, you're sexy 'make-do', because she's reasonable desperate. Hopefully, he'll wise up.

And "reasonable is very sexy"? Where have we heard shit like the before? Oh, right, from career shrike Sheryl Sandberg: “When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairness and expects or, even better, wants to do his share in the home. These men exist and, trust me, over time, nothing is sexier.”

Riiiiiiight. You can almost hear: "these men exist, but whatever you do, don't start fucking them NOW!" Never never mind that the future husbands betabuxes were relegated jacking off and building their careers while the targets of Sandberg's advice were wasting the flower of their youth banging every Outlaw Biker, Drug Dealer and Escaped Mental Patient they could find, until they become emotionally broken hosebags with the Thousand Cock Stare, and then, and only then, are they to insist that said betabuxes wife them up, risking divorce rape, for what they gave away to losers for free.

Except that the betabuxes won't even be getting that. They will be getting the Queen of Whore Island. Further reading:

Saving the Best


Hats Off to the Bull

The Takeaways

-The WallSPLAT! is real. The WallSPLAT! does not negotiate. The WallSPLAT! is inevitable.

-Choices (and narcissism) have consequences, especially for women.

Post Information
Title Sluts and the City: A Carousel Rider's Regrets
Author VasiliyZaitzev
Upvotes 956
Comments 301
Date 08 June 2018 03:25 AM UTC (2 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Original Link
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
MAP1000 cock staredivorce rapehamsterthe red pill

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2675 points676 points  (78 children) | Copy

I was at ground-zero when Sex and the City came out: university. Man on man did I have a sinking feeling as I watched it.

It advanced the fraudulent premise that men found women who slutted around to be attractive and high-status when the opposite is true. I still see this mentality pop up in women. No, we don't like it when you try to make us jealous with other guys even as you get insecure when we get female attention because it makes us suspect you might be covert sluts. No, we're not impressed by how many guys you have fucked because that "experience" amounts to NOTHING. You can become good in bed within a few hours if you pay attention. Years of getting plowed only detracts value.

Also, the City is all about vacuuming up all the attractive women within travel distance, which these days, is global, so that all the rich men that dwell there can have their pick making women compete for them like they are Hollywood casting directors.

Sex and the City is all about hypergamy. It wasn't Sex and the Suburbs, or Sex up in the Mountains. Noooo, it has to be the City, where all the expensive shops and boutiques are, because it's good for the corporate economy when all your disposable income from your company job is dumped at the company store, where everything is expensive, but polluted and dirty. New York City especially is a grave-yard for wannabe gold-diggers looking to catch a high net worth male, who of course, can see them coming a mile away, and uses them as cum dumpsters until he gets bored and can then parlay his experience as being husband to some rich bitch he was going to marry anyway. But it's useful for him to play along with the female Cinderalla hypergamy fantasy of finding her "Prince Charming," who is basically a youthful male with the age and body of a 25 year old, but the poise of a 45 year old, with the wealth and social position of an 85 year old, a status virtually unobtainable because you essentially be born into it, or be a good-looking genius who leverages his talent to become a billionaire before 30.

As for the handbags and shoes OP sneered at; those are trinkets that cost next to nothing for the men who bought them. They are practically an insult. What is the lady going to do with them now as she hits 40 except be reminded that she bartered her youth away so cheaply?

[–]CapnPoot171 points172 points  (2 children) | Copy

This is the most savage comment ive read in a long time. Keep on ranting brother, music to my ears

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire257 points58 points  (0 children) | Copy

Aw shucks... But it's so true.

[–]universalabundance11 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is the most savage comment truth ive read in a long time.

[–]Frenetic_Zetetic91 points92 points  (1 child) | Copy

What is the lady going to do with them now as she hits 40 except be reminded that she bartered her youth away so cheaply?

Watches grand slam hit leave ball park and land three cities away

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy

Aaron Judge swinging at a softball with an aluminum bat. Nooooooooo doubter.

[–]RedPilledGodEmperor65 points66 points  (20 children) | Copy

It advanced the fraudulent premise that men found women who slutted around to be attractive and high-status when the opposite is true. I still see this mentality pop up in women. No, we don't like it when you try to make us jealous with other guys even as you get insecure when we get female attention because it makes us suspect you might be covert sluts. No, we're not impressed by how many guys you have fucked because that "experience" amounts to NOTHING. You can become good in bed within a few hours if you pay attention. Years of getting plowed only detracts value.

So freaking true. I found it funny when women would actually brag about how many dudes they have been with.

[–]Graceful_Ballsack45 points46 points  (15 children) | Copy

This is my test to see if a woman is worth dating. If they are comfortable telling me about the other men in their lives, I appreciate their honesty and then ghost.

[–]RedPilledGodEmperor18 points19 points  (10 children) | Copy

True. Another thing I have noticed is that the women who are about talking about how many dudes they have fucked, usually aren't interested in fucking YOU. At least this has been my experience regarding all the women I have approached online or in life. It might be different if they fucked you and then opened up about it.

The times that a woman has legit brought up all the sex she had and stuff like that before we ever had sex, it never happened. It was her way of saying that she thought that she was "high value." Not worth dating and I have found that. They want you to think/know that they love sex, but it won't be with you.

[–]1SirKolbath20 points21 points  (8 children) | Copy

What's fun is to flip that script. I had a girl once who persisted in trying to tell me how great her ex was in bed.

Agree and amplify. I told her, "Oh. Bummer. Well, I can't measure up to that. You'd better go."

Drove her berserk. This was the mid nineties and I had a pager that she detonated over the next couple of days. Whatever caution she had remaining she scattered to the ends while trying to convince me that I should hop into the sack with her. Poor girl. I think I broke her.

[–]Future_Alpha4 points5 points  (7 children) | Copy

, "Oh. Bummer. Well, I can't measure up to that. You'd better go."

I'm confused, you told her that you suck in bed compared to her ex. why would she then pursue you? makes no logical sense lol.

[–]1SirKolbath8 points9 points  (4 children) | Copy

Read the sidebar. Concentrate on the part about shit tests and specifically agree and amplify.

[–]Future_Alpha0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

I have read the agree and amplify section. still don't get it in this context.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

For A&A, I’d have gone with: ”Wow, your ex sounds so amazing in bed, even I want to fuck him now”

[–]zephyrprime1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

You just sound gay then even if she knows it's a joke.

[–]zephyrprime6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Normally if you tell a girl you suck in bed, it simply makes you look bad. But since you are telling her you are bad in bed and then rejecting her, it makes you seem super confident and rejecting her makes her look low value.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Dude women are children. What do you say when you want to leave the park and the kid won’t come? “If you don’t come with we’re going to leave you here.” What do you say when the kid won’t eat his vegetables? “I changed my mind - you’re not allowed to eat any of these carrots.”

Women are children. Just remember that.

[–]Manilatimes10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

I have the exact same experience as you. 100% I were in same bed as a 6/10 rich 33 year old girl who kept telling me that she only enjoys rough sex and that her xbf were such a good fuck with a large dick. I was thinking to fucking her for fun only, but she never let me.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy

If you punish your dates for saying the truth - you will just end up with better liars. (modified proverb for raising children)

[–]Graceful_Ballsack1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Not for them telling the truth, but for them telling/feeling comfortable to tell/the type of person to talk about that unprompted is not someone I consider relationship material. I see what youre saying though

[–]Future_Alpha0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

no you bang them and then ghost. add a +1 to their notch count and to yours. and make it look innocent so they have no reason to lie.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yes, unlike relatives that perfect their lying skills for a long time on the same people in this case the baby rabies commitment seeker will learn from each rejection to lie better to the next person. I agree that appearing nonjudgmental is the counter-strategy to avoid "harvesting" (instead of training) the best liars.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock20 points21 points  (2 children) | Copy

100 dicks is not impressive because she could have had 1000

[–]RedPilledGodEmperor16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

Exactly. Even an ugly chick can rack up that many lays if she wanted to. A woman can go out every Friday and Saturday to a bar or club and find a guy to go home with, if she really wanted to. That's a little over 100 guys per year.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children) | Copy

Who the fuck downvoted this? Have an upvote, sir!

[–]Pie_02146 points47 points  (31 children) | Copy

What boggles my mind how quickly and easily women drink the feminist koolaid or "Sex in the City" mind set and how easily influenced they are. Over liberated with no thought to the future or what they are doing to themselves. I can't understand how these girls can't separate stupid tv shows and movies from reality.

It's also ming boggling to me why people thing someone who has slept with people in the double digits is going to be a good life partner. People love to act all "modern" and "progressive" and blame this and that for "oppressing" them but dam did religion have it right. Women can't handle freedom to a point where if you leave them to their own devices they will fuck around like crazy. And science has proved it many times over but people just ignore it. People with high counts are more likely to break up and that has been proven many times over. Religion controlled women by letting them go from the father to the husband in a controlled process and environment. Religion also shamed women for acting out and being disobeying their husbands, but not only that society would shun whores and bad women in general.

In my experience plenty of men are willing to commit to a girl aside from two major issues. One most of them have been around a lot and two getting married is financial suicide.

And the internet and social media ran more havoc with women. Now they are on constant attention overload. Cell phones deliver constant attention, validation, and manipulation to them. Social media let's them get that constant attention and validation, Instagram, Facebook, SnapChat, Twitter, etc. And today the media cant shut up about women and their "stuggles" left and right. Just yesterday someone posted an article about how women are being overworked!

These people are exhausting and honestly getting difficult to counter. Yes being red pill is great, have a good career, lift, have good frame, and be something, but the reality is that things have gotten much more difficult and volatile. A solider can only stand at attention for so long. So what option do most men have no? Either get married to some girl they chased after or some hippo which will eventually lead to some drama and divorce, date around with nothing serious ever, or just forget women altogether. Ultimately most guys crave a long term relationship.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire222 points23 points  (24 children) | Copy

Several things, and maybe I should do a post on this:

  1. Religion was effectively demonized around the time of Sex and the City. The "religious right" was viewed as a threat, in that it was going to create a theocracy. All the extremes were pointed out: dinosaurs coexisting with people, etc. Meanwhile, this deflected people's attention from other social enemies. Religious people are easy targets and scapegoats because one can cherry-pick irrational aspects of their belief systems for mockery and thus throw out the baby with the bathwater.

  2. The people in the film industry have had decades to perfect their craft. Sex and the City was shot and acted in a cinema verite style to give the impression that everything happening on there was . . . actually happening. This is like a magic spell that brainwashes people into thinking that what they see on the screen is normal behavior . . . when it's not.

It is expedient for the industry to try out new talent by having them appear in "guest roles" on various shows, or for promotional purposes. But IRL, how often do new attractive people magically appear in your life and then conveniently disappear over some trifle? How many times have you seen a show where the person is crazy about some new love interest, but then a flaw emerges and they are discarded never to be seen again? That happened on Sex and the City. Lots of one-night stands, short term flings, etc. This reinforces the cock carousel.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorCopperFox3c26 points27 points  (15 children) | Copy

It is ironic because Millennials have essentially made Progressivism their new religion. All they did is swap out the old religion (e.g. christianity) for a new one. If you don't fall in line with the Progressive agenda, you are socially ostracized and branded a "heretic". They of course don't realize that.

Sex and the City was part of the whole cultural zeitgeist during that time that brought it about. Funny to think about, looking back.

[–]Pie_02110 points11 points  (9 children) | Copy

Yup. Being "traditional" is seen as an insult or negative thing. I once talked to a girl who was angry that I held traditional values. She cried that women weren't slaves to men and that I wanted her to be stuck in a kitchen all day slaving away. No man wants that but hey, when you believe some made up crap to justify your new age "progressive" bs go ahead.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire212 points13 points  (3 children) | Copy

Oh yeah, she's really a "slave," as you go out to your 40-80 hour a week provider job and earn all the money that pays for labor-saving appliances that do the lion's share of the work.

My mom would whine about this all through my youth. My dad just ignored. He got up at the crack of dawn, went to work, came home. He did all the meaningful work. All she did was buy groceries and cook food. And often she would try to wheedle him into doing it for her by whining "I'm tired! I had a loooong dayyy!" I finally got sick of this, although he seemed ambivalent, and I would start saying stuff like "Aren't you ashamed?" Lol. What a joke. It's like the film "From Dusk Until Dawn;" the vampire stripper says "Welcome to Slavery!" Gecko responds with "No, thanks I'm already married," although I remember it as "No thanks, I've already been married."

[–]Pie_0219 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy

It's really strange. Before they acted as if men were going to work just to go hit the bar with the bros to only come back pretending to be tired. They demanded men do half the house work.

Now they work and don't want to do any house work and cry they are tired all the time.

Men used to work and literally hand women money for stuff. We made machines to make their easy jobs easier and automated. The thanks we get? We get thrown to the side, told to so shit ourselves, and ignored.

Women regularly decide to stop contributing in a relationship. They will one day declare they aren't cooking anymore, or won't sleep with them. Imagine if a man told a women that she needed to start playing half the bills. All hell would break loose. Imagine if he told her no more presents and dinner dates. She would be all over social media talking shit about him trying to get support and shame him.

People used to make a joke women are only good for their holes. Well it's a reality now. They dont' bring or offer anything in a relationship. They are parasites to a man's resources and even after they leave they want that benefit to continue.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire20 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Well, on the other hand, if you grow up with everything handed to you, it erodes your character and it makes you feel like shit because you are constantly getting a reward, but without any work, which means anything resembling work makes you suffer, as you lose the connection between the two. Also, if the husband does everything, he holds a lot of power and can fuck you over in a number of ways. I've seen it happen.

But obviously, as George Carlin says, empty careerism isn't the way for women, just as it isn't for men.

I think the key is mindfulness and education, where people understand the value of their choices, and the trade-offs being made. Both my parents had careers at one point, but my mother "sacrificed" hers to perform the domestic support role. But when it was no longer needed, she went on with her credentialing and got a job to feel like she was doing something with her life, because when children get older, they need less management, at least in theory.

[–]Alathon1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The reason people have said "women and children" as a phrase for the last however many centuries, is that women are closer to children than men. They don't know any better, they cannot know any better, though like children they are always certain that they could do better if only other people would listen to them (and do all the hard work of making their silly fantasies real without remuneration).

The highest standard of living a woman can hope for is to be the wife of a man in a patriarchal society in which the things she can usually do are held in high esteem (i.e. motherhood, household upkeep) and the things she is utterly incapable of doing (leadership, rational decisions to ensure a good future) are denied to her.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy

No man wants that

I sure as fuck do, and men shouldn’t be ashamed of it. The kitchen is her place. You don’t have to pander to feminine imparative here. Every man wants a loyal woman at home taking care of his castle.

Women were put on this earth to serve men. See Genesis.

[–]Pie_0211 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

I think that's different from a slave though. I don't expect her to do that every day. And I want to have fun with her and all that but yes as long as she's loyal and takes care of me. Otherwise take a walk.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

Again with the slave mentality. No one's a slave. A feminine woman, a REAL feminine woman inspires a man to work to take care of her & in turn, since she's taken care of, she acts feminine & so on & so on. Yin & yang.

Impossible for a slut to do because she can't pair bond.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I don’t know that I’d say no men want that. Hell I’d say I want that if I’m being honest. Having a wife to cook and take care of your home is something that every generation of men has enjoyed for all of western history that we are never going to experience. It’s actually really bizarre that this arrangement is now considered bizarre.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire22 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy

Eh, they were brainwashed into doing so, if you ask me, very subtly, and very deviously, through the selling of phony rebellion through the various media outlets. It's like joining the fake underground in 1984, or what they used to say about anarchist conspiracies against the government back in the 1920's: it's you, the idiot, and all the other guys are government agents looking to entrap you.

[–]Pie_0211 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

You aren't wrong.

He nails what feminism is. It's a movement through corporations to corrupt women and the family. Now more women can be taxed, women will spend less time at home so they will spend on cleaning services, day care, eating out, car maintenance, they don't care to raise a family or kids. Now kids are being raised by day cares and schools, just smart enough to follow instructions but to dumb to think for themselves. The ones that do good end up working in an office or some other labor job. The ones that don't end up in jail as even cheaper labor.

And then they tell the men they are with they "aren't their mothers", refuse to cook, clean, or do anything around the house any more. They see being with a man slavery or oppressive , but have no problem kissing their bosses ass to work their way up for a company or can't go on in a world where men aren't doing the heavy lifting. But they will gladly take a man's money and then government will help them get it.

So ask yourself who is really benefitting? It's the government and corporations. When you have a population unstable and educated they are easy to control.

Women used to raise kids with love, manners, care, affection, teach them, and more. Now it's a shit show of alimony, child support, baby daddies, custody battles, and all this other degeneracy.

There are women who see through the bullshit, but they are becoming endangered fast. These girls are being brainwashed and corrupted young. They haven't really faced any oppression but they use fear and bullshit to push women into and they eat that shit up.


[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire21 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

What's so diabolical about it is that it appeals to a person's natural self-interest and desire for self-improvement and increase of power, which can, in many ways, improve a person's life, but at the expense of their ability to form relationships, especially when taken too far.

My mother went back to school and worked.... after all of us kids reached adolescence and could more or less fend for ourselves. My grandmother started a small business teaching private lessons to make extra money. So, there is nothing wrong with making extra money, but this desire to compete in the corporate arena, as if it were the only arena that mattered, instead of say, the arena of life. I think it's because the hypergamy is triggered by the prospect of rising to the top of the corporate ladder where.... what exactly? They will be old by then. When they are young, they get proximity to it, because the dirty old men come after them. It's basically harems for men at the top of the corporate power structure. I know plenty of hot young women who literally teleported to the top of the power structure because they were banging the right 40 and 50 year olds while us "losers" were struggling in grad school.

[–]Pie_0217 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

My mom raised 4 kids and never left us with baby sitters and shit. She ran the house and was a shrewd money manager. She would get regular allowances from my dad to get groceries and stuff for the house. At the end of the month she would have saved a nice chunk of money. Of course we had no idea until we were about to buy a house and she hands my dad a wad of cash.

She never gave two shits about fancy purses and driving a Benz. Her kids were her life and she served my dad and made his life easy.

Women today at so god dam materialistic it's disgusting. I know girls that want to walk into a relationship and be granted fancy shit to put on instagram and won't settle for anything less then some expensive german car. Now there is nothing wrong with having these things, but if that is what you life is about then you are fucked up. There are women who earn them through loyalty and from her man because he loves what she does for him and then you have the gold diggers who's fun will run short when she isn't that good looking anymore.

I tell girls all the time, a resume and 401k won't take care of you when you are old. If you don't invest in a man, he will never invest you. Sure you have the upper hand now and get to be choosy, but a time will come where you will be begging to be chosen.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire20 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Want to know a true story? My cousin was dating this girl, who while beautiful, was a gold-digger. Her story was that she grew up dead broke, and was adopted by a wealthy family, who then fell on hard times. So, she had to things pressuring her into being materialistic: experiencing the reality of poverty and wealthy, and moving back and forth between the two worlds.

They stopped dating but remained friends. At one point, she dated a millionaire who tried to buy her love with car. She accepted the car, but had no interest in the guy. This is a guy with a high net worth, and presumably a brain, but he still made that rookie mistake, not to mention the tear-filled voice-mails and self-pitying emails that we all snickered at when they were replayed.

Of course, she went back to school to be a nurse, presumably to land a doctor. Not sure if she ever caught a big fish or not, but she was very beautiful.

I also tell women that having lots of stuff can weigh you down as you become a prisoner to the stuff you own. It is supposed to serve a purpose, and if it doesn't, you should get rid of it. Otherwise you are just a hoarder.

[–]Pie_0219 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy

I find it funny in society everything religion forbid is now common and rampant. On top of that all the "modern" and "progressive" views are just constant victim olympics. We don't live in a culture of patriarchy, rape, or whatever, we live in a culture of victimhood. How can I get sympathy by being a victim and not doing anything. And what all this is doing is divide and conquer. These groups like BLM, LGBT, Feminism, Left, Right, are all radicalized to silence and demonize anyone who isn't in their circle and push their propaganda on everyone else. Whether they are a minority or not, these groups have made their voices seem like the majority of the world too. And it's wrecking havoc on society. This is the destabilization of a culture and society we are seeing before our eyes.

I agree there are some parts of religion that have off the rails like dinosaurs living with people, but is that the people themselves or the religion?

Far too often people will blame the actions of people as religion. Religion is not the actions of people but what is in the book. But religion is a debate and discussion that could span years. Some people hate religion and then follow a "religion" of their own. Everyone eventually substitutes their own belief system.

I agree the media is powerful and has ruined a lot of things too. But really overall giving women too much freedom and cell phones is the biggest culprit. She can conduct her business in complete privacy, find unlimited supply of men, get money from people, get validation, and attention. All she needs is herself and her phone.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire21 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

I'm not sure about the whole end of civilization thing; I think it's more of what John Taylor Gatto would call management by creating bad character, where the true elite practice virtue, but encourage vice, some perhaps even going so far as to pretend as though they engage in vice. There is a common trope of people in high office who pretend to be virtuous actually being deviants.... but what better way to manage someone than to be able to blackmail for their deviancy when they can't blackmail you back? Poor character is what fills the prisons, which are of course, low cost factories. The lower you go down an organization, the worse the character, or so it seems these days.

[–]Pie_0212 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I've come across this signs of the end of the world. It's scary how accurate these prophecies have been. It's worth a read.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire20 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Well, if it makes you feel any better, it's more like the end of a civilization, because these kinds of civilizational apocalypses have happened before, with new ones springing up from the ruins of the old.

[–]destraht2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Things are pretty bad with instant gratification and denigrating cautious people that like to have provisions to even last a few fucking weeks, not talking months or anything. Where I'm from just buying a large bag of rice or beans is wiggity whack crazy stuff, you know those preppers and their extremism. Having a dozen gallons of water for your family, crazy stuff. Well the warehouses empty out in just several days and its all on-time delivery. The prepper shows, Nazis as nationalists, Christians coexisting with dinosaurs, literally Flat Earth, etc are designed to give ammunition for simple minded people to ridicule and shutdown important ideas. The only thing that is left is flavors of Marxism or in the EU's case their unholy alliance with Islam. The only thing that matters is that the current order is destroyed while they put their head in the sand about the consequences of actually destroying the current order. The elites ride on that and are far more cynical and devious and its all just tools to them.

[–]jewishsupremacist880 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

well with tinder..this is the reality for attractive men and women. or in some cases those who have cash for sugar babes

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire20 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

That's because the values of consumerism teach people to consume other people like disposable products, and not forge life-long bonds.

One mentality is geared towards experiencing cheap sensations, the other is towards intangible rewards that manifest gradually over time.

Ask yourself under which regime does the system make more money? A regime of relationship stability, where people for autonomous economic units in the family? Or one where people are constantly buying stuff to one-up each other so they can find the best-looking partner, only to grow bored and dissatisfied by some defect, real or imagined, and then move on to the next. Bonus if a legal marriage requiring dissolution is involved.

[–]jewishsupremacist880 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

neoliberalism ~ disaster capitalism

[–]PaulAJK4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

The thing that really struck me about this show was how they wrote it as if they were attractive women who all men would be desperate for. In reality they were old slags who no quality men would ever treat as anything but a pump and dump. As if she'd ever get "Mr Big" after banging a dozen men a series.

[–]Pie_0211 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's porn for women's emotions. But really it's a disservice to them and messes up their perspective of life. They want to believe they can live the life style of men chasing them in their young age for ever. Reality is a bitch and when it hits, you can't change facts or biology. They find out the hard way eventually but by then most men are long gone with the younger model or settled down with some other girl. Even then they will blame men.

[–]blownnnn2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

So true. Women follow Beyonce like a dictator, who was a virgin until she got married and is super duper religious that she even bought a Church. Yet...women still date and slut around. The modern western woman is being exploited, it's sad.

[–]zephyrprime1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Girls are like empty vessels. The first thing that comes along can fill them up easily. Most dads these days are either missing or too blue pilled to tell their daughters to not be a whore so there are no values in her to oppose what is taught by pop culture.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

It’s really not their fault. We are all a product of our education and values and these women quite simply were never taught the consequences of this lifestyle. This shit isn’t exactly obvious- that’s why civilizations developed complex systems of morality and the legal institution of marriage to keep everything running smoothly.

[–]Pie_0210 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

But it is. Just because you weren't taught something doesn't mean you can't learn. And it's not like there aren't people out there voicing against feminism.

I mean if someone told me all the world problems were because of women and every little thing they did was a subtle fuck you to men I think I would be smarter about that.

[–]TheReformist9434 points35 points  (4 children) | Copy

The unfortunate truth is that most of these women get away with it and live life to the full with 80% of us getting the crumbs

[–]InfiniteSpur27 points28 points  (1 child) | Copy

She'll use the reasonable choice guy to fund some inveto treatments and have a few kids, then divorce him and use him to bankroll another eat pray love trip to bali and a reboot or her sex and the city life when she gets board

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire24 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Nah, they COULD all get away with it, but most drank their own Kool-aid and actually think they are entitled to Prince Charming, and either won't settle, or settle but are extremely miserable and hateful because they never learned to appreciate what they have but to always chase and grasp for what is unattainable.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy

Jokes on her.

Yeah, she’ll get the beta sucker to marry her at 40, but she’ll never respect him or be truly happy. That’s why she always gives me fuck me eyes.

[–]yaysmr20 points21 points  (1 child) | Copy

Moving to the city and going full-on slut mode to land a rich husband is to sexual strategy as blowing all your spare money on scratch-off lottery tickets is to an investment strategy.

A 1 in 200 million chance of working out for you so you get to marry Prince Harry. Most likely a way to slowly fritter your funds away from cheap thrills and eventually end up broke. House always wins.

Not that the pickings are great *outside* the city.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

"free" STDs from these lottery tickets

[–]Denver_Luv412 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy

Last year, I ended a two-year relationship with a man who ultimately couldn’t commit and wanted to be polyamorous.


Sex and the City is all about hypergamy

It's also telling that some high-status guys have figured out how to deploy hypergamy and "polyamory" together. I just wrote about this in "Open or poly relationships from the superior position or inferior position."

For a game-aware guy in the superior position, however, “open” relationships are a handy contrivance to increase sexual availability and keep FWBs / lovers going over the longer term. As every guy who has ever lost chicks to the “Where is this going?” conversation knows, most chicks think they want marriage. Some genuinely do but many don’t; they’ve just been told by society since they were little girls that marriage is the right thing to do. The “Where is this going?” conversation kills most uncommitted relationships and even many non-cohabitating relationships. Sleeping with a chick for a couple months, until she’s into you, then taking her to sex clubs or similar venues, and building up the idea of consensual non-monogamy in her mind, can retain her, increase novelty, and make it somewhat easier to sleep with new chicks.

For high-status guys, the OR is the tool to keep women around for more than short flings.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire26 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Sad but true. They are so lacking in self-awareness they fail to see how they are being manipulated by the social proof they provide each other. Once a guy is known to have fucked one hot girl, it will attract more, and then it's a virtuous cycle of fucking hot girls that compete for the prize, like idiots. Even though the guy could have paid the first one, or is paying one or more. Guys talk all the time about using hired guns in this manner.

[–]untonyto11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy

Truth is fucking brutal

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

"Nature, red in tooth and claw."

[–]TCMThommy2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

What is the lady going to do with them now as she hits 40 except be reminded that she bartered her youth away so cheaply?

Going to break my no fap to this comment

[–]zephyrprime0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

good-looking genius who leverages his talent to become a billionaire before 30. Yeah and most guys who actually are genuises and become billionaires before 30 are not good looking and even if they are, they have weird personalities or are aspies like bill gates.

[–]ArmouredRat0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

'It wasn't Sex and the Suburbs or Sex Up in the Mountains' - yes because people and culture don't develop in the fucking suburbs or up in the mountains do they shit for brains? Culture takes place in fucking CITIES mate. Cities are a hive of everyone fucking everyone, and don't exactly adhere to your pathetic little rules. I know rich beautiful women who fuck crack dealers. I know african nurses who fuck white boys who grew up on the street. I know hippies who fuck hippies who fuck hippies who fuck hippies, in big fucking piles in sunny fields in england. People like to fuck eachother, all kinds of people, and all kinds of fucking. You just live in a falsly sanitised reality in which women act a certain way for certain aims, and men another. I mean by all means constrict your own reality to this absolute ridiculously polarised and generalised state, if that's where your own bitterness has led you, but at least admit that all kinds of sexual activities and relationships take place out there in the world, even if you've never had the pleasure in partaking of them (no doubt due to your own neuroses).

You come off primarily as a very bitter man who see's women in some warped, fucked up way. But hey this is the 'Red Pill', what did I expect.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire20 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

"yes because people and culture don't develop in the fucking suburbs or up in the mountains do they shit for brains?"

Nah, that's a stereotype. It depends on what you define as culture. It seems to me, that you view culture is eating at restaurants, going to art galleries, etc. But that's a very narrow view. There are many things you CAN'T do in the city, because the space won't allow. For instance, it is difficult to operate certain kinds of businesses on your personal property in the city, because the real estate is so expensive, and you have zoning laws. It is also difficult to grow your own food for that very reason.

The advent of the internet means people dwelling in the suburbs and in the mountains can now access many of the cultural artifacts that were once exclusively available to city-dwellers: access to books, print media, video content, pictures, etc. It's all there. Also, they can communicate with people all over the world in real time, for cheap.

Also, in the country, you have activities like hunting, farming, crafting, and so on, that you don't see much of in the cities for a number of reasons, unless they are part of subcultures. Virtualization means though, that people in the cities can experience some of these things; they can also form sub-cultures dedicated to pursuing them as hobbies.

The argument I made, though, is still valid.

If you watch Sex and the City, it's a show that oozes wealth. Carrie Bradshaw is after "Mr. Big," not Mr. Little. Mr. Big is a wealthy older man who at one point, marries a woman several decades younger than him, which then makes him more attractive to Carrie. But nobody stays faithful to each other on the show. Partners come and go. Charlotte's first marriage or LTR to Kyle Maclachlan's doctor character is a dismal failure in part because he habituated to masturbating to porn to get through medical school, where, presumably, he was so overworked, he had no time to form a normal, healthy sexuality, and thus cannot perform with his wife, possibly because he has no idea what it means to feel a natural attraction based on biochemistry, as opposed to the image; just as Charlotte is surprised to find herself besotted with a bald guy who has a hairy back.

Anyway, when I was in my twenties, it was very easy for women my age to advance in their careers by fucking older men with money and power. Their advancement wasn't merit based; it was based on the greed, corruption, venality, and immorality of these men, who a century ago, would be shamed for "robbing the cradle," not that this kind of thing isn't normal historically, because historically, young women have always gravitated to wealthy and powerful men. But none of these relationships lasted, and many of these women wound up single in their mid-thirties or early forties, or they settled for a loveless marriage of convenience.

Also, you don't know me, and you don't know my life experience. From what you've written, it seems as though you presume my personal problems have to do with inability of attracting women, or getting laid, when those in fact, are not my personal problems.

As you pointed out, people are constantly fucking each other. Fucking is easy. It's about short-term pleasure, and it's based on mutual attraction. These things exist in abundance, especially for attractive people.

Forming a life partnership, on the other hand, is extremely difficult, because everyone is now programmed to fuck everyone because seeking short-term selfish pleasure at the expense of EVERY OTHER VALUE is now the social norm, and encouraged.

So, what you are saying about "rich beautiful women who fuck crack dealers" is not surprising to me, or any of us on TRP at all. Rich beautiful women have many options, so naturally, they are can get bored with the socially approved "boring" choices of upstanding professional, and walk on the wild side for kicks.

But is she going to form a lasting life partnership with the crack dealer based on shared values and goals? Is she going to have his babies? Doubtful. I know women who fuck drug dealers for year at a time from that background. They never wind up staying with them because ultimately, they have other options, and the risks to their social standing are too high.

Anyway, fucking is easy. Forming a life-partnership... not so much.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire20 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Also, that you would use the "rich beautiful woman" fucking crack dealers is very telling about your character, and their's. Why would they grant such a favor to a person who makes their living poisoning, enslaving, and destroying the lives of others, hmmm??? You're not helping your case with that kind of thing. Here at TRP though, we know that sexuality is amoral, and that in these debased times, a rich PHYSICALLY beautiful woman can EASILY rationalize rutting with such a monster.

[–]asksk3 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

. "Two months ago, I started seeing someone I never would have dated 10 years earlier. Back then, I wasn’t looking to get married or seek a lifelong partner, and that was a mistake. This man is a very reasonable choice, and I’m at a place in my life where reasonable is very sexy."

Jesus Christ, its hilarious how insulting woman can be to Betas and not even fucking know it. Can you imagine reading this and you look to see what this chick thinks of you and you get called a REASONABLE CHOICE??? Im actually glad most women are not familiar with TRP terms and mentality so they can write shit like this , a textbook example of hypergamy, to back up all the stuff TRP talks about.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 124 points125 points  (12 children) | Copy

its hilarious how insulting woman can be to Betas and not even fucking know it.

I know, right?

It's funny how the modern cultural zeitgeist is all about how hapless men don't understand women - which is often true - but completely misses that women have basically zero fucking clue about men, beyond understanding that we want to fuck them.

[–][deleted] 44 points45 points  (6 children) | Copy

I think it's really the feminine imperative that has retrained women into consuming men, much like the YSL shoes or CC handbags. It's hard to see a difference, as this woman was obviously programmed through main stream media / feminine primacy social orders to view the men in her life the same was she views her other consumption choices.

It's a chore to walk a mile in her Christian Louboutins, so she made the "reasonable" choice and got some comfortable flats to walk in. Except we're not talking shoes, we're talking men. And she isn't "making" the choice to wear flats, she just can't afford the red bottoms anymore. Her spinning it as "reasonable" and pretending she is happy is her defense mechanism to avoid facing her realization that her pussy just isn't worth what it used to be.

[–]bl_12 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

Her spinning it as "reasonable" and pretending she is happy is her defense mechanism to avoid facing her realization that her pussy just isn't worth what it used to be.

My sister, now 31, is dating a beardo beta. He's a musician. She bitches him around whenever we're with them and he doesn't even flinch. And all she ever talks about when he's not around is "how smart he is!" You can feel the pain.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

That's whack, but one of my best friends go suckered into a marriage like this. Bitch doesn't even work, but treats him outwardly like a cuck (calls him "slow" and an "idiot" in front of ANYONE) My friend is an idiot. Beardo is an idiot. They both deserve the cuck pudding they're destined to eat.

[–]captainsadness10109 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

I don't think they deserve that. I think they deserve to be shown an alternative way

[–]truedemocracy30 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I would never, not once, tolerate someone who bitches at me or puts me down in front of others. Something is up you put that aside but in public you're a unified front. Have seen women do this to men. Always am glad I'm single and not married when it happens lol

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy

Regrettably for the TradCons, marriage and family have become consumer goods.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

Oh the irony that they would become the most trappable.

[–]Hegend199910 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy

Why can't they understand men? Why men "must" understand women?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 61 points62 points  (3 children) | Copy

Because men are the pursues because, at least when we're younger, we want sex more than we want to stay alive.

What women can't figure out is that there is no "subtext", so "I'm hungry" means "I'm hungry", "I'm tired" means "I'm tired", etc. They always try to over complicate shit for no reason.

[–]SteelSharpensSteel5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Not gonna lie, I want a sandwich after reading this comment.

[–]Future_Alpha0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Can you please elaborate more on the 'no subtext' part? are you saying men see no subtext so to them, 'i'm hungry' sounds like 'i'm hungry' and 'i'm tired' sounds like 'i'm tired'?

[–][deleted] 133 points134 points  (10 children) | Copy

Imagine if she said that in her wedding vows

"John is a very reasonable choice. Do I want to suck his balls dry and get pounded in the ass by him like I did the guys I met in y 20s? Of course not, but he has a very good career and will be able to provide me with ressources. I will reward him with bi-monthly starfish duty sex and if he ever steps out of line I'm going to make sure the full force of the legal system comes down on him. Also he's very sweet, I guess"

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy


[–]Cesare_MA26 points27 points  (7 children) | Copy

I know this is supposed to be funny, but there is so much truth in it. To suffer such a fate as a man is comparable to death.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (5 children) | Copy

It's the modern version of trench humour

[–]Endorsed ContributorRuleZeroDAD11 points12 points  (4 children) | Copy

Since it's trench humor hour, and we're on the subject of handbags, I'll get my reservation for Hell ready now:

Every young woman "knows" that a Kate Spade bag is her entry into "nicer things." A good looking accessory, at a fair, but not inconsequential price, a recent NYU grad would be happy to receive one.

A little known plus about the Kate Spade, is that if you get into a fight with your significant other and leave it on the floor of your bedroom, it will hang itself up in the closet and leave you a personalized note.

[–]Elgnairt2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

I'm a younger TRP browser and don't fully understand the metaphor. What's the meaning of the last bit regarding leaving the bag on the floor?

[–]Endorsed ContributorRuleZeroDAD9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy

Kate Spade committed suicide by hanging herself from her closet door after a fight with her husband and left a note for her daughter.

The Kate Spade "hangs itself."

[–]askmrcia3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yup sad isn't it? That's why it's important to not be that guy

[–]washington_breadstix93 points94 points  (5 children) | Copy

Jesus Christ, its hilarious how insulting woman can be to Betas and not even fucking know it.

The sad part, in my view, is that the beta dude probably doesn't even see the insult. He probably thinks this woman is a prize and/or the best he can do.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillcad15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy

Worse even. He thinks his patient, asexual orbiter strategy worked

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy

or the best he can do

And she might well be the best he can do, if all he brings to the table is a steady job, a shit frame and weak confidence.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Poor guys. No one cares about them too. Rip

[–]truedemocracy32 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

If the man has any self respect at all he will break things off after reading this public attention whoring article that basically calls him a safe choice.

The sad thing is I bet this guy is easily a top 20% or top 10% male. Never date someone that doesn't worship you or think you're the best she's ever had. This will never be the situation for this woman.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

She’s another victim or modern society and feminism. It’s pretty sad if you think about it, her family probably had a small role in this by not instilling values and letting their child by raised by television.

At least she is talking about the negatives, unlike those miserable resentful women who try and curse younger women to the same fate. You know, the post-wall women talking about how glamorous it is for her now, and young girls should follow the same path.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

The problems of sexually unappealing white males in America fall somewhere between the problems of drug addicts and the problems of migratory birds in order of importance.

-Single mothers

-Rape victims

-Women in tech

-All other women





-Homeless dogs

-Homeless humans


-Drug addicts

-Sexually unappealing white men

-Various migratory bird species

[–]Treanwreck0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Ya I almost thought it was fake lol

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This is why this sub will only become more popular with time. Women themselves preach the core principles of TRP without even realizing it.

[–]1Your_Coke_Dealer-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Women don’t act on reason, they act on emotion. Being told I’m “reasonable” is being told she does not want me yet decided to override her own desires. Fuck that noise.

[–]Fedor_Gavnyukov130 points131 points  (12 children) | Copy

Crushed and needing to regroup, I took a sabbatical and lived in Bali for eight months on a healing journey. I was also celibate during my time there.

this is straight up bullshit haha. i know so many people that go to bali including girls like her that are on the journey to "find themselves" in this spiritual land. bali is one of the biggest meat markets there is and its so easy because many sluts end up there on their "healing journey".

there's more that i could say about the whole article, but most of it has been said already. SAD!

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 94 points95 points  (0 children) | Copy

Oh, that part was def 100% "Eat, Pray, Slut."

[–]SovereignSoul7632 points33 points  (1 child) | Copy

She likely described her experiences there as such because banging non-Chads 'doesn't count'.

[–]ramakharma12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

This exactly, it just puts dinner on the table.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

Wow...a former female roommate of mine once went to Bali. Hilarious.

[–]Fedor_Gavnyukov7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

yeah i'm considering going because of how beautiful it is there, but all the "enlightened" pussy that's there is also a plus

[–]itsjustsimon-7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

I'm thinking about moving there for a couple of months. So, easy girls there?

[–]Future_Alpha0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

but she said she was 'celibate' in bali? how would she hamster that one?

[–]Fedor_Gavnyukov0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

she simply lied about it in the article. she wasn't celibate.

[–]Future_Alpha0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

how can we be sure? is it because bali is a known whoring destination?

on a side note, i gotta go there one day...and thailand...and mykonos

[–]Fedor_Gavnyukov-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy

did you not read the post you replied to or what? wtf are you asking

[–]Future_Alpha1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

in the post she said that she went to bali on a sabbatical where she was celibate. you said she lied about it. my question is 'how do we know she lied'?

[–][deleted] 126 points127 points  (3 children) | Copy

In previous generations where "Feminity" was valued, Women would have older Female mentors to slap them around the head when they pulled sex and the city shit. The amazing thing is that there was still someone to marry her at the end of the day. Despite the obvious bitterness in her realisation that she lost the game and didn't sell high.

Progressivism and feminism can't even help Women.

[–]throw_it_away_like34 points35 points  (2 children) | Copy

Also, back in the day, it was accepted for older women to slut around as Ben Franklin will tell you. Younger women were supposed to be having babies and families.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy

That makes way more sense, have fun after you take care of business.

[–]rigbed22 points23 points  (0 children) | Copy

Makes a shit ton of sense and would be hella useful for young guys to hone game and shit. Old wasn’t even old it was like 30 40

[–]Proto_Sigma109 points110 points  (3 children) | Copy

And the Ginch thought of something she hadn't before.

The meaning of life isn't purses and shoes

Or film premieres with a list of "who's whos"

"Maybe I shouldn't have been a big, giant whore,"

"Maybe life was ... perhaps ... about a little bit more?"

...Uncle Vasya, can you make more TRP Dr. Suess stories for your favorite internet nephew? Please?

[–]BigMawsmidget14 points15 points  (2 children) | Copy

After I saw this I started reading everything with the narrator for The Grinch after that.

Believe me it makes it way more hilarious.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy

the narrator for The Grinch

Boris Karloff, if you mean the animated film, which was the original and best.

[–]awakenedspirit1151 points152 points  (8 children) | Copy

The wall is super real. Honestly Im happy this is starting to get documented. But "old woman" rationality is likely to go unheard...

[–]Kornstar0491 points92 points  (7 children) | Copy

Unlike young men, young women rarely listen to older ladies.

[–]2kez8878 points79 points  (3 children) | Copy

old ladies never get the wisdom right either. instead they blame it on shit like sex and the city

[–]strwbrywild15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy

Depends on what generation you talk to. For example my dads mom was my go-to. My grandma. There are definitely women with wisdom out there. They are considered old fashioned. Fuddy-duddies and what other kind of b******* names they make up these days. So thankful I had the women in my life. My own mom was a very bad influence. Road the CC as long as she could... and then somehow trapped a man 14 year younger than her. She had five kids and five ex-husbands ... He is seriously only 3 years older than my oldest brother would be 😯😕As far as I was concerned she already hit the wall so I'm not sure what he saw. Naturally they're both miserable now 16 years later.

[–]SuperCrazy072 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

LOL, even the ones who "did it right" and got married young get it wrong.

Can't tell you how much bullshit I hear from women in their 40s, who have been married since their prime, yap about how hot they'd be if they divorced hubby.

I always want to say, "yeah, tons of dudes will fuck you, but they won't put a ring on it..." but there is no win there, so I just shut my mouth.

Granted, some guys flunk at life and the girl might actually do better. But, for the vast majority, the guy she got at 23 is the best guy she's gonna get (unless her new man is old enough to get social security).

[–]1Your_Coke_Dealer0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

They get their messages wrong, but you can always get the right ones reading between the lines of their stories

[–]ApexmanRP31 points32 points  (2 children) | Copy

Exactly what i was thinking. Women struggle with abstract thought. So, If she is is 25 and still getting attention, why should that end? She thinks.

Modern women just cant help giving it up for Alphas, assuming there will be plenty more down the road... but then they stop calling.. and she suddenly starts getting "sensible".

[–]w88dm4n12 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy

Curiously, SJP herself seems to have stayed in long term committed relationships, rather than riding it all out. Married during the SATC run. Smarter thanthe character she played.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

SMV differential worked in hubby's favor there for sure. Mr Gadget, must have a big tool too.

[–]Endorsed ContributorKeffirLime57 points58 points  (8 children) | Copy

It's even worse nowadays. At least Sex and The city only came on once a week, Or one disgraceful movie. This idea is now infecting every aspect of daily life. Every woman has this sort of shit playing out in the palm of their hand daily. Open Instagram, browse through the horde of "Instagram Celebs"(code for Professional Carousel Rider).

Woman who have nothing more to offer than their Tits and Ass but seem to be "Living the Life", getting all the attention points in the world(A woman's most desired commodity). Obviously getting this lifestyle funded by wealthy men using them as a cumdumpster.

My 18 year old cousin and her friends go out daily and take pictures for their Instagram, trying to emulate their favorite Insta Models. Posing with with their asses and tits hanging out in every photo. This is fashionable. This is "Goals". Then they get all the beta bucky boys liking and commenting on every photo, giving them that little dopamine rush and dose of approval, but, none of them actually get to fuck them.

[–][deleted] 47 points48 points  (5 children) | Copy

Chaperoned a school trip for 3-6 graders. A couple of the 5-6 grade girls were plotting and taking insta casuals. Got that term wrong but they’re posed pics intended to look spur of the moment.

These are kids from the gifted/talented programs. 99% percentile on standardized testing type kids. Their intelligence is staggering. I’m not a stupid man myself as I was high 90s percentile back in the day. These kids have the smarts to make the world eat out of their hands.

My daughter is still a vidya nerd who doesn’t really care much about boys. She’s just now starting to get into it. Had one of her first big rejections this year. I tell her she has to bring something to the table for boys to really like her. I lead her and pray she sees me as type of the man she should go after.. The problem is that she doesn’t see me in actual relationships anymore as I keep my gals separate from my family life. She’s one of the few things I actually worry about for her future.

[–]Endorsed ContributorPopeman7921 points22 points  (3 children) | Copy

Same boat: as my daughter grows into a beautiful young woman, she increasingly is surrounded by the cool beautiful chicks, the ones who compete for boys' attention, status, etc. Because that's how girls are at the top of the pyramid, when they've been raised with healthy bodies and assertive personalities.

My concern is to teach some restrain into her, and not let her get addicted to this ever-increasing attention and validation she's getting. It's gonna be hard, I know.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillcad1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Id appreciate solid advice on how to raise a daughter. Especially as it pertains to not being an attention whore cock carousel rider like most women are groomed to become

[–]Endorsed ContributorKeffirLime11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah, it's scary man, unfortunately their intelligence doesn't trump the social pressures. The approval of their peers is what matters most.

I would hate to be a parent in the current climate, but it's great that you're raising her with some sort of a value system, something most women today are devoid of. Keep her away from the bad(slutty,entitled) kids and hopefully we've got a more stable generation coming through.

[–]ApexmanRP5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

"My 18 year old cousin and her friends go out daily and take pictures for their Instagram"

Do you have any you could send me..? for research purposes, you understand...

[–]88Will88 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

Extraordinary that women can be sold two contradictory messages at the same time. They cannot get enough of the Kardashians and Sex and the city where women are applauded for having the same sort of sex life as man. They wear Manolo shoes, carry Prada handbags and want to wear $7,000 outfits while walking the red carpet. At the same time they clap like seals when they watch “powerful, strong” wimmin like Rey in Star Wars who dresses, acts and looks like a man. What is a woman to do? Should she wear expensive dresses whilst riding a conga line of cocks searching for Mr Big who earns 7 figures and is 25 years older than her, or should she become a Engineer or an MMA fighter to show that she can destroy imaginary glass ceilings?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 73 points74 points  (4 children) | Copy

Women have a strong connection to the Id. They're ruled by Tingles. That's why, on thing like "shinies" they tend not to think rationally.

she become a Engineer or an MMA fighter to show that she can destroy imaginary glass ceilings?

Nah. Women want he benefits of being a man, without the responsibilities that come with. They only want the good shit.

[–]88Will88 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

They compound their error by following two different paths to the same goal. Whether they chose the slut walk path of the Kardashians or Sex and The City, or the illusory competence path of STEM degrees they doom themselves to the same fate. Either way they doom themselves to become MORE MASCULINE. The exact opposite of what she could or should be. Feminists only offer one path, if you can’t beat them, join them. /u/GayLubeOil wrote an awesome post about Feminism not going far enough as it is basically Masculinism in theory and practice and Feminism only in name. It is a trojan horse invented by ugly, fat, rejected but unfortunately for them, intelligent females. It is basically the fat girl at the back of the class changing the rules so that her life is less miserable.

[–]ncstaterepted4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

They only want the good shit.

Equal pay for me, more work for thee!

[–]ApexmanRP21 points22 points  (0 children) | Copy

"Engineer or an MMA fighter"

Errrr.. these sound like hard work, for those poor damsels.. maybe the cock riding is easier?!

[–]ihatenormalpeople2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

The latter path is taken by women with lesser genetics who often project their desires for the types of men they want much like gay guys looking for guys that look like them and often becoming like the guys they want to bang. Even totally bottom guys will lift like no tomorrow to build muscles like the guys they want to get fucked by.

Female talk is generally best analyzed through the paradigm of projection.

[–]red_matrix25 points26 points  (1 child) | Copy

AWALT. I'm amazed at how many stories like these are plastered all over the internet (and women still don't get it), women all end up the same way, and at the same time women all find a way to blame someone or something for their unhappiness.

"I rode the CC for 10 years and now I'm unhappy so it's TV's fault!!!" LMFAO

This is the life cycle of a modern women, Sheryl Sandberg even agreed, ride the CC until guys stop giving you attention and then settle down with a reasonable beta...and we all know what happens to that poor beta.

Two months ago, I started seeing someone I never would have dated 10 years earlier. Back then, I wasn’t looking to get married or seek a lifelong partner, and that was a mistake. This man is a very reasonable choice, and I’m at a place in my life where reasonable is very sexy.

Chilling. This line says it all...

[–]truedemocracy30 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

2 months in so enough for the guy to wise up. You know even after they get married it'll be the AFs and millionaires this woman slept with that she'll think of at night or talk about with friends

Yet this guy I guarantee you is top 10% in his own right. Probably above average income, looks. Etc. just a beta mentality. So despite that since she's used to banging the top .1% (NYC millionaires) then she will never respect him and look to him as "settling" despite the fact that as of today his SMV is indeed higher

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon53 points54 points  (0 children) | Copy

In other news: Man models his life on Die Hard, ends up in prison, noone cares.

[–]Endorsed ContributorAuvergnat40 points41 points  (1 child) | Copy

Best redpill article coming off the MSM in a while.

Heartiste just did an equally hilarious takedown of it.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

LOL! Great minds. I love that blog. I have some catching up to do.

[–]Shaney9622 points23 points  (4 children) | Copy

That video you linked of that bird saving ~$1200 a month on dinners sickened me a little. Every now-and-again it's healthy to see the insane double-standard of women out there. Fuck me.. Her and the reporter are having a laugh about how she'd go on dates with guys she wasn't even attracted to, just so she could get free food.

30 dates in 1.5 months..? And I bet she'd fuck the guy if he took her somewhere fancy, just so she could rinse him again. Probably fucked a good 15 out of those 30, and that's in less than 2 months. Fuck man.

Edit: "It's tradition that the guy pays on the first date." It also used to be tradition that men raped the women of the town they'd just taken over. It appears that all these 'traditions' that exist in the modern world are only those that are approved by the feminine imperative. What a coincidence, huh?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 20 points21 points  (2 children) | Copy

"It's tradition that the guy pays on the first date."

“Why should I not expect the bill to be paid?” Yet she also declares herself a “traditional girl” who would look down on man who didn’t pay for the first date…um, riiiight, Jessica, but as it turns out “traditional girls” aren’t food hookers who have to use spreadsheets to keep their dates tracked so that they don’t get caught out in their bullshit.

My favorite part:

But Sporty said her aim was never to scam guys out of a free meal.

"I would never do that," Sporty told "GMA."

Except that's EXACTLY what she was doing. No Hamster left behind!

Hint: If you need to keep a spreadsheet of guys you've dated so that you get the free dinner or two and then drop them before you have to fuck them, then yes, you ARE a meal scammer.

[–]red_matrix2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

The Hamster gets stronger and stronger the more it gets used.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

And the more 'roids you feed it.

[–]destraht1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I can't emphasis enough how disinterested I am in getting women to blow $1200/month on dinners on me or even three times that. That would mean that I need to sit and talk with them. It is exceedingly unlikely that it would be enjoyable unless I was very attracted to every one of them and I was guaranteed immediate sex. Still though that is a lot of time to blow on frilly nonsense. I'd take an extra hour of sleep or Hearthstone over that shit.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil21 points22 points  (1 child) | Copy

The majority opinion among TRP is slut got what she deserved lulz

But here's an angle y'all are missing. First Sex and the City wannabe whore isn't an isolated incident it's a pandemic. More important she didn't sit around quietly getting what she deserved. Naww fam. She was/is a miserable bitch who desperately tried to drag everyone down with her.

Women between the ages of 32-55 arnt universally miserable cunts just in the Sex and the City West. Those same women are the ones being cunts to their students: our highschool age lurkers. Yea I know your here lil homie

The point of all of this is: Women are retards who attack 16 year old boys for what Chad did to their asshole in a highrise appartment.

[–]PS2Errol0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Best to avoid most over 30s.

[–]jytrader18 points19 points  (1 child) | Copy

Did you see this article linked in the relevant section of that NYP article?


Today there’s a universe of disgruntled men, called the Manosphere, ranting online about how women only want a “Chad,” a euphemism for a good-looking, accomplished guy who can have any woman he wants and often has several.

The Manosphere guys are widely mocked for their obsession with being a Chad. But what’s a Mr. Big except a Chad?


The good guys on the show were inherently boring. Aiden, Steve, even Smith Jerrod are too loving, too kind. Aiden and Smith both get cheated on, Smith while he pathetically waits outside. Steve was the ultimate beta male of the show for whom Miranda was seen as settling. Women were instructed to mostly ditch the good guys for the hotel developer who screws the maid or the famous artist who doesn’t seem to like you very much at all.


But what it (SATC) unrealistically taught women about relationships, and the kind of guy they should want, all the while telling them to pretend to not want a guy at all, is still a problem 20 years on.

It appears the lie is being realized en masse.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

I didn't read the comments, but yes, excellent catch.

[–]Ganaria_Gente42 points43 points  (2 children) | Copy

Every post from uncle vas Is such a pleasure to read

Thx mate. I love stuff like this

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 15 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy

Thx for the props. I appreciate it.

[–]EumenesOfEfa1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I am in my mid 20s, paying my way through engineering school. You give me hope!

[–]Endorsed ContributorDownvoteToDisagree16 points17 points  (3 children) | Copy

The Sheryl Sandberg quote is quite telling and pretty honest Red Pill advice to women who want to fully exploit their SMV during it's ebb and fall.

To blue pill men, they should hone in on the implication of her advice: if you want sex without commitment from girls in their prime, be a "bad boy" and don't show signs that you want an equal partner, value opinionated/ambitious women, or value fairness. And it's literally what makes you sexy.

Basically giving guys instructions on how to be a Red Pill Chad in college.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy

I like your comment but Sandberg's advice is pure bullshit, and ultimately harmful to women....and men.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillcad6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

harmful to most men There has never been a better time to be a ZFG muscle head

[–]EumenesOfEfa1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

True. There was never a time with less respect for beta bux

[–]sexy_mofo17 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Ah yes. The SatC movie premier. I was in Boston when it happened, and made the mistake of going to see another flick on the same night this was going down. Jesus fucking Christ. Every thot in the city of Boston was at the Regal near Fenway Park, dressed in their baggy thot dresses (was the fashion at the time, which was funny because the style of dress I'm referring to managed to be one of the least-sexy summer fashions I'd ever seen,) and their overdone hairdos/make up. It was It was a bald-faced demonstration of "basic bitch metro thot culture" and we were seeing it in real time!!

In essence, it was like the inverse of a bunch of nerds at an anime convention, only instead of future child predators and B.O., it was future post-wall thots and bad perfume.

[–]strwbrywild13 points14 points  (7 children) | Copy

She makes a mistake most women make. And some men. I'll f*** whatever I want to and eventually get exactly what I quote unquote deserve. Meaning they think they're going to be some prize for some good person at the end. In reality a good woman saves herself for her man. Also a good woman who has saved herself is not going to want a man who has been ridden more than Seattle Slew either. Self control, self respect and accountability are huge. As a woman that has been married for over 20 years to the same man happily and only with one man my whole life and him with me... It baffles me that these women and men like this think they're some prize or goddess. As I said no person of quality is going to drop their standards for somebody who has been f***** more than Seattle Slew. The ones that do are generally desperate and have already hit the wall. I know so many women entering the early to mid thirties one of my sisters included. It's just frustrating for me to see the b******* they're going through. Mainly their lack of accountability for it. They make up these scenarios where they're the victim. They get mad at me when I tell them if they weren't Skippy peanut butter and spread easy, they wouldn't be in the situation they're in. You trying to s*** talk of marriage because they're jealous of what I have. I'm happily married with two kids and living proof that when women take care of themselves not just physically and emotionally but also sexually they can look 10 to 15 years younger just by taking care of themselves. And having a good man that does the same. A sexless marriage... is no marriage at all. If a woman claims she does not like sex, either she has some serious issues stemming from her childhood or possibly being raped as an adult...or she's getting it elsewhere. It's okay to be submissive and respectful. If you have a good man there's no harm in it because he's not going to hurt or abuse you. He's going to take care of you and protect you the way it's meant to be. My husband and I were married young and broke as a joke. We have built a beautiful life together where I have work outside the home and also been a stay-at-home mom. Nothing wrong with either of these as long as you can find a balance that works for you both. I grew up with a controlling, feminist, narcissistic... mom. The worst kind of feminists, she doesn't even realize that she is. And yes I did turn out the polar opposite. We are out there but you're not going to find us in bars or any place where muff is being given out like candy. Because like the men we seek we have standards, respect, and accountability. The younger Generation of men... I feel bad for you guys because it's definitely getting harder and harder to find a good quality woman. Don't give up though they are out there. Most Women are easily manipulated emotionally when it comes to TV and b*******. It's the grass is greener on the other side effect. Because obviously they're weak-minded. This makes the pool for wife material way smaller. Technically it weeds out the bad ones though LOL. GL to you guys!

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 11 points12 points  (4 children) | Copy

She makes a mistake most women make. And some men. I'll {bang} whatever I want to and eventually get exactly what I quote unquote deserve. Meaning they think they're going to be some prize for some good person at the end. In reality a good woman saves herself for her man. Also a good woman who has saved herself is not going to want a man who has been ridden more than Seattle Slew either. Self control, self respect and accountability are huge

I am repeating the above in bold, because it needs to be.

ETA: Tracy McMillan did a 6 reason article of 200 proof "real talk" for her fellow women titled "Why You Aren't Married". Email it to your sister, but anonymously.

[–]KznRob1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Great read. Thanks for the link. The author has some great analogies to put things into context that most woman authors cannot do.

I am the mother of a 13-year-old boy, which is like living with the single-cell protozoa version of a husband.

The one I found most entertaining. The one below I liked too and also can relate to on some level as a young man.

Why? Because past a certain age, casual sex is like recreational heroin — it doesn’t stay recreational for long.

This quote though I found to be absolutely fucking retarded:

The kids put the woman on notice: Bitch, hello! It’s not all about you anymore! After a year or two of thinking about someone other than herself, suddenly, Brad Pitt or Harrison Ford comes along and decides to significantly other her. Which is also to say — if what you really want is a baby, go get you one. Your husband will be along shortly. Motherhood has a way of weeding out the lotharios.

If you want a baby just go get one!?! What in the actual fuck. In the end still AWALT.

But I do think she wrapped up the piece in a great way:

Because ultimately, marriage is not about getting something — it’s about giving it. Strangely, men understand this more than we do. Probably because for them marriage involves sacrificing their most treasured possession — a free-agent penis — and for us, it’s the culmination of a princess fantasy so universal, it built Disneyland. The bottom line is that marriage is just a long-term opportunity to practice loving someone even when they don’t deserve it. Because most of the time, your messy, farting, macaroni-and-cheese eating man will not be doing what you want him to. But as you give him love anyway — because you have made up your mind to transform yourself into a person who is practicing being kind, deep, virtuous, truthful, giving, and most of all, accepting of your own dear self — you will find that you will experience the very thing you wanted all along: Love.

In the end I do think one point of LTR/marriage is to teach a woman to love herself because she does not know how. She needs to be taught this by a man.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

If you want a baby just go get one!?! What in the actual fuck. In the end still AWALT.

This only makes sense if she doesn't care about trading down after she maximizes the kid's (well, the first kid's) genetics with alpha spermz. Maybe it can work for Charlize Theron, but unless the girl brings something to the table to make up for the baggage, she's headed down-market relative to her SMV.

Why would any guy with prospects and game LTR up a woman who has a kid(s) when there are other women who don't have that baggage coming with them?

[–]strwbrywild0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

That is an amazing read! Unfortunately the women I know that should read it would be so offended (cause it's true) they probably try to swing at me through the internet lol

[–]KznRob1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lol hilariously true. Ever since I've fully swallowed the red pill this is so true.

[–]professor_mcamateur13 points14 points  (2 children) | Copy

not to get too "meta" and conspiracy-ish... but doesn't her tone at the beginning lay out the idea that the TV literally programmed her brain how to think because she didn't have any friends in school as a kid? thats really f'D up and depressing.

also somewhat inspiting if you look at the flip side of it; the characters of entertainment are not so exclusively projections of the past, but imagined possible futures (at least from episode 1 to whatever) and kinda maybe could inspire people to write their own stories in a way.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

It's pretty fucking stupid for someone to base their life choices on a fictional television show.

She's suffering the consequences of her actions, yet refuses to take responsibility. She will likely live the rest of her life wielding the victim mentality, as she swallows antidepressants daily to dampen her emotional response to the reality she created.

[–]professor_mcamateur1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

a strange world we live indeed

[–]RedPilledGodEmperor7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy

Holy cow. I feel bad for the dude who is dating her now. He probably read that feeling like an absolute chump. This is literally the dual mating strategy that TRP talks about.

[–]varlogmessages 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

He is probably cheating on her anyway.

[–]RedPilledGodEmperor0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

That's implying that this dude actually has options.

[–]refunkulation12 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy

Television is incredibly toxic.

I’ll watch things occasionally, especially documentaries. Or at least things that require you to think. The amount of people around me who watch just an obscene amount of television I truly feel sorry for.

All these shows are truly mind control mechanisms.

Heavy TV consumption is as bad for your overall mental health as drug addiction. It’s not good to zone out and watch a fantasy world unfold.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy

Television is incredibly toxic.

^ Quoting this because it needs to be repeated.

[–]ApexmanRP4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

For me its not the downward spiral to oblivion of her own life, but the text book categorization of the men who have passed threw her, that really stands out.. the alphas, the rich guys and then the betas. Its such a repeatable pattern...

[–]NaraNawalt16 points17 points  (1 child) | Copy

The value of female friendships? She's really grasping at straws here hahahaha.

[–]red_matrix4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Women are a hive mind, they rely on the 'groupthink' to make all their decisions.

[–]1neveragoodtime9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

She nailed the thousand cock stare in that photo.

[–]varlogmessages 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

The older I get the more i look at my retirement account and I see these women don't bring anything to the table. Fuck a marriage. As far as sex in the city. I never seen the show but the longer any woman is single in the city they age hard between the tats, smoking, drinking and any other substance they decide to indulge in. They age like milk.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Indeed, and as I say for men and aging: "Stay away from shit that ages you, like smoking, drugs, too much booze and women your own age."

[–]red_matrix6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Those tats are just covering up their damage. That's why you see so many single 30 yo's with full on sleeves and jungles covering their backside.

[–]BurnoutRS7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy

If youre 27 and youre actively modelling yourself after a character on a tv show, striving to have the same kind of life and experience as is depicted in the show, then somebody fucked up in raising you and subsequently you fucked up once you picked up the reigns and started taking control of your life.

I see a lot of people who profitted off of this woman. Instill greed at a level where it becomes a primary motivator. Psychologically people feel the need to be glamourous almost as strongly as they feel the need to eat. Sit back and let the people run debt to buy shoes, whore themselves out for food, get their sugar daddies to drop dollars on them. Just make sure youre the landlord, the restaraunteur

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

She illustrates the problem of "literary" women beautifully. Lori Gottlieb does also, and like the protagonist here, Gottlieb only became self-aware once it was too late.

[–]bongohai10 points11 points  (5 children) | Copy

Good read. I do wonder sometimes why so many women go through the same shit when so many have done so before them. Are they incapable of learning from others' mistakes and from the formidable hivemind? It's like they all start from scratch at 16.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 22 points23 points  (4 children) | Copy

There are 15 good years to be a woman, from 15 or so when guys start to notice you, to 30. Can a woman be attractive after 30? Sure, but not like when she's 22 - this is another thing that women don't get about men, the importance of female youth in attraction, because youth implies fertility. So all things being equal, we will prefer 21 to 31, etc.

Women also get the goods young and think it will go on forever because it's all they know. And they're told shit that they want to hear because "Fuck being a grown up! Partying is fun! Babies poop a lot and are such a drag! You can have them when you're 40! Conception is a snap! You can be sexy at any age and fit at any weight! Now swing from that chandelier, baby!"

[–]bojsihtekat 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

Swinging from the chandelier is a good example. That song is actually meant to be depressing as hell and a wake up call, but women think it's an instruction guide on how to be awesome.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Holy shit all this time I thought that song was a party song. Just gave the lyrics a read, and my perspective turned right around.

[–]bongohai8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

Unfortunately, you are correct.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Unfortunately, you are correct.

Believe me, it actually sux to be right as often as I am.

[–]Eustace_Savage6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

This woman was no chad chaser. A decade ago she was pursuing tech nerd ceos, the guy who founded college humor, the vimeo founder and the founder of tumblr. She wanted part of the tech culture because as she says she grew up a nerd. Her problem was that she had nothing of value to contribute to the tech scene other than her pussy.

[–]TheBigPlates7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

Can someone send this whole thread to her?

[–]red_matrix1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I mean, she basically explains the entire red pill here...I couldn't have explained it better.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy

That Grinch poem tho...funniest RP shit ever

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Hahaha! Priceless. Thank you Uncle!

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Ladies and gentlemen, I present the results of unrestrained female hypergamy.

This is unreal. It’s so in line with TRP that it feels like a parody that someone here wrote of an over the top post wall hamster. Like “come on guys... this character is such a TRP morality tale that it’s not realistic.”

[–]DreamBoatGuy254 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Good lord.

I remember seeing pictures of this girl at all the glamourous events and on the red carpet. I never followed her but she really did stink of "famewhore". I didn't know Sex in the City was her bible but I am certainly Jack's complete lack of surprise to hear it.

I read the entire article unadulterated (without RP commentary) because I wanted to get a real feel for what she was saying (and because I can make my own commentary) and I'm just floored by what she wrote. I could almost swear she's an avid RPW reader or something. I mean this article is almost a RP Post Wall Come to Jesus Form Letter. It's really crazy how obvious it is that the entire article is basically one big apology for being a vapid, consumerist slut in her 20's. She even goes to the trouble to include that she was celibate during her sabbatical in Bali, assuredly so we wouldn't assume she was mindlessly following yet another vapid slut guide; the movie "Eat, Pray, Love."

This whole thing blows my mind. The cherry on top is her ending the article by reading the side bar almost word-for-word when she describes her "reasonable" new boyfriend that "she wouldn't have dated 10 years ago", but now "reasonable is sexy."

Holy Shit.

[–]plsdontkillme_0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I’m kinda new to this. What is a woman supposed to ideally do instead? And how will this help her?

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

The movie Pretty Woman started all this shit.

[–]dulkemaru515 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy

As important as this kind of uninentional RP evidence is, it tends to pull me back toward the anger phase.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

Is it anger or jealousy? That 15 years of female prime SMV has to be a helluva drug. The wall crash has to be indescribably horrible as evidenced by the original article.

[–]red_matrix-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Women buy cats and drink lots of wine to cope with the wall.

[–]sleepyweaselisawake4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

I saw this article a couple weeks ago. It sounds like she had a great life and opportunities out the ass and squandered them. Do you really think she regrets it? Hell no! She regrets that all the time she spent putting out didn't result in her being a celebrity. If her show had been picked up and she found the fame she was vying for this article would be very different.

[–]nastyamerican2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

So this woman is an idiot. Who watches that show and thinks it reflects reality at all?!? All women do this shit. This one ran out the clock tho.

[–]park_hobbo2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

So after reading all that. What is a man to do? Other than the obvious advice of lifting, reading/re-reading the side bar, and reading all the recommended books.

[–]hlokk1012 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's impressive that the article and the breakdown of it are simultaneously the most retarded thing I have ever read.


[–]oldrunnerguy2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I have a stepdaughter that has that SATC mentality. She even used to talk about the show, maybe even seemed to believe it as a template for her own life. She is 35+ years old and has spent 15 years in the military. She even has a child out of wedlock from a guy who wouldn't marry her. She has this "now I can settle down mentality" and cannot perceive why men she probably wouldn't have dated in their 20's will not gladly accept her into their life. In fact, she has the mentality that these guys are the problem, not her.

I can only surmise that ignorant influences like that show, as well as the tremendously flawed attitudes she "inherited" from her mother (we're divorced now) pervade in her gynocentric mindset. Hey ladies, convenient ignorance is not a solution.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

She is 35+ years old...even has a child out of wedlock from a guy who wouldn't marry her.

She's severely limited her options.

She has this "now I can settle down mentality"

That's kind of her only option, aside from ho'ing herself out to guys of increasingly lower SMV.

and cannot perceive why men she probably wouldn't have dated in their 20's will not gladly accept her into their life.

Yep. Some just don't adjust to changing realities.

[–]KBeer012 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Most entertaining piece I've read in a while, thank you OP.

[–]wheebwee3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lol.. this is one of the best written post I've read on this sub.. Laughed all the way through..

I wish life lessons can be taught this way!

[–]ADeadDawg2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

one of the better posts i've read recently.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

[–]JDRoedell3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

Aaaaaannd another woman realizes feminism sucks for women too.

[–]red_matrix1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Buuuut she still supports feminism due to the hivemind

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Sheryl sandbergs quote is so retarded lol.

What an utter idiot.

Side note: where do I find these hoes in college.

[–]dingleburry_joe1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

u/VasiliyZaitzev, you are the Uncle I always needed growing up. Your knowledge and experience are exceptional.

Thank you sir,

The grinch poem was absolute gold.

[–]jewishsupremacist881 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

lol. i always tell people how fucking damaging this show was/is to our young women. this kind of shit is literally white genocide. convincing our smartest/attractive women to be whores instead of loving mothers and parts of the family

[–]1msammy_is_back1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Sex and the City was great for me. I was a bartender and waiter on a resort island. On the show the girls would frequently fuck around with waiters. This made it cool and hip to "slum" with guys working the fine dining circuit.

It made women feel empowered to be having their dirty fun on their terms.

Meanwhile, waiters on that level make nearly 6 figures, drive bimmers, are physically fit and can talk major game. These women that come in for the week looking to get banged out by the hot waiter are easy prey.

I fucked women who's husbands were mayor's of major cities, CEOs of companies, wealthy women from abroad. I even fucked a women who was something like 18th in line for the crown of England (I don't remember the specifics lol).

I fucked them in the back of cars, on the beach, in their condos, back at my place... Fucked one in a bathroom of a dive bar!

These elegant wealthy women got fucked in every hole by me - some of them begged for it.

One in particular, who's husband was the chief of police of a recognizable US city wanted me to fuck her in the ass at 4 AM in her $500/night waterfront hotel room. I obliged and she moaned like she was being murdered (and loving it). After she went back to hubby she sent me police swag in the mail.

Those were some good times.

[–]redpilledcuck1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

She must have missed the most important part in Candace Bushnell's book: "The following is a work of fiction. Any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely coincidental."

[–]ilovehelmetsama1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

> I went out with a prince: Lorenzo Borghese from “The Bachelor.”

You never went out with him. He fucked you once.

[–]DeeplyDisturbed16 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

You fools still don't get it. You are using male reasoning to explain female behavior. It has never worked, it never will.

Most of the comments I read below are decent. But those who hint that "those sluts will get their comeuppance when they realize that...."

Those sluts will slut their way to the bitter end. They will do this because there are 3.5 billion males on the planet - the overwhelming majority of whom would fuck a land whale or dying carcass under the right conditions.

Little by little I see people getting away with shit like this that would have been shut right the fuck down 3-4 years ago.


[–]EumenesOfEfa1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Drop in T, feminization of men in the west, it is all getting worse. Expect no improvement

[–]Frontestgecko1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The human brain cannot tell the difference between a video and a memory. All these shows and movies, like SATC, are ways of implanting memories and instilling programs and modes of behaviour into your subject.

Most modern people never stood a chance and this has been developed into a very precise science.

[–]fatboy-slim2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Excellent analysis! The wall is real!!!!

[–]RedFoxThirteen 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

"vagina-odometer" got a big belly laugh hahahah

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

[–]Joey_Lopez1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The real sad part is that NYC is still filled with chicks that came from somewhere else to party and live the sex in the city life. I almost feel sorry for all of them because they are getting used up fast.

[–]Hjalmbere2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Wonder what her relationship with her parents was like?

IMHO you don’t just decide to model your life based on a TV show unless you’re seriously lacking irl role models.

[–]Lawojin6 points7 points  (12 children) | Copy

Why is there such a negative look upon women riding the cock carousel? Isnt this a good thing for us? Women who want to have lots of sex. Also why the complaining about them going for alphas (biker, drug dealers, mental patient as you called them) while you just as well become alpha yourself but grounding it in a Healthier way

[–]trees_away18 points19 points  (1 child) | Copy

What’s good for us ephemerally is not necessarily what’s good for them, or society, as a whole.

Hence the adage “enjoy the decline.”

Would the 21 year hotbody be better off being hung up on the 37 year old with no intention of monogamy/marriage/commitment or someone closer to her age who wants a wife and kids? I’d argue that the latter is what’s good for society and would be way better for her long term. Buuut, that’s not what gets her motor running, so I’ll enjoy fucking her (and her friends!) until i get bored of her.

[–]Lawojin2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Oh i didnt see this perspective before.

[–]red_matrix5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's not good for us because we all end up paying for their bastard children via increased taxes.

I wouldn't be surprised the government introduced a bachelor tax to finance the CC lives of all those strong, independent single moms.

[–]kareemgoat69giggity11 points12 points  (4 children) | Copy

On a meta level societies cant sustain unrelenting hypergamy. It is a sign of a decaying society, just look at ancient rome, by the time it fell, the nuclear family had been collapsed for a few hundred years

Women always go for alphas but we want them to marry alphas, not only be worth a pump and dump

[–]refunkulation2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

Society will be fine, at least America will be.

As far as meta goes, the only true challenger to American hegemony is China, and they’re more fucked up as far as how sex is treated. One child policy has led to 100 million shortage of females to males, there will be substantial numbers of men in China who will never have sex in their lives. And yet the Chinese society at the top worships money at a level that is not normal (way more than in America). Yet China also has a submissive culture and Chinese women treat the men who do get laid and married unlike any other population. I went out with a Chinese girl when I was there, and at a restaurant she was serving me food, getting up and getting me things I need.

It’s like upside down world in China and honestly I think they are equally as messed up if not wayyy worse off.

[–]kareemgoat69giggity2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

I know it seems crazy but islamic countries have really high birth rates, strong leadership in a few if them, are conservative in their culture, and have money. In a few hundred years they might overtake us

[–]refunkulation2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

That’s not happening anytime soon, Islamic societies need generations of reform.

There also are insane levels of incestual marriage, even amongst Muslims in Europe. In the UK there was a rate of nearly 60-70% of Muslim marriages between 1st, 2nd and 3rd cousins. The genetic defects of common incestual marriages explain the behavior that comes out of these extreme societies.

I actually think the one that could reshape itself into being a model country if they ever oust their leadership is Iran. Theyre among the most literate populations in the world, something like 95% literacy rate compared to abysmal levels in Arab societies.

If their country ever reformed and stopped being a global state sponsor of terrorism, they’d become one of the most intriguing countries in the future. An ancient civilization that has high education rates. What’s nuts is how similar they are to Jews, and yet Iran and Israel are sworn enemies.

[–]kareemgoat69giggity1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah you are right, but unless serious change in america happens we will collapse, and something else will take over. I was just spitballin there haha i have no true idea what will happen if america collapses

[–]Galaldriel4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Those of us with daughters see it from a different perspective. Society should support feminine virtues and behavior.

[–]The_Chiselnator-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

It is a good thing because then we get to fuck a lot of them. But it is not just about fucking them. We have things to do.

Here is the thing: I run a business with global presence. More than 30 countries. That is more than 7 timezones, more than 5 major languages and it is a very stressful job. But I work less than 10 hours a week. You know how I do it? I employ a string of very competent, dedicated, conscientous, provider type beta males. They run this thing for me.

The reason they do it is so that they can provide for their women. They work 80 to 100 hour weeks just to keep Mary Jane Sue and the 1.7 kids + a dog happy.

Now enter cock carousel and hypergamy on steroids and these bitches stop fucking my betas because they are holding out for alphas. You know what happens? My betas stop working as hard and fuck off to play computer games all day and smoke pot.

Where does that leave me and my business?

I don't want the cock carousel riding to stop but I also don't want hypergamy openly messing with my betas. What I really want is for society to shame and suppress open hypergamy plus stop divorce raping my betas so that these women can stick around and give them the motivation to keep working.

I want them fucking their alphas in secret. Open hypergamy removes that secrecy.

Betas build and maintain societies. Alphas are predators. Assuming that you are an alpha male, do you actually want more of you being the majority? If there were more of me the planet would be fucked, that much I know. I am a predator.

So this is the reasoning behind shaming cock carousel riding.

[–]Zdeneksfilter0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Who downvotes this? What the fuck is wrong with this sub? This is as proper a response as I have seen, and it makes 100% too. Even the most triggered beta reading this should upvote, seeing as hypergamy is here to stay. The next best situation, is to at least have women fuck their alphas in secrecy, seeing as they will fuck them anyway.

[–]TheRedPillMonkey4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Fucking wonderful bro. Another prime example that the wall is real and women get real when they hit it.

Some real talk though: TRP pretty heavily endorses just having plates and never getting married. Wouldn't women on the CC, living the SATC lifestyle, be perfect for that? Too busy to want relationships, but big into getting pipe laid into them. Or would the plating over dating advice be a result of the SATC lifestyle in women becoming more prevalent? Like, if there are more riders of the CC, than just be a stop on the CC and these women will never be marriage material anyway?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

TRP pretty heavily endorses just having plates and never getting married. Wouldn't women on the CC, living the SATC lifestyle, be perfect for that?

If you can get past the narcissism. I have a rule about women I bang, whether as plates or as OLTRs; they have to be chill and happy. That rules out most SATC-type broads.

[–]BillyBobNobSock2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

She doesn't regret it at all... She's just saying she does so she can pretend she's not a slut any more and lock down a beta bux to leech off. The best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour, so she tries to put distance on it with "I was immature" and "I made mistakes" etc. It's rubbish - she was doing exactly what she wanted to and would still be doing it if The Wall hadn't prevented her. Literally says she is settling for a reasonable guy who she normally wouldn't look twice at (ie she doesn't find attractive). A "reasonable choice". Puke. Could she be any more disgusting? Poor guy, I hope he sees the article and runs a million miles - right to this subreddit. It's a textbook red pill example. And to anyone reading - never be that guy, he isn't getting the girl, he's being used by the girl.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

she was doing exactly what she wanted to and would still be doing it if The Wall hadn't prevented her.

Pretty much. And these stories are not ending well, if they ever did.

The end isn't pretty fro literary women - Lori Gottlieb at least sounded the alarm for those who came behind her. The "Eat Pray Slut" chick is divorced again, and the "How Stella Got Her Groove Back" woman was in complete denial that she was marrying an obviously gay man who just wanted a green card.

[–]1SirKolbath2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Everything you write is the greatest thing ever written, Vasiliy.

I would so adore you to do one of these teardown in an entire Dr. Seuss rhyme. Eight lines just isn't enough!

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

The Before Time...A TRP "Origin" Story

Not in Seuss' stlye, but enjoy.

[–]1SirKolbath1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

That is absolutely brilliant, Vasiliy. Thank you.

[–]trancedj1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Bravo sir. Excellent break down and analysis. Great work. Thank you!

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

[–]trancedj1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy


For men who follow the path of war, “it is better to be a warrior in a garden than a gardener in a war.”

[–]park_hobbo1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

Could you argue then that this show and feminism are the Blue Pill for for women?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Feminism is a trade union for Fugly women.

See The Before Time...A TRP "Origin" Story

Beyond that, yes, it can be see that way, but it serves the feminine imperative of asset stripping men, while fucking over women by telling them to waste the flower of their youth in some cubicle job.

Getting women out in the workforce not only increases the tax base, it (a) puts children under state control by getting them away from mom and dad, and (b) makes mom and dad compliant because people tend to let their lifestyles rise to the level of their incomes and when couples become dependent on having both incomes, that's bad news.

[–]BillyBobNobSock2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

"people tend to let their lifestyles rise to the level of their incomes and when couples become dependent on having both incomes, that's bad news."

This really needs emphasising, being completely dependant on someone else's money takes your options away, which means you'll put up with way worse situations than you otherwise would have done, and this applies to a variety of situations, not just the romantic. You always need to have the option of walking away. I've heard of senior managers acting like snivelling toadies because even though they are paid very well, they took out a huge mortgage, an expensive car, got a gold digger wife etc and left themselves with no safety net and so were at the mercy of their employer - which naturally results in beta behaviour because they have no room to fail - their whole life goes down the tubes if they lose their job. But we also know what beta behaviour gets you. The lesson is not to over extend - and it'll usually be a woman trying to get you to, even when it's a bad idea - because it benefits her, and those consequences mainly fall on you - if it goes badly they'll be on to the next man, repeating the process...

[–]PS2Errol1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Agree. It's a war against beauty.

As Doestoevsky said - 'Beauty will save the world'.

[–]woodie_wood1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Why is it so satisfying reading these post wall hindsight 20/20 pieces? Karma is a bitch hitting the wall for sure.

[–]RudeAmbassador-3 points-2 points  (1 child) | Copy

On the real.. why the fuck do you care about what some dumb bitch is doing?

Self-develop yourself and fuck girls, no one cares about the regrets of some post wall slut

[–]TheTrenTrannyTrain0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I'll add a woman's view on Sex in the City as part of the vetting process.

[–]fairydust910 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

You have a concerning amount of free time

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

While I do have a lot of time available for my own pursuits, that's a result of working in a ruthlessly efficient manner while only needing about 5 hours of sleep each night. It can be both a gift and a curse.

[–]banthrow0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It's funny how The Wall on women translates to The Wall on men.

Men have a wall, a laboral wall. You are not employable after 50. If you spent your youth with whores and drugs, you will have a hard time when mature.

[–]killabeesindafront0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

That was a great read.

Curious for the answer to this. In terms of culpability from a biological framework(ie her hypergamy), is it really her fault?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

is it really her fault?

You’re joking, right?

Look, young men want sex more than they want to stay alive. Yet when Brock Turner went on his humpfest, nobody - at least nobody with any brains - defended him on the basis that ”Well, he’s 20, and young men have ‘needs’”

Thus, “AWALT” but let’s not pretend that women don’t have agency. That’s Hamstering of the highest order.

[–]metallicdrama0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Spoiler alert: pulling out

[–]dDiegoDLV0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Last year, I ended a two-year relationship with a man who ultimately couldn’t commit and wanted to be polyamorous.

Translation: "I wanted commitment as my vagina-odometer rolled over to the next century. He was like 'How about no.'"

Read between the lines: The downside (for women) to all the slutting it up is other women are doing it too! After 2 years this guy is going to trade her in for a rotation of younger women in their slutting it up phase. She was torpedoed by younger versions of herself LOL

[–]Odins-left-eye-3 points-2 points  (14 children) | Copy

You sound kind of mad, bro. This life is supposed to be fun. I love women who "ride the carousel." They are easy fun in your 20s. Don't complain that they are out there. Do you really want to add to a climate that makes women scared to fuck? If you want to marry a virgin, join an evangelical church. I honestly don't plan on getting married.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (10 children) | Copy

He’s not mad. This piece just reinforces that women will slut around in their younger years and then marry a beta when they’re no longer young and desirable. The point is to teach young men not to marry washed up whores who want a “reasonable” man. They could have had that man in their 20s but instead they sellout for free dinner, clothes and vacations.

[–]Odins-left-eye3 points4 points  (8 children) | Copy

I mean... why wouldn't they, though? It's perfectly reasonable from a woman's perspective. You get to globetrot around while men trip over each other throwing gifts at you as long as you stay single through your 20s. You get to do all that and still marry a successful guy when you're done. Why the hell would a woman give that up to sit at home with one guy during her prime?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

You get to do all that and still marry a successful guy when you're done

Did you read the article? She's 37, basically unwifeable, and rationalizing the omega guy she's dating as being a "reasonable choice".

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

He didn’t and that’s why he doesn’t get the point. These women don’t typically get married because they’re what’s left at the bottom of the bucket. When and if they do get married it’s never to a high value man because an alpha would rather have a young hot piece of ass that he can mold into the woman he wants.

[–]Thistookmedays4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Isn't this how society works nowadays? Any attractive person between 16 and 28 will be sleeping around quite a lot. Add in a few couple month flings, bunch of tinder dates, maybe a few 'serious' relation of 1-3 years, friends with benefits etcetera.

Till you run in to someone that is really better than the others and settle down. Or not finding that person / being unwifeable like the woman who wrote the article.

[–]plsdontkillme_0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This is what I don’t understand and want to know. It seems like you either marry a beta when you’re 20 or 35 after hoeing around. What’s the difference?

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (3 children) | Copy

They should give it up because no man would willingly marry a woman who gave it up for free every weekend if he knew who she were. What guy would want to spend the rest of his life with a woman who had dozens and dozens of partners?

[–]Odins-left-eye1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Apparently plenty. I haven't heard of a rash of single women who can't find anyone willing to marry them because they waited until they were 30.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I doubt many of them go around telling their husbands what they did in their former years. We all know it happens but women lie or leave out the other men because they “didn’t count.”

[–]PS2Errol0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

marriage rates are falling massively. There are going to be loads of women who can't find someone.

[–]miller2111 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Hes clearly upset... why bash these plates bro? Do you all secretelty want LTRs?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Don't over-literalize my posts.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

You sound kind of mad, bro.

Nah. It was just a take down for comedic purposes.

Hint: the guy who wrote the "Halloween" movies didn't really want Jamie Lee Curtis dead.

[–]NormalAndy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Sarah Jessica Bignose never really floated my boat and the tv series was a bag of shit so I can't really understand how anyone except the dumbest of fuckwits could be seen dead copycatting her. How wrong I am.... obviously. Fucking terrible indictment on popular culture all the same. What a dummy.

Some harsh comments there bro... I laughed so hard I nearly spat half a mouthful of noodles on the screen and almost pissed my shorts. Keep 'em coming.

[–]Treanwreck0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I know it's controversial but I think it would be better for women to be more aware of the wall.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Oh 100%. And subconsciously at least, a good number of them are. Some are overtly aware of it.

[–]GainzdalfTheWhey0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

This dynamic happened to me recently af/bb

I started seeing this chick that tried her best to show she is family material, while having some incongruent behaviours and being an absolute beast in bed. We dated for 4 months until she realised she wasn't my main girl. She proceded to end things and no more than 2 months later was seeing that nice-guy-from-work (shy fatty with money), 4 months later they are married. She proceeded to text me while in the beggining of the relationship, didnt accept my advancements when it came to having sex, but enjoyed the attention. Now i'm just sad for the guy when those needs gratuate to actual sex.

[–]plsdontkillme_0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

What would have made you stay with her?

I’m confused, why are people and that women hoe around and settle for a beta when clearly the chads will never want them anyway?

[–]GainzdalfTheWhey0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

I don't understand the second question, but we'll women settle exactly because Chad's didn't want them.

About what could she have done? Be more chill about not being a secondary chick and maybe in time get promoted...

[–]plsdontkillme_0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

What’s the point of being promoted and how would that even happen? I’m pretty average looking so would I stand a chance?

I was asking what’s so wrong about hoeing around in your 20s and settling for a beta later on, when it seems like either way women can’t get a chad or anyone better.

[–]GainzdalfTheWhey-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well being promoted after being through a hoeing around period in your thirties won't happen with most guys that have standards. About the looks, there is lots of things women can do, having a fit and solid body, good skincare routine works wonders and you don't have to have a 8 face for that. A girl that's not that good looking, bit has an amazing skin, body and personally is very fucking much appreciated.

Now the wrong part about hoeing around the later settling, there is none if you are open and not hiding that past, your partner having full understanding of that past. If they choose to accept it, they have shitty standards though, and will most likely be not that exciting to be with. But the quality dudes won't accept that past. The other wrong part with hiding that past is that you are indeed settling and will most likely not feel that much about your partner, denying him the experience of being with that someone that truly values him as a partner. If you don't hoe around in your 20s that same guy will probably feel exciting and valued by you.

[–]professor_mcamateur-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

i stopped reading at word "ginch" lmao wat does it mean?

lol'd at hashtagging change and the next few quips haha.

im surprised this broad is not trying to cash in on some hashtagMeToo accusations, she's a "writer" after all.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

"ginch" was an old slang word for "cunty bitch" when and were I was in the 90s.

[–]bikermonk-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

until they become emotionally broken hosebags with the Thousand Cock Stare

Do you blog? I am a fan already

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I just write here, and occasionally a couple of other places. But if you like that style then:

The Before Time...A TRP "Origin" Story


[–]magx01-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy

"Did a takedown of this for laughs."

Right from the first sentence you're hamstering.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

If only you understood the difference between "hamstering" and "satire".

[–]magx01-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Saying you posted this for "laughs" is satire?


[–]skipthename 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

K seriously who are these people who have time to do breakdowns and an analysis on what some random bitch has to say ?

I just saw another one that broke down Taylor Swift Lyrics, dafuq ?

  • the mods really have to start screening for this better.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter