It’s tough being a white woman in the modern western world. Her mothers, and grandmothers, and unsightly childless aunts, have constructed a system of selective sympathy reserved for only those who meet a floating-criteria of social victimhood. And since white women are the world’s aristocracy, it’s becoming an arduously difficult task to maintain her status as leader of the pack.

So they promote woman as inherently virtuous, evolutionary wish-fulfillment for the naive man, and on behalf of this omni-benevolence, she generously fights for victimized classes beneath her throne as long as they don’t compromise her supremacy.

The blueprint for this is laid out in the Progressive tome “To Kill a Mockingbird,” where angry ugly Harper Lee uses black civil rights, and the inarguable right to due-process, as a Trojan Horse to fit-in her gender agenda.

White women love gay men as long as they know their place under the throne. If you watch representations of homosexual men in 1990s television and movies, gay men exclusively exist to act as comic relief and make white women feel fabulous. In return for this, women appear virtuous by acting as defenders of homosexuality through wielding accusations of homophobia against villainous white men.

But why would men care about not wanting to appear gay? What would an accusation of homosexuality disqualify a man from?

Women drive the sexual marketplace, and men stand in reaction to it. Men are challenged to compete with one-another for women under rules that are ultimately decided by women. If women were truly repulsed by masculinity and attracted to men who gorge on pizza and video games, even men who are inclined toward productivity would cancel their gym memberships and pick up a PS4. This is reality; sexual success is the biggest driver for motivation, as it should be- sexual success and productive mating are what build Civilizations.

An accusation of homosexuality immediately disqualifies a man from sexual success. Even worse, it’s calling attention to the potential reality of a trait which may appear feminine- something that will also greatly limit his sexual success.

So why shouldn’t a man be vehemently opposed to accusations of homosexuality?

Because on the other end of the spectrum, he’ll be called homophobic. He’s scared, he’s immature, he’s ignorant, he’s just a little boy.

Women will wield the accusation of homosexuality as a shaming-device toward heterosexual men, and when they resist by not wanting to be accused of homosexuality- and this may take the form of heterosexual men not wanting to be associated with gay men or homosexuality at all- women will use this resistance to paint a more greatly demonized picture of the hateful white man.

Take a look at how the male-sexuality narrative changes when considering the victimized homosexual. Women will shout at heterosexual men accused of homophobia, “just because they’re gay, it doesn’t mean they’re attracted to you!!!”

Which is exactly how they view hetero-male sexuality…. or, is it??

Aren’t women wonderful?

FULL POST: “Freddy’s Revenge” (1985) and Homophobia