Male logic is based on the principle of cause and effect. Simply put, this type of logic is used to predict the future. Obviously of one can predict the future, they can make better decisions.

Female logic is based on getting what they want with a minimum amount of work. To achieve this, they use something called a fallacy. A fallacy is something that superficially appears logical, from the male definition of logic.

To get away with this, the woman needs plausible deniability. Using fallacies, usually that she is ignorant but it is the fault of men, she pretends she doesn't know what is up. Substitute the word woman for Nigerian scammer. The Nigerian scammer doesn't need to fool everyone, he isn't niave enough to expect that. Then it becomes crystal clear. You would not call a Nigerian scammer stupid.

Women are inherently redpill but they hide this fact. If you treed carefully, you can test it. Among themselves they will be dropping redpill truths, like how to nail down a rich guy. The fallacy they use to get away with it is NAWLT.

TLDR : women's statements are not supposed to be logical from a man's perspective. They are supposed to be fallacies used to manipulate others into getting what they want.