I have been thinking about this question for some time now, and I still don't get it, although I have a theory on what is happening.

If you visit FDS or other subs that women share their problems in, you will see that the majority of issues are with "low value men" which is a code for men attractive enough to have sex with but who don't want to offer commitment or don't have enough resources or a decent career.

Now, I don't understand how after 70 years into the sexual revolution it is still not inherently clear that this issue is entirely the cause of women's choices in life.

By opening up the sexual markets women basically incentivized top tier men to play the field as much as possible, since it is always advantageous to have sex without sparing any resources in the process.

And since I haven't once heard of a market failure spanning 70 years, I have to come to the conclusion that what happens today in the modern SMP is what the majority of women prefer, since women are the controllers of the sexual market.

So if the majority of women prefer the current SMP, then why are they so bitter and resentful towards men?

The situation is really not that complicated, if you read the average post made by women, you will immediately see that they target the top 20% of men as HVM (probably much less but I willing to give them the benefit of the doubt).

So there is no magic here, either women tighten the sexual market forcing men to offer commitment, which means that 20% of women will pair with top 20% of men and all the rest of women will have to stay single without any sexual access to these men, or we will have what we have today, which is women get to have sexual access to the top 20% of men but the majority of them will get pumped and dumped.

But there simply isn't an untapped pool of top tier men for all the women who desire them out there.

What I believe is happening is that women are oblivious to the fact they don't really practice a monogamous life style until marriage, I will give a simple example that I gave once before of how distorted the average woman's view of the RMP could be:

Let's say there are 10 top tier men and 100 women in an app like Tinder for instance, each one of these men swipes right on all the women.
So for each individual woman the situation looks great, there are 10 top tier men who are interested in her.

Not let's say all women and men decide to become monogamous on the very same day, that will be the day in which 90 out of 100 women will discover that not only there no 10 top tier man that pursue them, there are in fact 0.

So I believe the reason for the resentment is that women believe that if only these top tier men wouldn't be so low value scum and behave morally then everything could of been great in the world, while the reality is that if these men would of behaved "morally" the majority of these women would not have any access to them what so ever.

And here come the actual question, giving the realization that the majority of these women will never have any access to top tier men if these men would of behaved "morally", what would they have preferred the "moral" version of men or the one we have today?