TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

11
Lets science the shit out of this- Mark Wattany

submitted by Pirateangel113

So i was thinking about how we could be more scientific in the sub.. We need to be as scientific as possible because it will only be a certain amount of time before girls start catching on with fake profiles. Type of things i was thinking about 1.) (Number of matches/total number of swipes)= probability of getting a match 2.)number of replies /total number of swipes= probability of getting a reply 3.)number of replies/total number matches = the probability of getting a reply from some one you are matched with. 4.)amount of women who aggreed to have sex/total number of swipes = probability of having sex with some one on tinder 5.) Amount of women agreed to have sex/total amount of matches = probability of having sex with some one you matched with. 6.) Amount of women agreed to sex/total amount of women who replied to you= probability of having sex with some one who replied to you Quantifing our results will make our lives easier when comparing results of different accounts and seeing which ones are better. Any way i am not a math genius just took a class in probability. If you have any input into what type of things or probabilities you would like to see just tell me. Also if my math is wrong in any way please correct me..


[–]Pirateangel113 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I was thinking you could also track each of these variables over time for each profile. So you could potentiality track how successful a profile is in any one variable so lets say chad A is a red pill and chad B is a blue bill you could track which one gets more matches faster seeing which one is better suited for getting girls

[–]Pirateangel113 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I was thinking about this further and we could actually prove 100% that female selection of males actually follows a pareto distribution (80/20 rule) i know plenty of fish has already showed this but we could get similar results cementing it as fact. Or we could figure out what things would actually increase our chances of success by isolating certain aspects.. We could actually prove the red pill wrong or correct with this data.. By decreasing the attractiveness level of the male with a set of profiles we could actually see weather red pill philosophy is actually successful with averge guys or at what attractiveness level it becomes useless.. The posibilities are enless here...

[–]FrenlyAnon 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Here are so more measurements we can collect.

[1] #women who agree to a date/#swipes

[2] #women who give their phone number/#swipes

[3] #women who agree to have sex/#swipes

[4] avg. # of characters or words it took to obtain each piece of info.

Secondly, if we are to seriously study this. we need to create a tinder account for all ten levels of men for comparison.

[–]Pirateangel113 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

[1] is the probability of getting a date with a girl on tinder which is a good metric for below chads. This is a very good idea for figuring out different systems are best for success. [2] this would be the probability of getting a girls phone number but i am not sure about its overall importance when determining overall sexual attraction [3] this would be useful in determining the most speed and figuring out which chad was faster at getting each piece of info. As for your second part I was thinking about how to do it scientifically one way is we can use this formula to figure out where you are on the ten point scale using the metrics from my op it is 1) but this is the formula attractiveness%=16.8*ln(like%)+52.3 you take what you got from 1) and plug it into like% and just preform the operations of the formula on a calculator. And that would determin if ylthe person in the picture is objectively a 6 or not OR you could take each photo and have 31 females rate each picture. Then average the rateings of 31 females for each picture together. So picture A had female 1 rated it at 7 female 2 rated it at 5...ect. then average for picture A this will give you the average rating of picture A. We would then know objectively that person is that rateing

[–]SquallEdge 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This needs more attention.

[–]reeeren 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

More of this man

[–]bookloverphile 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Someone needs to keep data on their next chadfish.

[–]Pirateangel113 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

"Data data data i can make bricks without clay"

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter