293,138 posts


No need for a link, it's everywhere in the news. Just google it.

I find the symbolism quite awesome.

The iconic bull statue on Wall street was installed in 1989 as a symbol of "bull market": share prices rising, generalized optimism, prosperity for all... But the strongly masculine image never escaped anyone: the aggressive, strong, belligerent and unpredictable aspect of masculinity symbolized just as much in the muscles and horns of the beast as in its massive testicles that visiting women and beta males just love to fondle and take pictures of. It represents that same strong masculinity that is necessary to navigate in high finances: massive risks, massive rewards, massive losses, massive creation of wealth, massive destruction of resources.

So it was just fitting that at some point in our modern times, feminists/women would need to counteract the overly Masculine symbol by a Feminine one.

They just did. At the occasion of the International Women's Woe-is-me Day. And in the most splendid manner: by choosing the image of... a defiant little girl.

The combination of those two symbols is full of meaning. I love it.

First, apparently when women see Men as strong charging bulls, they see themselves as defiant little girls. Exactly as the red pill teaches. So next time you feel bad about having to force yourself to see women as children in order to Game efficiently, just remember the statue that feminists put on Wall Street: they see themselves as defiant little girls so why wouldn't you?

Second, the irony of the symbol didn't seem to have registered in the mind of those who put it there: what do you think would happen if a little girl would defiantly stand in the path of a massive charging bull? That's right. She would die on the spot in an absolutely horrid manner. It is likely that, in the last milliseconds of her short life, just before the sharp and strong horn - projected with fantastic kinetic energy by tons of muscles moving in a coordinate manner towards a single goal - eventually connect with her pale, young and fragile skin covering her soft belly, the young girl's defiant attitude would cede place to one of tragic fright. She might just have the time to form in her mind the distinct thought "I have made a terrible mistake. What was I thinking?" just before stupidly losing her precious life... The symbolism of it all just shows, as clearly as it was possible, how out-of-touch with reality feminist dogma is. But then, what would you expect from a little girl?

Lessons learned:

May you keep this image in your mind, my friends, to remind you always that:

  • Women can be seen as defiant little girls. They think so themselves.

  • Feminism is just little girls posturing, unconscious of how reality works. Don't break a sweat over it. Break a smile about the cuteness of it. While women take pleasure in massaging your big shiny balls.

[–]Platos_slow_brother 326 points327 points  (110 children)

How apt. In their minds, that is how life works. Strike a brave pose, and you will be celebrated, because something something arc towards justice.

In reality, the poor, delusional girl is gutted and left for scavengers, unless her male family members save her.

[–]brinkleybuzz 65 points66 points  (10 children)

I think the statue is hilarious, nothing more than an expensive shit test. In reality bulls attack only if provoked. The way this would play out in real life is the bull would walk around the little girl or brush her aside on his way to fuck another heifer.

[–]shr3dthegnarbrah 22 points23 points  (15 children)

Well, it's not completely baseless. What about tank man? We attribute honor to those who die on certain hills.

[–]V4PINDT1992 45 points46 points  (0 children)

True oppression vs perceived oppression. Thats the difference

[–]mffswharaapds3 28 points29 points  (4 children)

The motives behind tank man and this statue are very different.

[–][deleted] 40 points41 points  (2 children)

One was fighting for actual freedom and democratic rights. The other is fighting for.... A cute Instagram pic? I don't know.

[–]logicalthinker1 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Not to mention he could have fucking died!! Doesn't even matter that it was for noble intentions, it was actually brave.

[–]Deltakilo12 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm sure the PRC had him "disappear" after all that was over

[–]shr3dthegnarbrah 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree. /u/Platos_slow_brother was attacking the idea of the weak standing up against the strong; that's what I took issue with.

In their minds, that is how life works. Strike a brave pose, and you will be celebrated, because something something arc towards justice.

[–]Endorsed ContributorAuvergnat[S] 5 points6 points  (6 children)

I'm glad you raised that point. I did think of talking about it too because the parallel was obvious but refrained for the sake of brevity.

When I was a young, idealist progressive, I thought of Tank Man as that symbol of the resistance to oppression. Shit that's powerful man!

Now years later and as a realist, I gotta ask you: What's the guy's name? You don't know. Nobody knows. And we don't know because that man got captured right after (you don't see that bit on posters as much as the standing in front of tank aye?) and vanished. He was in all likelihood killed less than 24h later after a very probable long and painful interrogation. Another question for you: what did his bravery result in? Answer: Nothing. Absolutely nothing changed on that day in China or ever after in the decades since this happened.

The only thing that this man's brave action resulted in, besides getting killed, is getting young, idealist westerner progressives' collective dicks hard because of the power of the symbol of resistance. The symbol was printed on posters and tshirts and started thousands of discussions, but in terms of actual effects on reality: nothing.

The collective bravery of soldiers fighting and dying in a hill can change the outcome of the battle sure, but the bravery of an incredibly weak opposition to an incredibly strong force is nothing but a symbol for those who wish reality was not so awfully real. The collective bravery of French résistance to nazi occupation during WW2 had an extremely minor influence on the outcome of war. The number of résistants who were killed in the process compared to what they achieved is incredibly unbalanced. If it wasn't for the superior force of the US entering the war and saving the day, that minor resistance would have been but a barely noticeable splinter in the foot for the otherwise unstoppable march of the evil nazi war machine over Europe.

The symbol is great food for thought and discussed at lengths in the safety of homes, but the reality trumps the symbolism every time.

[–]1971240zgt 0 points1 point  (5 children)

The fact that that you think you can definitively say nothing ever came of the tank man goes to show youre talking out your ass. Too cynical old man. Im sure youve done multiple studies into how tank man effected the younger chinese populations ideas of the government. Sure.

[–]Endorsed ContributorAuvergnat[S] 2 points3 points  (4 children)

I'm happy to accept the idea that it "effected the younger chinese populations ideas of the government", but where is the bloody outcome? Tiananmen protests date from '89 so 27 years ago. Surely three decades of "effecting ideas" should have been enough time for something to happen out of these ideas right? Yet the party is still in power, as well as censorship.

But again, I'd be happy to be less cynical and be shown what actual results did this man sacrifice brought about? I read between your lines that you know you subject so hopefully you can point me to a couple actual changes.

EDIT: ah shit. I read your comment history and see you're just a blue pill troll. I had hoped for a second you had actually some expertise so I could revise my position in light of expert information. But I guess you just got triggered by my comment on "young, idealist westerners".

[–]1971240zgt 0 points1 point  (2 children)

No i just happened upon this sub. Thought it was a joke but yall are serious. I guess my string of comments was me trying to figure out just where youre coming from. Still so much to learn!

[–]Endorsed ContributorAuvergnat[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Our underpinning philosophy is not that new (it's just a modern view of traditional sex roles) but we express it in a tone that is extremely crude, mostly because we realised that the insidious creeping of political correctness (moral shaming tactics) in the political discourse is exactly what made our views so "socially toxic". So we push back violently against PC and end up overdoing it a bit.

Now if you're really interested in learning where we're coming from (say in an academic manner, you dont have to be looking to be convinced, though it's often what happens to those whose curiosity lead them to put aside the tone a second to start digging in our content) I'd say read Michael's story in our sidebar. It's but one example of a random man's foray into red pill thinking. For more info on the theory we developed to finally make sense of the world, see the Rational Male blog best of year 1. In a general manner, the content of the daily sub's main feed is 95% newbie so a lot of strong tone with little good content, but the sidebar is another story..

[–]1971240zgt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm i guess it seems so controversial to me because i dont see it as the world just trying to be PC. I see it more as the world trying to actually change for the better. And trying to fit in your shoes i guess people do use extremes both ways to help spread their belief(overbearing feminsts, you guys, you know).

Ill pronably read into it a little later, but Do you act and speak this crudely irl?

[–]Itr0llhoe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In this forum, anything by, for, about, relating to, or trending towards a girl or woman is basically on the same level as a corpse and sewage sundae. The statue is baseless and pointless. It's of a girl. Girls are not men. What a dumb fucking statue.

[–]samenrofringslikeLBJ points points [recovered]

I find the stronger symbolism in this case is anti-development. Wall Street is a symbol of success and progress (thats why Bin Laden hit the World Trade Center) , while Feminism is a marxist movement towards regression and destruction. They quite litteraly want you to make less money, less science and less development.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 24 points25 points  (3 children)

Wall Street is a symbol of success and progress (thats why Bin Laden hit the World Trade Center)

He wasn't attacking "success and progress." He was attacking American economic imperialism.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Lol, Imperialism, you and your jihadis can join the feminists for a big retard-gangbang.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Sure bud. Try learning a thing about geopolitics and history.

"They hate our freedoms."


[–]1EarthExile 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One may tend to resemble the other, to bitter, psychotic desert people

[–]xx69bootyhunter69xx 12 points13 points  (2 children)

I really want to start thinking of women as children but I don't want to start thinking of myself as a pedophile.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Tough call, mate. No one said swallowing the Red Pill would be easy.

[–]Jack_Sophmore 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it's very apt symbolism because feminism is literally standing in the way of capitalism and disturbing economic progress.

[–]WhorehouseVet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a very good observation, thanks for bringing it up, it is always a good reminder.

[–]TangoZulu 73 points74 points  (1 child)

I find the funniest part of International Women's Day is that the official website for the march/protest has a form letter for women to download asking their bosses to give them a PAID DAY OFF to join the protest. Yes, they are literally ASKING PERMISSION from the evil patriarchy to protest against them because they are unwilling to assume the risk of doing so. And they expect to be PAID to do it, to boot!

[–]RedPillJohnny 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Ah, sweet lady irony, there you are!

[–]DarkRenaissance 139 points140 points  (17 children)

Aside from this, even if you follow their train of thought - they're campaigning for more women leaders by using the symbol of a child. A fucking child. I can't even say follow their logic, because there is none.

Even for someone outside this loop of stupidity.. its unbelievable. Truly, pigeons on a chessboard.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 77 points78 points  (3 children)

Dont forget that the bull was guerilla art. A handmade sculpture that took countless hours to create (by a man), then the multithousand pound art piece was secretly transported in public by a truck. At first the gov tried to take it away, but it grew on them and it stayed.

That girl statue was made by a multimillion dollar corporation (Mcann) using automated machinery as a virtue signaling piece. So a woman didnt even have the talent, vision, or guts to put it up herself.

[–]askmrcia 28 points29 points  (1 child)

That girl statue was made by a multimillion dollar corporation (Mcann) using automated machinery as a virtue signaling piece. So a woman didnt even have the talent, vision, or guts to put it up herself

This says it all right here. For what the girl symbolizes, a woman didn't even create it. lol

[–]-Universe- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whose idea was this? Someone should file a lawsuit on them for being sexist that they didn't plant a boy's statue with the girl's.

[–]biographie 26 points27 points  (9 children)

Hah - Nike is even using children it. It's utterly absurd. Nike: What are girls made of?

[–]Turkerthelurker 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Because they are only trying to appeal to emotions. The same cliche "think of the children!" strategy.

They can't appeal to logic, because there is no logic in this retarded pandering.

[–]103342 23 points24 points  (3 children)

I don't see whats wrong with this. Its every girl's dream to become a famous soccer player, so they can make money and fuck bitches.

[–]DarkRenaissance 12 points13 points  (1 child)

What's wrong is that they're being told that they're made of iron, they are 'fighters'(that boxing girl). They're strong, independent and what not. These are all masculine qualities being imposed on feminine minds, as part of the war on masculinity. Even soccer is a contact sport, requiring toughness.

The 'correct', red pill ad would probably be them doing feminine things like cooking, dressing up in a non slutty yet nice way, nurturing the next generation, being ready to serve the man when he needs her services. But no. How will feminism continue if the next generation isn't taught(poisoned)?

Girls should be made of innocence and submissiveness. Now its squashed out of them and it can never come back. Nature has already given them cunning, they don't need and can't have strength.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What's wrong is that they're being told they're heroes fighting the wall street "patriarchy", when they're useful idiots serving the wall street capitalist agenda, by competing for jobs, undermining freedom of speech, etc.

[–]Mail_Order_Lutefisk 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Don't part time baristas make more than the average "pro" woman athlete?

[–]Endorsed ContributorMetalgear222 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Anyone see the Audi commercial during the super bowl? Audi: Daughter

[–]fingerthemoon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"that she will automatically be valued less than every man she meets?"

Cognitive dissidence. Everyone knows, if only subconsciously, that females have innate value and males are disposable. Only the top 20% of males have value equal to (or greater?) than a female and the rest are invisible. Male value must be earned and demonstrated whereas female value is automatic - the exact opposite of this comercials statement. It has to do with evolution. Eggs are more valuable than sperm. Genetic variance is played out on the male DNA but not the female. Females are the bottleneck of reproduction.

People have female bias built in. That's why the logical ridiculousness of feminism exists and our culture is gynocentric. I suspect culture always has been gynocentric, even in times when men dominated and subjugated women.

[–]DarkRenaissance 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Goddamn. I hope the critical mass that Rollo talks about is reached soon. The more shit they spew, the more the younger girls are corrupted.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I can't even say follow their logic, because there is none.

This explains why democracy does not work.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And why CIA astroturfing does work.

[–][deleted] 123 points124 points  (9 children)

  • "Woman’s greatest ideal is a life without work or responsibility – yet who needs such a life but a child? A child with appealing eyes, a funny little body with dimples and sweet layers of baby fat and clear, taut skin that darling miniature of an adult. It is a child that woman imitates its easy laugh, it’s helplessness, its need for protection. A child must be cared for; it cannot look after itself. And what species does not, by natural instinct, look after its offspring? It must or the species will die out."

Esther Vilar, The Manipulated Man.

Juxtapose this with the statue erected by feminists, a child who by virtue of their successful manipulation of the narrative, sees itself as "brave". She sees herself as "brave" facing down the patriarchy (the bull) who causes her to be a victim. However she only exists by virtue of the Bull's strength and tolerance, he has handed her the ability to stare him down. Her bratty behaviour now justified in the minds of the feminists because she has gotten away with this behaviour for decades. She now decides that she was fearless when in fact she was just behaving like a naughty, spoiled child all along. And men continue to fall for it, manginas call themselves "feminists", they embrace a narrative which emasculates them. A more realistic statue would be one where the little bratty girl holds the testicles of the bull in one hand, and a family court order in the other hand. But I guess that would be a little too honest and not play to the familiar narrative.

[–]1neveragoodtime 10 points11 points  (5 children)

So when women shave their legs and do their make up to appear as young as possible, they are not catering to a perceived male sexual fantasy, but to their own emotional fantasy of being child like, innocent, and protected. This explains so much, like how even feminists who externally hate men can't help their own internal desire to present themselves as children to be taken care of.

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 11 points12 points  (2 children)

shave their legs

This was actually due to successful marketing from razor companies like Gillette who wanted to get the other half of the market addicted to their products.

[–]1neveragoodtime 14 points15 points  (1 child)

And it worked because it makes them feel like little girls.

[–]falconpush 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Possibly, but im convinced it worked more so b/c men found it attractive and on a nationwide scale.

[–]DysfunctionalBrother 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They do their make up to get the approval of other women. Turns out women judge each other for how they look more than men judge them for it.

[–]WhySoRuff 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you have ever dated a or flirted with a woman who has a baby voice you'll notice that she ratchets up the "childish cuteness" at the most opportune times (when they want something). Many are in fact appealing to the male sexual fantasy.

[–]FoxMcWeezer points points [recovered]

Piggybacking off Themis higher comment:

I went to the Bull during my lunch break and captured some footage

[–]calloberjig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

be mindful of doxxing yourself bro

[–]SmuggleTown 36 points37 points  (3 children)

[–]Mukato 18 points19 points  (0 children)

bwahahaha! no one cares about the petulant child.

[–]jckiker 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That's what you do with brats: ignore them.

[–]goldnhorde 29 points30 points  (1 child)

The charging bull was meant to be a symbol of the strength and power of the American people following the stock-market crash of 1987.

This is not just true, but remembered in articles that are showing this today.

and the little girl is standing directly in defiance to this symbol.

The other strangeness is that while the bull is male (as are all bulls) and it is also masculine in nature .... it was never "a man's thing". it was never a "fuck you" to women. it was a statue using a industry icon to represent the American people.

this little girl is a direct and specific "fuck you". I guess my only hope is that they will not extend it's stay .... but in reading the article I didn't hear any "spine" type of comments about how appropriate or not the statue was.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The bull statue is freaking awesome. Such a sign of disrespect for the woman statue to be even built in the same vicinity.

[–]Raikkonen716 50 points51 points  (0 children)

This is why I love this sub. This is fucking poetry.

Awesome post dude.

[–]thunderfontaine 20 points21 points  (1 child)

It's really ironic since the bull and bullish markets also signify progress and growth. Putting this statue up seems to indicate feminism is defiantly stopping both...

[–]DudeMassage 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Noticed that as well... I guess maybe there's an argument that the bull market uncontested has lead to the economy to someplace worse... now that I think about it Elizabeth Warren probably put the statue there..

[–]razioer 40 points41 points  (3 children)

"as a symbol of "bull market": share prices rising, generalized optimism, prosperity for all"

Quick, we need something to counteract and be the opposite to this. - Feminists Logic.

You are right, they DID hit the symbolism on the head.

No fun allowed, no progress allowed, don't you dare inject capital into growing companies without MY permission. Bow down and kiss the ring, and I'll allow you SOME of the freedoms you used to enjoy.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (1 child)

The bull could also be seen as the usual testosterone driven boom-and-bust bullshit. Planting a voice of reason in front of that is actually smart symbolism.

It's just not a good idea to make this "voice of reason" a little tiny girl in front of a lumbering beast. I mean....who the hell thought it's a good idea to make a symbol, where the voice of reason is weak and powerless and can only exist due to the benevolence of a powerful beast? And what kind of women wants to be representated as a bratty powerless girl in exactly that position?

I gotta admit, those guys are really awesome at trolling. Any women who is glad about this is dumb as a rock.

[–]theONE843663 9 points10 points  (0 children)

They could have at least used Aphrodite or Athena or some other female God that can at least withstand the wrath of the bull... Ffs they're so fucking stupid.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hah. "Progress, and an intelligent, disciplined carry-through of specific goals? Nope, gotta get in the way."- All feminists

[–][deleted] 56 points57 points  (0 children)

A statue of women getting in the way of men? This is their brilliant idea? Literally symbolizing women preventing economic prosperity. This is actually hilarious. It's like they swallowed the sidebar. Women, shown as a weak, stupid, obnoxiously defiant little girl, throwing their useless body in front of the engine of male power.

The other side of this is also pretty funny. Young girls haven't even inherited the only use that women have! So their representation of women is weak, ignorant, belligerent, and sexually useless. Sounds like the average feminist.

[–][deleted] 53 points54 points  (6 children)

I didn't realise from your post description that they've actually positioned the stupid div right in front of it, so it looks like she's staring it down. It's so pathetic, wrong-headed and 'desperate-to-be-symbolic-and-poignant' that it makes me cringe.

Feminism must be running short of oppressors for it's constant victim narrative if they're having to demonise a fucking animal statue.

[–]GrabHerByThePEPE 19 points20 points  (5 children)

I think the only message of defiance that sticks is that men couldn't erect a statue to masculine power anymore. As if the last statue of masculinity is now an anachronism that is being stared into submission by a little girl. Go ahead and try to erect another bull. That said, this message is only powerful in their own minds. To rational people, it's pathetic and even bullying.

Let us see how the little girl does in the bear market.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (4 children)

Hmmm...this tit-for-tat 'statue war' implied by your assertion is appealing to me.

It would surely end with steel phallus-lined streets and bronze vagina's adorning every building.

You are most likely correct though, however the bull shouldn't be taken as a slap in the face to anyone that's not masculine, if you do that then you're huffing glue.

[–]GrabHerByThePEPE 6 points7 points  (1 child)

The bull was always a bull, and usually also a market symbol. Bull market is prosperity. It is the feminists that attributed masculinity to it. In their typical fashion, they created an enemy out of nothing so they can be victims.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

statue wars

Put a bear right behind the girl, 8 feet tall and mid strike.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Or a statue of a massive spider, that'd fix her wagon.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Virtue signalling. Whats the lest amount of wave-making one can do, while showing that they are against the system...

slacktivism gone amok.

Funny aside, I work beside the Canadians version of this, we have a field of Angus cows, lounging around. Typically Canada, copy what the Americans do, but screw it up in some meaningful way.

Literally replaced a dominant bull with imbred foodstock

[–]bberen1 15 points16 points  (1 child)

You know, this could have been an effective campaign had they chosen to put a female matador up there instead of a helpless child.

You can't overpower brute force with your touchy touchy feelings. A matador is swift. A matador is fearless. A matador baits the bull to charge, dodges the blow and then puts a sword deep in its thick skin that is impenetrable by words or emotions or feelings. You put a little kid against a raging bull; only thing that'll be left is people talking about how brave she was even though they would all agree what kind of a foolish act that was. Their plan wasn't to defeat the bull in the first place; it was to say that they tried their best and give themselves a pat on the back. It was to say how a raging bull took a little innocent girl's life. It was to swift the blame to the bull when the little girl herself was the cause of her own death. If a woman is reading this, please be a matador; not a little girl. Respect.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That's actually a good point now that I think about it. Regardless of people's opinions on bullfighting, matadors are badasses. Seriously, regarding of gender, it takes a lot of courage to do what matadors do.

[–]anon1moos 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Imagine for a second that she isn't gutted, and that she stops the bull.

She just stopped the bull market.

Its times like this when the deliberately obfuscated link between feminism and communism really shines.

[–]TRP VanguardArchwinger 34 points35 points  (4 children)

Once again, women prove that they will stand against and defy prosperity and success for the sake of their own feelings and ideologies.

"What do you mean a bull market is a good thing? Wall Street is a bunch of MEN who keep women down so our statue is opposing the bull statue! What do you mean Wall Street has nothing to do with misogyny? Men work there!"

[–]TheTrenTrannyTrain 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Feminists should change their name to Femidiots, like they don't care about money, because men will always provide.

[–]TRP VanguardArchwinger 18 points19 points  (1 child)

It's just stupid. The Wall Street bull isn't a symbol of Donald Trump, or a symbol of men and the patriarchy, or even a symbol of the government. It's a symbol for a bull market -- a period of success, growth, and prosperity.

And on women's day, the women have chosen a symbol for themselves:

A petulant, defiant child, standing in the way of success, growth, and prosperity.

This is EXACTLY how misogynists picture women, too!

[–]throwawaydawg369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol best joke I ever heard. Fucking idiot.

[–]vox_veritas points points [recovered]

It's interesting to me that the statue was placed there by State Street Global Advisors, which is the third largest asset manager in the world and manages over $2 trillion.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 12 points13 points  (3 children)

In large companies with big HR departments, you need to give the female managers busy work or they go create trouble. This single statue and the no doubt 100s of meeting hours, no doubt prevented a spontaneous eruption of a new diversity program that would have driven the actual productive workers nuts. It was money well spent for State Street.

[–]vox_veritas points points [recovered]

Ostensibly State Street claims they're sending a letter to 3,500 companies insisting that they increase diversity on their boards of directors.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Another 100 hours of meeting time to come up with the draft. Woot.

[–]AnAbsoluteSith 13 points14 points  (0 children)

And just in time for "International Women's Day". They know how to play the masses like a fucking Stradivarius.

[–]wanderer779 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Are we going to have a 'kiss women's asses day' every month now?

[–]ouroborus_ 26 points27 points  (4 children)

Tomorrow will be hilarious. I can see the headlines now - massive lay offs of women, and the patriarchy will inevitably be blamed instead of the lack of responsibility displayed by not showing up for work to march and be a useful idiot.

[–]LoneStarG84 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Tbh, it will probably be like the "day without immigrants". One company fires a few dozen and that will be the end of it.

[–]JawaharlalNehru 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Errrr..what? Bit outoftheloop

[–]ouroborus_ 2 points3 points  (1 child)

It's International Women's Day, whatever the fuck that means, so there are massive planned job walk outs and protests to show us stupid men just how much we really need them.

[–]VincentKenway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Male needs them yet they treat us like pets and tools?

Oh wow talk about "equality".

[–]Endorsed ContributorFLFTW16 32 points33 points  (2 children)

Never forget that die-hard feminists are masculine females that resent the role nature bestowed upon them. This statue is another example of women wanting "equality" at the top levels of society without true equality which would mean on the bottom levels of society as well.

"We want more women in board rooms!" they cry, but not more women as janitors, garbagemen, sewer workers, or any of the multitude of positions that are dirty, dangerous, disgusting. Yes, just more women in board rooms. Could you be more privileged?

These kind of actions are invariably the kind produced by movements led by privileged white women who are already at the top of society save for those super elite positions as CEOs and company presidents. You can bet a bunch of black women didn't think to themselves "you know what we need?! a statue of a little girl staring down that damned masculine bull on wallstreet! That will show the guys!" The symbolism of this statue is such a "white girl" thing. I bet it was brainstormed over pumpkin spiced lattes from starbucks by women with degrees in English literature.

The more women behave like bratty children the worse their lives become. Women are poorer compared to men. And children are the poorest Americans, largely because their moms are raising them alone in poverty. Women who aren't stupid don't stand in front of the bull to get gored, they make nice with the bull and ask to go for a ride.

[–]TheTrenTrannyTrain 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Don't forget the gender equal cabinet brought in by cuck Trudeau in Canada.

[–]RedPillJohnny 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Oxfam says that they are not feminist enough...http://globalnews.ca/news/3291233/feminist-scorecard-oxfam-canada/

Fuck oxfam and all the rest of the cultural marxists out there.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Let's put a woman in front of a real bull and see the reaction.


Very good analysis. It's all about feelz over realz.

[–]Endorsed Contributorsqerl 16 points17 points  (5 children)

The #heforshe is another liberal-tastic feel-good motivational pom-pom shaking look-at-me movement that is an utter waste of time. The successful business woman doesn't need or want this bullshit to artificially raise the self-importance of low-energy walking pink tacos.

The imagry of a defiant little girl is powerful yet we know is unrealistic. Women know they can influence a beast through female charm and feminine ways. Yet, when masculine imperative kicks in, they know they don't stand a snowflakes chance in hell. So they are allowed to express their cute, and touching images of femininity, and men look upon them the same way a parent looks at a child, "awww, ain't that cute." Ultimately, their behaviour helps seperate the men from the weak beta. So, support your woman or female colleagues if you must, but embrace the powerful bull inside you.

[–]throw17453 16 points17 points  (3 children)

You want to dismiss this as just a feel good, ineffectual, childish gesture. As do a lot of people posting.

Yet at the same time this meaningless gesture is producing headlines - emphasising issues of importance to feminist aims, advancing their narrative.

I have seen the argument here before - women only have as much power as men give / allow them. That may well be true. But right now that power is significant. Men may in theory be able in a second to turn the tide, but the reality is that is not happening. So in some ways that argument is as emotionally "feel good" and meaningless, as those that women engage in.

The reality of today's society is in some ways that childish little girl IS ACTUALLY as powerful as the bull. It may feel good to dismiss that and undermine it, but that changes nothing, and underestimates the power and influence that feminism has - and is continuing to have - on western society.

[–]Endorsed Contributorsqerl 3 points4 points  (2 children)

The problem here is that you ignored my statement:

"The successful business woman...."

...and continued with your narritive as though it was never said.

This is the problem with the entire movement. It discredits itself as nothing more than a tantrum when in fact, women have contributed to advancing business, science, arts, etc. But they continue to perpetuate perceived inequalities because they're on some sort of validation seeeking emotional tirade. There are countless women recognizing the equality that does exist and do not appreciate these movements as they undermine hard working and accomplished women.

[–]throw17453 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I actually agreed with quite a lot of your statement - the entirety of your second paragraph, and what you say about actually successful women not needing this, and that it undermines - although I expect some of them are happy for it to be there - even if it undermines - because it can advance their success and influence.

My post was in response to this:

The #heforshe is another liberal-tastic feel-good motivational pom-pom shaking look-at-me movement that is an utter waste of time.

I could have quoted to make that clearer.

[–]Endorsed Contributorsqerl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the clarification.

A successful (by any measure) business woman I know, was the one that said it to me. The ones that have found success (that I know) think the movement is silly. It's not just me saying it.

But you're right... it does generate news which means advertising dollars. I do suspect some of the effort is being inflamed for the ad revenue.

[–]WhySoRuff 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If anyone has been on youtube today they are honoring International Women's day by changing up the YOUTUBE logo a bit with the hash tag #herVoiceISmyVOICE. Check out the intro video its only about a minute long and from end to end is leaning on emotional appeal to make a statement. Also, get ready for what your about to see at the :37 second mark. It's nothing new, but prepare yourselves.

[–]yummyluckycharms 15 points16 points  (4 children)

Its funny.....I had a slightly different take on your ending synopsis.

This being the twillight zone episode where the child is given unlimited power and the parents have no ability to stop the abuses of their son. The episode ends with them living in continual fear as their reality continues its downward spiral.

Pretty much sums up western society - but thankfully the 21st century is asia's - they will take up the torch of the crumbling west

[–]Max_Bigly 6 points7 points  (2 children)

china and japan are both doomed due to demographics. China will become a third world country unless they genocide their entire elderly population. US and Europe will continue their domination as always

[–]lipidsly 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Nah, japan is having low birthrates but they will still have a cohesive society, unlike the west, inviting the invaders in "because if we dont thats raaaycisss"

[–]yummyluckycharms 5 points6 points  (0 children)

China and Japan wont be in trouble at all - but for very different reasons between themselves and the west.

China's biggest problem was too many people - the reduction in the number of women was fantastic in its ability to reduce its fertility rate, which now under control, can be allowed to grow again. Contrast this with india which did nothing to stop pop growth except to encourage emigration. The secondary issue of controlling the men who were not able to breed is being done with prostitution, foreign brides, and upping the competition amongst the males for breeding access

Japan, does indeed have a demographic issue - not enough workers to support retirees, but also too many people for the jobs available. The japanese approach is not to give a fuck, let the neets die out, and invest heavily in automation. There is little fear of social unrest (unlike the west) due to greater social cohesion that was brought about by resisting immigration.

Now contrast the two scenarios above with the west, which seems to have taken the worst solutions to both problems and magnified them. There is not enough jobs to supply the population, and there is not enough workers to support the retirees. What does the west do? Invest heavily in immigration!!! Not only does this not solve the job supply issue, and thus not solve the retiree issue, but it also magnifies the strain on the social security net. Moreover, the strain on the social net is occurring when immigration causes more discohesion in society. The net result is a breakdown in society.

[–]lancer000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Beast from the East will devour them.

[–]eccentricrealist 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They should've used a cow but they wouldn't because it hits too close to home.

[–]bigcitytruth points points [recovered]

I love the bull statue. I walk by it all the time. It's a powerful symbol of New York's strength and dominance on the world stage.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The bull statue is badass. Such disrespect to put that "fearless girl" statue in front of it.

[–]AnAbsoluteSith 5 points6 points  (1 child)

State Street Asset Management placed the statue there, the message being to encourage female participation on Wall St.

Makes perfect sense if you ask me: hire more women and that way they get to cut costs since women are paid less /s

[–]globst 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"I have made a terrible mistake. What was I thinking?"

A female taking accountability for her actions? Don't think so.

[–]Endorsed ContributorJamesSkepp 11 points12 points  (4 children)

"Ms. Feminist - today in that very special day, I give you this tulip as a token of gratitude for providing us, men, with a superb metaphor how the world really looks like and accurately depicting the difference in the capabilities of the genders."

Also, it would be hilarious if the sculpture of the girl turned out to be paid by Wall Street men.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It was paid for by State Street Global Advisors in a bid to promote more gender diversity in the financial sector.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Maybe the wall street men will go out and protest the fact the scultper/installer has used sexual dimorphism to imply a set gender.

Now THAT would be fucking funny.

[–]GrabHerByThePEPE 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Few working there would risk their neck for posturing. Plus they're busy working.

[–]Daddie0 3 points4 points  (2 children)

So wait is it going to stay there? Or is it just for today?

[–]Daddie0 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Finally found the answer:

The "fearless girl" statue, by artist Kristen Visbal, will be in place for a month.

But... I knew this was coming.

"Love this. McCann drop a statue of a "Fearless Girl" next to Wall Street's Charging Bull. Hope it becomes permanent."

"...it was installed after the 1987 stock market crash as a symbol of the "strength and poser of the American **people"

No mention of gender?

"Charging Bull, then, shows an aggressive or even belligerent force on the move, but unpredictably. It's not far-fetched to say the theme is the energy, strength, and unpredictability of the stock market."

Interesting, still no mention of gender?

Way to mock a symbol that has nothing to do about gender to begin with.

[–]theONE843663 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They should have put a statue of a cow waiting to get fucked instead of that little bitch.

[–]TRP_Lee_zard 5 points6 points  (2 children)

This fits perfectly into the fem-centric world. Women think they can do anything (stand in front of a charging bull), because they think it would stop in it's tracks to reconsider (as they stand opposed to all natural laws and hope they will be banished in favor of "equalism")

They all seem to be living in a tampon commercial.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRed_August 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Fearless girl" ironically exposes the naive false sense of empowerment of the Go-Girrrls. "Hear me roar" she says with her smug Patriarchy-busting pose.

A powerful counter-point message would be to surreptitiously add the statue of a man - perhaps her dad - desperately lunging horizontally between the bull and the girl and reaching out with his arms in a vain attempt to separate, shield and protect the girl from an obviously tragic and stupid mistake. The beta male once again sacrificing his life to save the petulant go-girl from her tragically misguided bravado. To save her from her solipsistic naivety. An artful interjection to remind people of the real social cost, of the real sacrifice our civilisation commits for tolerating the rising discourse of the Feminine Imperative.

[–]Conceited-Monkey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The fellow at Tiananmen square that faced off with a tank was brave. This is just artistic posturing.

[–]throw17453 7 points8 points  (3 children)

You make your own readings into it.

Feminists could just as easily claim it symbolises the quiet rise of feminine strength, defiant in the face of toxic masculinity, standing their ground unflinchingly.

That it symbolises the struggle against patriarchal oppression, and the successes that women have achieved.

Like all good poetry or art, it is symbolic yet ambiguous - and each individual ascribes their own meaning too it.

It's overt meaning is women forcing themselves on a stereo typically male environment, and symbol of masculinity - and challenging it.

[–]SmuggleTown 6 points7 points  (2 children)

toxic masculinity patriarchal oppression women forcing themselves

Or it could just be vaginitis personified, penis envy gone awry -- matriarchal misery attempting to assert itself on a group that just doesn't give a fuck about metrics that deviate from 'how many hours will you work, and how much money will you make me'

[–]Need2LickMuff 7 points8 points  (1 child)

I think their point was that they could easily hamster up some pseudo-deep meaning behind the retarded statue since art is subjective and is hard to prove an interpretation as fact.

They could even say the little girl thing is intentional because men 'make them feel useless like children, but this child is standing up to your bullshit no matter what happens'. A line of garbage, but it can still be done, and have fun arguing a subjective thing objectively.

[–]SmuggleTown 1 point2 points  (0 children)


Went right over my head.

[–]B_Campbell 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I was thinking "In real life, this isn't going to end well."

They shoulda at least gotten Wonder Woman outs with a machine gun or something.

[–]Frankm95 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you really live vicariously through a fucking Bull statue? That's very "Alpha" of you

[–]iplayhearts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I personally think that the girl statue is TERRIBLE. What the fuck is wrong with these people. It's like parking a painting of a muscular dude directly next to the Mona Lisa as defiance. It's a fucking disgrace. Whoever put the statue there ought to be ashamed of themselves. It's goddamn disgusting. Fucking just LEAVE THE GODDAMN STATUE ALONE. Women in the West have nothing to accomplish because no one is oppressing them. Why the fuck would you want to stand in the way of financial progress? Jesus Christ save us all. Women's day is like inject yourself with cancer cells day.

[–]AlphasEatBetas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I remember when this sub was about sexual strategy. Now everyone is circlejerking about a fuckin animal statue. What a great sub this is now.

[–]PaullyBeenis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some great points to which I bounced right on my boy's johnson. I especially liked the portion where women are children and men are strong. Not because of the content, which was dogshit, but because at that point my boy was really giving me the dick hard. Thanks for the material to bounce to.

[–]ragtagmofi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol, the bull is a good luck symbol and is supposed to represent a positive attitude toward the growth of the economy- the bull attacks by swiping its horns upward-- you WANT the bull to succeed, as opposed to the bear which represents the opposite, the attitude that the economy will decline- the bear attacks by swinging its paws downward.

This is kind of ironic by the artist- wouldn't it be more apt to have the girl support the bull if the message is that hiring women is good for the economy? Instead she is standing in the way... If the artist adhered to wall street's symbolism of the bull you could interpret the statue in a very different way.

[–]Butt_Man_Plumber 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Women’s day attempting to demasculinize something that wasn’t intended to symbolize masculinity at all. That bull is THE icon of THE largest financial hub in the world, for almost 150 years, and it’s meant to represent the bull markets of wall street, the rugged capitalism and ferocity of global investing, the unpredictable madness of the markets analogized perfectly in a raging bull. All of it’s now confused, castrated, and cucked by a petulant girl staring it down. Women’s day put her there specifically in defiance of this innocuous symbolism, conflating it with “toxic” masculinity, as they endlessly crusade against the phantom of patriarchy.

[–]randathrowaway1211 4 points5 points  (0 children)

its just a statue though why does it bother you so much?

[–]AiAmDreamer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"You mess with the bull, you get the horns."

I can't think of a better way to describe feminism's actions in recent times. This is just adding to the mix. It wouldn't surprise me if, in the coming times, we experience revolution, and someone decides to impale the statue on the bull.

[–]RealMcGonzo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

LOL, I hadn't seen this story until this thread, thanks. I wonder if some shitlord was involved in this, deliciously exploiting the emotions of the fembetas to produce this hilarious symbol. It works on so many levels, a petulant, dim-witted child standing in the way of financial success who is sure to get mowed down, for one.

[–]1theoctopuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think women put that there? That is the work of men. No normal, a.k.a. bangable, woman is going to have the gall to do some dumb shit like that.

[–]Poppinredpillsallday 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"A defiant little girl" I love this lol

[–]TheStumblingWolf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some of us aren't American. It's nowhere to be found in the news across the pond.

[–]sartorial_amateur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So little girls are opposed to market growth? I don't understand their intended symbolism.

What does the so-called "international day without women" hope to accomplish? My reaction is good riddance.

[–]landon042 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for this post hahahaha I couldn't stop laughing.

I thought this was a joke and maybe there was some "business woman" statue near there but not right there, maybe down the street so they show there's a new "women in business narritive"

but no, they put this little bitch right in front of the bull lookin like a tiny girl lmaoo, I would like to see her get impaled

[–]Late30sMasculist 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I like your analysis. How would you compare/contrast the defiant girl statue with the Tienanmen Square tank guy?

[–]Haufniensis points points [recovered]

One is a man literally standing up, in real life, against an oppressive state that probably got him either executed or thrown in prison for the rest of his life.

The other is a symbol of a little girl standing up against... a growing, free market? Nobody really knows.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Judging by her pose I'm guessing the mean bull won't share his wi-fi password.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a man his contribution to society/history/political discourse is negligible, despite his infamy and the pleasing manner in which the Chicoms are embarrassed about it now.

This brat's statue though...this...this is really going to shake shit the fuck up.

[–]lqtys 0 points1 point  (1 child)

They only did this because it's a statue.

You won't see a real little child in front of a real bull as a symbol of feminism.

A statue is weak. A statue doesn't move. A statue is like a beta simp. They don't fear it.

[–]SafeWordIsCommitment 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's okay. TV taught me that the little girl will grow magic powers to allow her to take down the charging animal that weights a metric ton. Reality has taught me that two dozen rodeo clown simps will jump in and give up their 24 lives to save that 1 little girl.

[–]oZeplikeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know 3 people personally that work on Wall St. They're all young women that I graduated with last year.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess tourists won't only be grabbing the bull's balls now.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's hilarious, considering that feminists are the CIA-led "useful idiots" serving Capitalism.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Youtube's got a stupid #hervoiceismyvoice thing going with it's website emblem.

This saddens me deeply.

[–]3savoryprunes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An image that would more accurately reflect reality would be to position the little girl astride the bull's shoulders with her same "defiant" posture, pretending to be superior to the bull and entitled to sit there.

[–]kalo_asmi 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Did no one else notice? She (feminism) is standing opposed to the Bull statue. Not the Bear statue. The Bear represents a falling market and a deteriorating economy.

Feminism is opposed to the gains and progress made by the modern man. Not the fall of economy. It has no constructive role in society, it is not in solidarity with struggles of men to build a better world, to create wealth, to achieve prosperity. It's opposed to those values and struggles.

This is deeper, truer symbolism of the placement. Feminism is opposed to progress.

[–]meninistMD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless if it is a lion charging then she is obedient puppy.

[–]bearjew293 0 points1 point  (2 children)

It's way too easy to trigger you little dudes.

[–]Endorsed ContributorAuvergnat[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It's funny, where did you and other passing trolls see I was triggered? I wrote I loved it!

[–]bearjew293 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know you did. You love being triggered.

[–]SovereignSoul76 -1 points0 points  (3 children)

Gee, I wonder which one of New York's BRAVE, FEARLESS women actually made that statue. Oh that's right, it was almost certainly a man that made it.

[–]throw17453 12 points13 points  (2 children)

A quick googling would show you it was made by a woman called Kristen Visbal.