625,770 posts


Girls are losers


submitted by L0wD0g | Blog View | Download Post: Download PDF Download TXT

This realization helped my game a lot, although I admit it was also very dissapointing to realize this. Girls are fucking losers. Pretty girls even more.

Granted, most guys are losers as well. But that's not the main subject now.

What do I actually mean with girls being losers and why is it important to internalize this thought? If you take a look at the daily life of an average pretty girl (8+, 20-29 y/o) any selfrespecting man would be repulsed by the amount of time they waste on mindless bullshit. Bingewatching Netflix series, spending hours on social media, reading Vogue, .... Activities that are in no way improving themselves or anything around them.

Most men actually also lead a similar lifestyle, which IMHO is even worse.

Inherently there is nothing with this lifestyle IF (and only IF) you are where you want to be. You have no things to work on, no more passions to pursue, no more money to make, no gym you need to attend, no mental issues you should work on, etc.

Which honestly rarely is the case.

Most pretty girls (8+) have nothing going for them, except their looks. They never learned to think for themselves, they have no problem solving skills, they have no ambition, they have no personality, no originality, etc.

Then the few girls that actually do have something going for them often are one-trick ponies. I have dated some girls that were publicly highly regarded in what they were doing (singing, modeling, cooking). Still I was utterly surprised when I discovered that again it was all they had next to their beauty.

Is this a bad thing? Absolutely not. I adore beautiful girls. I like their feminine energy, their naivety, their carelessness. I'm not looking to discuss Quantum Mechanics or the Jungian interpretation of religion with girls. Hell, if a girl could intellectually challenge me I'm pretty sure there would be close to no attraction from my side.

So why then this important to realize?

From a pragmatic point of view, this realization will increase your success with women, while also increasing your pleasure while interacting with them. Pretty women are attracted to men with options. To men that don't make them or any other girl their priority. That are selective with spending time. That have a goal and live with a purpose.

So. Realizing that pretty girls are nothing more then pretty girls, will:

a) take them of the pedestal, which increases your chances of fucking them

b) make you realize that one pretty girl you fucked is not that special, there are a lot of girls that can offer you the same

c) prevent you from spending too much time on a girl

d) it will make you less possessive. If you enjoy a waterslide, and then some other dude goes of the slide after you, do you cry? Does him going of the slide decrease your experience? Same with pretty girls, fucking them is a nice experience. Nothing more, nothing less. They're not your possessions.

Again apart from giving you more peace of mind, this mindset will actually ease up attracting them in the first place.

[–]WakingToNewDawn 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

I understand the point of this post is to help unpedastalize women, but the whole “women aren’t on my intellectual level because they won’t discuss quantum mechanics” is neckbeardy. In my experience going through gender balanced STEM programs, I have met a lot of very attractive women that were also ambitious and intelligent. While culture may give some people the option to be vapid, as you’ve discussed, many people (men AND WOMEN) are not complacent with that and elect to go above and beyond for their own fulfillment.

My advice is to take a break from this forum, delete tinder for a while (tinder will absolutely destroy just about anyone’s faith in the opposite sex), and actually meet some women in a different setting.

[–]Thetwothatgotaway 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

My sister is a really hot 26 year old engineer. OP isn't finding the right educated personalities to contend with. She is rare, but not unheard of, especially nowadays. Divorced her beta husband, too as she realized her SMV before kids. Warned her on that one but smart chicks figure it out regardless...

[–]Do not send modmail to my personal inboxCrazyHorseInvincible[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This is not a debate forum. If you wish to have an argument with what we do here, there's a different group for that. It's even neutrally-modded.

But if you are not personally here to play, get off the field.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Do not send modmail to my personal inboxCrazyHorseInvincible[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This is not a debate forum. If you wish to have an argument with what we do here, there's a different group for that. It's even neutrally-modded.

But if you are not personally here to play, get off the field.

[–]Do not send modmail to my personal inboxCrazyHorseInvincible[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This is not a debate forum. If you wish to have an argument with what we do here, there's a different group for that. It's even neutrally-modded.

But if you are not personally here to play, get off the field.

[–]brinkleybuzz305 points306 points  (63 children) | Copy

Bingewatching Netflix series, spending hours on social media, reading Vogue, .... Activities that are in no way improving themselves or anything around them.

To be brutally honest, substitute video games for Netflix and internet boards for social media in this line and you will have described a large portion of the male population.

The difference between a male and female loser is the female loser was born with something that has value out of the box, her vagina. A male loser is worthless.

[–]Jcart1051 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Except men... You know, build and maintain civilization, occupy all the important jobs, and pay all of the taxes.

[–]CaptainCrawnch 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

At least you can win in video games.

[–]fanturnedon 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

It's make believe. It's not real. Put that shit down.

[–]tolerantman-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

In the end, it is OK to be a worthless loser as long as you have a vagina, female privilege at its finest.

[–]MrCarepig184 points185 points  (7 children) | Copy

Well if you put women on the same standard as men yeah they are. But theyre not really programed to be ambitious, diciplined and strong like us. The worst thing you can call a man is a loser. Call a woman a loser, no biggie. The worst thing you can call a woman is a whore, call a man a whore hell say thank you.

[–]tolerantman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

"Girls are whores"

Now that would shake things up

[–]derex 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

Inherently there is nothing with this lifestyle IF (and only IF) you are where you want to be.

Hot girls are already where they want to be ... at least until they hit the wall.

[–]L0wD0g[S] 50 points51 points  (12 children) | Copy

Not true. Do you think girls want all the mental issues they cope with? Do you think they want their attention-addiction? Do you think they want to be vulnerable to manipulation? They are not where they want to be, but life does not force them to work on theirselves, like it does with men.

[–]letterboyink12 points13 points  (9 children) | Copy

Curious if you could expand that last part

[–]ioncehadsexinapool87 points88 points  (7 children) | Copy

Women see their pussy as currency for resources. Men see their resources as currency for pussy

[–]ThePhoenixOfDallas 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

Now that’s a harsh and bitter red pill. Eat before consuming.

[–]Endorsed ContributorMetalgear2221 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yep. One of those is worth little to nothing, one of those is worth endless hours of blood, sweat, and tears. Funny how things got to be this bad. Enjoy the decline boys

[–]WalterEArmstrong25 points26 points  (0 children) | Copy

And if the divorce courts weren't raping men's bank accounts at break neck speed that wouldn't be a bad thing. It worked for thousands of years.

[–]somebullshitrp7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy

To expand upon this:

Women are born with everything they need, and only have to do minor upkeep on their assets (don't get fat).

Men are born with nothing (unless you win the genetic lottery) and must build their assets and constantly maintain them.

So, to summarize the OP: pain, suffering, and struggle build character, but since women don't have to go through that as men do, they are typically bereft of any kind of character.

[–]test03140 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Women age 40+ have to go thru the pain, suffering, and struggle for the rest of their lives.

[–]daremeboy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Not if they properly cash in on their young eggs and lock down a provider before they hit the wall.

[–]tolerantman2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Women in western countries are exactly where they want to be, because nowhere else they have as much freedom as here, so yeah, they'd rather have the "mental issues" whoring around with Chads than being a housewife.

[–]WholesomeAwesome0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Lol whenever I hear of mental issues slutting around, I lol so hard.

yeah right mental issues spinning plates. mental issues. what a joke

[–]kaane270 points271 points  (27 children) | Copy

Do you realize how many offers do these women get daily ? Especially the beautiful ones. You wouldn't believe. Trust me.

When everything is handed to you on a silver plate, you will not find the motivation to get out and educate yourself. Do something better for you and for the world around you.

This is pretty normal if you ask me. The women are meant to be giving birth to the children and keep feeding them until they grow up. They don't have to be rocket scientists.

If this bothers you, well, there is nothing you can do about it. Remember, a man has to build himself from the ground up.

[–]Flying_Wingback209 points210 points  (5 children) | Copy

"Women are born, men are built"

[–]ThePhoenixOfDallas 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

If there as a TRP bible, that sentence and the theory behind it would be one of the gospels.

[–]kaane22 points23 points  (0 children) | Copy

In another words,

Men cannot make himself without suffering, for he is both the marble and the sculptor

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

A woman simply is, but a man must become - Camille Paglia

[–]BewareTheOldMan4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

"Women are born, men are built"

Quote of the week...and on Monday at that.

[–]SoulTheorist11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

That is so fucking true. God damn I love this thread

[–]Lambdal713 points14 points  (6 children) | Copy

I know several really hot girls, banging body, c cups, cute face.

It's actually not that much. Every couple of weeks maybe they get asked for their number, every 2 months on a date.

This isn't the case for bimbo-like women. Yes, if you wear a lot of makeup and dress sexy, you get asked out more, but if you're a hot girl, but wear normal clothes, then not so much.

It becomes even less if the girl is educated and has a career, because then, guys with lower education and l career, don't dare to ask her out.

[–]ghosts_of_me7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Nice anecdote bro. Now ask them to show you their inbox on their profile on the sugar daddy sites.

[–]FindTheBus3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

Bullshit. Not only are you undercounting the approaches they get, but you're not counting all the approaches guys throw where they think they're subtle. The cop pulling a girl over and giving a warning for a violation she didn't even do. The boss. The club owner inviting her to his loft for an afterparty. Etc.

[–]Lambdal7-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yes, but it's only every couple of weeks that they get asked for the number, including subtle beta approaches.

[–]g11142 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I just can't believe that, and wouldn't believe cute girls that told me that. Maybe in the 90s, but with dating apps, these girls can line up a solid guy every night of the week, for many weeks straight if she's efficient enough. And there are plenty of non-bimbos are on dating apps

I do agree with your final point though, only because women won't date down in their opinion. Hot females in med school got it bad, but only because they themselves won't date dudes 'beneath' them, which is like 90% of dudes in that case.

[–]Lambdal72 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yes they could, but the quality of guys on dating apps is abysmally low and yhey get bombarded by messages, leading most of them to delete the app straight away again.

The ones that love attention stay on the apps, the ones that dont bother leave.

[–]swejap14 points15 points  (8 children) | Copy

And now apply 200 000 years of evolution to that.

[–]TheRealJesusChristus17 points18 points  (7 children) | Copy

Humans are on planet for since about 1.2million years. Earlier humanoids arent considered humans (homo). So more like apply 1.2 million years to that.

[–]1empatheticapathetic52 points53 points  (5 children) | Copy

Don't even get me started on the lobsters.

[–][deleted] 48 points49 points  (4 children) | Copy


[–]1earlpfeiffer18 points19 points  (1 child) | Copy

I spent a good part of my childhood with my hands kept closed with a rubber band and I find this a painful and insensitive line of discussion.

My father was boiled alive!

[–]goldenhourlivin13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy


Such an abrupt transition lol. She knew she was going down in flames.

[–]L0wD0g[S] 30 points31 points  (3 children) | Copy

Is this a bad thing? Absolutely not. I adore beautiful girls. I like their feminine energy, their naivety, their carelessness. I'm not looking to discuss Quantum Mechanics or the Jungian interpreation of religion with girls. Hell, if a girl could intellectually challenge me I'm pretty sure there would be close to no attraction from my side.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy

that's a shitty thing if true.. smart girls turn me on.. It means that they have more than their pussy to get ahead in life... maybe a smart girl is less of a loser... They are in my opinion

[–]DayGameChirality15 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy

To each of his own. People here treat men like one size fits them all. My cock goes limp with a stupid woman.

[–]ThrowFader0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

deleted What is this?

[–]antariusz2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is profound, and applies to men also.

Complacency is the enemy.

Success breeds complacency.

I work out harder when I’m not getting laid. I focus all of my time and effort into being disciplined. When I want something, I have to strive for it.

[–]-clickhere- 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

"Sampling bias"

You need to hang around where smart women congregate. A few of them will be hot. Then, you can date someone who is not a loser.

It sounds like you are suffering from sampling bias, in that you are surrounded by the 'loser' variety of women.

Within that context, your post is 100% correct, and dead-on.

But why not try branching out to where the smart/successful women are, and then report back. I'm fortunate to work in a place with go-getters of all types, including women, and they are smart, successful, and definitely not losers.

Still AWALT, for sure, and on overdrive.

But not losers.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah that's no joke-

Like OP says, "MOST" women are this way...

But this confirms OP has never had a 9/10 or 10/10- These women exist, he's never even been close.

Every woman I have taken seriously was hot and also a stone cold killer... whatever it is, smarts, wits, dance, yoga, health, diet, art... I dunno... there are women with passion out there.

[–]ioncehadsexinapool6 points7 points  (6 children) | Copy

Yeah, oddly enough I can game any “dumb” girl. Even if she’s hot. But if she’s with it mentally and smart, especially career driven, it kind of throws me for a loop and oddly I seem to want her more.

It’s like I get a rush from fucking them because I dominated a smart person. Shits weird man I’m sure some freud shit could explain it. I hope I’m not alone but saying this on trp is like asking a bunch of nfl players who their favorite impressionist painter is.

[–]ThrowFader2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

deleted What is this?

[–]ioncehadsexinapool0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Same, check my reply to the other guy that replied to what you did.

[–]Lizzle3721 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Because you deem her more valuable. Who wants to lose something of good quality?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

I feel the exact opposite. If I'm gaming on a smart woman, especially one with a good career, I'm most at ease. But I'm also 38 and am pretty much at the top of my profession. I'm also in a field that all the, "I love to travel" types find fascinating (urban design and planning). Escalate to a walk around the city that includes me spitting some knowledge about city form and architecture, and they are putty in my hands. I've literally never once done this and not closed the deal. I don't think it would work on a dumb girl.

[–]ioncehadsexinapool1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Good point. My last plate I stupidly got oneitis for is an urban planner. She’s in the “aight” category, as Patrice would say (ugly, aight, & fine vs 1-10) maybe even ugly to some. She’s a huge dork.

I’m gonna get shit on for this but I really do get oneitis for a girl with a good personality that’s dorky & cute vs a 10 that’s a box of rocks, or even normal. I’m so weak for the former type it’s not even funny. The whole “treating her like a child” comes natural to me for normies and dummies, probably cause I can’t connect with them. You know as I’m typing this out I’m starting to figure myself out.

Dummies even if they’re hot, I only connect with them on a physical level so there’s no feels. If I can connect on a level higher than that, then I feel like that’s a prerequisite for feels. Hm.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I don’t think there’s any reason to give you shit for that. You like what you like. I’m all about the nerdy, curvy girls. Not giant dorks and not giant fat girls. Just cute girls who like geeky stuff and are capable of carrying on a decent conversation.

[–]BetaBitchBoy691 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

fuck man you haven’t seen loser until you’ve seen my ex lmfaooooo

[–]econquest15 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy

NOTE: I am just a novice to TRP so take this with a grain of sand.

This is what I thought of your post. There are two kinds of pretty girls:

  1. Humans, who are subject to the same laws as a perfect-10 male model. Do you think with the right genetics a man can be a model without any regard to his choice of clothing, style, health, diet, anything? Of course not. The first type of perfect-10 girl is only human and of course gets to be a 10 by investing the required amount of time into fashion, beauty, travel, clothes, diet, friends, and so on.

  2. There is another type of "perfect 10" girl who spends 0 time doing the loser activities you listed: the ones in your fantasy.

Please note that the red pill teaches you the male equivalent, but from the point of view of the first type (humans.) There's a second type of man who is a billionaire, but without any time investment (has all the time in the world), can read thoughts, is an expert at everything, can take care of a woman without any hesitation and always knows just what to say in all situations and all this doesn't take any time at all. This is the type-2 that lives in women's heads.

The actual billionaires are "losers". They're just in meetings for 100 hours per week, or reading 100 page legal opinions from their chief legal counsel. And they have a beer gut. Here's mark zuckerberg.

What a loser. Type 1 billionaires are losers, just like type 1 perfect 10 models are losers. what you're looking for, and what some women are looking for, is just a fantasy.

[–]Heinzdoofens1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

They are looking for a magic show. It is the Prestige

[–]look_good 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

“she’s not yours, it’s just your turn”

[–]Georgeaid28 points29 points  (5 children) | Copy

Nothing I’ve ever read is more accurate than this statement.

[–]ass_boy41 points42 points  (4 children) | Copy

Luckily we get to read it in every post even when it is completely out of context.

[–]3whatsthisgarg18 points19 points  (2 children) | Copy

Luckily we get to read it in every post even when it is completely out of context.

god I'm so sick of seeing that.

It's also not accurate and not helpful. It's a cuck mantra that completely throws in the towel on the whole thing.

Get good enough, become man enough, and it's HER turn with YOU. I speak from experience: it's HER turn to have you fuck her in a stairwell, or in a stranger's van parked on a public street.

[–]SuperbDuke-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy

“hoes are like a doorknob, everybody gets a turn”

[–]Reunn114 points115 points  (21 children) | Copy

I'm not looking to discuss Quantum Mechanics or the Jungian interpreation of religion with girls. Hell, if a girl could intellectually challenge me I'm pretty sure there would be close to no attraction from my side.

To be fair, you have to be very high in the dominance hierarchy to understand Jordan Peterson. He is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of psychology most of the truths will go over a typical listener's head. There's also Peterson's non-nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterization - his personal philosophy draws heavily from Jungian literature, roughly speaking. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these truths, to realize that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Jordan Peterson truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in his existential catchphrase "Clean Your Room," which itself is a cryptic reference to Dostoevsky's Russian epic The Brothers Karamazov. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated post-modernists scratching their heads in confusion as JBP's genius unfolds itself on their computer screens. What Neo-Marxists... how I pity them. 😂 And yes by the way, I DO have a Jordan Peterson tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they've climbed the dominance hierarchy.

[–]sharp762 points63 points  (0 children) | Copy

I love JP but this copypasta is hilarious.

[–]1empatheticapathetic6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

Imagine getting a THE RED PILL tattoo. I bet someone out there has. AWALT

[–]dreadfrog1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy

I did not read The Brothers Karamazov (yet) so I'm interested in knowing what the "clean your room" cryptic reference is. Would you elaborate?

[–]Reunn20 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's just an adaptation of the Rick and Morty copypaste. I'm not aware of any actual reference between the two and I have read it.

[–]danhaas2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

It's a copypasta, ignore the original commentary. But Dostoiveski is such a rich source that the "clean your room" phrase does have a use. In "Crime and Punishment", the protagonist is a nihilistic blue pilled that lives alone in a filthy and depressing room. His room reflects the state of his mind.

[–]BigLebowskiBot0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Ah, that must be exhausting.

[–]Rian_Stone-2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy

high in the dominance hierarchy

the fact you think there is only one tells me you're simply parroting what you're told.

Which is funny, in his attempts to quell millennial narcissism, he's given it a perfect narrative to wrap itself around.

Dominance hierarchy. What does it mean? Who knows, but I know im in the top of my own!

[–]Reunn3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Of course I’m parroting, it’s literally an adaptation of the Rick and Morty copy paste.

[–]Rian_Stone0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I never watched it. I've heard people who quote it are midwit though

[–]GoGetting9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah, sure, the grapes are sour.

[–]IdoNtEvEnWaTz61 points62 points  (8 children) | Copy

Well they get treated like goddesses when they are in their prime which probably reduces their drive to become competent in a particular field of knowledge.

I'm not looking to discuss Quantum Mechanics or the Jungian interpretation of religion

Cringey as fuck. Just because you watched some physics youtube videos and JBP you think you are knowledge in these subjects? You only scratched the surface and that doesn't take much time. The truth is it's most impossible to be a rennaisance man because the depth of knowledge available in every discipline these days is incredibly vast.

Everyone has strengths and weaknesses. It's not healthy to only point out the worst in people.

[–]PostMellow 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

OP watches a JBP lecture:

"Wow, my IQ is now 150!"

[–]BetaBitchBoy69-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

pop a modafinil your IQ will instantly be 210

[–]WalterEArmstrong10 points11 points  (2 children) | Copy

"The truth is it's most impossible to be a medieval man......." Did you mean "renaissance man"?

[–]whoismikejoneswho2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Lol. "Its like, yur never gonna be that smart bro, yur not fkn mid-evil man"

[–]CanuckinFL21 points22 points  (2 children) | Copy

that's absurd. Of course you strive to repeat that level of knowledge or you're just simply a dumbass.

The metric of intelligence is curiosity. Talk to a very pretty girl. They're the most un-curious people you can find.

It makes dialogue with them sheer tedium.

[–]PostMellow 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

Talk to a very pretty girl. They're the most un-curious people you can find.

What an absurd statement. The other day, this pretty girl was really curious to know my zodiac sign!

[–]Boeijen66612 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

But also they can feel things! My current cum sock says to me "I think the full moon is making me feel moody lately. I feel emotional, bit all over the place". I said "Ah that sucks, maybe if we root youll feel better". She replies " nah I cant, got my period".

[–]IntensePancakes16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

This post reeks of someone who has never been successful enough to be in an environment composed of other truly successful people, which gasp includes women as well, and they're not one-trick ponies.

I work at a top management consulting firm, and my colleagues (both male and female) are both extremely knowledgeable and interested in the world and its various intellectual disciplines, as well as being extremely successful at a young age.

Are there patterns and tendencies among women to be interested in, on average, less-intellectual topics than men? Sure. But does that mean that all successful, intelligent women are "one trick ponies"? Absolutely not. If you truly believe that then you are a legitimate idiot.

Also, dear lord, have you ever actually had a conversation with a real human being? Nobody fucking discusses Quantum Mechanics in common conversation unless you're a physicist, or you're an edgy neckbeard "I am very smart" type who has no idea what the fuck he's talking about, which I would argue, is even worse than a girl who only watches netflix and goes shopping.

You, sir, are the loser.

[–]throwlaca33 points34 points  (1 child) | Copy

I'm not looking to discuss Quantum Mechanics or the Jungian interpreation of religion with girls.

Sorry to dissapoint you but the only thing that the majority of men and even men in this very sub think is "ahh my team is better than yours!" or "I'm alpha as fuck hurr durrr fucking betas everywhere!"

And this is what girls have to put up with, because they are attracted to this beasts of men.

[–]C_Till23 points24 points  (3 children) | Copy

I didn't think that RP could get any sillier....but here is a post saying girls are losers. Bravo

[–]nomorelulu10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yeah this is brutal. Just sounds bitter and stupid.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Agree. This guy probably got cucked or something

[–]otticusoppositionist 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

Genuinely curious as to how this OP (and others like it) get upvotes and generally supportive comments - even on this sub.

Do the sane folks just ignore this drivel? I see some genuinely intelligent arguments on here occasionally; surprised not to see these folks speaking out.

[–]zombi-roboto3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

I have recently been wondering the same thing.

#TinfoilHat: Is TRP being provocateur'd?

[–]Do not send modmail to my personal inboxCrazyHorseInvincible[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This is not a debate forum. If you wish to have an argument with what we do here, there's a different group for that. It's even neutrally-modded.

But if you are not personally here to play, get off the field.

[–]laughingandgrief3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Hell, if a girl could intellectually challenge me I'm pretty sure there would be close to no attraction from my side.

And the truth reveals itself.

[–]suckinfishboy16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

This isn't really redpill material

[–]liizzsar9 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy

Thanks to Marie Curie, a physicist, chemist and Nobel Prize winner, you can get an X-ray to see how tiny your brain really is.

Honestly, I'm not saying every women is an intellectual machine, but to categorize the whole female population as losers when just as many guys spend their whole life being gym rats and spouting "bro" (the equivalent of female "like") while posting Instagram pictures of their perfect abs to get attention, without the slightest interest in politics, business, history or science, doesn't strike me as fair.

You're simply talking about vain and low IQ people like Kim Kardashian, and maybe there are more women in that category, but that doesn't mean ALL women are like that.

[–]SelfTaughtPiano0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

"women in general are unexceptional in most field"

"not true, look at this one exception from decades ago"

[–]liizzsar2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Men and women are biologically different, so we're not going to excel at the same things (modern feminists will try to say differently, but obviously most rational people can agree on this.) That doesn't make one gender "losers."

Biologically, it's much easier for men to take risks and become entrepreneurs, while women tend to be more cautious. That doesn't make us "losers" it makes us better mothers, wives, homemakers.

The point of all this is, we're all better when we work together, instead of pointing at the other gender and saying, "Men aren't shit" or "Women are losers."

[–]L0wD0g[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy

Marie Curie. Solid 1.5/10. Please read again btw.

[–]nomorelulu2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I adore beautiful girls. I like their feminine energy, their naivety, their carelessness. I'm not looking to discuss Quantum Mechanics or the Jungian interpretation of religion with girls. Hell, if a girl could intellectually challenge me I'm pretty sure there would be close to no attraction from my side.

Man you're missing out on a lot

[–]3chazthundergut2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Girls may be losers, but even the most uninteresting woman is capable of bearing children.

So they have intrinsic value.

Men have little intrinsic value. All the value that a man has comes from what he has done and what he is capable of doing.

So men should stop worrying about how women are losers and focus on rising to nature's challenge. Sort your life out. Face your demons. Lift. Kill it in your career. Ace every class. Find something that ignites your passion and pursue it seriously. Build a social circle of men you respect. Take ownership of your life. Become a leader, starting with yourself

Chicks are plenty cool. Tits, ass, and a pretty smile. The smell of her hair, the softness of her skin. The way her head tilts back as she laughs. The look in her eye when she surrenders to you completely. She's already good. It's up to you to become better than her.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yea. It's a lot harder to be a decent man than to be a decent girl that's where discipline and wisdom comes into play

[–]jackandjill222 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is true. Women can make it further in life being mediocre.

  • "It's more fun to be a mediocre uninteresting girl than a guy"

High achieving men, & average women have every incentive to STOMP average & below dudes. Combine that with the fact that women have hoards of people willing to take care of them. The scenario's entirely different.

[–]mocket_ran2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I know a girl sb9 that is a model and has 170k followers on instagram. She does absolutely nothing to better herself in anyway..in fact she stays up late most nights watching movies and drinking, sleeps in all day, doesn't exercise or work out..is just lucky to have the face and body she has. Personality boring....but men fall at her feet and treat her like a goddess. I agree with your point..she is a loser. At some point once she has fallen from the tree of the desired she will grab some beta bucks branch on her way down and likely be taken care of the rest of her life...still being a looser. As you said, don't worship it, slay it when you can and just move the fuck on. They aren't unicorns..just pretty horses.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

It looks like you are surrounded by idiots and you've become one as well.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (10 children) | Copy

Pretty law student had a giant property law book under her arm so I asked "Does that book say anything about finders keepers?" She had never heard of it. So I said "you know, if I find something on the street, whose property is it?" She said "oh that's Tort law" Tort law is civil liability, suing McDonalds for too hot coffee.

This woman is in law school. Why?

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points  (7 children) | Copy

I just read the Wikipedia article on tort law and I'm pretty sure you're wrong, bro. It seems to be the category of law breaking that isn't really criminal and has a lower requirement of evidence. But it can definitely be about individuals. Seems like her point was that finders keepers is considered a sort of negligence with intent to steal. Since it's reasonable that you won't be able to find the person anyway so like you can probably keep it but they can take you to tort court (lol) to get it back if they find out.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (6 children) | Copy

Good to know cause I've found some nice shit and I'm not just gonna go hand it in to the police station like some goodie two shoes.

[–]Stolles9 points10 points  (4 children) | Copy

Wow dude. You just tried to shit on this girl for telling you what law that falls under, you having NO experience or knowledge of said law (otherwise you wouldn't have asked her) and then it doesn't make sense to you even with a quick google search well within your grasp, so you shit on her and insult her intelligence? The fuck dude.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

Except I was right. Finders keepers is part of property law. It has its origins in Roman law. Later cases set the precedent that when you find something it belongs to you unless the original owner claims it. A law student carrying a property law book had never heard of it. The fuck dude.

[–]Stolles1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

So if you find someone's wallet, finders keepers?

If you find an item and the owner comes back for it, then you have the tort issue.

The finder must try to locate the true owner and care for the chattel in the interim because one is liable for the chattel until returned to its owner or prior possessor. If the finder does not return the thing upon request of the owner, the finder may be liable in the tort of conversion and be ordered to pay damages.

The page on tort law states: Property torts involve any intentional interference with the property rights of the claimant (plaintiff). Those commonly recognized include trespass to land, trespass to chattels (personal property), and conversion.

Finders, keepers is just a lazy saying and doesn't mean a whole lot legally. She was studying actual law and told you what it would fall under.

Theft by finding occurs when someone who chances upon an object which seems abandoned and takes possession of the object but fails to take steps to establish whether the object is abandoned and not merely lost or unattended. In some jurisdictions the crime is called "larceny by finding" or "stealing by finding"

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

No, if you find's someones wallet it is both clear that they didnt abandon it and known who it belongs to. You have a responsibilty to return it if you know who it belongs to.

Finders keepers is not just a lazy saying and it DOES have legal meaning. There was a case where an employee found something, owner never claimed it and employer sold it. Employee sued and won. Finders keepers. Same precedent for finding a watch and taking it to police station. If you want to earn karma by hoping they check there for it then good for you, but you dont have a legal requirement to hand it over to the state anymore than the employee had to give it to employer.

[–]Stolles1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

There was a case where an employee found something, owner never claimed it and employer sold it. Employee sued and won.

Yeah? Cause as far as the law goes, it was the employees, however the employee has an obligation to try and find the original owner, not necessarily through the state. If it's just not possible then that's fine. If the original owner comes back then you have to give it back. If you find a lost phone and there is a contact number but you ignore that because you want the phone or try to get rid of the sim card, then you can be charged.

Finders, keepers is a slang term, no judge is going to say "well this is clearly a finders, keepers case" He's going to use the legal term.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Why have two shoes when you can have four? That homeless guy didn't need them anyway right?

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

This is property law not torts.

[–]tibikush20125 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy

"Hell, if a girl could intellectually challenge me I'm pretty sure there would be close to no attraction from my side."

Why is that? It is much more satisfying having an intelligent AND pretty plate/GF.... What the hell am I suppose to do with her between sex sessions if she is an empty jar?

Why are you not attracted to intelligent girls? I have an opinion why but I don't want to insult

[–]L0wD0g[S] -1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy

In women rationality is inversely correlated with beauty and femininity. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy women when they passively speak about something. But in between sex sessions, as you mentioned, I am not looking for a heated debate or lecture tbh. So in the end it's all good. It just forces you not to spend too much time with them.

[–]Jikira11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy

I am not looking for a heated debate or lecture tbh.

What?!?! Am I reading this straight? You complain about women being losers, yet you admit you only like hanging out with loser girls. I think you should have entitled your post "Why I date loser girls?"

[–]L0wD0g[S] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

Because they are hot. For fucks sake learn how to read.

Hot girls have no personality. Which is great for fucking. But it also prevents oneitis. Oneitis is projecting qualities on a hot girl she does not have.

In general. Lel.

[–]Stolles10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

So you only hang around hot girls cause of the sex, you don't want to talk to them about anything meaningful and then complain that girls are losers? I'm seeing a pretty giant disconnect here. I don't care about how many women you supposedly slept with or even had a casual conversation with (unlikely) you don't have the life experience or statistics to make such a generalization.

Peoples experience really comes from who they CHOOSE to surround themselves with. I feel you need to improve in that area, look for vain but pretty girls because all you care about is getting your dick wet, then that is literally all you're going to find, don't bitch about it.

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor33 points34 points  (60 children) | Copy

Ask a pretty girl- ANY pretty girl- a deep question about politics, cosmology, or history. Unless she is a politician or this is her "one trick" she will know nothing. Even if she is an Astronomer she will know NOTHING beyond her narrow range. She may be able to tell you all about Cepheid variables in the Triangulum Galaxy but she won't know a Black Hole from an Alpha particle (except the Alphas somehow make her tingle while the Beta particles don't do much for her). She may be able to tell you about 14th Century Victorian England but she won't know a thing about the Battle of Jutland.

Even the most accomplished woman is absolutely a one trick pony.

My wife is a ridiculously highly paid Business Lawyer and knows the federal tax code inside and out and backwards and forwards. Beyond that? Well, she can recite every character and all the relationships between every house and every character in Game of Thrones- which is really quite impressive- but not exactly a sign of a well rounded intellectual.

[–]HabitsForSuccess 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

And what is the problem with that? Im genuinely curious, because I am the same way.

I know my field inside and outside, and I get paid very well for it. Learning something that doesnt benefit me or interests me in any way sounds like a waste of time.

[–]nomorelulu6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

This thread as a whole is retarded, including the comment you're responding to

[–]Jonathan_Frias1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well I mean that seems true enough, but at some point people might find somebody who is mostly one dimensional (and usually closed minding) to be off putting. People tend to like people who are well rounded. You might already be well rounded. I don't know you

[–]ButterTartWarrior10 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy

And you are an alleged liberal arts PhD professor and a barred attorney with your own practice and just typed the phrase "14th Century aVictorian". What a ridiculous joke you are

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor-2 points-1 points  (3 children) | Copy

I did not study English History in law school or in my Social Science discipline or in any romantic fiction which I never read. However, I am sure you are quite the student and it must give you great satisfaction to finally find a practical use for your education. You get to fact check the professor after making my Latte! Gratz, but don't forget the extra chocolate.

[–]ButterTartWarrior6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy

You claimed to be a liberal arts professor , not a social sciences PhD. You know that, right?

No liberal arts professor in the US is unaware of when queen Victoria generally reigned, who do you think you're fooling?

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

You would be surprised how narrow PhD training actually is. When they say piled high and deeper they are not kidding.

A 'liberal arts professor' just last week got into a fight with a student claiming that Australia is not a country so confusing Queen Victoria and Queen Elizabeth is hardly a capital crime.

The gotcha games are tiresome and so typically female. Nitpick, bitch, moan, and criticize. It is what they do. Anybody want to get married yet? THIS is what you have to look forward to. Constant arguing. Constant criticism. THIS is what women add to your lives fellows. They see it as their goal to slight any man they hear. They argue, whine, bitch and complain NONSTOP. Go back to 50 Shades and your Angel Porn. Nobody gives a fuck about your games.

[–]RandyMcsavage14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy

She couldn't tell you about 14th Century Victorian England as it wasn't a thing!

[–]3whatsthisgarg8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

14th Century Victorian England

I would like to think that was just a typo or oversight or something, but I really don't think so.

[–]Hydwyn 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

This is true of all people though, not just women

[–]CanuckinFL10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

absolutely not, there have been, and always will be "men of letters". Despite our current idiotic social climate (flat earthers, conspiracy theorists, and #metoo and that nonsense), many men aspire to know as much as humanly possible about all subjects. But if you want a treat, head over to Buffalo Wild Wings one night, watch the trivia play. Women know nothing. They're empty headed as a brown paper bag you burp into.

God and it's worse via text, the preferred means of her having many empty headed conversations at the same time.

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points  (0 children) | Copy

With a difference: there's a certain % of the male camp that breaks this rule. Nobody does on the female camp.

[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I wouldn't say this is true of "all" people. True of many, yes, when you look at the population as a whole. But anecdotally, on the individual basis, I would say it's more true about women, than it is about men, by a significant margin.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

Ask any female a question of any depth and they'll run off, "creeped out". Lolz

They can be intelligent, but not intellectual.

[–]redbarrister1 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

As a professor, how can you in good conscience pass your female students, knowing full well they barely possess the wherewithal to feed and clothe themselves appropriately? You catalyze empowered femcunts as worthless and inane as your fatass harpy moron wife who refuses you your due obedience. She has the power to completely Denali you because of professors just like yourself who looked beyond her “one trick pony” rote memorization skills despite her being a complete fucking ignoramous otherwise, and who gifted her with the keys to the castle: a dignified high paying career that dusts the earning capacity of her Master and husband. Do you allow your daughter to humiliate you too? Are your female children as noxious ly ambitious as your you radfemcunt wife? Your story rips my heart out bro. I destroyed the little girls who had the audacity to vie for their MD in my Med school cohort. We ran them out on a rail forged by their own intellectual inferiority. It isn’t hard to do. You simply shine a white hot spotlight on their feeble thought processes and they run with their tail between their legs. I fail to see how you can so stridently preach trp yet fail to enact measures that are congruent with your beliefs.

[–]Augustuscrassus-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

My sister worked as an accountant at IBM for a number of years and I'm often shocked at how little she knows. This is a woman who graduated with a 4.3 GPA. Shows you just how awesome our school system is.

[–]redd_reality10 points11 points  (2 children) | Copy

Girls are losers

Only because in your nievity you compare women to male standards of success.

By that logic, you're an ugly fucking ogre. I mean, compared to the vast majority of women, it's true. So am I, even despite my chiseled jaw line.

The bitter beta loves to criticize women regarding them as inferior males in intellect, strength, integrity and honor. And while this is true, generally, it points to one MASSIVE flaw the bitter beta might want to take note of asap.

Before you can truly game women, game society and game other men, you have to actually apply TRP. TRP is an objective lens. You must view women for what and who they are, you must view beta men for what and who they are and (arguably) most importantly, you must view alpha men for what and who they are.

Beta men, women and alpha men are not comparable to one another. Clearly all three live by and are judged by different standards.

So stop hating on women for not being alpha men. Believe me, you wouldn't want women to be alpha men, because they would be extremely masculine and use your beta ass as a punching bag - kind of how every single movie produced frames every female character in 2018; but I digress.

A more productive pursuit would be hating on yourself for not being an alpha man, but that wouldn't be a very good post, would it?

Another more productive pursuit would be to write a post criticizing women for not living up to feminine standards, as that is their imperative.

[–]BetaBitchBoy697 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

lmao “dispite my chisled jawline” smh 🤦‍♂️

[–]Usemi53254 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Read the post next time instead of the headline, OP addressed that one should not view women the same as one would view men.

[–]LouisSeaGays1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The fact you gaf makes you the biggest loser of them all.

[–]tolerantman1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The ugly girls have even less personality than the pretty girls, ugly girls join together on mobs composed of only ugly girls and they all think the same and do the same stupid shit, and are always bitter and angry about everything.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I've never met a woman with an ounce of intellectual curiosity. They simply don't give a fuck. If they ever seem interested in something it is usually more of a social proof type thing.

[–]lacinyc1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I don’t know, this isn’t something I necessarily agree with. Granted I’ve met girls who get by on looks and looks alone, but I know plenty of girls who are attractive and still hugely productive in other aspects of their life - and not just by virtue of said looks, but also intellectually. It all depends on the social circles you reside in.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I don't disagree, but what makes you so amazing, "L0wD0g"?

You're good at making reddit posts.....?

[–]enkae73171 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I know a girl who does basically nothing all day but watch TV dramas, go on facebook/instagram, and play with her dog.

She's a solid 8+.

It's quite hilarious if you think about it.

[–]drkinferno721 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

She only loses when she's forced to settle

[–]Cross_De_Lena2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Nice observation.

Just listen to their conversation when they meet with their girlfriends. Only gossip.

[–]diMT-132 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Mate I think it’s a strange loophole you’re manipulating yourself into. If all you want is casual sex, then do make sure that you keep someone intellectually stimulating because otherwise, well, you are who you surround yourself with, and this is no jokes. You also seem to have a strange relationship with what accounts as the perfect female for you, by seemingly despising and thinking as inferior the very type you seem to lust after, a conflict which, if left unchecked, may lead to problems down the line. Thirdly, your knowledge is sourly limited, by I don’t know what interaction. I’ve seen loads of pretty females with actual personalities, but then again you don’t seem to be interested in those.

[–]Lambdal73 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yes there are some women like that, but this theory fails for any law, business, medical, science student pretty much, which are a significant portion of women.

[–]Andgelyo2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Girls are fucking losers. Most guys are fucking losers. All we can do is keep fighting to become the top 10% (not even 20% to me) of men.

[–]Jonlife1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

All they have to offer is pussy and headaches. At least before they used to make you a sandwich in between bitching

[–]Lateralanouncer1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

An attractive woman has no biological reason to perform in any way. She can have a shit personally and be a broke ass bitch so long as she doesn’t hit the wall to hard will be fine. This is where the red pill has it correct, men have a biological reason to be the best we can. Strive in all areas of our live. if we don’t we will hit 30-40 and be nothing. No body will help you. Only u can help yourself.

[–]DickyDurbin0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Takeaway here is be a winner

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Oh yes. Dear Lord have I seen this all too often.

[–]victor_knight0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Some would argue that self-improvement, in itself, is a myth.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

The key is to find a girl that can offer more. The issue is that beauty and intelligence are usually an inverse relationship.

[–]CommunistFesto0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Wow. This boosted my confidence a whole lot! XD

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Good post, one thing I realized when learning the red pill was that you should have the mindset of women needing YOU and never the other way around. And it's true, bitches are pretty and all but in the end they NEED men

[–]HandsomeCub0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

They're not your possessions.

This means no relationship security. You cannot depend on women like things you own. You can depend on yourself, because you own yourself. This prescribes seeing women as auxillary to your life, like a dessert you can live without if need be. Most importantly, us men and our male sexuality dont get to be possessed, if we are to play by the same rules.

This feels very MGTOW. Awesome post!

[–]-Tepes 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

I was with you. And I would put it as Shes just another Girl, Just Another Little Slut Likely. Always One Around the Corner

Nothing more, nothing less. They're not your possessions.

  1. Not My Possessions? Sounds like a CUCK thing to say.
  2. Do I want a gutter whore or a water slide as my Possession? No.
  3. A lot of guys here got their end game as the older Marriage type of deal or in back of their mind, the white picket fence and all that shenanigans.

Far as I am concerned, man is king, his possession is whatever he wishes, Its this recent liberal post WW2 shits that gotten to ya folks, Even if its a Water Slide of the conquered tribes who were too weak and open, as society today in west is, crumbling.

One mans Garbage, Another Mans Treasure

  • There will always be some cuck to take her in till there isn't any.
  • Most guys are just a BJ away from going Beta Bucks.

So wise up fellas. She better be your possession if you want to start something with her, and dont you go around possessing aids ridden or cum dripping former cock carousel sluts or post wall chicks vice versa*

  1. Its Just your Turn, YOU DONT WANT HER TO BE YOURS.
  2. If its YOURS, Means You OWN It.
  3. Usually Shes just another girl, dont take her seriously, most girls are just as big losers as the Betas they have to end up with. So always remember, there is always another around the corner long as you dont let her get too close to ya.

[–]punkrockfishboy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

The average woman is a ditz. Pretty girls are mostly for fucking.

[–]Hugh_Munghous0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I’m always blown away by the fact that women never really seem to have any hobbies. Granted not all men have hobbies, but it seems like most do. When you ask a woman what she likes doing (watching movies, hanging out with friends, going out, etc.) you rarely get anything that resembles an actual cultivated interest. Though sometimes if you’re lucky you get some bullshit answer like “photography,” i.e. taking pictures of tree leaves.

[–]ptdorf 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

All women are "losers" because they want to. They crave that.

Due to how their brains are hardwired, their decision process is so intense that they really just need a man to step up and put his foot down so they can relax. So they can return to be their natural, vulnerable selves. They want to maintain some sort of pseudo control, mostly over the fluffy things. But they really want the man to do the heavy lifting.

Even successful women in power jobs want to come home to a guy that will shoulder the responsibility.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Most of the guys i know at least have a hobby or field of interest, while the girls entire lives revolve around stupid memes, instagram pics, tv shows, etc. No skills, no goals, no interest in knowledge or learning, just 'ooh, drag race is on' or 'aaron paul had a baby'.

[–]emptythatcup0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I assume if you are only surrounded by unproductive, unmotivated except nice looking girls whose sole focus is their looks, then it's easy to come to this conclusion that girls are shallow. but this can pretty much apply to both genders, it's not that girls are shallow, it's the people you surrounded yourself with, that you interact mostly with, makes you come to this conclusion. my point being that if you find yourself seeing nothing worthy of most girls other than their looks, maybe you should consider surround yourself with different groups of people. and of course, doing this is not an easy thing, you need to improve yourself first, heighten your socio-economic level, before you can get into that high-functioning group of people. that's if that's what want, to see behind your current limitation, to not be bored by the low-valued people you now are confined to.

[–]hugaddiction0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy

I agree with a lot of this, but imo, its harder as a guy to truly understand this and live by it, than it is to read it and technically understand it. Until you see first hand through experience the extent of how meaningless their lives are in their 20's, you can't really see them for who they are.

Outside of partying, looking good, basic mindless entertainment in the form of tv, magazines, and spending money, you will not find much more going on. And generally the more interesting they are, the less attractive they are, because at some point they realized in order to get male attention they were going to have to develop interest in a male interest category, or a skill that they were good at and would set them apart from other women in the SMP.

A great way to remind yourself of how much depth a girl is lacking, log onto her instagram. If its full of travel photos and activities and friends, she has some substance, if its full of selfies and pictures of her doing things in her normal life, then she is self centered and has nothing going for her other than her looks.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (7 children) | Copy

If its full of travel photos and activities and friends, she has some substance

Oh yes. Lotta substance in that.

[–]Andgelyo1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

95% of girls on social media put travel photos though lmao

[–]hugaddiction0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

i live in a tiny place with a lot of people that never leave. Many of the attractive girls just have a wall of selfies. Thats what IM conplaining about.

[–]Andgelyo0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

You need to get out of there my dude. On the other hand you wanna switch places? I’m from the NJ and NYC area and everyone here are fucking assholes and the girls are absolute entitled whales. The only good thing is the amount of abundance here, but hands down the most feminine and beautiful girls I’ve seen where from suburban and rural environments.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Exactly what I said.

It's part of the normie-hen preening ABC — to word it kindly.

They can go no further than hen-see-hen-do, and of course it can't be but silliness.

[Made no mistake: serious pics of real travels shared not to strut like peahens are totally legit. But that's not the case of females... "Travel" was in origin a male sort of adventure, and a genuine experience made for the travel itself.

Social media & hen-minds have turned it into an item of mode: like clothes and dresses, a new one every year must be shop-windowed, not to be left behind in the henratrace.

To word it kindly :)]

[–]hugaddiction0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

I agree with you, and the other comment, its still showing off competition bullshit, but I would rather spend time with the girl that has the drive to take her female competition to the next level, and doesn't solely rely on selfies and ass shots to keep her ego in tact. In your opinion what is the idea ration of selfies and other pics?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Are you considering LTRs or fuck buddies/lays?

For 1), I'd screen out anyone who does any silly things on FB (as long as you want something more than a conglomerate of flesh with a vagina)

for 2) their social media doesn't matter

[–]waldo8880 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

except that nearly every single girl gets to reproduce and only like 75% of men do. So I guess if success is having some worldly knowledge you can lord over them then ya , men are gods. hahahaha

[–]hdosnxbjdjeb0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

All we have to do now is be attractive enough and fucking LIFT to get the hot girl

[–]WalterEArmstrong2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

You can't be a dullard. A woman wants a man who has some spark, energy, dynamism.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Had a chuckle at the water slide part. Very valuable observations, great post.

[–]DR_JDUBZ-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

If I ever have sex it will not be with a girl who has intelligence equivalent to that of a monkey (such a thing may as well be known as beastiality) or is so shallow as to think ghosting is an acceptable practice.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy


This guy is in for some real pain-

[–]XanderS311-3 points-2 points  (2 children) | Copy

The amount of times that I have listened to a conversation between two young women and wanted to vomit at the banality of it. This old adage has never been more apt:

Great minds discuss ideas Average minds discuss events Small minds discuss people

[–]hisbirdness10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy

The funny thing about that quote is that it was said by a woman.

[–]SickofUrbullshit-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

The world would be so much better if only men had power.

[–]WalterEArmstrong6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Giving women the vote was an EXTREMENLY bad mistake.

[–]MeltFaceDude-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

You ain't ever getting laid, virgin.

[–]Solodolo1795-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

Then how the fuck most of you guys get past all the cringe? I can't even find a common ground while talking to a dumb girl, seems impossible for me.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

In fact the "talk" is instrumental to the fuck/reproduction/having a housekeeper.

That was the natural order of things.

If you try to make serious talk of the "talk", women will leave / their liking gauge will go a notch down.

[–]BetaBitchBoy69-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lmfao if you want a good example look at any social media...chicks will fucking set up photos to look sexy/cool/fun.... Then the beta comments come rolling in...they love the attention, but just in the form of likes and comments. The second said beta tries to directly contCt them they’re creepy!

[–]bearinfoxhole-3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I have more respect for Harvey Weinstein than cunts and thots these days. At least, he delivered quality entertainment most of the time.