Anglosphere Social Engineers and Scientists Strive for Sexless Future as Part of a Suicidal Machine Culture

Gender confusion is everywhere these days and it’s part of a calculation, not an accident. Anglo-American social engineers have carefully introduced gender fluidity, transgenderism, sex shaming, mom shaming, male shaming, and other anti-life, anti-biology, anti-human concepts into the public consciousness. They’ve also fueled an entire feminist movement by manipulating the masses of women to become wannabe men using Freud’s penis envy theory. They’re even starting to turn sexual intercourse itself and the natural male pursuit of it into taboo with ginned up social hysterias like #MeToo.

What could be the ultimate aim of those not only endeavoring to confuse the masses about their gender but to make sex itself a thing of the past?

Is it eugenics? Do the elite desire not only to control the entire world, but to control human reproduction itself?

Could this aim be the reason prostitution remains illegal in the Anglosphere’s all-out War on Sex, despite calls for its legalization and elite members of the Washington establishment including Dick Cheney, Rudy Giuliani, and John McCain reportedly, along with a host of high level government officials using the services of a suicided D.C. Madam and her call girls? Sex for hire is okay for me but not for thee, plebs. Stunning hypocrisy.

(A little background: The D.C. Madam, under investigation by the corrupt IRS was about to take her case to trial and squeal. This would have revealed her client list and their hypocrisy but the madam suddenly killed herself instead, after giving multiple interviews saying she wasn’t going to kill herself. This, after interviewers claimed her life was in danger because the D.C. Madam’s phone records list consisted of elite Washington clients. Imagine the scandals it would have provoked when the D.C. Madam fought back against IRS thievery of her livelihood, a livelihood gleaned from her escort service that Washington insiders frequented. More on this case another time.)

Could eugenics be why Anglo culture drives a wedge between men and women at every turn? Could eugenics be why there are severe financial risks for men who dare to reproduce? Could eugenics be why women are submerged in Don’t Need A Man⢠propaganda their entire lives? Could eugenics be one of the motivations behind creating a #MeToo culture in which men can be brought up on witch trials with baseless claims decades after “harassment” supposedly happened? Does the Anglosphere want to ban sex altogether, as TNMM suggested in a recent article?

The answer to all those questions, it appears, is yes. The Anglosphere has long taken over the realm of eugenics, the science of controlled human breeding it once lambasted when the practice was employed in Nazi Germany. But, even after Hitler killed himself eugenics never went away.

As was the case with Nazi rocket scientists being gobbled up by the American establishment then employed to create the U.S. space program, it seems the realm of eugenics was absorbed into the world’s modern evil empire. The Anglo-American power structure seems more determined than ever to sneak the use of eugenics in on a socially atomized population in which men and women have become bitter enemies thanks to gender wars ginned up by the establishment. An obscure article in the Daily Mail may give us insight into what elites who buy legislators, scientists and social engineers alike are endeavoring to do.

Birds do it, bees do it, even educated fleas do itâ⦠The wonderful Cole Porter song, Letâs Do It, Letâs Fall In Love, lists many of the species who enjoy pairing off: ‘Even Pekineses at the Ritz do it!’

The Pekineses are not alone: 99.9 per cent of higher animal species reproduce themselves sexually. Species capable of reproducing themselves without contact between male and female are in the distinct minority.

Whiptail lizards and some hammer-head sharks apparently do it. Or rather, donât do it. But so far no one has written a song about them and their lonely sexual endeavours.

A research geneticist from Imperial College London, Aarathi Prasad, has tried to do the next best thing. Not only has she written a celebration of those eccentric creatures who are capable of reproducing by themselves without sexual contact, she controversially claims that sexless reproduction is the way of the future for humans, too.

Yes, it seems viviparous reproduction (as Huxley called it in his novel Brave New World) will be the next causality of Anglo culture and its never-ending designs to strip humans of our biology to create a “perfect” machine-dominated culture. The Daily Mail predictably places this horrific undertaking under the banner of so-called progress early in its report:

A generation ago, test-tube babies were the stuff of science fiction: now, we accept these things as realities. In the same way, suggests Prasad, we could well be looking at a future in which human babies could be born without any sperm donors, let alone contact between the sexes. The future is sexless.

Artificial wombs, genetically engineered sperm, splicing eggs together, test tube babies and the end of sexuality are the way of the future, Prasad claims. In true Anglosphere fashion, the equation is as follows: Machines > Humans.

It does seem the Anglo world is making life miserable for men in anticipation of something grandiose on the horizon.

Like a sexless world.

But, just because humans can do something, doesn’t mean we should. That said, prudence never stopped the world’s ultimate sellout culture – an apt description of the Anglosphere – from trying to make a buck off of a new discovery no matter the human cost.

Prasad, possessing the “superior virtue of the oppressed” by virtue of being a woman of color, doubly virtuous because she abandoned the father of her daughter in true feminist fashion, has obviously been selected to be a cheerleader of the eugenics movement.

It seems Prasad familiarized herself with the tried and true Anglosphere corruption of The Hegelian Dialectic that cleverly amoral PR flacks use to shoehorn fake problems into the public consciousness.

Fake problems are frequently introduced via the mainstream media. A fake problem this profound means those licking their chops at the prospect of seizing control of the reproductive capacity of the human species can, nay must introduce their “solutions” on a pliable public:

She warns that the Y chromosome â the strand of DNA which helps shape the male of any species â is âhurtling down the evolutionary road towards extinctionâ. Research has shown that the genetic information contained on it has been disintegrating over time.

This is the first I’ve heard of this problem. Where did it come from? What’s causing it? How could a Y chromosome be stable for millions of years then suddenly become unstable?

Could the catastrophic drop in quantity and quality of American sperm counts reported by the press in recent years be a result of intentional tampering with human biology via the food and water supply? Eugenicist Paul Ehrlich, darling of the Anglo-American establishment has long promoted his fantasy of sterilizing people by putting chemicals into the water supply.

Predictably, in comes the corporate solution from those wanting to play God. Continuing from Daily Mail:

And, if that is the case, if the Y chromosome really is dying out, then does this not mean that the human race itself is slowly dying out â unless scientists can devise artificial means for the human race to reproduce itself?

Do you realize how diabolical this is? Tell the human race it will die out unless an artificial means of reproduction is introduced, effectively ending heterosexuality, eventually making sexual reproduction illegal, and putting the genetic legacy as well as future of the human species itself in the hands of the profit-worshiping medical-pharmaceutical establishment?

What could possibly go wrong with that plan?

There are more troubling questions that arise as a result of the revelation that eugenicists are busy creating the case for a sexless future. Could this be why the HIV/AIDS narrative was introduced into the public consciousness decades ago? It’s becoming plain to see what the HIV/AIDS scare really amounted to was a form of plague terror intended to scare people away from having sex. HIV/AIDS predictably never materialized into a pandemic in the heterosexual population because it is next to impossible to transmit by penis in vagina intercourse. The CDC’s own statistics bear this out.

But, the seed was planted in the public mind. Sex was now dangerous. And having sex meant you could contract terrible diseases. The Anglo-American establishment effectively made billions of people scared of getting a deadly form of the childhood game of “cooties” with the HIV/AIDS campaign of plague terror.

Was this a social engineering scheme aimed at garnering public acceptance of a sterilizing drug when a bioweapon is eventually synthesized and introduced on the world population? Considering the astronomical level of corruption displayed by the American government and its insidious Deep State, corruption that has only started coming to light because of the Internet we should not put anything past Washington.

Towards the end of the writeup, Prasad finally gets at what she really means as she predictably mixes in Social Justice Warrior rhetoric with her desire to take away the very essence of humanity – our ability to reproduce and to enjoy our sexuality.

Like so many scientists, Aarathi Prasad believes long-held taboos and traditions should be cast aside in the name of progress.

Did you catch the code word? I did. Yes, you plebs need to stop fucking. Sex is for the ruling class to enjoy, not you. Giving up that nasty habit is “progress” towards a perfect, sterilized, mechanized world. Continuing from Daily Mail:

She wants us to drop all our prejudices about sex, sexual difference, reproduction and foetuses, and to allow science to develop in any way it chooses.

In comes the gender bending, now being taught to young girls as a way of life.

âWhy canât a man be a mother?â she asks. âWhy do we care so much about what it means to be a ‘mother’ rather than to be a ‘parent’?

âBy all reasonable estimates, in the near future we will conquer the tyranny of the womb. The question remains if we can also conquer the tyranny of human prejudice, too.â

At least the author of the Daily Mail piece called this frightful plea for humanity to abandon sex, abandon family, and embrace the sterile, mechanical future the Anglosphere has designed for us what it is – evil. A product of a culture that has gone insane.

In the old myth about the Garden of Eden, God says that âit is not good for man to be aloneâ. Modern science disagrees. It thinks there is nothing wrong with this.

A generation ago, we watched families breaking up in large numbers for the first time, and the breakdown of marriages. Nearly every observer of society agrees that this was calamitous, especially in the less privileged parts of our cities, where lack of family structure is the major background and cause of crime, psychological dislocation, and anti-social behaviour.

What appears to be a scientific exploration is actually a political tract, saying that we can do without a patriarchal, male-dominated society, do without Dad, without family, without any of the structures which have hitherto shaped the human destiny.

The subtitle of Prasadâs thesis is How Science Is Redesigning The Rules Of Sex. To my mind, this book is not so much redesigning the rules of sex as suggesting sex as we know it should be abolished.

It is a good example of something purporting to be a work of science but is, in fact, as brimful of prejudice as any religious text, and as biased as any loony tract.

However, this article was published a while back and we all know how politics works. Hillary criticized gay marriage before becoming a fervent supporter of it, after all.

This is the playbook: The establishment introduces a social engineering concept, initially criticizes it, then herds the public along towards its eventual acceptance.

This single article from Daily Mail ties together so many loose threads. It explains the true intent of the Anglo-American War on Sex, it explains why children are now being confused about their gender, why heterosexuality is marginalized and alternative sexual preferences are vaunted, why men are being emasculated, ostracized and abandoned, why plague terror is a recurring agenda item in the mainstream media, why women are being told to act like men, why the family unit is being destroyed by the state, and why women are being given absolute power over men in all matters of sexuality.

It’s eugenics. The elite want to control not just your life but strip your sex life and your ability to reproduce from you. The earth will be a human farm with the 0.01% driving the rest like cattle if the elite’s plans come to fruition.

Gentlemen, the questions I have raised as a result of not only calls for a sexless world but probable plague terror and definite social engineering are why I have become deeply concerned about not only the future of free Western societies, but the fate of the human species itself. An artificial world is about to permeate and poison the natural one our species evolved in. It must be stopped.