Purdue Ups the Ante on Misandry: Says Eliminate “Man” from English Language

Anglo culture hates men so bad it wants them removed from the English language entirely

Proving that deconstruction is in full swing and misandry is reaching astronomical new heights in a post-democracy, post-feminist America, an institution of lower living that was formerly an ivy league school is now recommending words with “man” in them be expunged from the English language.

It’s the latest, stunning display of hatred of all things male in the Anglosphere. This culture hates men so much it doesn’t even want words like “policeman” or “fireman” or phrases like “the common man” to exist, anymore. This is the thanks men get after dreaming up, engineering, and constructing the entire world that women now want to rule like petty tyrants. From the National Review:

A writing guide at Purdue University advises students to avoid words with âmanâ in them â such as âmailmanâ and âmankindâ â in order to write âin a non-sexist, non-biased way.â

This is deconstructionism at its finest, a philosophy that academic Webster Tarpley tried to warn us about a generation ago. Tarpley thinks deconstructionism (i.e. destruction of the world of philosophy, language, and science males of European descent created) could ultimately end in the deaths of billions. As rationality is replaced with irrationality, and the scientific discoveries of dead white males eviscerated, Tarpley and others think the carrying capacity of the planet will ultimately be reduced.

In that sense, sterilizing the language is the beginning of a frightful decline into the abyss. Truly, the beginning of a new Dark Age. That isn’t stopping Purdue University, however. Purdue writes:

“Although MAN in its original sense carried the dual meaning of adult human and adult male, its meaning has come to be so closely identified with adult male that the generic use of MAN and other words with masculine markers should be avoided.”

Of course, identity politics are never far behind.

“Writing in a non-sexist, non-biased way is both ethically sound and effective. Non-sexist writing is necessary for most audiences; if you write in a sexist manner and alienate much of your audience from your discussion, your writing will be much less effective.”

As usual, university eggheads are full of it. Even the woman writing the article at National Review took umbrage with Purdue’s strange claims.

Iâm all for gender equality, but I have to say that this seems a bit overblown. Iâm a woman (not to brag), and I can tell you that there is approximately a zero percent chance that seeing a word like âmankindâ in someoneâs work would âalienateâ me as the guide suggests. Itâs just not that serious, and Iâm just not that sensitive.

All of this has gotten out of control. Earlier this month, Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau actually corrected a woman who said âmankindâ at a town-hall event, telling her to say âpeoplekindâ instead. Even aside from the fact that âpeoplekindâ is not a word, thatâs still absolutely insane.

Indeed, it has all gotten out of control but the deconstructionists aren’t finished slicing and dicing the English language yet. Deconstruction is becoming the dominant philosophy in universities, and is indicative of a Western culture in terminal decline as Europe and America both show signs they’re dying in the winter of Spengler’s prescient civilization model. Language will continue to be parsed until it is gutted.

Political correctness (self-evident in the move to strip the word “man” from language) and Marxism (removal of all personal identity) are the evil step sisters of the deconstructionist movement. Deconstruction also goes along with Anglo America’s Androgyny Agenda, which is slowly merging the sexes into one with everything from social engineering to chemicals in food.

The name is fitting, however, as deconstructionism will ultimately deconstruct the whole of the Western world in a supreme display of insanity and seething, visceral hatred of the European male and his accomplishments which have ultimately benefited the entire world. Deconstruction begins with language. Next, they’ll be coming for more than just words. All that “science” the white male discovered must be “racist” right?

P.S. Is deconstructionism the way elites plan to get world population down to 500 million, as stated by the Georgia Guidestones? Just a thought.