TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Censorship in academia in real-time

Robert Brockway
November 22, 2020

Recently an article was published in the open-access journal Nature Communications. This article, entitled The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance suggests that less experienced female scientists benefit more from mentorship by more experienced male scientists than more experienced female scientists.

Of course, feminists are demanding that the article be retracted, with some of them specifically citing hurt feelings in a thread on Twitter. This is another example of a phenomenon I have often noted. Feminists will go nuts any time anyone suggests that women benefit from interacting with men.

Nature Communications is taking feminist complaints seriously of course. They couldn’t just ignore a bunch of screaming harpies now, could they?

2020-11-22-143246_790x189_scrot-300x72.png

2020-11-22-134740_592x198_scrot-300x100.png

“Toxic misogyny in Academia”, oh lordy. Exactly how pro-woman would she like academia to get? Don’t answer that, I already know.

2020-11-22-135207_591x174_scrot-300x88.png

Strawman anyone?

2020-11-22-135634_594x162_scrot-300x82.png

Hurtful I tell you!

2020-11-22-143056_592x162_scrot-300x82.png

Offensive!

2020-11-22-140119_592x146_scrot-300x74.png

Damage!

2020-11-22-140248_593x157_scrot-300x79.png

This gentleman even claims the results are unethical. I’d love to see his working.

2020-11-22-144243_588x147_scrot-300x75.png

Feelz before realz!

2020-11-22-140446_594x163_scrot-300x82.png

An academic system that is biased against women? She must mean how tertiary enrolment rates for men have been sliding for decades, or how women have a 2:1 hiring advantage in their favour in STEM.

2020-11-22-141919_591x160_scrot-300x81.png

Two of the three authors are women. Must be more of that internalised misogyny we keep hearing so much about.

At least there are a few people still willing to express the voice of reason.

2020-11-22-135736_593x293_scrot-300x148.png

2020-11-22-141004_590x286_scrot-300x145.png

I can’t speak to the strength of the paper, but the correct way to address it is to challenge it in the marketplace of ideas, as I suggested to Nature Communications.

2020-11-22-235445_591x121_scrot-300x61.png

Censorship in academia continues apace. They can’t or won’t argue with the contents of the article, they merely wish to see it banished.

In case the original article is taken down by Nature Communications, an archived copy can be found here.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the blog A Voice for Men.

A Voice for Men archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Censorship in academia in real-time
Author Robert Brockway
Date November 22, 2020 12:00 AM UTC (3 years ago)
Blog A Voice for Men
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/blog/A-Voice-for-Men/censorship-in-academia-in-real-time.40295
https://theredarchive.com/blog/40295
Original Link https://avoiceformen.com/featured/censorship-in-academic-in-real-time/
Red Pill terms in post
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter