Bluepillprofessor goes to a conference:

A Red Pill guy in enemy territory for a week. I won’t describe the conference fully so as to protect the guilty (and the innocent) but trust me, it is put on by a Women’s Study’s Department and a Sociology Department has turned into being all about sexual assault woe-is-me-isms and prevention strategies.

In reality it was: --90% PhD sized hamster solipsistic bitch fest look what happened to me…..me…me….me,

--9% men are awful terrible beasts, how can we undermine the patriarchy and teach boys to be more feminine and nurturing?

--1% are there any real solutions to the issue at hand (except men are bad…bad…bad…)

I could write a book on my experiences so far but will be content with a couple examples.

One lecturer told us all about the cycle of domestic violence.
Here we go fellows: Strap yourself in:

1---Husband Bad, beats wife---

2---Husband apologizes, please forgive me I will never hurt you again---

3---Hamster accepts apology----

4---FOR SOME UNKNOWN REASON THE COUPLE WILL THEN INEVITABLY HAVE HOT SEX. (bwwwwaAAAAAHAHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAHHAAAAA).

5—Husband uses “negs” (her words, not mine) and isolation to destroy woman’s ego and cut off her social contacts

6---Husband violent---goto …..2

Got that everybody? The woman has no agency for making up and fucking the shit out of him for treating her badly.

It is all the man’s fault! Here is more proof:

The 5 reasons a woman will not leave an abusive relationship:

  1. HE has lowered her self esteem using negs and isolation.

  2. HE has taken away her resources and FORCED her to not work or has taken her paycheck.

  3. HE does the bills (cuz we know when a man does the bills that is abusive and controlling)

  4. HE threatens her

  5. HE may become violent

If you thought SHE had any responsibility to leave an abusive asshole you would be mistaken.

Then the next lecture revealed some Red Pill truths:

Males are violent in 6-12% or relationships depending on the study. Females are violent in 15-25% of relationships depending on the study.

So women are TWICE as likely to be violent in a relationship! Got that?

Another lecturer pointed out that women lie in over 50% of domestic violence cases. They lie and make false charges even when SHE injured HIM and 99% of the time HE goes to jail.

Women will also attempt to take the children away from the man (using them as hostages) in over 30% of divorce cases).

Another attempted to hamster the difference between “low level relationship violence” (which is “exciting and mutual” AND “FOR SOME REASON THAT WE DON’T UNDERSTAND IS ASSOCIATED WITH FREQUENT AND HOT SEX. THEY ACTUALLY SEEM TO LIKE IT FOR SOME REASON, ESPECIALLY DURING SEX AND WE HAVE NO IDEA WHY”- lmfao- I started giggling and had to leave the room) and “relationship terrorism” (which can ONLY be committed by the MAN). The Speaker had never been a man (although based on her looks that was not entirely clear) OR on the receiving end of a divorce summons where REAL terrorism is committed.

Here is another tidbit “we don’t understand.” 85% of women in domestic violence situations report feeling “very safe” and 10% report feeling “safe.” Take home? 95% of women who get beat up by their SO feel “Safe” or “Very Safe” with their Significant Other. Wow, you mean a big strong man willing to use his muscles to get what he wants makes a woman feel safe. Your kidding! We don’t “understand” because it doesn’t’ fit the paradigm.

This is more proof: The first question asked after the Rape lecture was: “It seems the solution is to TEACH MEN THAT WOMEN ARE PEOPLE AND NOT PROPERTY. WE MUST MAKE SURE THAT MEN UNDERSTAND THAT WOMEN ARE NOT A CONQUEST. HOW DO WE TEACH MEN THEY SHOULD NEVER EVEN APPROACH A WOMAN WITHOUT HER APPROVAL?”

Here’s another one: [after a long discussion about young boys acting out some hideous feminist asked a real gem]: “Boys acting out is caused by the patriarchy and the masculine face that it forces on young boys. The long term solution is to train boys away from these masculine tendencies and I think that should be the main goal…”

Yes they talk about these things openly and unashamedly at academic conferences.

We could power our civilization for 1,000 years with the kinetic energy from those PhD hamsters.