696,979 posts

Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager In The House - If you only read one thing today, it's this.

Reddit View
January 5, 2013
37 upvotes
http://no-maam.blogspot.fr/2012/06/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in.html


Post Information
Title Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager In The House - If you only read one thing today, it's this.
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 37
Comments 18
Date 05 January 2013 02:42 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit askTRP
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/174810
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/160b5u/woman_the_most_responsible_teenager_in_the_house/
Similar Posts
Comments

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy

I'm not sure if the author assumes that women stop maturing mentally once they are 18 due to physiological differences between men and women. If that is the case, I have to disagree. However, if he see's it more from a view of "Women are conditioned by society to not have a need to mature any further than 18" (which is then bolstered by an entitlement complex), then yes, I do agree.

The 'science' behind this is from the 1850's, so I would take it with a grain of salt, but the sociological side makes sense.

Women have been conditioned by many aspects of society to feel like they do not need to mature, to gain a better knowledge of the world, to explore philosophies on life beyond the feminist narrative, because they still hold onto the ideal that someone else will take care of them, always, and that they deserve to be taken care of.

They want to feel like they're all grown up with their psudo-feminist ideals, but all they do is change the narrative from "I will stay at home and take care of the place and children while the breadwinner is out (be they male or female)" to "I can stay at home because someone will take care of me". There is no reciprocation of the goods the breadwinner brings in (I don't count sex as a form of reciprocation in the way of goods and services in a relationship. It should be a separate matter between consenting adults, for their own pleasures).

[–]zionController 17 points18 points  (6 children) | Copy

They will instinctively fitness-test a man with all kinds of irrational and basically abusive behaviour, to test the steel content of his balls

Shit tests, compliance tests, "fitness tests"... wow. Amazing how so many different people write about the same thing. Like so many people have discovered this on their own and are trying to share it.

This is a much more comprehensive version than the one I posted last night.

Thanks for the post.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy

It's only after you know shit test exist that you realize a lot of things you see on tv condition you to put up with it. The married guy in the sitcom giving his wife money when she complains, getting abused by her when she's upset, getting screamed at by her, and as soon as he gets upset and raises his voice we're made to think that is unacceptable. A man should never do anything to make a woman upset or feel threatened.

We label men cowards if they put up with abuse from their wives and abusers if they don't put up with it.

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

Exactly. Our culture programs most of us to behave in a way that actively drives women away. A woman absolutely does not, or soon will not, respect a man that gives into her tests.

[–]zionController 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

or soon will not, respect a man that gives into her tests.

There is a concept that applies here that I read about... On the subject of giving and taking. If you give a person something, you basically increase their value in your own mind, while simultaneously decreasing your value in their mind. And vice versa. So its important when in a relationship, you make demands. Demand cooking, demand cleaning, demand sexual favours. Upon compliance, theoretically, you will have earned value in her mind, because only the valued deserve these favours.

Contrarily, by giving in to shit tests, you erode your value to her everytime and your put her up on a pedestal a little more every time. Its the perfect way to castrate yourself.

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

If I had this information just one year ago, my life probably would have been hell of a lot easier at the time. Red pill wisdom is invaluable for men. No question about it.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 10 points11 points  (5 children) | Copy

This article is so high density, it needs to be on EVERYBODY's reading list.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (4 children) | Copy

You cannot expect a woman to be your true confidant, your soul-mate, and your respite to lean upon during the stormy times in life. That is your role for her benefit. It does not work in reverse, for as soon as you believe it can work that way, she will lose confidence in your ability to lead her and begin to resent you.

When one considers that one must "game" a woman, even your wife, in order to keep her around, then it also means that you must always be operating at a "higher level" than her. It totally negates the whole notion of having a "soul-mate" and means that on many levels, a man will always be alone

one of the most key elements to remember

[–]scottyah 12 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy

That's why dogs are Man's Best Friend. If you need somewhere to turn to for your unconditional love, it's those furry little balls of joy and acceptance.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

was about to ask, if it's not going to be women, should a man focus on his mates when he looks for the confidant, or a dog? I say both, but dog is definitely next on the list.

[–]zionController 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

This is red pill bread and butter. Always needing game. If you pull a woman up to your level, she will then use hypergamy to monkey bar to the next guy who might be better than you. Its important to always maintain an edge. Embrace your masculinity and never buy into the 'soul-mate' equality trope. Men must lead, or be misled.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Men must lead, or be misled.

The active ingredient in Red Pill.TM

[–]Bobsutan 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

fantastic article in my opinion. as someone who's dating a woman much younger it's entirely spot on. men have to be the leader and the emotional rock women can lean on for their stability. I learned years ago that women mirror male emotional states, the same way small children do. that's the difference in how small kids react when they fall down. if a mother gets all worked up, its her reaction that results in the kid crying. on the other hand, often times when the man responds to the child's fall by picking the kid up, dusting them off, asking if they're oKay, without the hysterics, it results in the kid not crying. it's the same dynamic with men and women and I think a lot to do with why women respond positively to male emotional stability.

the inververse correlation is when men approach women and they are completely nervous and awkward, women pick up on those feelings and begin to feel them themselves and mirror the men's emotional state. this is partly why confidence is so attractive-- men who approach with confidence are bereft of those negative emotions.

[–]r_rships_account 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I learned years ago that women mirror male emotional states, the same way small children do. that's the difference in how small kids react when they fall down. if a mother gets all worked up, its her reaction that results in the kid crying. on the other hand, often times when the man responds to the child's fall by picking the kid up, dusting them off, asking if they're oKay, without the hysterics, it results in the kid not crying.

This is an insightful comment which explains why aloofness works. Saved.

[–]GeorgeGordonByron -3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy

been reading this blog for years. it's got some stuff that would be controversial even by other red pill blogs. (one of the writers thinks that the misandry bubble has already popped.) But IMO it's one of (if not the) best.

[–]harmonylion -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy

This makes me want to weep with relief.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter