696,979 posts

One of the surest indicators of an AFC-beta mindset is the automatic presumption that anything remotely critical a man would say about women, or the feminine, is by default, equated with misogyny.

Reddit View
January 24, 2013
15 upvotes
http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/bitter-misogynists/


Post Information
Title One of the surest indicators of an AFC-beta mindset is the automatic presumption that anything remotely critical a man would say about women, or the feminine, is by default, equated with misogyny.
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 15
Comments 8
Date 24 January 2013 03:09 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit askTRP
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/174843
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/176wx3/one_of_the_surest_indicators_of_an_afcbeta/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
average frustrated chumpbeta
Comments

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy

I've been seeing this more and more lately, where anything that doesn't directly serve the feminine imperative is labeled misogyny. I realize some of the stuff we say on the red pill is shocking if you haven't gotten used to it. I even understand how seddit's vibe can seem a bit off (relative to traditional courting).

But when they describe Men's Rights as misogyny, you realize there's something going on. How, exactly, is wanting rights hating women?

Oh, it's not.

It just isn't directly serving the feminine imperative.

[–]ZorbaTHut 8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy

I was recently in a "debate" where I kept saying that, if college enrollment equality was our goal, we should be cutting back on women's scholarships and using the money for more productive things, like, for example, non-gender-specific scholarships.

She kept asking me why I wanted to hurt women instead of helping men.

The conversation kind of imploded when she demanded I provide documented scientific proof that, somewhere in the country, a male has been rejected from college. Which . . . is something you need proof for, I guess?

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Women could have everything handed to them and feminists would still say they are oppressed.

[–]GeorgeGordonByron 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

see, if it were up to me, I'd take that money to help boys graduate from highschool since they drop out 5 times as much.

[–]ZorbaTHut 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It may be that once women's scholarships are cut back, things will be equalized again, and we don't need to focus on boys. At which point handing the money over to boys is bringing us right back into imbalance.

[–]Kepaso 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

true. We like women. We don't just pedestal them and sugarcoat them with rainbows and unicorns, but we see them in a realistic way, and analyse the data. The women are already doing it for us. They don't pedestal us, they know exactly how we work and know how to navigate between the mass of men to get the goodies, aka they know the game since a long time, while the majority of men are in a thick mist and blind to the rules of this game.

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yes, exactly. How dare men help themselves! Individually or en masse, women can be so god damn selfish - to the extent where looking out for yourself is "hating" women. Meanwhile, they continue to manipulate social norms and laws to enforce their imperative.

Knock them off their pedestal. Learn game. Spin plates, don't commit, don't invest. You'll avert some headaches and disasters that way.

[–]Bobsutan 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Ah, the good old Feminine Imperative. Here's another excellent read on the subject:

http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/shouting-in-the-wilderness/



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter