Social Welfare Creates A Society Of Sluts

Reddit View
March 18, 2013

Post Information
Title Social Welfare Creates A Society Of Sluts
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 42
Comments 29
Date 18 March 2013 06:18 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Original Link
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pill

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

No need for a man if you can steal his property via divorce and taxation. All aboard the slut train! Practice your game.

[–]mechakingghidorah8 points9 points  (5 children) | Copy

I've been saying this for years.In the dark,paleolithic past hypergamy was a huge gamble.Yeah, a woman could bang some alpha male,but if he didn't stick around then her child and maybe her as well would both starve.

Women now don't really face any consequences like our ancestors did.I mean why not bang that pot smoking drummer in a band?

She has the pill,and even if she gets knocked up the government will take care of her.

[–]101996 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy

In the dark,paleolithic past

it's in Russia now. amount of welfare is plain ridiculous = ~60$ a month.

[–]GeorgeGordonByron1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

so what's the single mother situation like there?

[–]101993 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

uhm. they work and desperately try to find a husband. Usually the granparents take care of a child while mother is working somewhere. Sometimes it's another city.

I work in a factory as an engineer, there is such a mother in next room. I remember last summer she was buying a dress a week - she has a good body also - and was going on foot to her flat (~1.5 hour) every day trying to meet somebody. Dunno if she was successful.

What else can they possibly do?

[–]mechakingghidorah0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Why didn't she wait on marriage to have a child in the first place?

[–]101990 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

she is divorced

[–]RedSunBlue13 points14 points  (6 children) | Copy

Out here in Japan, there is a strong social welfare system -- a single mother of 4 can make enough off of welfare to live quite comfortably -- but there are still a lot of women who want nothing more than to snag a decent beta provider, get hitched, and pop out a few kids as soon as they graduate from high school/college. These women aren't hurting in the looks department either.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy

Why do you think that happens to be the case in Japan and not in the west? Despite our monogamous history, the western society changed in a matter of decades. Wouldnt the same have happened to Japan, or have they been unaffected by feminism?

[–]RedSunBlue8 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy

My best guess is that Japan, and collectivist societies in general, tend to be resistant to feminism because of the way that they value the group more than the individual. And because they value the group over the individual, Japanese folks more readily "know their role"; men go and kill themselves at work while women stay home, take care of the kids, cook dinner, and look good. Japanese people love to belong to groups, and the monogamous family unit perhaps the most important group one could belong to.

Of course, this is changing, less due to Western feminism and more due to expanding career options for women and the rise of grass-eating males.

Honestly, it seems that feminism is just an off-shoot of the "What about me?" and "I gotta get mine" mentality that comes with individualism.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

My best guess is that Japan, and collectivist societies in general, tend to be resistant to feminism because of the way that they value the group more than the individual.

Precisely. I am thinking about bestofing your comment. We on Reddit often tend to think in too simplified liberal-conservative dichotomies. This needs to be made more complex.

I mean the essence of American society is the pursuit of individual desire. And then those who think some people must subsidize some other people's pursuit will be called "liberal" or "socialist" or "collectivist" and those who are not will be called "individualist" "conservative" or "libertarian". But at the end of the day both are individualists, because they conceive life as a whole as the pursuit of individual desire.

A traditional society is different. You have your place, you have your duties, in the family, in the society. And the reason there is extensive welfare system and stuff like that is not the same as in America, it is not about equalizing individual chances, but more like if you accept that not everything is your choice but society gives you a lot of duties, then of course you can expect something back from society as well.

Living in Austria - similar to Germany - the social message does not seem to be the same as the American Left's i.e. "Government is here to ensure everybody gets a fair chance to pursue their dreams." More like "You must do what everybody else does and want what everybody else wants. In return we will ensure that you are comfortable."

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Great explanation, thank you.

[–]mike18180 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

no multiculturalism (i.e. soft genocide). simple as that

[–]mechakingghidorah-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy

Guy who studies Japanese as a minor,and knows a bit about Japan as well here.

Honestly,I think it's because they like being housewives. Their husbands will work 10-12 hour days every week and they get to do what they want when the kids start going to school.

Of course,they're expected to wait on their husband hand and foot when he is at home.

[–]orographic10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

I, and I know many other men have come to this same conclusion independently. Women still need men as much as they ever did. Fathers, boyfriends and brothers have traditionally protected women, provided for women and did their dirty work for them at the cost that the woman wouldnt be a total slut. Thanks to feminist policies in the past few decades the providing, protecting and doing of the dirty work switched to the government funded by men's tax dollars which allows them to follow the hypergamous nature.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy

Extremely insightful and accurate article. I really need to buy his books.

[–]TRP Vanguardtheubercuber2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

I'm a few chapters into Day Bang, really enjoying it so far.

[–]Catch_N_GoCarter-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

What is the name of his book?

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Day Bang

[–]SequencingLife1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

I've been many many times to Mexico and have lived there for a few years. Mexico has a low GDP, 9k dlls, and a useless welfare system that can be cheated quite easily. If the system is not cheated then the money paid is incredibly low. I've heard of people paying 30 dlls a month on child support when they make 2k dlls a month. Result?

Women in Mexico are sluts, cheap, and manipulative as fuck. They are borderline obsessive with men they deem higher value than them like if they were fighting for their life. The hypergamy is extremely high since there are many who don't have much and a few who have, but have shit.

Women in Mexico are sluts without the variety of options American women have and with the desire to survive at all costs.

Doesn't matter where you put women. They are going to slut if given the chance. Welfare system or not.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Interesting contrast to a recent thread about Mexican women in US, where everyone seemed to have a positive view of them (at least on those who are 1st and 2nd gen immigrants)

[–]SequencingLife2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

That is because the men who wrote there are most likely white American and the girls who chase them although hypergamous are not much sluts compared to American women. 1st/2nd Gen immigrants usually if not always are trying to assimilate into the country genes wise, socially and economically. That is why they are so 'sweet' because their men are their ticket.

I could also do the same to a lower degree (im not white) in Mexico because of my economic power and citizenship. It all boils down to hypergamy.

[–]TRP Vanguardss_camaro1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is the backdrop that made Roosh so successful in Iceland. The sluts line up at the port when the sailors come in. They ain't looking for love, just sperm (or a walking, jive-talkin' PUA dildo). The matriarchy has them covered 4 life.

The irony of Scandinavia is that their taxes are so high to provide those gold-plated benefits that it’s almost impossible for a man to compete with the government as a provider. The government cockblocks its own male citizens, who have the indignity of having to pay for the cockblocking. Is it any surprise that the biggest sluts in the world exist in Scandinavia? Why be a good woman when the government will bail your slutty behavior out? Their governments are too beta for sluts to fail.

Redpill all the way:

It’s much easier to choose a bi-annual visit to a welfare office to get monies directly deposited in a bank account while succumbing to whorish tendencies than to serve one man and ensure that his marital investment is paying off. If there is no potential for the woman to endure financial hardship after getting kicked to the curb for being lazy, foul, or unattractive, then the institution of marriage will collapse. There would be no incentive for it.

Good question (don't marry):

This is all good, but once you find the dream wife, do you bring her to the West, where she would quickly be spoiled by her spiteful sisters? This was even observed by Eddie Murphy in the 1980s:

Or do you settle with her in her shithole? If so – how do you maintain your income which is perhaps 90% of the reason she chose you. If you lose that, she’d be gone with a quickness.

Money talks and...

I live in NYC. I knew a graduate school educated asian girl in a long term relationship, who also signed up to be on a waiting list for NYCHA (govt. subsidized low-income housing). Once she was guaranteed housing, she kicked her beta boyfriend (white guy) to the curb so fast, his head never stopped spinning. Now that she could keep her (low wage) nonprofit job and have her rent subsidized, he was no longer needed. Cock Carousel for Life, baby!

[–]TRP Vanguardtheubercuber0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Dig the new bedazzling on the site

[–]RedSunBlue0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Seconded, however, the red pill theory icon looks like a red pill plus a crude ASCII depiction of butt cheeks and a penis from afar.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter