699,178 posts

SMV Ratios & Attachment - Rational Male "[These women] crave the SMV imbalance that a dominant Alpha would satisfy, yet through their own ego investments... must relegate themselves to being the less necessitous person in their LTR."

Reddit View
June 22, 2013
16 upvotes
http://therationalmale.com/2013/06/20/smv-ratios-attachment/


Post Information
Title SMV Ratios & Attachment - Rational Male "[These women] crave the SMV imbalance that a dominant Alpha would satisfy, yet through their own ego investments... must relegate themselves to being the less necessitous person in their LTR."
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 16
Comments 14
Date 22 June 2013 06:12 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit askTRP
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/174927
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1gv6vi/smv_ratios_attachment_rational_male_these_women/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
alphalong term relationshipsexual market valuedominance
Comments

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

[–]telnet_reddit_80 -3 points-2 points  (5 children) | Copy

is there actually anything backing this thing?

Please, peruse our archives.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]telnet_reddit_80 -3 points-2 points  (3 children) | Copy

blog to backup a blog

This "blog" begins with a link to a peer-reviewed scientific paper, you fucking illiterate moron. Except it's better because the guy bothered to plot the data in a similar fashion to OP so it's easy to spot relevancy.

But you don't care, right? Because you don't really want to know, you just want to whine about lack of sources. And now I have wasted five precious minutes of my time trying to provide you with information.

[–]MSoftHarem 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

You can have some solace in the fact that he will be banned shortly.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]telnet_reddit_80 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The paper has nothing to do with what the blog was attempting to state.

Nothing at all.

I offer the graph (data drawn from the paper linked above)

[–]Modredpillschool[S,M] -4 points-3 points  (5 children) | Copy

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Modredpillschool[S] -1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy

Nil.

How did you come to this conclusion? I'm looking for sources here.

[–]fuk_offe 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Touche in a way...

[–][deleted] 4 points4 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Modredpillschool[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

No, you're just a moron.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter