699,178 posts

Alpha Game: Sexist men make better dads

Reddit View
August 19, 2013
17 upvotes
http://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/2013/08/sexist-men-make-better-dads.html


Post Information
Title Alpha Game: Sexist men make better dads
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 17
Comments 35
Date 19 August 2013 07:15 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/174961
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1kokrv/alpha_game_sexist_men_make_better_dads/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
alphagamethe red pill
Comments

[–]JohnPeel3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

"Sexist"

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I would think this would be obvious. Alpha males are generally labeled as sexist by the feminist agenda. Alpha males are manly men who exercise, are confident, successful, and most of all believe in traditional societal values either because of religious reasons or because they are redpill naturally and will likely pass on these values to their children either consciously or unconsciously.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself0 points1 point  (15 children) | Copy

It's borderline abuse what some boys go through living under a rabid feminist single mother regime.

[–]Offensive_Brute3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

it doesnt even have to be directly feminist, and its definitely not the boys alone. the gutters of our society are littered with the female victims o broken homes as well.

[–][deleted] 5 points5 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy

Yes. Someone forced them to indoctrinate their male children for the crime of being born male.

Go back to your passive aggressive bitch-fest in /r/thebluepill, SRSer

[–][deleted] 4 points4 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

To take anything out on their child (the point you keep avoiding to address the wiminz) is inane and abusive.

I'm talking about rabid feminist single mothers abusing their male children. You're hamstering it around as an attack on all single mothers and blaming men for it. Typical.

[–]Thai_Hammer-2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy

To take anything out on their child (the point you keep avoiding to address the wiminz) is inane and abusive

Yes, the same should go for men who do the same kinda of abuse. However, it's wrong to assume that feminism is more abusive then other forms of mental and emotional abuse. There could viably be some residual abuse but to focus on feminism compared to the other reasons is shallow.

You're hamstering

Like Richard Gere? (Isn't it unfortunate that that is still associated with him?) And I have no idea what hamstering means.

around as an attack on all single mothers and blaming men for it.

Again, it's looking at the situations and trying to understand them. Not all women make the choice to be single mothers, there are some circumstances. And not all single mothers are always single mothers forever. Yes, there maybe times when there are extreme feminists who do that, but there are situation when that is not the case. Give people some benefit of the doubt and really try to understand the situation.

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

However, it's wrong to assume that feminism is more abusive then other forms of mental and emotional abuse. There could viably be some residual abuse but to focus on feminism compared to the other reasons is shallow.

I never assumed it's more abusive. Stop putting words in my mouth. Abuse is abuse. Dick-measuring about which is worse is not my intention.

And I have no idea what hamstering means.

Ignorance is not a defense. Go look it up yourself. I know you're a troll from the troll alter-ego sub. If you're going to stalk a sub, at least know your enemy.

Yes, there maybe times when there are extreme feminists who do that, but there are situation when that is not the case.

And those are the situations I was talking about. Stop making it like an attack on all women or whatever solipsistic shit you're conjuring. A male child in a single-mother household is already at a disadvantage, even if she's great. A male child in a feminist male-bashing single-mother household has a lot of baggage to overcome later on.

[–]Thai_Hammer-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

So just to clarify, you believe that a

rabid feminist single mother regime

is as abusive as any other form of abuse? I just want to make that clarification. And it's the rabid feminist in particular that are leading this charge of abuse by forming a regime of single mothers the indoctrinate their sons...

Also, I apologize for not knowing your lingo, though if you are speaking to someone who is on the outside, it doesn't hurt to change it up a bit. I understand if I should be at your level, but I am not.

Also, how exactly am I a troll. There were points made that I disagreed with and I am trying to have a calm and rational discussion on why I don't believe those points.

Also I take note with this

A male child in a single-mother household is already at a disadvantage, even if she's great. A male child in a feminist male-bashing single-mother household has a lot of baggage to overcome later on.

You would agree that a home of a female child where a single father was women-bashing would be as destructive correct?

[–]REDDITCanSuckMyCOCK 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

By far the most of them did. (That "80% of divorces iniated by woman" stastistic I keep hearing about)

It is pretty much such a large amount of single-mothers that did it to themselves that there is little need for your politically correct bullshit about how not all women are like that

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

Because women were on the cock carousal chasing irresponsible alpha cock doesn't mean they aren't exempt from the consequences if the deadbeat guy skips out on her. She has an array of options to deal with it. Abortion, adoption, safe zones, etc. To deny those options means to take responsibility for raising the child.

[–]Thai_Hammer-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy

So, why shouldn't the deadbeat guy take up his responsibility?

He is as responsible for bringing in the child so why shouldn't he take responsibility?

If he knows it's more of a disadvantage for a child, let along whatever gender it is, to be raised by a single mother, why doesn't he take responsibility too?

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

He does, by government thug gunpoint, only if she chooses to have the child. This is by wealth-transfer schemes that are completely unaccountable. Her body, her choice, his responsibiliity. Nice setup, huh?

[–]Thai_Hammer-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Haven't you seen Knocked-Up? Even in a comedy, just learn to take responsibility and both of you learn to compromise.

[–]puck_mar1n-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

I always assumed that this was just common sense. Kids that grow up in a household where the man is "head of the house" tend to be better adjusted, do better in school, etc... compared to kids who grow up in households where there is no father figure.

That's not to say that single parents can't be good parents but kids who grow up without a father figure are missing something. Without making this a racial issue, look at african american families. In those families the majority of dads are absent (for one reason or another) and kids are raised by their mother. There's a higher rate of crime and lower performance in school seen in AA kids and I think this is directly related to the culture of single-parent families.

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well this thread got SRS brigaded quickly.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (14 children) | Copy

Now, from an actual scientific perspective, both studies are complete junk

Most leftoid studies on gender are.

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Chased the studies down several links and still couldn't find the definition of "sexist." I'm assuming it's something along the lines of "dominant and doesn't fail shit-tests"



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter