This is for all the Spergs on MRP- you know who you are. I have been reading Rollos series on The Reconstruction (parts 1-3). In it he discusses the factors that play into whether men will have a successful outcome to their (current) marriage when they run the MRP plan.

Rollo identifies two groups of men:

Defeated Alphas- this is the group of “Alpha-esque” men who were strong, had a mission in life, and great sex at least in the beginning.

Beta In Waiting- this group of thoroughly Beta men were they guys who waited patiently until their oneitis got tired of being pumped and dumped and they were “selected” by their prize.

He concludes that a Defeated Alpha has a much easier time running a MAP in marriage because the wife has seen (and felt/experienced) you as an Alpha. However, if you have always been Beta, several in the comments claim that there is no way to come back from that. Rollo disagrees and claims that the earlier level of Beta determines the Shit Testing and fighting the woman will put up to maintain her dominate frame BUT that a true transformation in a man can cause a true transformation in a relationship.

I have come up with a VERY ROUGH quantitative formula that appears somewhat precise and marginally accurate. The concept is simple:

Multiply the factors that go into how “Alpha” you are then divide how your wife perceives your level of “Alpha.”

This is the formula but I am certain the variables are not arranged exactly right. Probably needs additional number constants and to weight the variables better according to how important they are. Ideally the formula would be greatly simplified but I have my doubts.

The most simple form of the equation is:

(Amount of Alpha Fucks) / (Her perceptions and feels) = Chance of “marriage saving” MAP

The somewhat more complex formula I have is this:

[(2NHP WTGL %DNGAF) (ASW) C] / [3NWP WAM RD%]

= A value reflecting the chance of a successful MAP that includes staying married

Top Variables- NOTE: These variables weight your “alpha” quotient and these are the variables you can control!!!

NHP = Number of Husband’s Partners (lifetime): This is weighted double (i.e. * 2)

WTGL = Weeks to get laid, how many weeks it would take the man to find another soft, slimy hole to fill.

%DNGAF= Percent of Fucks that you no longer give expressed as a number between 1 and 10 (i.e. 30% =3; 70% = 7)

ASW = Average Sex / Week (number of times you have sex per week with your wife currently)

Bottom Variables- NOTE: You have NO control over these variables after you choose a wife. None! So choose carefully.

These are:

NWP= Number of Wife’s lifetime partners before marriage. This is not weighted by a multiple of 3 because of the well known manosphere convention (women lie so always multiply their claimed “n” by 3) but because this number is so important! I tried squaring it but that really screwed up the scale.

WAM= Women’s Age @ Marriage (I feel this should be weighted differently than just the number. Something like a logarithmic scale after age 29?

RD%= Ratio of Denials Percent (Nearest tenth whole number so denied 30% = 3)

Let us break it down.

The top variables are your objective level of Alpha. The bottom variables weight how the wife views you in terms of fuckable Alpha. The more lifetime partners she has, the harder she will poke and fight (aka “Shit Test”) a “true”TM Alpha and the more viciously and dismissively she will treat a Beta. Contrary to manosphere lore, once she has been run through a mile of cock it doesn’t necessarily mean she is ruined. However, like swinging and cucking, you have to be the biggest dick in the room to pull it off. A woman with 50 partners is almost never going to be happy with a man who only had 10. Similarly, the older she is at the time of marriage, the harder you will have to work before she can see you as “Alpha.” Alpha’s don’t marry post wall women, Betas line up to do that horrible thing. Together these factors roughly determine the “Alpha Viewing Quotient.”

Finally, there is the fudge factor “C.” I call it: The Cuntological Constant. It was a risk but I ultimately decided on excluding this term because the equation was already complicated. Not including this term may turn out to be my greatest error (bonus points to whoever gets the joke but you will need to stand on the shoulders of giants to do pull it off). In simple terms, C references the degree to which feminism has infected the wife and accordingly how big of a feminazi yougogirl cunt she is. Of course this depends on several factors from whether her parents are still together, the role of her father in life, her involvement in feminism and feminists ideals, education, degree, her friends and family, and religiosity. Therefore it is not really a “constant” but varies by each woman and is a “constant” only in the sense that it cannot be changed and it remains relatively constant in a given woman.

This is the workbook for a dry run of this formula:

Example1: Chad Thundercock- Let’s say we have a wife with 10 lifetime partners who married a man at age 22 with 20 lifetime partners. He is a stud and could get laid within hours if he chose. This guy is Chad and he really doesn’t Give much Fucks at all- perhaps 20% and he almost never gets turned down for sex which he has 4 times a week with a ratio of denials of just 10%. Thus eliminating C (because it is constant in this particular woman) we get:

[(2NHP WTGL %DNGAF) (ASW) C] / [3NWP WAM RD%]

2(20) 1 20 4 / 3(10) 22 * 1 = 3200 / 660 = 4.84

Example2: Billy Beta- Wife with 20 lifetime partners who married a man at age 30 with 4 lifetime partners. Billy couldn’t get laid for months in his present state. For ease of comparison we will say Billy is really pissed off so he gives the same amount of fucks as Chad (20%). Billy gets laid twice a month whether he wants it or not and then only reluctantly and gets turned down about 50% of the time when he initiates.

[(2NHP WTGL %DNGAF) (ASW) C] / [3NWP WAM RD%]

2(4) 26 20 .5 / 3(20) 30 * 5 = 2080 / 9000 = .23

Example3: Bluepillprofessor- wife with 5 lifetime partners married a man at age 25 with 12 lifetime partners. After 3 years of MRP I could pull another hotty in less than a month and possibly in a week or less so I will arbitrarily assign the number 3. Again we will use 20% as the number of fucks given though I am probably much higher than that arbitrary number.

[(2NHP WTGL %DNGAF) (ASW) C] / [3NWP WAM RD%]

2(12) 3 20 2 / 3(5) 25 * 2 = 1440 / 750 = 1.92

SUMMARY:

CHAD: 4.84

BETA: .23

BPP: 1.92

Conclusion: This formula appears to provide a rough numerical estimate of the likelihood of “Saving” your low sex marriage. It takes into account the Alpha that you are currently, and divides by the perception of Alpha you have given the wife. This is an extremely rough guess and the variables do not appear to be weighted exactly right. However, it provides the first ever quantitative method to estimate ow much work will be required to “Save Your Marriage.” The data is insufficient to develop a full scale at this time but from a first glance it appears that any score below about 1.0 suggests a rough ride so buckle up.