Just two days ago, I was told I was being alarmist for posting "Straight Men Will Soon Be Called Homophobic For Not Sleeping With Gays And Trannies." You can't make this shit up.

Reddit View
January 12, 2018

Post Information
Title Just two days ago, I was told I was being alarmist for posting "Straight Men Will Soon Be Called Homophobic For Not Sleeping With Gays And Trannies." You can't make this shit up.
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 528
Comments 172
Date 12 January 2018 09:42 PM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/226698
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/7pzyqt/just_two_days_ago_i_was_told_i_was_being_alarmist/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pill

[–]Phixer7395 points396 points  (50 children) | Copy

These people can't even accept someone who votes differently, yet they want straight men to accept and date someone whose mutilated their genitals to appear like a faux vagina. The mental illness of these people is astonishing.

[–]doklaan211 points212 points  (33 children) | Copy

Meanwhile, it’s a-ok for women to reject short men.

[–]swift_phoenix57 points58 points  (7 children) | Copy

I think the quote is: "If it were not for double standards, they would have no standards" - They in case can be women, liberals, these new 21st century beings. Their ability to mental gymnastics if could be transferred to physical gymnastics, would win all the gold medals in the world.

[–]pill_thrower20 points21 points  (3 children) | Copy

Some think it's shallow(or rather, people will give them shit for it) so they say "oh it has nothing do with his height/money/big dick, I just really like him, we are just so compatible!". They keep it vague.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (2 children) | Copy

Same thing when a woman tells people she likes a guy who is sensitive and treats her like a princess. Read as “I wish Chad was sensitive and treated me like a princess”.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

But then he wouldn't be Chad as per their own definition. If women were computers they would be caught in a logic loop and be deemed worthless.

[–]NationalLurkersParty0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yep they want to have their cake and eat it too. Doesn't help that feminists have been brainwashing them that having any sort of logical consistency is part of the "oppressive patriarchy". This is one of the main points that redpilled me.

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (8 children) | Copy

Short, skinny, fat, nerdy, poor, has acne, too tall, shy, creepy, abusive, weird, gamer, trump supporter, bad dresser etc, etc

[–]ShadowOfAnIdea1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

To be fair, corporate executives, sperm banks, and my high school basketball team (mfs) also do this.

[–]1swaglordobama-4 points-3 points  (10 children) | Copy

Nobody gets rejected just because they are short. You get shit tested on your shortcomings. If you fail the shit test by displaying insecurity or becoming reactive then the girl rejects you.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours20 points21 points  (5 children) | Copy

I have been rejected solely on my height, some bitches are like that. It happened just last year, and the bitch is delusional about what she thinks she deserves. Other bitches don't care or aren't so shallow, yeah I get laid easily but I understand that some bitches will reject me simply because I'm not even close to 6'. It's reality, it's going to happen sometime, but not all the time. Some guys like fat chicks, I like thin ones, fat girls don't have much chance with me, that's the way it is. Confidence only takes you so far, if the bitch isn't interested, confidence is not going to change her mind.

You can let it get to you and piss you off, but it's better to simply ignore the bitch and go fuck one that is interested.

[–]swaglordobama 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

You literally sound retarded when you call women bitches and brag about getting laid. It's like a guy with a bit of wealth bragging about his money. It just comes across as vain.

You have a valid point, though; if the chick isn't into you, she isn't into you. There's dark game you can run to change her mind, but rejection isn't rejection; it's a mismatch of personalities and intentions.

For example, you open a girl who is on her way to the bathroom or to meet her friends. She blows you off. Why? Because you're an obstacle to her goal at that moment.

You could open a girl who just got news her mom died and doesn't want to deal with your shit. You're an obstacle to her goal. It's not actual rejection.

You could open a girl and just have no chemistry. It's a bad match. You wouldn't be good together. It's not rejection.

You could just not be her type. I have female friends who almost never hook up with white guys. Some of them only like asians. Some only like black or brown guys. Some love guys with tattoos. Some love guys from a certain country.

On the contrary, a girl can be attracted to you because whatever trait you have may be her type.

So the girl being uninterested can happen for a variety of reasons. As long as you have some swagger, you're good. The rest is largely out of your control. As you said, you can't let it get to you and piss you off.

[–]party_next_door1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Your method of addressing him was

Step 1 belittle him and bring him down to earth (that's the nicest way to put it I feel)

Step 2 Preach some bullshit to him

[–]1swaglordobama-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Your method of addressing me is ignoring the content of my post. I addressed what he said and expanded on it. What did you contribute?

[–]blacklightsleaze0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

You sound like some 20yo who just discovered some puck-up red pill shit.

[–]Do not send modmail to my personal inboxCrazyHorseInvincible[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Annnnd ya blew it.

[–]Jofarr10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

ur getting downvoted for the truth. being short is a strike against, but the powerful will overcome.

[–]1nzgs5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy

Women reject based on height all the time, maybe more often than any other criteria. Only really blue pilled idiots from the PUA crowd think height doesn't matter.

[–]1swaglordobama1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Your height is not something you can control. Therefore, even if it does matter to some girls, it doesn't matter. Do you understand?

The only things that matter are things you can control. For the rest you are better off having a delusional blindspot than a dumb excuse and a limiting belief.

TRP is PUA, don't kid yourself. Its model is get fit, dress nicely, cold approach get tinder, direct game, strip the girl of validation, get a fuck buddy.

[–]Do not send modmail to my personal inboxCrazyHorseInvincible[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Your height is not something you can control. Therefore, even if it does matter to some girls, it doesn't matter. Do you understand?


[–]everyone_wins33 points34 points  (8 children) | Copy

Sometimes they don't even have a faux vagina.

[–]ShotgunTRP36 points37 points  (1 child) | Copy

The vast majority. Surgery is not cheap

[–]xXx420VTECxXx3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

They should just cut their wallet in half and turn it inside out.

[–]Kinbaku_enthusiast11 points12 points  (4 children) | Copy

No bleeding wound that has to "dilated" painfully multiple times per day so the skin doesn't regrow back together and that has hairballs and other junk that has to be peeled out from time to time? I don't get how people can live without faux vaginas

[–]asymptotic_salvation8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy

That's fascinating. Where do I find out about the maintenance of a faux vagina?

[–]Kinbaku_enthusiast9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy

Not for the weak of heart



And for a more bluepill sanitized version:


[–]asymptotic_salvation2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Baffling. Thanks for the links.

[–]mathmatical_games0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah, the one's with dicks are the ones I like too

[–]ShadowOfAnIdea5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Do they, though? I live in a notoriously liberal area and have never seen anyone get slammed for not wanting to fuck a tranny... In fact I would guess there is still a stigma against it even among sjw types, most of whom would not fuck trannies

[–]Self-honest5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy

The most simple way I can describe my position is that it just doesn't get my dick hard. I can't fuck something with a soft dick, so I don't see the need for any further discussion.

[–]Phixer71 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

They are gonna come back with. Just bend over and take this hard pounding you don't need to be hard for that.

[–]Self-honest5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Hahahaha. If somebody brings their dick around me, they're getting some cheap and effective gender reassignment surgery to say the least.

[–]Makakua2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

On the other hand, somehow, gay men have to accept the fake clit-turned-"dick" that trans men have? If I can even call them men.

Stop trying to be something you're not. You were never a man, you're not a man, and you're never going to be a man. Though, if you still want to do weird shit with your body, don't involve me jn jt.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

yet they want straight men to accept and date someone whose mutilated their genitals to appear like a faux vagina

Not even. A lot of these transgenders keep their Penises/Vaginas and maintain the full reproductive capability of their original sex.

So they are literally telling a straight man who prefers vagina, to get down and suck a dick once in a while.

[–]2Dmva10071 points72 points  (0 children) | Copy

He should've used metoo against the trans person.

Error report! Umm sir, you can only be a woman and use this Twitter hashtag on white males.

[–][deleted] 70 points71 points  (9 children) | Copy

India was later seen telling another guest that "all this superficial stuff that you are a woman and all that sounds great and is the right thing to say. But it makes no difference if people don't believe it - that's the problem."

if you don't share their delusion, you're a bigot transbasher.

The majority of straight men are worried about what society thinks of them if they date a trans woman

i give zero fucks what society thinks. i don't date crazy bitches. trans people have emotional disorders.

[–][deleted] 32 points33 points  (5 children) | Copy

And in a lot of cases dicks bro

[–]throwlaca16 points17 points  (2 children) | Copy

I just don't date men, even if they have vaginas and tits. I don't date men, what's so hard to understand?

[–]Self-honest8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

That is so truthful it hurts them. You're a man. That's why I'm not interested. You think you're a woman, but you're a man.

[–]throwlaca0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

She want to think she's a woman, fine with me.

I just won't date her because I don't like her.

[–]fearl3ss0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I definitely date crazy women, so send them my way.

Trans people - hell NO!

[–]Luckylancer960 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

If most of people believe in delusion, is your reality became the delusion?

*Inserts "enjoy the decline" music CD

[–]trapaik0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

If you don’t share their delusion, perfectly worded.

[–]1TheProphetPhysiquiel74 points75 points  (4 children) | Copy

What's hilarious/frustrating is all these people on the left don't realize how hypocritical they're being about this issue. How dare you criticize gays for their sexual preference, how dare you criticize transgender folks for their decision, how dare you reject the notion that there are more than two genders.

What's that? A heterosexual man's sexual preference is someone other than you, a fellow (biological) man? SHAME ON YOU AND YOUR FAMILY.

The point of this LGBT123R-E-S-P-E-C-T movement is, quite literally, to respect everyone's sexual preferences. Unless you're not a victim, then go fuck yourself.

[–]Pope_Lucious10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy

Everyone is equal. Some are more equal than others.

[–]Achillesreincarnated3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Cognitive dissonance is a commonality amongst feminists

[–]Millixaw-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

When everyone's a victim, no one is.

[–]1IDGAFMentality125 points126 points  (30 children) | Copy

What a fucking disgrace. If anything transgender individuals should be required by law to disclose the fact that they are transgender. I would be horrified to find out that a woman I had fucked wasn't a woman at all.

The notion that my refusal as a straight dude to date a transgender "woman" can be considered discriminatory is ludicrous. It is exceedingly sad and worrisome to see how far feminist propaganda and leftist ideals can be pushed onto our society. It started with the whole LGBTQ rights bullshit, then the legalization of such practices, but now it has interfered and clashed with the interests of heterosexual individuals, which is not acceptable. I feel like originally feminists began to stress test our society, to see how far we would bend, and then, realizing our society is full of pussies and retards who wouldn't dare attempt to stop them for fear of reprisal, decided to fuck our society just because they could.

During WW2, when Hitler began marching through Europe, invading and shitting on any country he chose, the rest of the world sat with their dicks in their hands, praising the merits of appeasement. We all know how that shit worked out. Feminists are degrading and replacing the virtuous and unifying ideals of past generations. And most of our society is too scared to do a fucking thing.

[–]Endorsed ContributorMarsupian27 points28 points  (2 children) | Copy

It's probably not even on purpose or planned. It's just what toddlers do. They test for boundaries to find security. Modern feminism is largely women collectively looking for boundaries to find security. It's in the best intrest of both men and women that a firm line is drawn.

A bunch of fucking pussies and big corps/interests afraid of negative media are destroying society.

Btw. This specific example is clearly manufactured drama but the fact it's considered a news story shows the insanity of the media. At the end of the day there are people influenced by this and gradually this will become the new normal where this garbage is seen as a valid discussion to have.

[–]1IDGAFMentality8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

Exactly. Feminism is an example of a complete regression of logic and intellectual thought, which equates them to the mental level of a toddler, and rendering them useless to society. Toddlers cry, whine, manipulate, and wear down a parent to attempt to get what they want.

I agree, this specific example is more of an extreme for the present time. However, as you noted, the fact that an article from a major news source which millions view would even take the time to write such an article hints at the potential to become a future problem, and I guarantee some people reading this article agreed with the sentiment of that pathetic trans woman.

[–]Makakua34 points35 points  (4 children) | Copy

I hate it when feminists use gay men to advance their agenda. Aside from the "queen" minority, most of us just want to live our lives too. But noooo. Somehow, by virtue of being gay, we have to accept this. Yeah, no thanks.

[–]1IDGAFMentality24 points25 points  (0 children) | Copy

Of course they have to use gay men to advance their agenda. As a collective group, they are incapable of accomplishing anything besides playing the victim and creating issues where they don't exist.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

They did that with us atheists as well, as if I need to conform to their religion because I see no evidence for god. Don't have to be a delusional liberal to be an atheist. I'm a gun living capitalist, so I clash with the idiots who think non believers have to be liberal nuts.

[–]Makakua1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yup. Ideologies (and biology) are not mutually exclusive unless their tenets directly contradict. [Definitions may be a bit wrong. English is not my native language.]

  • (Tenet of being) gay: liking people of the same sex

  • non-feminist: not a feminist

I don't see how both of them conflict.

  • atheist: someone who does not believe in a god

  • capitalist: someone who supports the idea of private property

Doesn't conflict as well.

[–]gELSK-3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy

// , Just accept your status as a powerless victim of oppression or co-option, by turns

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (6 children) | Copy

A trans woman wants to be seen as a woman in their day to day? Fine, I'm a man, I don't give a shit. Live and let live. In the bedroom though?

It kinda freaks me out - no matter how good the treatments are, no matter the cosmetic surgery, even with the really convincing ones, there's still some man left there. And that's some uncanny valley shit, which I can't cross. They're in that inbetween world, because it takes more than surgery and hormones to completely remove what started off as mostly man. Some people like that in between world. I wish it was for me. It's not.

Maybe it's possible to completely cross over, but I haven't seen it yet. Give it fifty years when we have DNA splicing and all sorts of organ growth mechanisms, could be interesting. I don't see why life shouldn't be lived like a role play game, you want to live and experience life as a woman for a few years or forever? Go nuts. Likewise the reverse.

You don't have to be a weasley appeaser to find a middle ground. Identity matters to people. Gender is really fucking weird.

You got all sorts of intersex chromosomes, you got weird hormones in the milk and water and food, and then you just got straight up culture and trends. It's unfair to say it's exclusively mental illness - hormones do crazy things. The crazy kicker is this: testosterone and estrogen are fairly similar chemically: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/Testosteron.svg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/00/Estradiol.svg

It's possible for something to come in and kick that testosterone ketone down into a estrogen hydroxyl, freeing up the methyl group. One possible mechanism: Your own hormonal system could be stealing all the calcium from your bones, knocking some strong base into your testosterone, and converting some testosterone over to estrogen. Then now you've got a man who "doesn't feel right inside his body". Well, no shit, his body's been fucking over his bodily chemistry by possibly producing too much slightly too much base to regulate some nerve system somewhere, breaking down his testosterone into estrogen.

P.S: If you can't tell a fake vagina from a real one, you clearly haven't seen trans vaginas. They're not very convincing.

[–]1IDGAFMentality8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

You raise a very interesting point. However, even if trans people can transform themselves into something they're not and should not be both physically and chemically, they still retain the consciousness and behavior of the entity they chose to change from.

Trans people can do whatever they want, and I believe they should have the right to mutilate themselves however they deem fit. However, when their choice interferes with my ability to live my life I have a problem, which is the bottom line.

I've never seen a trans vagina, nor do I ever desire to. But good to know that it doesn't look real ;)

[–]Koryphae_5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy

It's not too hard for something to come in and kick that testosterone ketone down into a estrogen hydroxyl, freeing up the methyl group. One possible mechanism: Your own hormonal system could be stealing all the calcium from your bones, knocking that calcium hydroxide into your testosterone, and converting some testosterone over to estrogen. Then now you've got a man who "doesn't feel right inside his body". Well, no shit, his body's been fucking over his bodily chemistry by possibly producing too much slightly too much base to regulate some nerve system somewhere, breaking down his testosterone into estrogen.

Stop spewing nonsense please. Even in chemistry lab it would be extremely difficult to reduce the carbon exclusively to which the methyl group you are refering to is bonded.

Besides, there is a hormonal balance of "sex hormones" in both men and women. And given how complex our bodies are, I am sure we have a way to counterbalance, if needed to, the amount of hormones, so I find your theory of 'anything converting our precious testosterone into estrogen' quite close to fantasy.

And yes, you could argue that "Oh average testosterone has decreased greately and we have estrogen mimicing compounds in foods so that must be it!". Much more realistic cause of that is the current diet when we are ingesting low amount of healthy fats (i.e. precursors for hormone synthesis) and energy dense foods which cause obesity and alcohol which is a testosterone killer on its own.

[–]Skyhawk_And_Skyhead6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

No he is 100% right. The enzyme aromatase breaks down testosterone into estrogen. The body has ways to regulate hormones but it is really easy to mess them up.

[–]beginner_1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Exactly and that is why roiding it up has to be done with caution so you dont end up with man boobs

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Good catch. That mechanism is unlikely - I should've checked it. You'd need a different base, like LAH (which probably isn't too common in blood). But things get weird with enzymes - see below:

This does 100% happen:

A base attacks the methyl group instead, forcing the ring below to go cyclic. That in turn pushes the lower density of electrons on the carbon side of the CO bond, back up to its oxygen (where it doesn't really want to be), where it'll immediately attract a hydrogen from the aqueous solution it is in.

It's perfectly reasonable that a few male bodies could overproduce aromatase. That's one possible mechanism for disassociative gender identity. The current diet might lead to that mechanism being triggered. Or it could be a gene being a bit too eager to express itself.


[–]Koryphae_0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It's perfectly reasonable that a few male bodies could overproduce aromatase.

Enzyme kinetics does not work this way. At least from the standpoint of Michaelis-Menten approach. Limiting step is enzyme-substrate complex formation. That means it does not matter if you have 10 times more of the enzyme, the reaction will come to a steady state at some point.

Look, I do not know biochemical basis of transexuality, nobody really does I guess, but the reason is certainly not some one messed up enzyme production, it must be a myriad of reasons.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy

I have 6 trans friends, really. If you can't tell they use to have outdoor plumbing, you're blind. Of course, none of them are from Thailand. One wants to fuck me very badly, not happening because the shape of a male is not even slightly arousing to me. No problem, we're still friends. Yes something is off in their heads, but there is nothing to fear from them. It's not like they want everyone to be like them, that's what sjws want.

It's the sjw fucks who want to make us conform to their ideology that is the problem, trannies want to live their lives and not be harassed or beaten because they aren't like us. The cunt who wrote that article is probably one of those she fucks.

[–]Tesrali0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

here here I have a bud at work who transitioned to woman. I would not accept a blow-job under any conditions.

If you're approached by an SJW at work though, just say you don't find Transexual X attractive and drop the subject. They're concern trolling ALWAYS. They just want to fuck you over and take what you've got. All of this stuff is fucking bullshit---its used to advance secondary agendas.

Incidentally, false morality is what turned me off of Republicans in general. All of the moral hogwash when they're a bunch of fucking rats with no honor. (Maybe someone like Ron Paul had honor...)

Fuck the gays! Then get caught blowing a dude in a bathroom. I'm sure the guy got some VOTES though.

Politicians are all concern trolling, along with people in the workforce who are concern trolling to get you fucked out of your job.

Don't bite unless you wanna take em' to court. In fact, call out the fact that they're concern trolling.....

[–]P10001230 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Shouldn't you stand your ground here? This is how they further their agenda. "I don't trans-women". Can't that be enough? Or do they attack you that you don't believe trans-women are real women? If that's the case, shouldn't your reply be "Duh"?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy

Correction: the USA sat with their dick in their hand. Plenty of there countries got stuck in

[–]1IDGAFMentality0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

I think lots of countries sat with their dicks in their hands. The United States, Canada, all of Western Europe, even places like Australia and, as it embraces an increasing amount of western values, China. The countries that aren't afflicted by feminism today are not the ones who stepped in, but rather the ones who largely have rejected many Western ideals and cultural values and already had institutions to combat feminist ideals. Places like Eastern Europe (Russia especially) will just send in their police force to beat the shit out of feminist protesters. Problem solved.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

The UK? They stepped in immediately yet are afflicted by feminism. There's really no relation between the two

[–]ChuckRock1230 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Australia also joined WW2 2 days after Hitler invaded Poland. Feminism has ran rife here too.

[–]1IDGAFMentality-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

I think my wording was somewhat vague. I meant the whole WW2 anaology as an example that appeasement doesn't work, not that there is a correlation between countries that entered WW2 and the prevalence of feminism within those countries. I was trying to convey that many western countries like the US, the UK, and very liberal places like Sweden are sitting with their dicks in their hands currently, and in some cases, even contributing to the spread of feminist ideals, while countries who do not embrace western values (Russia) are showing opposition, which has proven itself to be effective.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Correction: the USA sat with their dick in their hand. Plenty of other countries got stuck in

[–]xdppthrowaway9001x 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

I'm not sure why you're trying to make a Hitler comparison, but it seems like a case of psychological projection. The nazis share your views about LGBTQ and trans people.

[–]1IDGAFMentality0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I merely offered an example of probably the most prominent case in which appeasement failed. Claiming that I share Nazi views on LGBTQ individuals and trans people is a very unfounded and misguided statement. I believe that both LGBTQ and trans people can do whatever the fuck they want; I only object if their agenda interferes with my ability to exist as a straight male. You sound like a feminist calling me a Nazi buddy boy.

[–]xdppthrowaway9001x-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Claiming that I share Nazi views on LGBTQ individuals and trans people is a very unfounded and misguided statement

You do. It's literally in your post. You called LGBTQ rights bullshit.

I only object if their agenda interferes with my ability to exist as a straight male.

Nobody cares who you fuck. Nobody is coming for your penis.

[–]RedPill1150 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Not nearly as much as we're told. The head of the nazi brown shirts was an openly gay guy. He was only eliminated after the nazis won but the brownshirts were becoming a publicly unpopular liability.

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet31 points32 points  (3 children) | Copy

An acquaintance of mine began dating a psych student who is in on the whole choose-your-own-gender scam.

She seemed harmless at first, but slowly she has begun pulling him into her insanity. Now he addresses her as "xir" or whatever the fuck, and he gets upset if his friends offend her by not doing the same. She has been alienating him slowly, and we see less and less of him.

Just say no to collaborative lies. Just say no to enabling other people's mental illnesses. If someone suggests you're discriminatory for not wanting to fuck a dude who is LARPing as a chick, do them a favour and laugh out loud at them.

[–]3whatsthisgarg4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

a dude who is LARPing as a chick, do them a favour and laugh out loud at them.

Funny stuff. My woman has a friend who is "LARPing as a dude"; I referred to ... this person ... in just the most offensive way. I said I saw HER while I was out. My woman said "oh that is terrible!" while she was laughing.

Just doing my part. I get away with saying the most sexist shit.

[–]RedPill1151 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The primary goal of feminism is not hating men. That's secondary.

The primary goal is to control women. What they think, how they feel, etc. The 2 major areas are making them more profitable by avoiding relationships, and trying to control who they vote for.

It's not surprising that people who love this stuff are out to control others. That's the goal of the narrative.

[–]Fyrjefe1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I think the telling part was when "Miss SaHHara" dropped the "toxic masculinity" bomb. These people must have deeply internalized those words and thus turned to LARPing.

[–]morebeansplease66 points67 points  (6 children) | Copy

A reality television programme kicked off a debate...

You can make this shit up. You can make it up, blow it out of proportion and then profit selling it on day-time TV. This is nothing more than hate fuel. There are so many more important things to spend our time on.

[–]Senior ContributorMentORPHEUS52 points53 points  (5 children) | Copy

I strongly second this. This is The Red Pill- we don't extrapolate cultural trends from reality shows, right? Right?

Leave this on the scrap heap of pop culture waste, along with the Cash Me Ousside girl and other mouthy 13yos Dr. Phil trots out during Ratings Week.

If this becomes a SERIOUS cultural pressure, I'll be standing along my Red Pill Brothers to fight it. Right now, dialing up a response to 11 over a reality TV show seems more like a failed shit test than a prescient vision of an actual cultural reality.

[–]MarkJohnPaul9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is black and white, and you're both incorrect. Are we going to let everyone who doesn't like us run amuck slandering and assailing the reputation of men however they please, and isolate ourselves in a fortress thus cutting ourselves off from information that's valuable while letting them control the options?

This isn't dialing up to 11, and to reference the first parent comment if this shit is made up that's even worse. They're stirring waters to catch fish and courting attention.

This shit, legitimate or not, is irrational intolerance at best. Furthermore it's through a node which connects itself to millions by only a few degrees of separation, the last thing we need is to wait until it's too late and then end up fighting a losing battle.

TRP sub is 2 things, discussion of sexual strategy and positive identity for men. This falls into the latter and is thus relevant to the sub.

[–]ChampOfTheFuture-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

Agreed. My problem with the OP was not that it was alarmist but click-baitey. Don't engage. Don't give it attention. That's the only way not to fail this particular type of shit-tests.

[–]gELSK-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

// , There are several examples of people banding together to ridicule notions like this during their test phase.

Paying attention to it by pointing and laughing works.

Use the conformist nature of women against them, and they tend to buckle

[–]Dat_Chad-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Cash Me Ousside girl

she's a public speaker and a rapper with millions in the bank now.

[–]rationalthought31426 points27 points  (2 children) | Copy

A chick with a dick makes me sick - I can't help it, I was born that way.

[–]CcyCV 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

There are no chicks with dicks, only men with boobs

[–]1IDGAFMentality5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

There are no chicks with dicks, only guys with tits has a better ring to it ;)

[–]brinkleybuzz16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

Some viewers claimed Ginuwine rebuffing the notion of dating a trans woman was discrimination or transphobia - dislike or fear of transgender people.

I'd ask female supporters of the tranny when was the last time they fucked a short, ugly, poor man. Women are clearly guilty of rampant incelphobia.

[–]Docbear6413 points14 points  (2 children) | Copy

I almost think certain people need to experience some sort of calamity to help bring them back down to earth . People are so in need of conflict , danger, or abrasion that they start imagining new ways to get offended , excluded, and feel outcast.

We talk a lot of shit about third world shit holes but I would argue the struggle to find food, water, and make it another night makes you much more of a human being than these Insane imagined Micro-Mini - Cell level aggressions so many people in our society are trying to paint as real struggle.

[–]throwlaca5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Exactly. Try asking some veteran, or someone from a country devastated by war or disaster, if they feel their gender don't match their sexual preferences. They will laugh at your face. This only happen in the first world, so sheltered people, with absolutely no problem at all, they create their own. It's human nature, the human mind is not prepared to live worry-free.

[–]3whatsthisgarg25 points26 points  (0 children) | Copy

"Let's have a kiss." "No."

How about this: How about if I cut off some of my toes, then ask someone with a foot fetish if they would suck on my feet?

[–]rockmasterflex5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Hey man pretty soon you won't be able to turn a woman down for dating.

Your nonconsent with chicks who resemble the literal dumpster outside mcdonalds will be some kind of social justice issue.

[–]sc16905 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

So, will straight women be called Homophobic for not sleeping with Women with surgically implanted schlongs?

[–]batdh844 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Are women still racist for preferring white guys instead of minorities on tinder?

[–]Johnnyvile7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

I really don’t understand why feminists fighting for supposed female problems ever teamed up with M2F transexuals. These transexuals are kind of stealing their spotlight. They are getting women of the year and shit.

I had this discussion with a woman that has some feminist ideas. I asked why she supports them being that they don’t not face the same issues. A ts doesn’t have to worry about pregnancy so the female fight over abortion, birth control, taxes on tampons, etc. doesn’t apply to them. Gender reassignment issues don’t apply to females.

The only thing they have in common is perceived victimhood. This was also something I didn’t understand about SJWs fighting together with BLM and Mexican immigrants. The issues Mexican immigrants are facing have nothing to do with the issues blacks in America are facing. Again all they have in common is perceived victimhood. It dilutes their real issues and just gets them lumped together as cry baby ass SJWs.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

New World Order being pushed by the elites. Mark my words, these freaks will make everything and anything legal in the future.

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

Who the fuck is "India Willoughby"? I had to google her and she doesn't even have a wikipedia entry, while every z-celebrity already has one.

Just posting some horseshit that a random ugly nutjob has told some paper, will not make your premise any more valid.

It's like all the "evidence" that tumblerinas collect for the evil whit patriarchy.

[–]Endorsed Contributorsqerl7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

An entire culture whose only power is the weaponization of sex. Take the most significant aspect of life (reproduction), then use every ounce of energy to find new ways to prevent men from enjoying what they're born to do. On one hand, it's an effective method to force incels, spergs, and shitholes from propagating the species. On the other, they found a way to recycle all the useless soyboys into a product the other useless soyboys can use.

And if you think sex robots will save you, just wait until they're powered by siri or Google. Then if you say something wrong, the robot performs a sex change for you.

Don't be fooled by the noise lads. Develop yourself and tune out the incessant beat of insanity.

[–]Dat_Chad2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Last girl that rejected me was definitely dickphobic

[–]IronMeltsinmyHands2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

All this mental gymnastics to make trannies seem ok is horse shit. I've never liked em.

People are just asking for moral confusion when they blur the lines between men and women.

[–]fearl3ss2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

From the article:

"The majority of straight men are worried about what society thinks of them if they date a trans woman," she says. "Toxic masculinity makes them violent and rude about their attraction. When you don't fancy someone you should talk about their characteristics. It's not as black and white as many people think it is because whether you are attracted to someone or not is about being attracted to a fellow human being."

Ok, I'll tell you what turns me off about trans women.

  • Your fake pussy. Wtf, are you going to lube it up every 20 minutes? It's the equivalent of making a fake rolex and saying "Isn't it the same as the real thing??" No, it's not the same thing. I'm not interested in fucking it, and I'm DEFINITELY not interested in eating it.
  • They look weird, even attractive ones look bizarre in certain angles. I can't imagine what they look like no make up the morning after...sheesh.
  • Their voices sound weird.

All of these things turn me off. If you're into this type of person because they are "exotic," hey, have fun. It's not for me.

The argument "maybe you'll find one amazing trans woman that really does it for you" is strange to me. It's a bad argument, because it's implying that this happens. Sure, if I find a guy i'm suddenly for some reason attracted to, I guess I would date him. I find that highly unlikely, since I've never been attracted to a man. But logically, yes, that would hold true IF it happened.

Anyways, this is all just bullshit word games, and the only way to win is to not play the game. Calling this kind of bad faith argument out for being bullshit isn't worth the energy.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

This is great and so predictable. Opponents of gay marriage or sex changes have been told for so long not to be such a bigot because nobody is going making you gay or transgender. It won't affect you, so stop worrying. Except now you'll be shamed for wanting to fuck actual women just like men are currently shamed for not wanting to fuck fat women.

SJWs, take note. You're making all those warnings from "right-wing nutjobs" come true.

[–]canadianmooserancher-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lol don't hold your breath

[–]subgamer909 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy

The thing is, who gives a shit what some mentally ill degenerates think about who you want to date? Just tell them my body, my choice

[–]gELSK5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

// , Men don't get that choice, generally

You don't have a say in what happens to your sperm once it leaves your body

[–]Jakei348 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy

Everything is going right down the drain.

What even is America anymore.

[–]losectrl4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Just to be clear, this it's a reality TV show in UK. The ratings for it have been falling for years, so it may even be a set up to gain an audience.

What's more disturbing is the state sponsored leftist BBC is reporting on it.

[–]Sonic3241 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It doesn’t matter if it’s for ratings because it’s still being aired. Whether people realize it or not this shit moves the Overton window.

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points  (0 children) | Copy

America’s been like this for the last 50 years, just in varying degrees and much more noticeable in certain areas of the country. You’re just older now, and presumably mentally stable, so you’re hyper aware of it and going through the anger stage. We’ve all been there.

[–]ThrowFader6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy

deleted What is this?

[–]Kinbaku_enthusiast2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Just critical theory. Though it is mostly part of many people's (unspoken) philosophy, it is NOT western in origin, nor originally pushed by "westerners".

It's as western as French is African, even though it is the official language of the republic of Congo.

[–]Millixaw0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

A lot of the LGB want nothing to do with the T.

For the longest time, the L have never wanted anything to do with the G or B, and far from the T.

Gay men now especially want nothing to do with the T. They're now considered the "Republicans" of the LGBT.

[–]M23W0OH7FV2t3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yes, it is. Discriminatory in the same way that my refusing to date guys is discriminatory.

[–]DonnyThrump4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

Immigration has ruined Britain

[–]2comment2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I think the west has effectively conquered the world and now is really, really, really bored to come up with shit like this.

[–]Kinbaku_enthusiast1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I think most people are simply missing what groups are pushing this, cognizant of what the results would be.

[–]Endorsed Contributorex_addict_bro1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I've seen the comments and the real problem with most of you guys is that you're even discussing that.

There is no "tranny". There is a man dressed like a woman.

There is no "chicks with dicks".

But, there are dudes with tits.

And most of you failed this shit-test. You're discussing if you would fuck a male because he decided to dress differently once.

[–]canadianmooserancher0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Biology is more complicated than that and youre off topic.

Bbc is telling people what they ought to find attractive. How is this different from that christian gay conversion shit?

[–]DonnyThrump1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

How the mighty have fallen. Fucking BBC, the British Broadcasting Channel, a channel that I held to high standards for so long, posted an article about how it is offensive for people who are straight, those who want to stick their dingaling inside a rubber balloon, to not date someone who also has a dingaling. Please don’t fuck up doctor who. I don’t care that Jodie Whittaker is the new doctor, I like her and she seems a good actress. Don’t make it about how unfare people are to women. It’s space and nothing makes sense

[–]Sotemal2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

Just wait, next they'll say you're racist for not sleeping with a different race

[–]Millixaw1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

They already say this. Even in LGBT communities.

[–]ThrowFader0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

deleted What is this?

[–]rektHav0k2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

When you don't fancy someone you should talk about their characteristics.

I agree. The trans-woman characteristic that I find unattractive is their dick.

[–]2comment3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well, there's the entire fact that trans-mutations can't conceive a child... and if one did somehow give birth, I'm not entirely convinced yet the result shouldn't be drowned in the nearest tub.

Most successful guys I know eventually want to start a family, not a circus.

[–]Jackylegss3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Jesus Christ I literally cringed out of the article.

[–]spacedogg1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Trans are really having their moment aren't they

[–]MGTOWManofMystery2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Trannies can have my penis when they wrench it from my cold, dead hands!

[–]Millixaw2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

But then, you would be a trannie too.

[–]TunedtoPerfection3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy

It's simple you can't outright say you didn't want to date them because they are a tranny. You just didn't like them as a person. It does not matter if everyone on earth knows your lying through your teeth about it. As long as you never admit to it, they can't get a foothold to start shaming.

Covert communication is going to be more important then ever in the next few years. The rules of power while be more and more required. Where men seem to falter a lot on this front is getting themselves in a situation where they get asked an unanswerable yet innocent question.

"Would you date a tranny?"

You can not answer this question directly. it's not a fair question so you have to deflect with a disqualifying statement.

"I judge who I date based on personality."

Remember you can always reject dating a specific person, but not a broad group of people. So as long as these questions are broadly focused your answers need to preserve the same tone and coverage base. In general when sensitive topics come up, especially around people that like to push agendas, you always want to control the flow of specifics so that it benefits your side the most.

[–]bitcoin1188-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

Fuck that fag shit. Grow some balls and answet like a man. 'No, I would not date a tranny.' No further explanation needed. If asked say its personal preference

[–]ThrowFader1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

deleted What is this?

[–]gELSK-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

// , If you need to hide behind something, why not pick "I didn't like her music" or "her socks didn't match her belt"

I mean, practically speaking, this is pretty easy. But if you want to shape and direct this sort of thing, and respond to it in a way that benefits you, we need to know about this sort of shit

[–]Eulerbrah3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy

honestly, I don't get what homophobic means. does it mean someone who's scared of homo individuals? I'm not scared of them, I'm just disgusted of them. call me a homophobe all you want. phaggots.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Something-phobic just means a strong aversion to it, e.g. hydrophobic material isn't scared of water.

[–]ThrowFader0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

deleted What is this?

[–]freto2231 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

who cares about what some girl calls you why would you care and how does that improve your smv

[–]gELSK1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

// , This shit affects your day to day life. You also need to be aware of what happens if you end up dating a tranny, or coming into social contact with one.

The risks are there, be aware

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

So organic is no longer the trend?

[–]TheRedPillRipper0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

"Sexual attraction is a response to stimuli - that can be based on any number of things for example waist to hip ratio, certain behaviours, or breast size," Dr Timmins says. "If you have a trans woman who transitions very early on, she may be physically identical to a cis woman at a surface level."

This is the issue. The disconnect between the "surface level" and the physical reality. A trans woman may be physically identical to a cis woman in every way bar the most fundamental difference; his or her's reproductive system.

Sexual attraction is a biological imperative; exposure to stimuli illicit's a physical response. Gender fluidity is a psychological construct. What's fascinating is the social response is framed towards acceptance and tolerance yet there seems to be little focus upon why someone's psychological "gender" deviates from their physical sex. If we address the disconnect all subsequent issues are nullified.

[–]RandomTRPan0n0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Can anyone explain what this is about?

[–]I_WRESTLE_BEARS0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Traps are gay, and I'm a transphobe for not liking dick?

[–]Millixaw0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

The only issue I see is bundling gays and trannies together.

Gay men largely want nothing to do with trans-women (or trans-men, for that matter). Gay men are on your side on this issue.

[–]marinscorp0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Where in the country is this kind of shit taking place? Where I am at you are allowed to like what you like. This shit must be going on in San Fran.

[–]canadianmooserancher0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I think mainstream media needs to focus on trying to remind the greater public that trans people are also people and their murder rates are relatively higher.

But you can't convince people to be a different sexuality. Isn't this the same thing as gay conversion shit?

"You MUST be straight or else!" Was the mantra... and now we forgot and expect dudes to change their sexuality? You cannot negotiate sexual attraction

[–]blacklightsleaze0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I think you are giving too much attention to these trannies. Who gives a fuck what they think.

[–]Sotemal0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Sounds like feminist rage in a different form. Why can't people just mind their own business. If you aren't invited into someones pants you have no business being there or talking about it. I guess if everyone was willing to follow that rule of thumb we wouldn't be having all these arguments in the first place.

[–]Shiva-Lingam0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

So you're either transphobic or you're coerced and pressured into having sex with them even if you don't want to? Yup, that's considered rape only if it applies to women...

[–]freemale101-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

  1. Soon it will be TOO RISKY for a male landlord to collect rent from his female tenant WITHOUT a witness.

  2. Soon it will be TOO RISKY to date a woman and have sex. The only SAFE ZONE for single men to have sex will be a BROTHEL.

[–]shadymcyoloswaggins-3 points-2 points  (2 children) | Copy

I wouldn't say you are alarmist king redpilltool, I would say you are an absolute fucking plamf. What sort tool makes such a broad sweeping Nostradamusesque statement. The type of tool that links an article which at no point proves your point. Did you even read it? The tranny they asked said she was cool with the guys behaviour and the doctor said yeh it's a gray area. Nobody called anybody homophobic, it's ok to unlock your chastity belt.

"Some viewers claimed Ginuwine rebuffing the notion of dating a trans woman was discrimination or transphobia" If you are referring to the BBC writers obvious attempt to portray this as anything more than a fringe issue then for fuck sake get the violin back in the case a grow a pair. Maybe in your world it's a big deal (dunno why your obsessed with trannies), maybe it's a big deal on liberal college campuses in America, maybe on uni campuses in the UK (it's not) but that's it. This is such a low quality post that if you scraped the bottom of the barrel any more you'll hit fuckin concrete.

How about this 'many redpillers have came forward to me and said that redpilltool is an absolute wankstain of the 4th degree' now I can say the red pill community think that redpilltool is a wankstain. Did I do it right?

So I may as well address this total shitshow you've somehow managed to engineer. Everyone agrees the red pill received a big influx of recruits (oh no they found your secret club) but this is beyond a joke. You couldn't run a fuckin bath. What do you say to the guys who have half a brain cell and accessed everyone of the articles on the front page simply by clicking top then all time as is recommended? I would suggest that they don't do what all your lapdogs do and cower around you in fear of losing their pretty little badge (fucking girl scouts have a better system of merit than yours). 'I'm going to add two new flairs this decade' clear the fuckin way Einstein, redpilltool has an idea.

This sub has become what we all agree is one of the most submissive little bitch cults out there; Islam. We have the grand gayatollah redpolltool and his bumchum imams (not all it must be said). Presedntial democracy and parliamentary democracy are the best systems invented yet here you are playing out your Mohamed larp fantasy.

I've checked the rules and my post only breaks one rule. The one which says 'be nice'. Let me just quote one of your imams "Mods can someone please ban this fucking idiot, he is clogging up this sub and asktrp with his crusade against hygiene. This fucking idiot has not washed himself in over a week. I can smell you from here you filthy unwashed moron. What shithole are you from?".

The emperor has new clothes. I vote no confidence.

[–]anonmmmm1120 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I don't know what point you are trying to make, just rumbling on non sense. Indeed the thread overall doesn't mean anything other than pointing the possible trajectory we are heading.

Are you giving credit to BBC for trying to seem impartial regarding this ridiculous accusations from that tranny? Why are the comments disabled? Why do you mind having a discussion about it?

[–]shadymcyoloswaggins-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

On the first part of your comment I will quote Carl Sagan "to make an apple pie, first you must invent the universe". If you think that this article exists in a vacuum and is as simplistic as you think then that's your understanding.

To further explain my point; the article on no way supports redpilltool's delusional claim. At no point does a real person accuse straight men of being homophobic. In fact, as I stated, the only people who are quoted support the opposite of redpilltool's claim; ""I do not want to call it transphobic," says Miss SaHHara, a transgender woman" and "So being unwilling to date on the basis of someone being trans, rather than on the basis of individual stimuli is something I would personally call transphobic." As you can see the first quote from the article completely negates the mad king's claim and the second clearly attaches conditionality which allows for non transphobic rejection of trannies. That should be the end of it, the claim has not been satisfied. But . . .

To delve a little deeper; go over to two x and read the post about people who don't have kids. What thing do they all have as a result; time! So what do you do? Hang out with your pals, hobbies etc. what if your mentally ill, have no kids and an extreme ego? Bingo. The fuck do you think mentally ill people do? Think 'I'm mentally ill, I better just lie here in the recovery position untill help arrives'? Nope, they are given a platform by everyone who validates them by giving them attention, good or bad. People used to hold up placards 'the end is nye', vast majority ignored it. Is the end of the world any more nye now? Only complete fucking weapon like redpilltool would have such a lack of understanding of the issue to become part of the problem.

In conclusion; who let the sub become so fucked that it had to be put on lockdown? Who failed at their job? Who lost control? The administrator come demi-god redpilltool.

The emperor has new clothes, I vote no confidence.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter