696,979 posts

Censorship on the Internet • r/theredpillright

Reddit View
August 25, 2017
197 upvotes

Post Information
Title Censorship on the Internet • r/theredpillright
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 197
Comments 28
Date 25 August 2017 02:11 PM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/226735
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/6vyp0w/censorship_on_the_internet_rtheredpillright/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pill
Comments

[–]ResistAuthority36 points37 points  (9 children) | Copy

The free internet has become a collection of specialized safe spaces where dissent is discouraged or outright forbidden. This was not done by the corporations, it was done by the snowflake users and volunteer moderators. Their ideas can't hold their own ground against a light breeze. To protect their egos, they silence dissent. The voting mechanic of reddit encourages this twisted habit.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_20166 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy

This was not done by the corporations

100% wrong.

Corporations are run by globalists. They manufacture cultural Marxism for profit and power. Nearly all modern movements are astroturfed and not organic. Even feminism was manufactured at its core. (Watch century of the self.) modern day movements have been pushing for ideological overlap for the past decade or so. This is to consolidate disparate factions under the Marxist umbrella. For example the "march for science" was really about getting leftists together to join other movements such as queer, blm, and feminism. What do those movements have to do with science? Nothing. Same with feminists. Now they are "intersectional." What does feminism have to do with race? Nothing.

Anyway, corporations lead the charge of nation wrecking to maximize their exploitation of the people. For instance, Google fired James Damore for not towing the party line. They seek to bring more women into the workplace to suppress wages (one reason of many). Intel invested something like $100 million in "diversity efforts" and a chunk of those funds went to Anita "con artist" sarkeesian of feminist frequency. Twitter has been anti-free speech since its inception, so much so that it seems to prevent the corporation from being profitable. Explain how can corporations make such money losing propositions, if there is not some other agenda at play? Successful businesses do not do things to "feel good" so please explain their business model. Facebook worked with the last administration to combat "fake news" and both they and Google are doing all they can to censor and stifle free speech. That includes our beloved Reddit, where cannibal Spez went so far to commit fraud and edit users posts.

These corporations are at the forefront of social engineering and censorship and it comes from the top down.

[–]ThoughtsYouNever2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I think fake news is real news trying to escape censorship because the big guys don't want you to put certain ideas together, and fake news slips through their filters and exposes the dirty, nasty,, ugly side of the world that the press is paid off not to cover.. And thats saying something considering the shit that's fit to print.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_20160 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Watch this and you'll have a much better idea of what "fake news" is. In short ALL MSM is bought and paid for propaganda. The thing is, the establishment tried to silence dissent and the Obama administration reached out to his corporate cronies at Google and Facebook (all globalist pigs) and asked them to "combat fake news." The problem was that many people of the world were wise to their tricks and we quickly co-opted their attack and you saw the downfall of CNN as a result (with other MSM outlets in tow). Recall, it was Obama that literally authorized the use of propaganda through the NDAA. Everything you hear is to make you believe what they want you to believe.

Documentary https://youtu.be/VcA76lcXtwU

[–]intenz1ty1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

There might be neo-marxists in corporations but they are very few in numbers. Corporations support the SJWs because they are absolutely shitting their pants about being branded "racist". The SJWs are so powerful that they can destroy any company with a racism witch-hunt, so these corporations are falling over each other to embrace "diversity". They don't actually give a flying fuck about any of this, they want to make money.

[–]TheRedThrowAwayPill11 points12 points  (3 children) | Copy

The same can be said about many sites. Take T_D for example. Since u/CisWhiteMaelstrom was doxxed by them and replaced by a phalanx of puppeteers the numero uno rule there is "No Dissenting Opinions".

I'm not joking - if there's even a small factual statement of that breaks the circle jerk you're looking at a banning (or 4, or 5 or 6).

It's basically Dark Triad + a gas lighting debate strategy for websites.

[–]Future_Alpha1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

For sure. T_D has mods that are SJW's in disguise. I got banned for bragging about sexcapades with Sikh girls. When I asked the mod if he banned me because he got laid, he brought up a totally irrelevant comment, latched onto it and used it to justify my ban.

[–]1OneRedYear1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Reddit is owned by a corporation. Asking corporations to participate in free speech is like asking hookers to participate in free love. It's about that dolla yall. Make some mother fucking money!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5IEyS_JKKQ

[–]xidonero 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy

Extrapolating from here, I can quite easily envision a future in which a hard crackdown on all sites with TRP style knowledge comes to pass. Because of this, I am left wondering what the best way might be to make sure the knowledge that we have gathered stays preserved even if the websites we frequent are lost. Further, I wonder to myself what the bare minimum is that we could ask a person to download such that even if everything were burned to the ground, that they would still be able to rebuild this again.

I cannot understate how important and valuable the knowledge we have here is. The complete discovery, understanding, and explanation of the male/female dynamic and how to navigate it properly - this is as important as the discovery of fire or of the wheel. This is the type of knowledge that would set off a renaissance if it were introduced to a society without it, and as such it must be preserved.

From my time lurking here, I have managed to get my hands on the Red Pill Handbook, the Red Pill Sidebar PDF, and a few of the recommended reading books. I have also seen that collections of top posts from this community exist in a downloadable format.

My question then is what else should be saved? I believe that we should spread the data as far and as wide as possible once we come up with a list what might be considered to be the bare minimum of what needs to be preserved - the seeds of TRP. If the filesize isn't too bad it can be easily hosted across many of the different archive and download sites that currently exist, and even something like a torrent could be set up for it.

I'm open to suggestions especially on the topic of what should be preserved since I am already getting started on saving things.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 13 points14 points  (3 children) | Copy

I have an archive of most of the TOP posts of TRP and it's expanding.

Check it here: https://www.forums.red/i/theredpill

I wouldn't be adverse to posting the database itself for download.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Thanks for everything, redpillschool

[–]p3n1x0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I wouldn't be adverse to posting the database itself for download

Absolutely

Should we learn anything from history, redundancy in all forms.

[–]HeavyJhon4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

In spain we used to have a site called misandria.info, Was a site with a forum like this and full of red pill blogs with valious información, the Last month the site dissapeared without explication

[–][deleted] 60 points61 points  (13 children) | Copy

You lost me when you started blaming Obama. TRP isn't alt right. Maybe it started with alt right guys, but it's apolitical.

[–]thesturg16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

Just because it's not political doesn't mean its invulnerable to witch hunts or censorship. This place rustles a lot of jimmies and all it takes is some hellbent SJW with some connections to villify us and start the ball rolling to censor all we have built. These recent developments are like the Patriot Act of censorship. After 9/11 people had no problem justifying the Patriot Act. It might not happen today or tomorrow, but more and more sites will be removed and the subjective line dividing acceptable sites from unacceptable ones will blur and shift with the whims of those who control it.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy

Same. Idc for Obama, or for leftists or rightists, but idc about the altright either. I prefer to be independent.

[–]Ganaria_Gente7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yep

I see both the right and the left as enemies of free speech. This includes many of the Trump supporters.

It's comical to see everyone getting so triggered that they wanna silence or physically hurt others

[–]PS2Errol5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yes, it's hilarious that the Trump reddit won't allow any dissenting opinion (even you still ultimately support Trump). They have become as fascistic as the antifa.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

when you started blaming Obama

It wasn't Mitt Romney that gave away ICANN.

[–]Calebrox12411 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy

I don't mean to step on toes, but I don't think that's entirely accurate. If I'm wrong please say so, I wanna hear your side.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Staying a fact that he gave away the US government’s oversight of ICANN (thereby removing any free speech protections of the internet) makes you political? It sounds like you’re the partisan one who doesn’t like it when your guy gets criticized.

[–]1nzgs0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

It is not apolitical. If you can read the whole sidebar and not come away understanding the evils of collectivism, entitlement and envy then you need to read them again. The empowerment of the individual is at the core of TRP and it's something that is anathema to the left.

Now TRP is not specifically tied to one political position, but it most certainly does favour the politics of individualism; broadly speaking conservatism, libertarianism, anarcho-capitalism. Government is the enemy of the red-pill aware man.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

You are failing to distinguish politics from culture and therein lies your problem. Foreign policy, taxation, domestic spending priorities (policies) <- politics. SJWs, 3rd wave feminism, rape culture <- culture/social. RP is a cultural battle about how we define ourselves. The laws have just been swayed because of it.

Think of analogies. Was MLK an anarcho-capitalist just because the laws were fucked up? Did he declare the concept of government the enemy? No. He ushered in social change which led to changed laws. MRAs are the modern MLKs and fighters for equality.

As an example: I believe America should have a leadership presence internationally, that supply-side economics has failed, and that a larger social safety net would let more millennials take risks with entrepreneurship. Leftist ideas. While still think 3rd wave feminism is a bunch of lies and has led to the destruction of good relationships. I can recognize hypergamy and betaization of men, while also recognizing that the tax practices since the 80s has stymied risk tasking by the poor.

This is why I am LeftAndRed. SJWs want you to think politics is social so they can hijack that sphere and fuck up our ability to have political dialogue. They want to demonize and moralize what never was before. If you still believe that, you haven't seen SJWs and 3rd wavers for the charlatans they are, and are still seeing through their lens.

Being LeftAndRed is easy when you see what 3rd wave feminism has really done. I'm at peace with the sidebar.

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Think of analogies. Was MLK an anarcho-capitalist just because the laws were fucked up? Did he declare the concept of government the enemy? No. He ushered in social change which led to changed laws. MRAs are the modern MLKs and fighters for equality.

I agree with most of what youre saying, but this is where it falls apart for me. RP/MGTOW/Manosphere/whatever you want to call it is never going to work as a social movement, because social movements are driven by women. You might get the occasional attention whore on board for a few weeks because the arguments sound fair and hanging out with all of the "scary angry men" excites her, but female support for reforming divorce laws, rape laws, etc., will literally never materialize in meaningful numbers because it runs completely counter to a womans best interests.

All that TRP as a philosophy can do is let men see the world clearly in the present, and suggest individualistic choices for the future. We wont become a social movement because we inherently cant, it just doesnt match the demographics that we have.

[–]TheReformist94-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

The red pill is not apolitical. It is sexual economics, probably most accurately described as sexual capitalism.

It is completely oppositiely opposed to sexual socialism, feminism. So it may not he be right wing,but it certainly won't be left. Where there is tension there will be identity politics.

[–]1GreenPiller4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

At least we still have /pol/... Not sure if that's a good thing though.

[–]NeoreactionSafe3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

 

Alternative

 

mid 16th century (in the sense ‘alternating, alternate’): from French alternatif, -ive or medieval Latin alternativus, from Latin alternare ‘interchange’ (see alternate).

 

So for example we might "interchange" the Blue Pill mythology with an alternative which is Red Pill.

What we know by "waking up" is that the Left and the Right are controlled through "puppets" who do the work for those actually further up the pyramid.

Therefore:

 

  • If you are an alternative to the system you are neither Left nor Right.

 

What this means is when you place "Alt" (short for "Alternative") and "Right" together you have actually created a contradiction.

 

  • Alt Left

  • Alt Right

 

...these are both impossible.

 

  • Alt Center

 

...would actually be more logical.

Hey, you had to figure a guy who "Thinks For Himself" is going to spot errors like this. (sorry)

The identification as the "Red Pill Right" is an internal contradiction.

It's a mistake.

 

[–]THETRUMPTRUTHTRAIN0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This post is SPOT ON !!! BOOM



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter