Brief story that inspired this post: Some girl I met at a party contacted me out of the blue on facebook. She wanted to "introduce her friend" to me. I'm always open for more plates, but I asked her if this is one of those times when she introduces a fat/ugly friend to me.

Yep. I won't post the photo here but suffice it to say, I wouldn't even touch this chick if I was high + drunk. And I've even hid behind the "a hole is a hole" justification before in my pre-redpill days (to my everlasting shame). But this was too low.

Anyway, I immediately told her she was high on crack and that her friend was not attractive at all. She of course called me "mean" and "super asshole" that I wouldn't extend the label of "beautiful" to her friend. She said that "she has a great personality though". As if that matters. I told her I have standards and no thanks.


Analysis:

Women think they deserve to be called "beautiful". When they aren't called beautiful by men, they blame those men for being mean. Why? Because they FEEL they are good people and it hurts them. Because being called beautiful makes them feel good. Because they equate beauty with being a good person.

The last part is really key. In my mind, when I called her friend unattractive, I wasn't insulting her at all. There's no connection with beauty and morality/ethics in my mind. As someone who's used my dick to plow through the fertile female fields of Korea, I know that some super hot girls are righteous bitches. Her butt ugly friend could be a moral saint and great person, probably even better than me (who cares?). Hell, she probably works in a soup kitchen for the homeless.

So why the resistance on her part? It's because women think "beauty" makes them into a good person. Beauty compensates for hard work/fair play/equal responsibility. So when you deny them "beauty", you are essentially denying them access to all of these exclusive benefits women can potentially receive (material goods; high moral character).

On the other hand, for redpill guys, beauty is a thing unto itself. If you're unattractive, you simply cannot attract people. Doesn't mean you can't do your job or raise kids or be a good friend. It just means less people will want to stick their penises inside your body if you're female or want to allow your penis if you're male. Simple.

The next time a woman says:

  • "Beauty isn't everything", she's hamstering. Because otherwise she wouldn't get upset when a man simply doesn't want to call her pretty. In her mind, the man is essentially denying his future resources to her, because they know high SMV men only give resources to beautiful women. That offends (and saddens) her. So it's easier to believe that beauty isn't that important for attractiveness (even though it is for all of us), because that would mean their low beauty wouldn't detract from them anymore.

  • "You're mean! My friend isn't ugly!", she is upset because she thinks you are calling her friend a bad person. She is upset because her friend deserves access to alpha resources. By extension, if her (uglier) friend deserves them, then she definitely deserves an alpha (Basically, it's the thing where a moderate girl hangs out with 2 ugly ones to make herself look better).

  • "It's the patriarchy's fault for perpetuating unfair beauty standards", what she is really saying is "It's men's fault for perpetuating unfair SMV access standards". Again Beauty = access to security, value, money, ease of responsibility, etc. The majority of women implicitly recognize this, as they plaster various chemicals on their faces daily to look better.

    So when a subpar woman doesn't measure up to a high SMV community's standards, she will call those standards unfair/excluding/sexist/patriarchal/mean/antiquated instead of improving herself to MEET those standards (exception: Korean girls get surgery in droves to meet those standards).

    Simplest example of this phenomenon: Exclusive clubs deny fat/ugly/underdressed women (and men) while also providing better treatment for richer men and hotter women. The club = high SMV community. Women who can't get in blame it on the "standards", not themselves, because inside the club is a treasure trove of validation/alpha men/benefits. If it was a construction site (no high value), no woman would care.

    Another example: Augusta National golf club (No regular woman actually wants to golf there, they just want to know they can since golf is probably the "richest" sport in the world. So they sued the place. On the other hand, no woman is clamoring to play in men's only Ethiopian barefoot soccer leagues. "Eww u guyz!").