~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
GaiusScaevolus
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What’s wrong with this picture is the same thing that is wrong with men’s attitudes in most of their approaches to women: it puts all the onus on the man.
Hamster alert.
I am the master of my fate. I am the captain of my soul.
[–]randomdude6005 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Started out interesting went nowhere
[–]bad_pattern2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
just another reminder that in our current situation, it benefits men to defund the state
promote politicians who shrink the government, cut spending and lower taxes
[–]trophyboyfriend 7 points7 points7 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Swing and a miss. The author completely misses the point of RP. He's still trying to modify his behavior to attract a woman. Backwards.
The goal is not improve yourself to bag more women. The goal is improve yourself, because.
Full stop.
Everything, everything EVERYTHING follows from there.
[–]semigod__1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link
no its not. if women would get wet from guys with blue hair, trp would advice you to get blue hair to get pussy. i quote redpillschool.
I don't like the stupid attitude that this is about self-improvement. It's not, it's about sex. Sex is the destination and self-improvement is our transportation. Some guys try to act holier than others by saying "i don't care about the sex bro, it's about this and that and what not" I think it's chest thumping, really. We're wired to feel good about things that make us better at getting sex.
but it seems like the seddit guys with their feel good lies have taken over here.
[–]semigod__1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Were women obedient, loving and kind to men because alpha men led them well? OR Because THEY HAD NO OTHER CHOICE and their very survival depended on it.
Were women obedient, loving and kind to men because alpha men led them well?
OR
Because THEY HAD NO OTHER CHOICE and their very survival depended on it.
nail on head. any civilization flourished by making women dependant on men. this may seem unfair to the observer, and it is unfair to the women. but thats the only way you can motivate men to produce at their maximum - give each man a woman, and you force him to be a responsible anchor for his family, and therefore for society as a whole.
by allowing women to work and subsidizing those who cant via welfare, not only have men lost the control over women, but have been make redundant.
now let me be clear: this is a much, MUCH more just situation. however, the price for this justice is that you have a huge amount of men with no motivation to be that anchor, not to mention not to produce at their maximum.
the question is, can the gain in productiveness of women balance the loss of productiveness of men? the data suggests no.
[–]Senior ContributorDemonspawn0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women's survival still depends on men. It's just that they've corporatized: now all men serve women via proxy of the State rather than a woman picking one man who picked her and having him support her.
If we defund the State, women will be back to picking individual men who pick them back to support. The problem is that will never happen unless we eliminate women's suffrage. Without eliminating women's suffrage, the only way to defund government support for women is to collapse the State financially.
[–]2johnnight2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
He has a good diagnosis, you are criticizing him for not providing a solution.
He is right that technology and the security state has changed the situation. Women do not need A men immediately at the start of adulthood to survive. For the last 100 thousand of year every woman needed a man for protection, but not anymore. Their emotional needs are just a genetic echo of those times.
On the other hand, all the women, who have the wrong emotional behavior resulting from wrong genetics, will simply die off in a few decades. If she is a "strong, independent woman", who needs no kids for career, she is going out. Only women, who have a strong biological need to get impregnated as often as possible will level up into the next generation. That's r-selection. K-selection was about not getting killed be the environment and is not a challenge now.
[–]sir_wankalot_here0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You have the right idea but you are looking at it backwards. Through out history, 80% of women reproduced, only 40% of men. In the last 200 years this has changed so more men reproduce.
The problem isnt women the problem is men. Fortunately there are men like me who are doing my part to improve society. I am attempting to impregnante as many Beta Buxx wives as I can. Then beta buxx will spend his resources raising my children, which will prevent him from reproducing as much.
Women do not need A men immediately at the start of adulthood to survive.
Correct. She does not need A man. But she still needs men. Men who contribute the vast majority of taxes to government who spends the vast majority of the collected taxes on programs for women and enforcing "non discrimination" laws.
Without the support of those men, she'd be back to picking A man to support her.
This cannot be resolved without eliminating women's suffrage. As long as women have suffrage and control 55% of the vote, the will get government to take from men to serve women.
So you want solutions? Revolt, Expat, or Turtle. Those are the only three solutions to the destruction of society we are facing due to allowing women too much control over our society.
[–]FortunateBum1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I tend to agree. This is why I think MGTOW is superior.
[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The site with one one of the most annoying popups...
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
adblock
[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not working with ABP in Chrome. Also it's not an external ad, but a FB like box. Most annoying thing is, that i already liked it and it still keeps appearing.
Only thing that will help would be a script-blocker and I don't want that.
[–]otiswild0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is infrared pill MGTOW wisdom.
The only solution is dissolution.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
" If you’re not getting what you want from your relationships and sex life, then it’s your fault for not being alpha enough. It’s your fault for not being strong enough. It’s your fault for not having tight game. It’s your fault for not having big muscles."
The red pill tells us that we're in the driver's seat and to expect outside help is less effective than doing it yourself. It doesn't mean it's your fault. This quote is a false interpretation of TRP.
He's absolutely right about technology facilitating woman's entry in to the work-force. This, coupled with the fact that women have an overwhelming abundance of access to men now, is the main reason women in North America are a total nightmare.
If you don't do it all, the next guy will. Why should she needlessly expend effort when there are men out there willing to free her from the burden of expending that effort?
[–]deepsouthscoundrel-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The author tries to make a few points but doesn't actually demonstrate that any of them are true. He just sort of asserts them based on his own experience and hopes that to be good enough. Even if what he's saying is right, he's done nothing to convince the audience of that.
[–]Endorsed ContributorUsherai-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Aside from the example of slaves being liberated due to agricultural innovations, I don't see why an article on RoK is expected to be some full-on dissertation with extensive citations that conclusively proves whatever topic (however banal) they talk about. The point of an article like this isn't to convince people, but to proffer a new idea or viewpoint.
[–]MartialWay0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly!
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]randomdude6005 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bad_pattern2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]trophyboyfriend 7 points7 points7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]semigod__1 point2 points3 points [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]semigod__1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Senior ContributorDemonspawn0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]2johnnight2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]sir_wankalot_here0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Senior ContributorDemonspawn0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FortunateBum1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]otiswild0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]deepsouthscoundrel-1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Endorsed ContributorUsherai-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MartialWay0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link