698,118 posts

Study: Only 3% of Straight People Are Willing to Date a Transgender Person

Reddit View
June 17, 2019

Post Information
Title Study: Only 3% of Straight People Are Willing to Date a Transgender Person
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 510
Comments 280
Date 17 June 2019 05:50 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/242393
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/c1qocr/study_only_3_of_straight_people_are_willing_to/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pill

[–]Stabiel747 points748 points  (14 children) | Copy

Yeah i have this weird fetish that involves me being the only one with a penis in my bedroom.

[–]fireandbass211 points212 points  (5 children) | Copy

I've got an even weirder fetish where I would only consider sleeping with a person if they have XX chromosomes 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–]1RevolutionaryPea714 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah... sometimes it feels like my body kinda, wants to reproduce. It feels almost like some kind of instinct that has been developed over countless generations of sexual lifeforms. But that's silly, of course, I'm clearly a transphobe.

[–]relationship_padawan101 points102 points  (3 children) | Copy

Yeah I think I have this fetish too. I only want to be sexually involved with people who have XX chromosomes. I don’t necessarily need to be the only penis in the bedroom though; her husband could be in the corner jacking off to us.

[–]RememberWhenEye40 points41 points  (2 children) | Copy

Most transgender people are simply mentally ill gays.

[–]pm_me_tangibles2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

You sick man. Oops my bad: you sick person who may or may not identify as a man.

[–]Stabiel3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Depending on the time of day. In the morning i identify as a Autobot leader. And in the evening Just a regular joe (gender not specified)

honk honk

[–]DancesWithPugs370 points371 points  (21 children) | Copy

"Be gay on demand or you're a bad person."

[–]HomoSapiens9185 points86 points  (5 children) | Copy

Just tell everyone you’re the opposite gender. Nobody can question it or they’re the bad person.

[–]Aestheticcunt199631 points32 points  (0 children) | Copy

So many more people would have survived the titanic if they just told everyone that they changed their minds and chose to be women 😭😭😭

[–]Yashugan0037 points38 points  (1 child) | Copy

as a self-identifying HerpaMochaFrappoLatteDammeLangeDingDong gender, I'm looking for my gender specific soul mate. Suprise! It's not you :)

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

oh ok well I know this great gay dick you should suck tonight. Why not? are you homophobe?

[–]RightHandWolf0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Just to fuck with people, I sometimes identify as a lesbian with the wrong plumbing. Reactions tend to vary, as you might have guessed, but the most fun happens when a self-absorbed SJW type dares to debate me. It oughtta be illegal to wind people up that much . . . and it probably will be, soon enough.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire232 points33 points  (11 children) | Copy

I have experienced just this. It literally led to a fistfights... twice.


[–]DancesWithPugs34 points35 points  (2 children) | Copy

How dare you like pussy and have preferences

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire22 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

But... but... it tastes and feels so good!

[–]darkmoon095 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy

Care to elaborate? I'm curious to hear this story now.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire210 points11 points  (2 children) | Copy

In both cases, I was at a party, there was drinking. In each case, a guy was interested in me, but I politely made my position of being a straight person clear to them. This created resentment, which then festered for awhile. Later on, in each case, the person, having gotten frustrated, invented a pretext to swing at my me. In one case, after I had made my position clear, the person tried to argue with me at length and convince me that a sexual orientation I had experienced since I was a small child, was somehow negotiable. I never at any point got upset, I just stuck to my guns. I also made it clear that I had no problem with LGBTQ people at all.

[–]cupshadow0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Where do you live?
Thankfully nobody repressed me for denying gays... yet.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire22 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Nobody repressed me either. These were just individual gay or bi guys acting out their frustration while drunk. I live near a major cosmopolitan city.

[–]edefakiel3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

I have also experienced this, at least five times. No fistfight at all, though.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire22 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Wow, five times? I guess I'm not as 'lite as I thought, lol. Aside from those two occasions, I have only experienced some non-verbal hostile body language.

[–]organicfluxx3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

You cant be serious? A man started a fist fight because you rejected their sexual advances?

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire22 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Pretty much. They basically mistook my human decency for sexual interest, meaning because I treated them with courtesy and empathy, like I try to treat everyone, they assumed I was interested in them sexually, and then became angry and frustrated that I was "teasing" them, then found a pretext to start a fight. In both cases, they had been drinking. It's kind of like how betas get enraged after talking to a hot girl for a half hour, getting their hopes up, then Chad roles up and says, "Thanks for paying attention to her, Ole Gil, I'll take it from here and claim muh hawt sex." Of course, I'm not a girl, so it isn't completely unacceptable to get into a physical altercation with me. I'm the kind of person who people can say all kinds of shit to, and I'll just think "Oh, I see what you're trying to do, you're trying to provoke me into throwing the first punch." Then I'll just smugly present a psychologically impervious demeanor, and they'll either give up, or get more angry. Usually it doesn't escalate to an actual fight though, because usually I avoid people prone to violence, and if I encounter any, I always walk on eggshells to preempt violent conflict.

The notion that gay guys are somehow more peaceful, more moral, more effeminate, or less dangerous is a media fabrication. I mean, they are like anyone else, there are good people and bad people, and people have good days and bad days, and look out if they get drunk etc.

I think also, that many suffered abuse over their lives for being in the minority, before it was socially acceptable to be gay. Vicious beatings, verbal abuse. So, the ones that didn't kill themselves, toughened themselves up, learned to fight, band together etc. I just read a few days ago about a gay club in New Orleans being firebombed by a homophobe, and 30 people inside were incinerated, and then the newspapers joked about burying them in fruit jars. That was 40-50 years ago, but that's nothing in terms of time.

[–]FinancialElephant8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

State enforced homosexuality

[–]rogellparadox4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Then: "Orange man bad"
Now: "Straight man bad"

[–]DigitalDog0001[🍰] 416 points417 points  (97 children) | Copy

Because. They. Are. Straight.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 390 points391 points  (70 children) | Copy

What the study should say:

3% of people who say they are straight are lying.

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman77 points78 points  (32 children) | Copy

Or they drank so much SJW koolaid that they genuinely perceive transwomen as real women without any reservations.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire241 points42 points  (4 children) | Copy

I personally think that it's just a way to distract people with SJW tendencies to prevent them from actually trying to take on problems with the systems that affect vast swathes of the population. How are you going to have prison reform or collective bargaining if the SJW cognitive surplus is tied up in the trans rights movements, which affects around 1% of the population? That's why the corporations subsidize it. Also, they like the idea of malleability, just like the Marxists, because it plays into their power fantasy of complete control over a subjugated human population that they can change at will, just like humans were pure robots, and not living organisms.

Edit: forgot to add: feminized men and men who become women will buy more stuff, because women are bigger consumers than men, so more trans men = good for the economy. That, and the alphas have even less competition.

[–]Random Xpat Rantingsxsplat9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

To paraphrase, you see a corporate/media collusion. If we include some government collusion in the mix, then you are seeing facism and an attempted control by elites to maintain their power.

I see the same thing. It gets tricky knowing who are the sheep and who are the puppet masters though. There is real propaganda that is created for deliberate reasons, however some people choose to buy into it for unconscious reasons that happen to coincide, usually, with some of their best interests.

So the conspiracy idea is real, but it's very difficult to know what actions are a collusion of deliberate ignorance, and which are calculated propaganda.

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I personally think that it's just a way to distract people with SJW tendencies to prevent them from actually trying to take on problems with the systems that affect vast swathes of the population. How are you going to have prison reform or collective bargaining if the SJW cognitive surplus is tied up in the trans rights movements, which affects around 1% of the population? That's why the corporations subsidize it.

While I wouldn't label this as actively distracting someone (after all, the SJWs seek out these problems themselves), I agree that politics and corporations use these ideals to get the media and by extension one of the politically most problematic demographics (young, politically active, radical, oftentimes "well-educated") off their backs: by paying lip-service to their ideals (feminism, anti-racism, pro-LGBTism etc.) and by implementing a few dubious policies (affirmative action etc.) they're giving idiotic journalists the reason to believe that their political activism actually "changed" things and pat themselves on the back for it, while their actual practices (which usually include pollution and exploitation) are the same as always.

[–]redpill772 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

It's not just distracting the population from the real issues, it's also weakening men (by making strength faux pas) and taking the most basic form of building power and contentment (nuclear family) and turning everyone against each other. And they believe it's for their own good!

"Don't listen to the only practical thinker in your family, listen to what we've told you is your heart (princess fantasies)."

Princess fantasies have take advantage of woman's drive for power, to be seen as unique and to be treated special. Woman seek resources and only stop asking for more long after there is no more given.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire22 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well, the alphas at the top win when all the betas or whomever fall for this con. Less competition for them. I used to joke to guys that there was no point being homophobic. They should tell OTHER guys it was COOL so there would be more women for them. I guess someone took the joke and ran with it. It was funny, too, because then you would watch the system error from some atavistic, irrational prejudice conflict with the obvious self-interest involved. Most refused to acknowledge the soundness of the argument. It simply went in one ear and out the other. I literally never understood homophobia from the straight male perspective. I mean, I guess if enough guys are gay, they can start lobbying to make gay the norm, and then coerce straight guys into being gay, but that seems more of a historical anomaly than a norm, since the organism wants to reproduce itself, heterosexual orientations are the statistical norm, with homosexual orientation occupying around 10%, and other orientations occupying 1%.

[–]theadj12323 points24 points  (16 children) | Copy

I would imagine that would stop the second they see a penis flop out from under the dress right?

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman20 points21 points  (15 children) | Copy

There are also post-OP transgender folks, and a genuine card-carrying SJW who isn't just virtue-signalling the fuck out of it might actually feel compelled to consider her a valid dating prospect.

[–]1Ill_mumble_that13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

post-op is such a waste of penis. and balls, but mostly penis.

[–]Skeeter_onmyPeter 1 points [recovered]  (11 children) | Copy

Even calling the dude “her” is buying into the bullshit.

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy

It's no skin off my back, as long as I don't have to date one.

[–]greenlittleman0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Still, cute girl who consider herself homosexual male would be sort of transgender too, lol. As long as she looks great and acts within your boundaries it doesn't really matter if she has self-identity disorder.

[–]iliketreesndcats1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy

Eh, you ask people how they'd like to be called. You dont ask someone's name, they tell you "I'm James", and you say "thanks, Richard."

It's just manners to call people what they'd prefer to be called.

[–]WaspOnAWall3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

What if their name is "James" but they want to be called "Superman from Krypton" ? Should you entertain them ?

What if they don't want to be called "he" or "she" but "zhe" or "xhe" or some other made up pronoun ?

Here's the thing : you don't usually need to use pronouns when you talk to the person, or at least you can avoid doing so. The rest of the time, when talking about them to a third party you can use whatever pronoun you like. You can also use gender neutral pronouns like "they/their/them".

If they bitch about it you can just avoid associating with them.

[–]iliketreesndcats2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

What if their name is "James" but they want to be called "Superman from Krypton" ? Should you entertain them ?

I mean, sure, i guess. I can't say that i believe that that's an incredibly common scenario - but if James wants to be called Superman from Krypton, who am i to be a cunt?

What if they don't want to be called "he" or "she" but "zhe" or "xhe" or some other made up pronoun ?

What is language but something thay we made up to convey meaning?

If they bitch about it you can just avoid associating with them.

Agree. Gendered pronouns is really not something that we should have to waste energy arguing about.. just dont be a cunt, or, if you can't not, just avoid associating with people that you think are weird, right?

[–]Skeeter_onmyPeter 1 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy

Can they decide when they were born too? Can they decide where? Can they say “from now on, people can only use subjunctive verbs when talking to me”? If they are short but really really wish they were tall, are we all going to be socially compelled to pretend they are tall?

[–]iliketreesndcats2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

I mean, a pronoun is a word that you use in place of a noun, like a name, right?

Gendered pronouns highlight genders; and gender, being "social and cultural" traits that you exhibit, aren't the same as quantifiable measurements like height. I wouldn't really consider height to be a current, socially explosive issue with real (sometimes life or death) impacts like gender, either. There aren't big social distinctions between talls and shorts.

You know the easiest way to deal with the (how many?) trans people who affect your life is to just refer to them by the pronoun they prefer to go by. Most people will just reasonably let you know if you mess it up. (because pronouns are replacements for nouns, like names and it's not like people are flying off the wagon at you for getting their name wrong the first or second time you deal with them.)

[–]Skeeter_onmyPeter 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy

I think a dick is quantifiable and measurable. At least mine is. I can’t speak for you.

P.S. I don’t need anyone to let me know if I “mess up.” I’m not trying to stop them from playing make-believe. But they can’t socially compel me to play make-believe with them.

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yeah. Go and find some pictures of what post OP looks like. Put a bucket within reach. You have been warned.

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

That's immaterial.

Even the most convincing of transwomen is still a transwoman.

[–]n4ru6 points7 points  (9 children) | Copy

Wouldn't that mean they're straight then?

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman6 points7 points  (8 children) | Copy

It makes them in denial above anything else.

[–]Expokiosk14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy

I think the 3% are straight SJWs or people that pay lip-service to SJWs.

I think pretty much all of them would "go out on a date" with a trans-person to virtue signal, but find some reason to dump them.

An even smaller minority would probably even have sex with them or be in a relationship with them to virtue signal even harder.

[–]beginner_9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

Or 97% of people don't want to associate with the severally mentally ill.

[–]medicineandsports39 points40 points  (23 children) | Copy

Everyone has their fetishes man, some people like trannies but are not necessarily into men. Are these people still considered straight? Depends who you ask. I think it’s best not to get involved in arguments/discussions about this stuff because why would you give a fuck. Live your best life and let others live theirs the way they see fit.

[–]Eugene26134 points35 points  (9 children) | Copy

I don’t know how screwing a dude LARPing as a girl (with a penis) can be defined as straight, with any consistent definition at least.

Like you said, people are free to do as they please, but it’s pretty difficult with fetishes of that nature to consider oneself truly straight.

[–]lukkassu3 points4 points  (7 children) | Copy

You really can't call a trans woman on hrt a dude. They're missing a huge component of what makes a male. Debate their womanhood if you like, you have room for argument there, but those are not guys by any stretch.

Crossdressers are the LARPing men

[–]killcat10 points11 points  (6 children) | Copy

Male is a biological definition, it's set.

[–]NickA974 points5 points  (5 children) | Copy

He means that trannies on hormone replacement treatment are subjectively more akin to women, since their new hormones make them more emotional. It's artificial though, so they're still dudes in my book.

Fun fact: There's a TRP-validating story out there from a guy who transitioned and started experiencing natural attraction to alpha traits. I'm sure you can find it somewhere on this sub. It's quite interesting and it was very well received by the community, since it confirmed the obvious fact that women don't experience the world the same way a man does.

[–]Dahmerkitten3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

There are several distinctions.

Aside from chromosome, muscle, and skeletal discrepancies-

Transgender individuals ingest hormones produced not by people- but by horses.

In addition- those hormone levels are a static dosage- Womens hormone levels fluctuate, and change depending on their cycle.

To equate a trans person who reinforces ridicoulus gender steroypes as the gender they feel is intellectually dishonest, and causes significant harm to actual women, and men.

[–]NickA971 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Interesting, I didn't know that. I agree that gender dysphoria is problematic and should be treated as the mental condition that it is.

[–]killcat-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

Well of course hormones affect the brain, but it doesn't change their sex, it's a biological definition.

[–]NickA971 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah, no doubt. I'm saying that calling them dudes ignores their change in subjectivity. That doesn't change the fact that, biologically, they're not any less of a male, nor that fucking them is basically having sex with a drugged up man with tits.

[–]gprime0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I don’t know how screwing a dude LARPing as a girl (with a penis) can be defined as straight, with any consistent definition at least.

I would agree, but there are points where it becomes less clear cut. For example, a fully post-op transsexual who can not only pass for a biological woman but is attractive enough to win a beauty pageant (see: Thailand), is sleeping with them heterosexual? I think there's a very reasonable argument that it is, even if it is a matter of biological fact that the person is a man that just happens thanks to medical advances to look exceptionally feminine.

[–]psychonautalot15 points16 points  (5 children) | Copy

They are into trannys because they watch large amounts of tranny porn, thus training their brain to be attracted to transvestites. Organically men are attracted to women, P in V. Porn has created a whole plethora of shit for people to corrupt their sexuality with.

[–]RedditorFor1OYears15 points16 points  (3 children) | Copy

right, i forgot there were no homosexuals before porn

[–]psychonautalot4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

Homosexuality is a gene. I'm just stating that attraction can be drawn from excessive porn usage. Edit: Source: https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/linkage-between-dna-markers-x-chromosome-and-male-sexual-orientation-1993-dean-h-hamer-and

[–]MoDuReddit2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Shit study, n < 100.

Probably a small correlation because it might be a trait activation/deactivation. The real "gayification" occurs in-utero and increases chances for every pregnancy. If you want to find some gays reliable, find large families.

[–]5Imperator_Red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Exactly. This effect is well documented. People start with regular porn and then their brains get desensitized and they move on to crazy shit like trannies and cuckold and bdsm. It rots your brain.

[–]5Imperator_Red0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

We tried it your way cuck. Look what our society has become. No one has a “preference” for trannies. No, degenerate behavior and ideals must be ruthlessly checked at every turn.

[–]well-ok-then2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Either about being straight or about “willing to date”. At least one said “yeah, whatever” before hanging up.

[–]HBenedek382 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

They're delusional. Get them to the infirmary!

[–]greenlittleman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Much more. Biologically about 20% of men and 90% of women are bisexual, but consider themselves straight by choice and because of their preferences and choices. Among bisexuals majority considered themselves as straight at some point in their life.

[–]ChefCremeFraiche 1 points [recovered]  (6 children) | Copy

Exactly. It’s still a dude even if they cop their penis off. Or even just by dressing like a woman. There were people saying that people are sexist and transphobic because the other person wouldn’t date or sleep with the trans person.

[–]1neveragoodtime19 points20 points  (4 children) | Copy

If it’s transphobic not to sleep with someone who’s trans, then it must be homophobic not to sleep with someone who’s gay. And that means gay men are sexist against women. Do people really not realize how dumb their conclusions sound?

[–]edefakiel3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

All my gay friends are extremely misogynistic, it is something that I have always found pretty funny.

[–]chadwickofwv5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

They are not misogynistic, they are simply looking at women realistically, since they do not have the drive to fuck them this is possible for them. You just have a heavily influenced by the possibility of sex with them.

[–]edefakiel0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah, but they still want to kill every woman and rive in a world of dicks. You must admit that this is slightly misogynistic.

[–]BusterVadge35 points36 points  (1 child) | Copy

I wonder if it coincides with ~3% of people having a mental illness?

[–]dsade102 points103 points  (8 children) | Copy

"A new study which found that only 3 per cent of heterosexuals were willing to date a transgender person proves society has a problem with “transprejudice” and must be re-educated, according to its author."

Here come the "re-education" camps.

[–]1Mr_Badass26 points27 points  (4 children) | Copy

I don't understand why we must be "reeducated" because a person decided to artificially change their gender.

[–]joey_diaz_wings9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

You like sex, right? So go have sex with a guy and pretend that's what you wanted. You might need to be forcibly educated that your instincts and preferences are wrong, and then it'll make sense.

[–]pacosteles7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Try to "educate" an homosexual to be attracted to the opposite sex. You can go to jail.

[–]shaggyctes880 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Of course you dont, but dont worry a week in the room 101, on your nearest Minluv station Will clear thing for you...

[–]Irtotallynotrobot11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

I had a feeling this was coming. Before you know it, we won't even be allowed to unmatch them on tinder.

[–]TheStumblingWolf2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

As always the SJWs go directly from what's happening to their preferred conclusion disregarding every possible other reason.

[–]2awalt_cupcake0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

where can we seek refuge to? I'm not joking.

[–]DigitalDog0001[🍰] 144 points145 points  (1 child) | Copy

Also: only 3 percent of vegetarians are willing to eat a nice steak.

[–]Endorsed Contributorthelandofdreams55 points56 points  (8 children) | Copy

Yeah I'm going to give a hard pass on sticking my dick in a surgical scar dawg...

[–]soyboy9818 points19 points  (7 children) | Copy

Its not even a scar. Its more like an open wound constantly trying to close and leaks. Absolutely disgusting

[–]cristianoskhaleesi7 points8 points  (3 children) | Copy

wtf is that actually what happens?!

[–]brosky73317 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yep, they have to treat it for bleeding constantly, since the body treats it as what it is, an open wound.

[–]chacer982 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's literally an open wound. They have to stick a dildo in it for several hours per day several times per day sometimes for the rest of their life or the wound will close.

Worst case scenario I've heard of was a post op tranny literally leaking shit out of her vagina because the doctor for some reason redirected his intestines to connect to the open wound or vagina. Along with an open wound there is also normally a strong smell.

Then you also have pus and oftentimes hair inside the wound because turning your dick inside out doesn't stop hair growth. Apparently it's quite common every several days for them to have to dig out clumps of hair from inside the wound. It's also not uncommon for the "clitoris" to fall apart because after all it's just a dick chopped up, put inside out and cut up to look like a clitoris. Because of this many trannies literally just have an open wound between there legs and nothing that even resembles a vagina, it's just a hole, a wound. It's also pretty common for them to experience little to no sexual pleasure.

I think the general population is under the impression you can just magically make an exact replica vagina from a penis but this is not the case at all. People sign up for these surgeries not realizing how risky and life destroying the procedures can be because anyone who dares to talk about actual facts and information regarding transition surgery is viewed as a bigot. The amount of trannies who regret having surgery is quite high. It'll be interesting how this trend is looked back on in 50 years or so. If we don't look back at it in disgust it will only mean things have gotten even worse.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

Wait, what. Please tell me that's not actually how it works.

[–]Mr_Auric_Goldfinger5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

Look up "Vaginal Dilation". MtF trans have to shove a special dildo up their after-market front hole on a daily basis to keep the wound from closing.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy

You know what, I'll just take your word for it.

[–][deleted] 169 points170 points  (9 children) | Copy

3% of straight people are actually gay.

[–]maximun_vader38 points39 points  (3 children) | Copy

it's not gay if the penis is femenine

[–]trancedj12 points13 points  (2 children) | Copy

Also not gay if you’re the one doing the fucking.

[–]girlinadream57 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

Ain't nothin' gay about getting your dick sucked! In fact...YOU'RE the one who's gay for suckin' MY dick.

...I'm getting sick just lookin' at ya.

[–]maximun_vader8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

I feel disgusted by fags like you sucking my dick. Yeah yeah right theeeeerrreee

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Considering that <5% of the population falls under the 'not straight' umbrella (ie gay, Trans, gender queer etc etc) this seems pretty likely.

[–]Endorsed ContributorFereallyRed[🍰] 166 points167 points  (2 children) | Copy

There are no chicks with dicks, they're guys with tits.

Plus, they're broken people. Imagine being so fucked up even your gender is misaligned.

That's not "ist", it's simply deciding to not stick your dick in crazy.

Fucking article trying to shame you into being attracted to something you're not attracted to with "education". How is this any different from sending the gay kids away to Conversion therapy camp?

Lazy clickbait herd mentality "study". Using stats to support confirmation bias.

Karen Blair needs a kick in the cunt/balls.

[–]Nergaal22 points23 points  (0 children) | Copy

How is this any different from sending the gay kids away to Conversion therapy camp?

It's not, but the same people told us that they are not moving the goalposts every time the masses give away a single inch.

[–]TigerXtrm32 points33 points  (3 children) | Copy

Can't say I find that surprising when 90% of male to female transgenders look like the fucking monstrosity in that article's first picture.

Can't deny that in rare cases some transgenders manage to make themselves look better than many actual females, though. To the point where you wouldn't believe they were ever a guy. Creepy, really.

[–]Distractingyou14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy

I was watching transgender transitions in reddit to see how acurate they were, from at least 150 cases 5 were almost legit. My conclusion was female to male is easyer and that even on those sucessfull cases there are hints like of a male like the eyes and muscular/skeleton structure. The funny part it trains your eye to see the diferences between male and female but yeah all this talk and my final conclusion boils down to they are mentally sick and they degenerate society

[–]Brazilian_Slaughter6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah, the later type are really creepy. Like wtf, that's unnatural and shit. Uncanny Valley stuff when you notice it

[–]3Yakatonker1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

That's why the government sterilizes them with hormone therapies. Its covert Eugenics against homosexuals.

For more on this matter please refer to the work of Kennith Zucker. Super majority of "trans" are just homos.

[–]_do_not_read_this_ 1 points [recovered]  (4 children) | Copy

So 97% of the people agree with me.

Yet somehow we're the ones with the problem.

[–]Bleu_Cheese_Pursuits 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy

The proportion of people who agree with an opinion has precisely zero effect on the validity of that opinion. Tragedy of the commons, etc.

[–]Ibannedbypowerabuse1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I wish people understood this with reddit upvotes and down votes 🤪

[–]Leather_Sea-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Appeal to majority fallacy.

[–]CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK53 points54 points  (16 children) | Copy

I remember being sat in a room with 3 left wing friends who confronted me about this. They said I was being very hateful for not being willing to date a MtF. They were so condescending about it. All 3 of them were far-left. It was like an intervention that they had planned, I believe.

I turned the table on the ringleader by talking out loud about him being open to dating MtF at a party full of more moderate people. That weasel kept trying to change the subject then claimed I was mistaken and he never actually said he was. God, I hate him.

[–]maniclurker 1 points [recovered]  (12 children) | Copy

Time to find new friends, my dude. Fucking creeeeeeepy.

[–]CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK18 points19 points  (11 children) | Copy

I did. I blocked 2 of the 3. The worst guy was very machiavellian and turned people against each other and destroyed some of my relationships. I blocked him years ago, not talked to him or seen him, but even just 2 months ago he texted a girl I've been seeing to tell her he urgently needed to meet up with her and talk about my mental health. He is a parasite who went after my career, my family, turned 2 groups of friends against me, smeared me with doctored images in secret Facebook groups and used the true form of gaslighting to really fuck with my head for years.

I've considered expensive lawyers but thought he would get bored and disappear. Now I'm reconsidering

[–]Brazilian_Slaughter15 points16 points  (4 children) | Copy

Its called beatings, and you give them with your fists and feet

Tools are fine, too

[–]inittowinit77710 points11 points  (3 children) | Copy

Not everyone lives in Brazil bro. In some places there are actual consequences for violence.

[–]Brazilian_Slaughter8 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy

Just bait him into attacking and claim self-defense

[–]greenlittleman1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

This guy probably wouldn't have balls to attack no matter how you bait him or humiliate him with words. IDK, to me it seems what in modern countries where you can't beat people things are easier. You could just destroy anyone with your frame. In Russia or Brazil even if you won "frame game" and made your opponent look like retard they still could get your ass kicked if they are stronger or have bunch of friends with them.

[–]redpill770 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This is true. I live in an incredibly safe place (small girls normally walk home alone after bars close), and frame is quite easy. Even with guys much bigger than me. I would have a lot to learn to survive in a favella.

[–]TRAUMFAENGER02111 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Sounds like some cluster b shit

[–]greenlittleman0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Pro tip - you can destroy anyone in words battle 1x1 by just telling humiliating shit to them over and over again, even if it isn't truth. Because our brain have very weak defence against such treatment.

[–]redpill770 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

The higher profile you get, the more you are a target for unstable people. All they know is that you excite them. They don't realize it's that they wish they could be like you.

They see your joy, dignity and freedom and it doesn't make sense to them. The emotional aggravation gets filtered through their silly in-group fantasies that have been established just so that they can stop hyperventilating. What they really want is guidance, but our media is incessant on divide-and-conquer so anyone who pays uncritical attention to it actually believes that extant hierarchies are bad, and somehow simultaneous individualism and submission to groupthink are the correct approach.

[–]5Imperator_Red22 points23 points  (1 child) | Copy

The average man is a weasly back stabbing bitch. That’s why a dominance hierarchy based either on violence (barbarians) or codes of honor and status (well functioning patriarchal societies) is supposed to exist. If a bitch boy fags out on you like that, they are either supposed to get their faces smashed in or be socially ostracized. But in clown world nothing happens.

[–]edefakiel5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

I am all against violence. Because I think that the risks of employing it are far to great, and a society cannot properly function when violence is one of the primary resources for people to deal with disagreements.

Having said that, I cannot stand when someone abuses the unwillingness of people to resort violence. I hate when someone weak and evil breaks havoc just because no one wants to endure a violent or just uncomfortable position. Sometimes, this people really, really need a lesson for the good of everyone. I have had a lot of trouble in the public transport for facing thugs who were abusing the passivity of the rest of the travelers, and the bystanders did nothing about it, even when I tried to stop them. It is really sickening.

[–]_Leukocyte_36 points37 points  (2 children) | Copy

No shit.

And i even bet they defined "date" very loosly.

I see it going like this:

Would you get coffee with marissa from bumble? Her pictures are nice... ..oh fuck its a dude. But he already saw me..

..guess ill be polite and wait it out...

[–]chasemyers8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

Be polite? Nah. If they put female as their gender, they started off lying to you. Gonna nope straight the fuck out, regardless of eye contact.

[–]_Leukocyte_1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Youd be 100% right..

..but some apps will deprioritize your account in future matches if someone flags you enough..

..so the hope is to be polite, establish boundaries, establish dealbreakers which theyve already broken by lying..

..and then go cleanse yourself however you deem best.. ..after all that lying you just did to get out of the situation.

[–]RepostGhostCst2Cst16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

Only? That seems really high to me lol

[–]Cha_Cha_cho16 points17 points  (4 children) | Copy

You’re gay either way if you date a trans gender

[–]greenlittleman0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

No truth, you can date biological girl who consider herself as male bi/gay and look like a model and not some sort of mutant. The problem with trans is what most of them unattractive physically.

[–]Cha_Cha_cho1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

yes, but you still have the big gay if you date a tranny nonetheless.

Let's say you're a striaght male. You see a female you find attractive. PLOT TWIST it's a dude dressed up as a female. Your brain is tricked, but if you end up fucking the tranny, you're fucking a male, which you are aware of, who's just disguised as a female. So, big gay confirmed.

[–]greenlittleman-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lol, if she have no dick and biologically female then she IS female even if she convinced what she is guy.

And honestly I disagree about all this topic, in fact most guys who watch porn with trans consider themselves either straight or bi - real gays (and I know some of them) HATE trans more than we do because they are attracted to masculine traits.

Biologically sexual attraction is about sexual traits (mostly bodily proportions, face and voice) so if someone looks like attractive woman, but still have dick then only straight and bi guys would be attracted to them. There are some different theories about sexual orientation in biological community, but most of them have consensus what biologically it is 100% fact what almost all women are bisexual and among guys this number is at least as high as 20%. So this shit is more social than anything else, for example in Ancient Greece it was not only normal to bang young boys, but it was a way to earn respect among people. In modern society most guys don't want to have anything to do with being gay or bi because it lowers our status, that is it. It is specially humiliating to be on receiving end. So it is expectable what we will have some sort of disgust to people who do it willingly.

[–]Nicolas063111 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

And there far less than 3% that is transgender, they have plenty of choice so let them do that together and let us alone !

[–]Rememberthecodex11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy

Homosexuals are about 1-2% of population. Maybe those are simply latent Homosexuals or bisexuals that have a strong education and don't realize that they are in fact attracted to penises.

[–]greenlittleman1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

By statistic on 2015 year 8% of people in USA consider themselves homosexual. From biological viewpoint about 4% of population are homosexual and bisexuals are about 15% among males (some of them are self-proclaimed gays who just can't get laid with women) and 90% among females. One of the researches:http://indiana.edu/~sexlab/files/pubs/Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.pdf

Though it is a proof mostly for female bisexuality, as they use average instead of releasing actual data by % of people aroused. For male bisexuality more definitive proof would be Kinsey statistic which found out what only 80% of guys are zero (completely straight).

[–]Rememberthecodex0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I don't live in usa, i'm astonished by The %.

[–]thasixohfour10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

Why is this shocking? Most people aren't LGBT. The ideologues have entirely dropped the ball in their quest to convince men that trans women and cis women are equal substitutes.

[–]5Imperator_Red9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

And 2.9% are lying virtue signaling faggots

[–]omen_tenebris16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

so basically 3% are fake straight.

[–]jimmyb2076 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Can you fucking imagine...she says, “Eat me” with the voice of Barry White.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy

“using dehumanizing language, such as saying that a trans man “was not a natural man” or a “real man” 

Hahaha fucking clownworld... we're supposed to believe that horrific elective surgery qualifies someone as a "real man" or a "real woman" despite their body being deliberately modified to differ from their natural genetic expression.

You couldn't make this shit up. The equality bandwagon continues to run its ridiculous course... and we're all called bigots for preferring women over transgender men-partly-modified-to-look-like-women.

[–]redpill770 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

dehumanizing language

I believe the fallacy is called equivocation, or perhaps begging the question (inserting a conclusion as the premise). It's what they're attempting to do with the word racism: redefine it so that it still carries its pejorative, but only serves their exclusive purposes.

A word is employed with the intention to evoke the emotional reaction of the original term, but it is then used with a completely different, self-serving definition.

Calling a tranny not a real man has no relation to one's judgement on their humanity. This is quite apparent to anyone who pays attention to words and their meaning. But by sneaking that premise in quickly, as if it's taken for granted, most people do not question it. Not contesting their illogical use of language then gets taken as tacit support.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

A word is employed with the intention to evoke the emotional reaction of the original term, but it is then used with a completely different, self-serving definition.

Yeah, I've noticed this. Start with "rape is bad" (everyone agrees), then it's "sexual assault", and before anyone knows what's happening a wolf whistle or innocent comment is equated with rape.

Calling a tranny not a real man has no relation to one's judgement on their humanity. This is quite apparent to anyone who pays attention to words and their meaning. But by sneaking that premise in quickly, as if it's taken for granted, most people do not question it. Not contesting their illogical use of language then gets taken as tacit support.

Right, and it's fucking irritating that it works. There are too many good people who take this shit at face value and go along with it, without realising how much it's destroying society.

[–]redpill770 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Honestly, it takes years of work to have the skills to even sometimes get yourself to an adequate well-thought-out conclusion about something. And even then each problem takes time. Most people are either too stressed or blessed to take on such focused delayed-gratification.

So they just feel out who they should listen to.

Most people's level of empiricism is: "am I better off (treated better, higher status) in this tribe or the other?"

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Most people's level of empiricism is: "am I better off (treated better, higher status) in this tribe or the other?"

Basically yes.... and the answer is usually "what my friends / parents do"

[–]throw_this_far_awayy17 points18 points  (3 children) | Copy

3% seems pretty high. Then again the old saying I learned in college was this. "The hottest girl in the club always a man".

[–]f3m1n15m15c4nc3r30 points31 points  (1 child) | Copy

You’re in the wrong club, I think?

[–]edefakiel5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

In the wrong college, I would say.

[–]dotslashlife3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Can we also shame all the hot women who won’t date me?

Just because my personality sucks, why discriminate against people with bad personalities???

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Those 3% are Liars.

They are Not Straight.

[–]Shadow_Of_17 points18 points  (0 children) | Copy

Because they're attracted to the opposite sex not some intentionally deformed goblin.

[–]hazelstein22 points23 points  (5 children) | Copy

Those 3% of Straight People are probably females or Justin Bieber fans.
Straight up Bullshit, Reasons:- Dating trans as a straight person = gay dude.
The people who actually change their gender are kinda retarded. Biological they are male but pretend to be female, I have a video supporting this statement.

[–]someonesopinion696911 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy

saw this couple the other day on a kink site, this girl is dating a trans dude that likes watching her get banged by other men. I suppose each to their own but then that is the 3%

[–]BusterVadge6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Nothing like keeping it simple...

[–]Leonidas_798 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

The fact that it’s above 0% is concerning

[–]lux_75 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

How surprising... NOT. But wait, actually, it IS surprising it's that many. Most likely the same people who go pay trans hookers. Or PC people who felt guilty saying otherwise.

[–]f_ckupsomecommas4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yeah, I have an idea, it’s called being attracted to women. Who would’ve thought of that?

[–]pitufo_bromista4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Weird that you are attracted to the opposite gender that has complementary sex organs and psychology. Biology is weird, hail ideology.

[–]awakenedspirit13 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

People are so closed minded! ;)

[–]jaznex4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

isn't that a lot? like 3 in 100, 1 in 30? you must have 200 people in your life. friends, relatives, neighbours.. 6 of them are doing that....

[–]joey_diaz_wings2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

The mentally ill tend to cluster together, just as the healthy do.

Your 200 people might all be healthy, while another person's 200 people could have dozens of broken and ill people.

[–]porncompilationguy5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

If they saw my posts that number would increase significantly

[–]Dls954055 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Jesus Christ just reading the comments is exhausting. I'm a straight male. IDGAF if anyone doesn't like the fact that I am attracted to feminine straight women and I don't want to even touch a man, dickless or not.

[–]SuperCrazy073 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

3% seems really high to me.

Possibly because you don’t actually have to go on the date-just say you would on a survey.

[–]Project_Zero_Betas3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Possibly because you don’t actually have to go on the date-just say you would on a survey.

The correct answer. It's virtue signaling.

[–]BadMoles3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

I have no wish to have sex with someone who also knows what the male orgasm feels like.

[–]jbModsSuck14880 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

what is the significance of that lol

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

that 3% are closet faggots.

[–]PS2Errol12 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy

Anyone who was straight who wanted to date a transgender would have mental issues, I think. Probably very confused about their own sexuality or mental state.

I'm surprised the figure for actual straight men was as high as 3%. Those 3% were probably not actually straight (or else they were mentally ill).

[–]ZerglingKingPrime0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It would be people who are pandering and don't want to be seen as transphobic.

[–]thetruthfl4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Is this a surprise to any normal person?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

And of that 3%, most are either virtue signalling women who are talking IN THEORY (Kind of like how so many people want all immigrants to be welcome but won't rent out a room in their house to one) or men with a trans fetish.

[–]Casanova-Quinn4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Funny how the issue of offspring is not even mentioned. The majority of straight people want children, and a trans person cannot truly provide that (a child related to both parents).

[–]Project_Zero_Betas5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is what really bothers me the most about the article, the author acts as if contemplating who's going to inheriting your DNA with you isn't a valid concern while dating.

[–]Boggob153 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

3% for anyone wondering is a LOT of people.

I don't understand what any man sees in a FTM (female to male)

But I've almost always confused a MTF (male to female) for a female.

But I have a huge problem with the article suggesting we should re-educate the next generation to be more attracted to them.

[–]Distractingyou0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Then you are probably not that inteligent cause it sounds like you would be easy prey for a tranny to take advantage of you

[–]prettygoodfixie2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

"Liking traps and futa doesn't make you gay; as long as the boy is cute, it's not gay. The dick only makes it better." - Donald Trump in People Magazine, 1998

[–]russian_nigger7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

“using dehumanizing language, such as saying that a trans man “was not a natural man” or a “real man”.

the truth is dehumanizing now. leftist faggots.

Blair said that such “dehumanization” and “transprejudice” could be combated with more “education about the diversity of gender identities” and by increasing “accurate media representations of trans and non-binary people”.

"more brainwashing required"

There definitely appears to be some kind of innate stigma that straight people have towards transgenders when it comes to having romantic and possibly sexual relationships with them.

hmm.. i wonder what the "stigma" is.. maybe its called being straight?

Some transgender commentators have previously asserted that it is bigoted for heterosexuals to choose not to date transgenders.

more soylent mental gymnastics

Is this really something that can be changed with enough re-education and social engineering, or is it a completely normal preference to hold?

is this really something we can actually convert people into believing?

[–]nantucketghost5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Shocked. Not. % of Straight people willing to date a person of the same gender? Probably the same. Which is probably the same % of people who don't understand straight from straight but curious

[–]ArtDeve[🍰] 6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy

Some of them on Tinder are crazy hot.

I have considered it.. but its not my thing. Not into hookers either, women who are too masculine, women who are too fat or even too skinny with flat chests.

To each their own.

Dudes who are comfortable with it are certainly not gay but I do think it is borderline fetish level. That is fine, we all have minor fetishes at minimum.

Here in Thailand, trannies are so convincing that normal hot girls have to explicitly state they are not, in fact, ladyboys 🔥😂.

I would like to think the ladyboys are setting a higher standard for all women to aspire too!

Regardless, I won't be shamed by my sexual preferences. That is hypocritical and messed up.

[–]russian_nigger6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

can confirm about thailand. half the tinder profiles on normal girls are all "not a ladyboy"

[–]ArtDeve[🍰] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Poor girls. Can you imagine how many messages they must have got from terrified men before they had to start putting that on their profiles? 😂

[–]Endorsed Contributorsadomasochrist2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy


[–]Nergaal2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I am a bit surprised that there are LESS hetero women than hetero men willing to dat transgenders. But more lesbians than gay men. What could lead to that?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Other study: 3% of straight people aren't straight.

[–]Dishevel2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Study: 3% of people who think they are straight are not.

[–]HOSSY952 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Is it really straight? And are those 3% so desperate they scraped the barrel for whatever they can get?

[–]distant_shade2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Call me a racist , call me a bigot , I'll raise the nazi flag far and wide if I have to but I won't fuck mentally sick DUDES WITH BOOBS hahahahahah

[–]Endorsed Contributorsqerl2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Similarly, in the UK, they asked people on the street if they would help a migrant by giving them a place to stay (in their home). A large majority said they would. The questioner then brought a migrant over and asked if they would give this guy a place to stay, now. Nearly all gave some BS excuse to deny the request.

Media focuses on the extreme because it triggers people. Which equates to ad revenue. Mix that with soy and you have SJWs

[–]StevenConfident2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Aw shit, here we go again.

A new study which found that only 3 per cent of heterosexuals were willing to date a transgender person proves society has a problem with “transprejudice” and must be re-educated, according to its author.

JFC. So many things wrong in a single sentence. Ah yes, heterosexuals need to be "reeducated" and learn to, somehow, modify their innate sexual preferences. Because that totally worked with homosexual reconversion camps, right?

In the study, [...] participants were asked to check which of the following they would “consider as a potential dating partner”.
– a cisgender woman
– a cisgender man
– a transgender woman
– a transgender man
– a person with a non-binary gender identification

More correctly: man, woman (let's drop the cisgender bullshit), transgender man, transgender woman. The non-binary stuff is just nonsense. I could sexually identify as a kettle, doesn't mean I'm not still biologically a man.

According to its author Karen L. Blair Ph.D., the results showed that many heterosexuals rejected dating trans people because they thought they had “make believe” identities and that this is a form of “transprejudice”.

But they do have "make believe" identities. They believe they are a woman whereas they were born a man, or the contrary. And there's nothing wrong with that.

But speaking of "transprejudice" when you don't want to fuck someone you're just not attracted to? Nah, fuck that.

[...] even people who rejected trans partners because they “mentioned a desire to only date people with whom they could have biologically related children” did so “using dehumanizing language, such as saying that a trans man “was not a natural man” or a “real man”.

Which they aren't. As much as you would like to, by definition, you will never become a natural woman if you were born a man, and vice-versa.

The concept of real man is subjective. One person's real man will be the other's wimp. So why take offense?

Blair said that such “dehumanization” and “transprejudice” could be combated with more “education about the diversity of gender identities” and by increasing “accurate media representations of trans and non-binary people”.

Watching Brokeback Mountain did not make me want to mount dudes. "Accurate media representations" probably won't make me want to fuck trans people. You do not negotiate attraction.

The author notes that the same type of “prejudice” doesn’t exist when it comes to dating people of a different race.

Why the fuck would transgender-related prejudices apply to race in the first place?

There definitely appears to be some kind of innate stigma that straight people have towards transgenders when it comes to having romantic and possibly sexual relationships with them.

"Innate". Exactly.

Some transgender commentators have previously asserted that it is bigoted for heterosexuals to choose not to date transgenders.

Yes. And they're idiots who'll then complain that the backlash they get is because "they're transgender".

Is this really something that can be changed with enough re-education and social engineering, or is it a completely normal preference to hold?

Well gee, I wonder.

You know, I get transgenderism. Some people do need a sex change in order to live a normal life and be happy.

But here's the thing: you can't coerce the rest of the world to change their natural sexual preferences just to fit your own choices. You'll unfortunately just have to make do with those 3% of kinky dudes who don't mind.

This is the kind of article which will probably hurt transgenders more than anything else, but thankfully it'll probably quickly be forgotten.

Oh, and as a bonus:

There is a war on free speech. Without your support, my voice will be silenced.

Read: "Without your money I won't be able to write my shitty articles which are basically a rewrite from another website, and I'll have to find a real job."

And whose free speech are we really talking about?

[–]chadwickofwv2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

In other words 3% of people incorrectly identify as straight.

[–]Govedo136 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

This year is 3% next would be 5% after 10 years it would be 20%. The Overton Window just moves slowly but surely:


The Agendas of the global elites are pushed without remorse. The whole "gender" thing is the same like the "rape" thing.

Just follow the money trail- there is a lot of profit to be made by segmentation and destruction of the family. The "gender" relations are known to be volatile ones, the probability to find suiting partner for longer period of time is lower. So one needs everything two times- 2 homes, 2 cars etc...

It is great if you own a bank and give loans, or factory that products more stuff than the people even need and can consume in general.....

Hell they even make money from the gender change operations, implants and even the wedding industry: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/the-gay-wedding-industry-goes-mainstream/2015/06/08/b456c164-0a1a-11e5-95fd-d580f1c5d44e_story.html?utm_term=.3d3447e176d0

[–]juggernaut82 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

The Overton Window just moves slowly but surely

Well you can push back against it. I personally see a lot of pushback these days.

[–]Distractingyou1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

So is homosexuality high as 3% the fuck lol i think at least this actually means society has degenerated thanks to sjw and the multinacional porn industry

[–]Omegistosalex1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lol wtf, you know I do not want a ding dong flapping around midst sex...

[–]Leather_Sea1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I guess I'm in that 3%, then.

[–]LilPrinRen1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

its that high??

3% of straight people in the US!? thats close to 7-8 million people, on webMD anything over 3 million cases ( of a disease per year) is considered "very common".

[–]Distractingyou0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

You need to remember a lot of them are beta sjw feminist gaining sjw points in reality many man are stupid and don't have standars and they don't care what hole they are putting their dick on.

So basically your population is between really low iq males and beta feminist sjw that probably wouldn't do it on real life

[–]SemiLoquacious1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I know the crowd here can appreciate this:

They say the transgendereds are mentally ill but most are less mentally ill than the average biological woman and that's a fact.

[–]adminsaregayniggers1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

If you date a tranny ur not straight

[–]Garathon1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Not gonna lie, if they were post-op and looked like a very hot female I could *maybe* overlook it. The Caitlyn Jenner look though? Barf.

[–]_teh_overloard0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

so only 3 percent of the population is on tren? goddit

[–]Brazilian_Slaughter0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Study: 3% of Straight People, Aren't

[–]Stink-Finger0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I think that 3% is somewhat inflated, but I do recognize that a certain percentage of people have some kind of sideshow freak kink whether it be the fat lady or a he/she.

[–]MCFiletMignon0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

"You may consider this a woman, but I don't"

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Correction: 0% of straight people are willing to date a transgender person. Only gay people want to date men.

[–]the99percent10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Im pretty straight but there are some transgender people that will put real girls to shame.


[–]Nomfwic0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

That whole site is a shit show.

[–]RedPilledGodEmperor0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

transprejudice is a word now? How far has society fallen where not dating a transgender makes you prejudiced?

That's like saying a straight dude is prejudiced against gay people.

[–]Hjalmbere0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

One of the premises of the science fiction novel The Wanting Seed by Anthony Burgess from 1962 is state sponsored homosexuality.

[–]SalporinRP0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Lol just wait until all these transitions get even harder to notice in 10-15 years.

Nowadays and in the past trannies looked like dudes because they got on hormones after puberty. Just look at Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner. No amount of hormones/plastic surgery was gonna make that guy be able to pass for a girl.

But now you have some pre-pubescent children taking hormones it's insane. They will be taking these hormones all throughout puberty and thus will develop as the other gender. There is about to be a huge wave of trans people who will be able to seamlessly pass as the opposite sex and you wouldn't even know.

[–]SMRII0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

"People won't date genetic dead-ends with obvious mental illnesses"- jounalism in 2019

[–]SmamelessMe0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

The purpose of dating for majority of people is eventual reproduction, and people don't want to date people who willingly sterilized themselves? What a a shock!

[–]MafiosoMGTOW0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

If I was going to ever bang a tranny it would have to be an Asian. Non-negotiable.

[–]thechaosz0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy


[–]Robert_de_Saint_Loup0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Wtf??? Of course. How are you gonna go to your client or business partner’s reception when you are bringing a tranny girlfriend? Its a reputation killer

[–]KidArk0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Only 3% of straight people saw this survey and only 10% took the survey and only 3% of that would date a trans person. So more like 0.033% of straight people

[–]mindplaybyneo0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yea cause maybe 3% of it is the gay/lesbian community

[–]1trueliberal10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Study: Only 3% of Straight People Are Willing to Date a Transgender Person

In a followup study, those 3% turned out to be gay.

[–]1trueliberal10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

A straight man will not want to have sex with a transgender woman because a transgender woman is a man and a straight man, by definition, does not want to have sex with another man.

A gay man will not want to have sex with a transgender woman because the transgender woman chopped off his dick and gay men like dick.

So the other person a transgender woman could have consensual sex with is another transgender woman, and no transgender woman wants to have sex with another transgender woman because transgender women are gay men and gay men like dick. See statement 2.

The only hope for a transgender woman to have sex is to deceive a straight man, and that is by definition rape. If a straight man claimed to be a butch lesbian and put his dick into a lesbian while pretending he was using a dildo on her, that would definitely be rape. For the exact same reason, a transgender woman tricking a straight man into sex is rape.

Transgenders should simply stop being homophobic and accept that they are gay. They would be far happier, and would avoid rape charges. All straight men fantasize about sex with lesbians, but we don't try to impersonate women to trick lesbians into sex. Transgender men and women need to follow the same rules for consent. It's that simple.

[–]DigitalDog0001[🍰] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Holy shot. Bi is gay. Listen, I'm getting into an argument with you. I'm right. You're wrong.

[–]into_devoid-5 points-4 points  (5 children) | Copy

Mod’s flag this thread. It’s no longer an opinion, no matter how you phrase it. This is borderline hate.

[–]Dishevel10 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy

What is hate? Not being gay? Now we not only should celebrate anyone making any choice, but we are hateful bastards if we want to choose who we do and do not fuck?

You can CHOOSE gay sex, but it is hate to CHOOSE straight sex?

Fuck off.

[–]Sharmanix-2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy

I'll give my two cents on this, being a bisexual man rules me out of the argument mostly but the way I see it is that if I'm dating someone with a penis/vagina and they act/look like the gender they transition to, then I don't see an issue in accepting them as a member of their defined gender. Although this is somewhat easier for me in the case of MTF as the method of sexual activity is more in line with their chosen gender, I can't get over the hill of fucking an FTM doggy style and eating them out and still view them as a male, especially when they moan like that. I guess the penis is easier to ignore if you're going for the hole, but when they only have a hole then it's a lot less believable.

[–]Distractingyou1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

You are bi that's your answer

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter