Practical female psychology for the Practical man question, high self-esteem women?

Reddit View
August 16, 2019

Anyone here read Practical Female Psychology for the Practical Man? Obviously its a required read on married trp.. Anyway for those of us who aren't married. Anyone have any thoughts/opinions on the low self-esteem vs. high self-esteem women dynamic? Obviously most women are low self esteem and I've heard it said TRP teaches to how to deal with low self-esteem women. Curious if any red pillers have anything to say. No doubt - doesn't have to be said - AWALT. But curious if anyone's got anything to say about supposed "high self-esteem women" and if they think there really is such a thing. And what makes them different from all others? If you haven't read this book then stay out of the conversation please.

As always, I wish I could get some endorsed contributors opinions but I can't make them see my post :(

Post Information
Title Practical female psychology for the Practical man question, high self-esteem women?
Author rawrlolrofl
Upvotes 7
Comments 19
Date 16 August 2019 12:41 AM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit askMRP
Original Link
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
AWALTthe red pill

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy

OK bud, I'll bite even if your question is vague as fuck and a little autistic. I happen to be on the spectrum and I loved this book.

I read about HSE and LSE women and everything finally made sense. Was married for 12 years and didn't understand my woman at all. Knowing the flavor of woman I had helped me develop a strategy to deal with her.

She is LSE but as I grow in leadership, she grows in femininity and that is connected with her self esteem. The more she enters my frame and listens to my leadership the more she grows and moves away from LSE tendencies. I'm new in my journey and have a lot of work to do but I am seeing the changes and it is a world of difference.

My point is, it doesn't fucking matter the flavor of woman you have. Women take the shape of their man. If you provide a safe and secure frame for her to live in she will take the shape you desire.

Women grow in praise. The more she succeeds in pleasing me and receiving praise from her alpha the more valued she feels. It's my job to cultivate good Feelz for her. As I grow in leadership, status, power and masculinity she grows along with me. It's all on me to do the work.

Read this as an example of how a woman can change.

[–]Temp_Shelter1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

What you say is spot on!

I haven't read the book, but recently have been discovering what you point out. It's been a very enlightening and enjoyable 2 weeks thus far.

[–]HornsOfApathyMod / Red Beret1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Good to see you've made this transition, DTC.

And thanks for sharing this post with OP. I was going to do the same.

The masculine grows through challenge.

[–]BobbyPeruRed Beret3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Seems like we get a similar autistic question like this about every couple months on that book.

Don’t get caught up too much in those labels from that book. It’s one of my favorite sidebar books, but the best information from that book is on the betaization process

[–]rawrlolrofl[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

I agree, and that realization was novel and is quoted a lot around here on this subreddit. Figured I'd see if I could get some guys to comment and open up about their opinions about this, since we can't open up with woman obviously... ie: betaization

[–]man_in_the_worldRed Beret7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy

Yes, both HSE and LSE women exist, as do both HSE and LSE males. (You are clearly LSE.) IME, PFP accurately describes HSE women; read the book.

Now that you have my validation of the HSE concept, feel free to go hamster away whatever red flags are bothering you, or to validate your LSE ego with whatever delusion you're too ashamed to share with us overtly, as a HSE man would.

[–]rawrlolrofl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

damn, that is me

[–]The_LitzRed Beret2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Firstly, trying to place a person 100% in a certain box (HSE/LSE) is a fools errand.

People will have traits of either, but not tick all the requirements to fit in a box.

HSE women exist! Not sure why you think most are LSE. Don't confuse AWALT with low self esteem.

What I have experienced with them is that they thrive being a first officer when mated with a good captain.

A good relationship will have both parties bringing out the best in each other. If your partner is more HSE than LSE there will be less resentment and self pity from her side when you go out living your life, because she will be living her life.

I am guessing your question has to do with vetting a woman in the future. If it is the case check out u/RStonePT 's post on vetting on the main MRP sub.

[–]rawrlolrofl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Thank you, yeah I figured this would be a question a lot of guys would have - besides me.

[–]red-sfpplusHard Core Red3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy

high self-esteem women

They still love dick, come, fucking, sucking, anal (most) and most of all, they love to be man handled by a man.

Da' fug else matters here?

[–]simbarlionRed Beret2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Well i am hoping for another graph, possibly a formula.

[–]threekindsoflucky10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy

x = (H + sdb) + (L x W)2 /[(b x i) + s]4 +50


Solve for x


x = how good the sex is

H = your height

sdb = 1rm squat x deadlift x bench

L = length of your penis

W = girth of your penis

b = how much of a bitch you are

i = how shitty your initiations are

s = how much you suck

[–]FoxShitNasty832 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I need to work on my bs

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

As an aside, these types of open-ended questions generally do not fare well here since this place is strongly in favor of practice instead of theory. Along these lines, this sub-reddit isn't as analogous to asktrp as the name would make it seem.

With that said, I'll go through your post bit by bit and offer some thoughts in your asktrp thread.

[–]simbarlionRed Beret0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Anyone here read Practical Female Psychology for the Practical Man?

You are really going to lead with this question?

To help you out, yes it is real, i don't know the subtle differences but in my opinion it crosses over with the ideas of frame (hers), but with more relevance to one's background such as personality, upbringing, social status, etc. Try to post less vague / open question, perhaps with an example of a problem you are encountering.

For others benefit, this is also posted on r/asktrp

[–]rawrlolrofl[S] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

For others benefit, this is also posted on r/asktrp

Yes it is, and I'm getting more relevant info on there then here.

I figured men who might've married a woman might have some scope, being stuck 24/7, long-term with a woman might reveal some differences between HSE and LSE, if there is such a difference. Perhaps some married guys by chance married a HSE woman and can give some relevance to what the differences might be between HSE and LSE women. For ex: BPD is obviously LSE, very LSE. I think this topic could be picked up and put to rest, since the book is on the sidebar.

[–]simbarlionRed Beret1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

My recollection is PFP providing fair coverage of this topic, but it has been a while, so i am not best to advise.

Why don't you tell us what you are trying to work out? Or is it theory for theories sake?

[–]johneyapocalypseThe one that says "Bad Motherfucker"0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Obviously most women are low self esteem.

Dumbass, ill-informed homo.

[–]rawrlolrofl[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I mean, anything to add besides I'm gay, no?

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter