TheRedArchive needs help
With 700,000+ posts and 16,000,000+ comments archived, and new Red Pill content being added every week, keeping TheRedArchive alive and discoverable to everyone is starting to become very costly. As a 20-year-old student who just moved out and is living independently for the first time, keeping TheRedArchive alive is beginning to cost me much more than I thought.

Therefore, if you appreciate the website, have gained a lot of knowledge and insight from it, and want to show your appreciation, you can do so by donating any amount that you want via the options below. The money will be used on the expensive monthly host bill and any future maintenance of the website.
Thank you, and I wish you all a successful 2021 and a good luck with achieving your goals and dreams!

Best, /u/dream-hunter

Are single mothers the new trend in the USA?

Reddit View
October 6, 2019

Recently visited the US and it was crazy how many single mothers I met. It seems fashionable to get impregnated by any random guys and then raise those kids without ever having a father figure partly or most of the time.

Those kids grow up and be damaged or become beta cucks with no father figure guiding them.

Post Information
Title Are single mothers the new trend in the USA?
Author Gavin-Sangria
Upvotes 170
Comments 143
Date 06 October 2019 04:09 AM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit askTRP
Original Link
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
single motherbeta

[–]MR_SKINNYPENIS6967 points68 points  (18 children) | Copy

It's really kicked off over here in Asia as well. You'd think it'd be more Conservative here but divorce and single mothers are a big problem here too.

I was raised by a single mother and honestly, I was one of the lucky few who had a great mother. I missed out on a lot by not having a dad, a lot of things I had to teach myself and it took me a lot longer than most guys to become a man because I had to figure it out for myself. I appreciate everything my mother did for me but, simply put, there are some things women just can't do for their sons. I would never advise anyone to raise a kid alone. Boys raised without fathers are at a higher risk for just about every poor life choice. Suicide, mental illness, homelessness, drug addiction, crime - you name it, boys without fathers are more likely to do it. It's the number one reason black areas in the USA have the problems they do. It's not racism, it's fatherlessness. Something like 70% of black men in the USA are raised by single mothers.

And I'm sure a lot of guys here know what happens when a girl is abandoned by her daddy...

[–]MDmanson7 points8 points  (10 children) | Copy

I was raised by a single mother too. My mom has been the most supportive and loving person in my life. She never had a partner after that, maybe several boyfriends over the years but nothing to be considered as a paternal figure for me.

I grew up ok. I mean, I don't feel different from the others. I have had girlfriends, I have a decent game, etc...

I wonder what are the factors that make someone grow bad or good in that situation.

[–]MR_SKINNYPENIS692 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy

I think it's a combination of nature and nurture. I think that the reason I turned out OK is because of how I was made. I am naturally a survivor and stronger than some others, and that helped with my circumstances. Perhaps you are, too. It's just that being raised without a father makes you more likely to turn out shitty.

When discussing men raised without fathers we are talking about a huge demographic, so there will always be plenty of exceptions such as you and I.

[–]RapeTortureKill -1 points [recovered]  (5 children) | Copy

you and I.

It's you and me, contrary to popular opinion.

[–]MR_SKINNYPENIS692 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy

Ackshually, when the phrase is the object of the sentence (at the end), it's "you and I".

When it's the subject (at the start), it's "you and me".

So I was using it correctly.

Suck it, grammar tourist.

[–]RapeTortureKill 1 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy

Well, that's what my awesome prof. told me. I took it to be an axiom, and I simply tried to gift you my knowledge. Why you're mad, I don't know. Maybe you're following the pattern of other redditors who are hateful for no reason, like most of this world. However, thank you for trying to teach me something as well. I'll definitely look into what you've said here.

[–]MR_SKINNYPENIS691 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

You'd like me to be mad probably because you think it will cede some victory back to you. Truth is I'm not mad at all, I'm just gloating.

[–]RapeTortureKill 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy

This isn't a competition, it's unity. Working together makes you troubled, if not mad.

[–]MR_SKINNYPENIS691 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Says the dude who came in to correct someone's grammar so he could feel better about himself but then got BTFOd lel

[–]krunchtimer2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

I wonder what are the factors that make someone grow bad or good in that situation.

See my other post below... if a boy has the good genetic gifts of higher IQ, no psyche/neuro-chemical imbalances, good testosterone and GH, he'll likely do well despite not having a father around.

And think about the opposite... what if a boy has these gifts but has a father who's super beta/BP or is projecting his own mental problems on his son? How's that any better?

[–]Waymar_Royce0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

What is GH?

[–]krunchtimer0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Growth Hormone. It affects height and other things.

[–]fender18784 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Boys raised without fathers are at a higher risk for just about every poor life choice.

Most underrated quote here and a great way to sum it all up into common sense terms.

[–]GGrub82 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

She deprived you of the single most important resource a kid needs: a father. Behind every single mothers there are always bad decisions, no matter how you rationalize it.

[–]MR_SKINNYPENIS690 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

I completely agree but at the end of the day, she's my mother. She loved me and still loves me more than any other human being ever has or will. She did a lot of good for me, even if she failed in keeping the family together (my father is equally to blame for that, more so I would say as the man should be the one driving it and keeping it together). They were both very flawed and made bad decisions for which I paid the price, but nothing is as simple as "they're bad people". They were flawed and selfish but I still consider my mother as having done the best with what she knew and the man she chose. My mother was just being a woman, my father was the real fuck up.

[–]Pussyshack 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy

Your father can't drive & keep it together in this environment with these biased family court laws favoring mothers. Most likely your mom's fault more than his.

[–]MR_SKINNYPENIS690 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

My parents were never even married bruh

[–]drunkPKMNtrainer-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

My friends a single mother and many of her friends have gone thru divorce. It seems like many of the women are trying to be independent and leave their husbands. From what I have seen, many of the husbands are beta but idk. I mean one turned out gay lol.

[–]MR_SKINNYPENIS690 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Turning out gay has more to do with being molested than being raised by a single mother.

[–]Thespecial0ne_18 points19 points  (6 children) | Copy

Unfortunately it is not exclusive to the USA.

The same happens in my country (Spain) All Spanish women over 45 who I know are divorced and with children. the divorce rate is around 71%

The loss of strength of the Catholic Church, the loss of values ​​in society, modern feminism, having many men who want to sleep with you when opening an app are many of the reasons.

and men begin to ignore them, thanks to allegations of false gender violence that violate the presumption of innocence (you have to prove that you are innocent), along with the low loyalty of our women (jump from man to man) where in case of divorce with children, you will lose everything (child custody, home and spend a pension a month)

Dark ages for men are coming, buddies!!

[–]HotelMohelHolidayInn5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

It'll be men pulling society out of the Dark Ages.

[–]abhi_071 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Been hearing a lot about Spain lately. - from Germany

[–]krunchtimer1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

The same happens in my country (Spain) All Spanish women over 45 who I know are divorced and with children. the divorce rate is around 85%

Is Portugal (next door - very similar culture) also about the same with that?

[–]Thespecial0ne_1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I think the only countries which aren’t affected yet for this nonsense are the east Europe countries.

[–]anonbast1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Check Portugal with 70% has top divorce per marriage ratio.

[–]Thespecial0ne_1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

And the rate is increasing every year.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

The funny thing is these women don’t realise that no high value man/alpha is gonna want to settle with them the moment they disclose they got a kid.

Feminism and other women out and out lie to them, and they believe it because they want to believe it.

Couple that with the fact that she can still get laid and low down betas offer them marriage... it's very easy to believe that one day she'll get the alpha fucks and beta commitment together in one package.

Of course it's not gonna happen, but most women are not honest with themselves or informed enough to see this.

Look at what she's exposed to:

  • Feminist "you go girl!" messages
  • "It's what's inside that counts" narrative
  • Endless fucking endless movies that present a gorgeous knight in shining armour who inexplicably falls in love with the average girl who offers nothing.
  • Beta offers of commitment
  • Alpha fucks if she's lucky, but without commitment
  • Her own wishful thinking
  • Society saying that genetics don't matter, it's all social anyway.

Literally noone is saying "a great man can do better than raising someone else's children".

The other major change in the last 30 years is that being a single mother is financially viable - even profitable. Government welfare, enforced child support plus alimony if married and she can do just fine without the voluntary help of the father.

[–]agjrpsl13 points14 points  (2 children) | Copy

Florida here. A lot of knocked up young adolescents, and early 20's moms here as well. If you view read news headlines. You will see that a lot of these kids are being abused/neglected and sadly killed by the mother or a new bf etc etc. It's quite sad actually for these kids.

[–]HIJKelemenoP0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

And that’s the best thing Florida has to offer!

[–]vicious_armbar0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Nah the best thing we have to offer are our beaches.

[–]DerDroogie159 points160 points  (20 children) | Copy

Single mothers form a big voting block and only vote for ONE of the parties, the one which gives them more and more benefits. That party supports that lifestyle choice, more women join it and they get more and more votes

The momentum is there

[–]moonpresence- 8 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy

reminds me of this video

[–]Alphainprogress1230 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Exactly this

[–]PandaLitter-1 points0 points  (10 children) | Copy

Which party is that?

[–]vullnet12360 points61 points  (1 child) | Copy

Do you really need to ask?

[–]_Legendairy_11 points12 points  (7 children) | Copy


[–]PandaLitter21 points22 points  (1 child) | Copy

Is that Democrat?

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (0 children) | Copy


[–]TheH1dd3nFear1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy


[–]PolesWithGoals1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

And more “free” shit

[–]imtheoneimmortal-3 points-2 points  (4 children) | Copy

What party

[–]babybopp8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy

The implication is democrat party here. But reality is that it formed and leeched as a necessary evil because the Republican Party is the one that decimated these communities and put minority’s fathers in jail for a long time for minor drug offenses. Don’t ever let any American democrat or republican take any high ground. They are all a shit show. When you sit down and read history on how the FBI and CIA actively destroyed black and minority family units as a preemptive strike against them as a voting block. These people just wanted equality. CIA and FBI both worked to introduce drugs into these communities then created harsh penalties. You do that, you destroy family units and they are not a choice but a consequence of a targeted operation.

So single moms culture is a product of this. The govt with its shame and guilt stepped to take the role of father figure by rewarding them. The fact that single moms get benefits started in the 80s and is and was started by republicans not democrats. They just capitalized on it. American politics is infantile and ridiculous.

[–]Morpheus_TNTB9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy

Your history lesson omits the fact that Dem's used government programs to subsidize single moms in the black community. This is the catalyst which destroyed their communities, not some b.s. conspiracy from the CIA/FBI.

[–]babybopp3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

It is not conspiracy. CIA actively brought in drugs to decimate black communities.

[–]vicious_armbar0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Did the CIA force blacks to take those drugs too?

[–]Endorsed Contributormallardcove135 points136 points  (59 children) | Copy

Blame LBJ's Great Society. His plan was to "get niggers to vote for democrats for generations" (actual quote by him) and he achieved that by replacing the father with the government. Women with kids don't need a husband anymore, they have Uncle Sam as their provider. The more kids a woman has, the bigger checks she gets from the taxpayer trough.

Since the New World Order has a vested interest in destroying the family unit, they have heavily promoted black culture which amongst other things glorifies single motherhood and "baby mommas/baby daddies", it has spread to other races and cultures in the US as well.

As a taxpayer I am supporting an endless conga line of bastard children because the New World Order is the one enabling it and promoting it.

[–]Wodensnacht48 points49 points  (0 children) | Copy

Black man checking in.

Mallardcove is absolutely right!

[–]Zombiespire11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lol glad you wrote this so I didn't have to. Top comment easily.

[–]PolesWithGoals8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

LBJ was the worst fucking president the US has ever seen. I hope he burns in hell for eternity

[–]AGameofTrolls6 points7 points  (6 children) | Copy

Let's not bullshit ourselves people, when a woman gets pregnant she's not checking what political party belongs to. I come from a red state and I can clearly tell you it's not just Democrat or whatever party who are getting pregnant and end up being single mothers. Let's focus on the issue at hand for once and recognize it's a women problem not a political one. Single mothers don't necessarily belong to a unique political ideology, that's narrow thinking.

[–]SeeTheFence15 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy

Both parties have huge flaws. But you’re missing some pretty obvious signals if you are missing how the blue side doesn’t use emotion to drive it’s power grab, and therefore create a fembot army who goes around talking about how heartless it is that I don’t want to use my tax dollars to subsidize Suzy’s carousel ride.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

At least, Republicans care about conservatism, which is to a degree benefits men. Are you a democrat?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Women don't have parties. Women don't have borders. They are natural socialists.

[–]lololasaurus2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

While it's true that you'll find outwardly conservative/Republican single mothers, within the frame that they are in, they are always far left. Not necessarily at the scope of the world, but in the crowd they run in, they are universally on the more liberal end of their crowd unless you get to the extreme outliers.

The only time a woman will not be like this is if she has a husband she trusts and has helped in his mission or built a massive amount of her own success.

[–]AGameofTrolls0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

What I also factor in more than political affiliation is economic background, it seems more common to find single mothers in poor socioeconomical neighborhoods, but now we see that pattern increasing in middle class too. But, I digress again from the main post....

[–]LordFlakkko1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yea but i guess the FBI and CIA running crack through black neighborhoods creating the drug war didnt have any negative affects at all... nope none at all

[–]Endorsed Contributormallardcove0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It did, but that's not here nor there

[–]BPasFuck0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

What I'm noticing about this comment is almost all of the people objecting to it the most strenuously with cries of racism, are not from the US.

Consequently, I'm honestly struggling to identify just what it is they're being triggered by, other than a knee-jerk sensitivity to anything that might possible be non-pc.

Help me out here, you South Africans, you Europeans, explain like I'm 5 here.

[–]jrr6415sun0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Why would the new world order want to destroy the family unit?

[–]Boorishamoeba11 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Destroy the family unit

People rely less on family/friends/community, more on big government

More big government, eventually people no longer identify with their local community, receptive to big one world government style bureaucracy like the UN/EU etc.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Whenever I see a mixed race child, I get mad

[–]argentpurple -3 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy

"black culture" promotes single motherhood? Which black culture, African, Caribbean, Afro Latino, American? Tell us!

[–]LunarWolf475 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy


[–]growingstronk1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

American black culture

[–]oldrunnerguy4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

As long as there are beta orbiters willing to take on the baggage of women's piss-poor decisions, I believe that it will be a continually occurring problem in our society. Take it from someone who married one of these gals first-hand, and found out that any value this woman had to the man, quickly disappeared after marriage. It is hard to find a woman that adds value to your life and is not just a parasite. If you can find one, that's the woman that you want.

[–]MDmanson3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

My mom has been single since I was born. However I grew up ok without a father figure. She didn't even get money from my father and I'm here I am, a healthy male. Maybe an exception I guess. I wonder what are the factors that made me grow that way instead of growing up damaged.

[–]PandaLitter-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

You a Democrat?

[–]MDmanson2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I hate politics

[–]still_unresolved3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Its the same in the ussr and russia

[–]YungRichKid13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

It has definitely been more prevalent than before but we can pinpoint that growth as the result of degenerate “progressives” pushing for benefits, feminism, and abortion rights

[–]deathhandmachiavelli5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Not a "new" trend, but definitely a growing trend.

Women don't need a father anymore, with the government and child support taking care of their financial needs.

They get the best of BOTH worlds, they get to fulfill their fantasies and be impregnated by guys based on attractions, even irresponsible guys, psychopaths, and criminals, and then they get to be financially supported while doing so.

The kids suffer, as does society. But women's whims always come first.

That's just the way it is, and the way it will be.

[–]CrazyNicholad2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's been like this for a long time. You can thank women's lib and the legal system for incentivizing single motherhood. Oh, and MSM too. Nothing like the wholly unrealistic portrayal of the single mother eaiting tables during the day and going to school at night. Not saying it isn't true but usually, the kids are fucked up from being latchkeyed and the mother is a neurotic mess who takes her anger out on the kid. I'm literally looking at that very situation in front of me now.

[–]primusinterpares18 points9 points  (11 children) | Copy

Maybe try asking the 'random' guys why they didn't step up and try taking care of their kids, nowadays the courts are more in favor of joint custody,and I got custody of my kids without a battle.Better still ask why abortion is being criminalized . The problem isn't just single mothers , it's a broken system, and stupid people making stupid decisions

[–]liquorbaron2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

You got joint custody. May I ask what state? Not every state is going to treat men the same with regard to the family court system.

[–]primusinterpares12 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy


[–]vicious_armbar0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy

Abortion is currently legal in all 50 states. In the 1950’s when abortion and contraception were illegal the out of wedlock birth rate was 2%. So don’t give me the bullshit argument that the problem is access to abortion.

Those “random guys” didn’t want kids by that woman. Her body, her choice, her responsibility! She’s the goalie of her vagina and exclusively determines what goes into and comes out of it.

If a woman allows herself to become a single mother that’s on HER and not anyone else. If the government stopped paying them with other people’s money to welp out bastards like feral dogs they’d stop doing it.

[–]primusinterpares1-1 points0 points  (7 children) | Copy

You don't want kids by a woman then don't ejaculate fertile sperm into the vaginal canal of a fertile woman of child bearing age, carry condoms and Plan B. Stop leaving all the reproductive choices to your sex partners, and if shit happens despite all your precautions then man the fuck up and take care of your responsibilities. The kids had no say in how they came to be, and they shouldn't have to bear the consequences of two idiots. Y'all run around acting like you don't know the basics of human reproduction. I have nothing but contempt for jackasses that abandon their kids.

[–]vicious_armbar-1 points0 points  (6 children) | Copy

No one gives a shit about whether you have contempt for them or not. Mind your own fucking business instead of sticking your nose into other people’s personal life!

[–]primusinterpares1-1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy

Let me guess.You've got a couple of kids that you don't see or support but it's all the woman's fault because she should've had an abortion.Grow up take responsibility for your own damn actions and take care of your kids instead of whining about their mother.And if you can't stand the heat then gtfo of the kitchen.I was minding my business when you decided to take exception to my comment

[–]vicious_armbar0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

You know nothing about me fucktard and your assumptions are incorrect. Telling other people how to live their lives is the opposite of minding your own business.

[–]primusinterpares1-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy

The irony, aren't you sticking your nose into the personal lives of the women that you're yammering on about, or it's only the case when you're called on your bullshit ?

[–]vicious_armbar0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

The irony, aren't you sticking your nose into the personal lives of the women that you're yammering on about,

Not at all. I could give a fuck less what loser single mothers and their bastard children do. So long as neither I nor anyone else is forced to pay for their irresponsible decisions and support the future criminals they shit out.

[–]primusinterpares10 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Then save some of that energy for the men that are knocking them up, most of these women aren't reproducing by parthenogenesis,and IMHO its more cost effective to pay to prevent unwanted pregnancies than it is to pay to raise the children that are ultimately going to be the tax payers burden.I agree with you 100% that people should not have kids they can't afford, but it's hard to sit back and watch kids suffer for the decisions of their idiot parents, and I should know ,because I've worked with kids in areas of unbelievable poverty like the Appalachians, places where it seems all there is , is bibles and meth,and in some inner cities at the peak of the crack epidemic, and it convinced me that we should be funding more planned parenthood clinics instead of trying to shut them down. As a taxpayer I'd rather pay for the termination of an unwanted pregnancy than have to bear the burden of supporting the outcome of said pregnancy for pretty much a lifetime. I've seen men that have more than 20 kids , and that aren't paying for or supporting any of them, why should they get off scott free ?

[–]vicious_armbar0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Then save some of that energy for the men that are knocking them up

Men don't "knock women up" because those men aren't responsible for anyone else's body. It's the woman's body as females so often like to remind us. They're responsible for what goes into it, what happens to it, and what comes out of it.

IMHO its more cost effective to pay to prevent unwanted pregnancies

THE PREGNANCIES AREN'T UNWANTED BY THE WOMEN!!! Women understand how to not become pregnant. In the 1950's when the pill and abortion were illegal the US only had a 2% out of wedlock birth rate. Now women can avoid pregnancy by simply taking a pill (among a host of other things), and we have abortion on demand.

Poor women want the children because the government is paying them to welp out bastards like feral dogs!

children that are ultimately going to be the tax payers burden.

It doesn't have to be like that!!! We can simply stop rewarding irresponsible women with other peoples money for making bad choices. Choices which cause their children to suffer, and amount to a government program promoting dysgenics.

it's hard to sit back and watch kids suffer for the decisions of their idiot parents

Then feel free to voluntarily give as much of your money to these retards as you want. But you shouldn't be able to force other people to involuntarily support their bad decisions. By financially rewarding idiot parents you're enabling their idiot decisions. Also because intelligence and conscientiousness are highly heritable you're creating more idiot adults in the future.

As a taxpayer I'd rather pay for the termination of an unwanted pregnancy than have to bear the burden of supporting the outcome of said pregnancy for pretty much a lifetime.

You shouldn't have to pay for either!

I've seen men that have more than 20 kids , and that aren't paying for or supporting any of them, why should they get off scott free ?

First of all men don't have uterus's so they can't "have kids". How could one impoverished man possibly support 20 children? That's a non-starter. These women are choosing to reproduce with a loser. They're doing so because they know the government will give them free: food, housing, cash, and medical care. In other words the government will support them so they can sit around on their ass.

Are you disgusted by that situation? Good, me too! People will start behaving reasonably again when we turn off the spigot of government money. Then people will have to face the consequences of their actions. That isn't theoretical. It's shown very clearly in the data.

[–]DjGus4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

Western EU, same here.

It's not working out well for them here either.

Old schoolmates that were knocked up then dumped, everytime i look into their eyes, i can see the regret in there, it almost makes me feel sorry for them.

But frankly, what the fuck did those women expect... It shouldn't have to be this way.

[–]deathhandmachiavelli8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

Don't feel sorry for them.

It was their choice. You blame it on the guys who "dumped" them. You've been programmed.

[–]DjGus0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Oh no, mah dude. you should notice i wrote "almost" sorry for them.

My brain hasn't accepted those programs since i was like, 15...

After that my life changed that programming for me. There's no going back from that, and neither would I.

Having said that, a little compassion for the misery of others is still a human trait afaik eheh

Especially if, like the great Obi Wan said, "You did this to yourself!"

[–]krunchtimer5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy

Those kids grow up and be damaged or become beta cucks with no father figure guiding them.

I'm going to disagree here. If a boy has these 4 things as a result of genetic luck:

  1. Decent IQ

  2. No neuro "chemical imbalances" to cause depression, anxiety, adhd, etc

  3. Decent GH for height

  4. Decent Testosterone for muscle

He's going to be able to figure things out for himself and become an alpha, irregardless of whether there's a dad in the picture or not.

Chances are probably good that his "baby daddy" had these traits (and he'll likely inherit them) which is why his mom fucked him with little regard for the consequences.

Anyone disagree?

[–]mrrooftops9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy

You just described Ted Bundy.

[–]krunchtimer1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

See item #3 - "chemical imbalances" is shorthand for "psychological problems" (which are caused by neuro chemical imbalances) If a guy has psyche issues (like Ted Bundy) he's not going to succeed.

[–]BrodinsOats2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

If you asked Ted Bundy, he’d say he was quite successful. Lol

[–]vicious_armbar0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

When women want to bang for fun psychologically stable and high iq isn’t on the list. Whether the children of single mothers do well isn't theoretical. They have worse life outcomes on every conceivable standard of measurement. Just look at the data.

[–]mbapls 7 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy

There are people in this subreddit that communicate value, and then there’s shit like this.

What are you trying to imply? That single moms have some sort of agenda stemming from government/social propaganda? Ask yourself - would you want to be a single mother (or father)?

My dad married a woman who had 3 children with another man prior to me. He raised those children like they were his own, and is a man I aspire to emulate. For validation for the neck beards in this sub, he is a medical doctor, and was a resident when he met my mom.

For the sheep who follow everything they read in this sub: not everything is black and white. Learn how to think critically.

[–]Granite_Pill19 points20 points  (1 child) | Copy

Oh yeah? I know a tall Chinese person. What's your point?

[–]WildCock301 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy


[–]liquorbaron10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

So your dad was beta bucks. Cool. Glad it worked out for him as it NORMALLY doesn't work out well for a guy that decides to take on his girlfriend's previous children as though they are his own.

What are you trying to imply? That single moms have some sort of agenda stemming from government/social propaganda? Ask yourself - would you want to be a single mother (or father)?

Well your father didn't teach you comprehension obviously. He's simply stating that what was once risk and shame in being a single mother there is now reward and glorification. And it's all because of government policies that have enabled and promoted it. Everything from child support, food stamps, welfare, etc. Courts and government policies fully in support of women and their bad choices. It's essentially a golden safety net for them and has allowed them to become reckless. Add that with the pill and you have a nice recipe for the decline of Western civilization.

I'm sorry you're too fucking stupid to comprehend or see this.

[–]maljo241 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

You make a lot of assumptions which undermine your creditability.

[–]Hydrakeen0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Old trend kid. Not "new" since I was raised by one starting 36 years ago.

[–]desistrategist0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

it certainly is peaking in New Zealand!

[–]imtheoneimmortal0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I don’t think they get pregnant by beta cucks with fat

[–]TRP_mask0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Oh 'murica

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter