Look at the language different genders use for those they find unattractive.

If a man sees a woman with low SMV, he will only judge her on a skin deep level. Ugly, butterface, small tits, fatass, etc. Since we don't find women sexually attractive because of their personality, being unattractive does not make them a bad person to us. We won't call an ugly woman a creep, we won't call a woman with small breasts pathetic. They may become invisible to us, but there is no real inner hatred for them.

But a woman? When a woman sees a man with low SMV, it's personal. Creep, loser, pathetic. These are all words flung around by even the sweetest of women at men they find unattractive. Since women are attracted to what to more than just surface level physical attraction, an unattractive man isn't just ugly, fat, or any of that. He's a bad person. This is why it's so easy for women to treat low SMV men like shit, to manipulate and despise them. Low SMV men aren't just unattractive or invisible, they're dirt.

Feminists may say this is what they want, to be judged for their actions and personality rather than on a purely physical level. However, once again, the watch what she does and not what she says principle applies. Why? Because there is one thing men do that absolutely infuriates women. Slut shaming. This is a direct attack on women's character for actions they've done in the past, and they can't stand it. Once again proving that women want all the good things about being a man with absolutely none of the negatives.